EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 02 2012 22:08 marvellosity wrote: But I wanted to argue!For Alsn's eyes: 2-2 or 1-1 during the day counts as mafia victory, no hammer rushing needed. Presume all rules take a common sense approach like that. Setup is fairly simple this time around though. 1 spot remains. *shakes fist* | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
 Edit: That being said, there's nothing to say hosts can't do whatever the fuck they want when they decide roles. :| | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 03 2012 09:35 debears wrote: Trying to rush us are you?Lets get it on ##Vote: debears | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 03 2012 10:04 debears wrote: I like it how you say 99% of the time, yet I know from reading XXIX's scum QT that you were away on purpose for the last lynch. I also bet you haven't yet participated in anywhere near 100 lynches, so technically that's a lie. Although, I probably should have paid more attention to what you actually voted for that game as opposed to whether or not you were actually around so I'll let that one slide.If I'm not here for lynch, its irl conflicts 99% of the time. Don't pull an Alsn I'm Alsn, I'll be around for flip-time generally, but they happen at 1 am local time so don't expect me to stick around for too long afterwards. Prior games include XXV(VT), XXVIII(VT) and XXIX also as VT. And yea, if given the choice between weak scum reads and hardcore lurkers, I'll hunt down and feed the hardcore lurker gone off cheesecake first chance I get. That being said, I'm off to lurk(also known as sleep, for those of you concerned with base things such as human metabolic function). | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 03 2012 10:28 debears wrote: Argue however much you want, you were missing from the thread on purpose. The fact that you were away because of something I said is besides the point. Hand waving away someone not being around because of IRL issues is a mistake I'm not libel to repeat. A lie? I've played in 3 games. With what? 3 lynches each. I only missed the last one cuz you said you would unvote my scum teammate if i didn't come back. So that's 90%. Not a lie. I was there only 45 minutes before the lynch, after u said that you weren't voting dandel if i was afk l. If you didn't say that, i wouldve come back. If fact, for mafia it is usually dumb to not be active around lynch due to the suspicion it causes and the lack of control ot gives the scumteam FOS Alsn for real. You know better than to call me a liar like that especially when 1) its an exaggeration if anything and not a lie and 2) when being afk around lynch is usually bad for scum However, like I said, unless there's something inherently scummy by not being around I won't hold it against you. I got hung up on the fact that you were missing much more than what actually happened while you were missing last game. The fact that you're saying it's not a lie is hilarious though, 90% vs 99% is a massive difference. I admit, it's nit picking, but it's still a lie. Don't think I'll make the same mistake and give everyone a second chance because they claim IRL issues. Especially when it's done like you just did as some kind of magic explanation as to why we should always expect that if you are away, it's all right, you've got stuff to do, we should just trust you. It's way too convenient. And you instantly FOSing me for it suggests to me that you know it was a dumb thing to say but don't want to admit it. I'm really heading off to bed now but I expect better than knee-jerk reactions and stupid statements like "99% chance that I have pure intentions, trust me I promise!" or I'll definitely look out for you heading forward. | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
| ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
Taking a look at Djodref's reason, he seems to consider "casting suspicion" to be a scum slip, yet that would mean he considers a FOS a scum slip? Because that's essentially what a FOS is, casting a finger of suspicion on someone. Particularly, debears used his vote against da0ud in essentially the same way(as a way to paint suspicion against da0ud and get him to right his path), yet Djod did not find debears suspicious enough to vote him. This coupled with the fact that he made a case against Cheese based on jokes suggests to me that he's grasping at straws. FoS Djodref Debears on the other hand is OMGUS voting. His points 1 and 2 contradicts each other, his point 8 mentions a supposed scum slip when the paragraph is merely an answer to what sylver thinks about lurker policy, something which debears brought up in the first place! Saying that the town seems more dedicated when there's not a single truly lurking player in the game(at least considering the short amount of time the game has been up) seems about as genuine an answer that one can give at this point. Debears, how about you either start addressing sylver's points instead of your list of bullet points which are almost all entirely wrong or contradictory(3 is flat out wrong, sylver did in fact point out that you had content, but that it was buried among your - according to him fluffy - other posts. Which would be the opposite of neglecting to mention). You've also now used the "omg he ran away after posting so I can't question him!" twice, first against me, now against him. Why is it people sticking around until it suits you a requirement for being town? Also, you were keen on pointing out that you thought sylver considered you town as something scummy, yet at the same time you point out that you are among the most active players, painting yourself as some beacon of townieness. You did the same the last game where you called out Djod for "defending you" in order to state to the thread that "oh look! scum thinks I'm town!". Also coupled with the argument that someone else made(sorry, I don't remember right now) that you seemed to be bullying Obzy and creating a bad town atmosphere definitely fits your scum profile. FoS debears I find it unlikely that both of you are scum at this point, but I find the behaviour of both of you worrisome. | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 04 2012 01:13 debears wrote: debears, even if we hypothetically assume the two most active players are scum, it would still mean that town on the whole is being active and not lurking. I think your argument is bad and your insistence that his statement is a scum slip is far fetched imho.You said townies. That's very different than saying the town or players. Very, very different. It means that you either 1) Think the people being active are townies 2) Know that the people being active are townies There is no other reason for using townies to describe those of us who are showing activeness and dedication Also, you voted me, meaning you voted for someone who you think is townie based on the above. That is scummy as shit | ||
|
Alsn
Sweden995 Posts
On November 04 2012 01:33 Mr. Cheesecake wrote: Now that's something I can believe has a chance of actually being a scum slip. Nice find.So, you say that town players shouldn't vote as a pressure move / attract suspicion to someone? You used your vote last game on Inig as vote pressure: Same with Nack: You obviously believe in vote pressure to cast suspicion from a townie perspective. | ||
| ||
