EPTOn September 25 2012 08:27 grush57 wrote:
Yeah but I still play the game.
It's not like that is all I do.
Yeah but I still play the game.
It's not like that is all I do.
yeah.......
no.
Liquid City Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
yeah....... no. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 25 2012 09:20 grush57 wrote: Sigh was I really that bad in LVII? I know that I'm not even trying in Caller's that game just went to shit. point me to one case you made, ever | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 26 2012 11:06 VisceraEyes wrote: /in smooches <3 | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 30 2012 04:31 Mementoss wrote: mightaswell /in aww yea  | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 30 2012 13:54 Shady Sands wrote: Yes! Thank goodness the gambit worked. The whole plan was either to troll hard and have some fun, or enjoy a serious, non-troll game of Mafia by inciting the mod to explicitly threaten a modkill for trolling and scare all the trolls into the straight and narrow. Shiao, you can thank me after the game is over. With that being said, I find the easy rando-vote at the beginning highly suspicious. ## Unvote ## Vote Z-Boson Explain your rando-vote without trolling as a factor. Hi all! Totes wasn't expecting to be going by now. Shady, why you lie to us? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 01:36 kingjames01 wrote: I'm not backing off at all. I quoted it so that I wouldn't lose it later. He asked why and I explained. Just because a post gives off a scum-tell doesn't mean that the post was made by a mafia. Town players sound scummy all the time without realizing it because we don't care how we sound. You're currently way in the lead in the Wiffly Waffly Awards. It's contrived but it's not contrived but it seemed contrived but it doesn't have to be contrived. Thanks man. If you're curious, it didn't seem contrived to me. I still want Shady to come back and tell us why he basically lied to us about his trolling. Covering his tracks after the event is super scummy. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 03:16 VisceraEyes wrote: The thing is marv the way he phrased it, he doesn't have to EXPLAIN why he lied because all he has to say is "nuh uh" to the accusation. The way you phrase the accusation even invites such a response (Y U LIE). What do you think of annul so far marv? annul seems kinda pointless so far. Have you played with him before? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'd much rather lynch Shadypants. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 10:25 Keirathi wrote: Kind of frustrating that we're halfway through D1 and half the people haven't even posted. Anyways, regarding Shady and KJ: He wants to troll to buy a free-ride through the game because he thinks that's automatically why those players make it to endgame. I don't buy that it was a gambit to get a mod to threaten trolling. That said, I'm hesitant to jump on the bandwagon because its so...easy. Which is ironic, because THATS the reason that people like BM and grush make it to endgame. Not because they troll, but because lynching them is the easy way out for scum when they are town. As far as KJ, I just want to say that I wasn't even getting defensive. I was legitimately trying to figure out his thinking, and explain myself. That he got defensive to my questions, and then decided on a wishy-washy stance rather than taking a firm opinion and trying to explain himself make me question his motives. Just throwing mud out for the sake of appearing like he was contributing? For now: ##Vote: kingjame01 Yes it is ironic, because it's preventing you voting for him. Mission successful on you at least then? It's the inherent 'too scummy to be scum' defence which is bleh. VE's post at the top of this page mostly covers my thoughts on both Shady and KJ. With kingjames, the general wishy washyness isn't *so* bad in general except for the fact that he just lumped those quotes in the thread in the first place. If you're not willing to uphold why you're doing so, it's just insidious suspicion placing. With Shady, what I really really dislike is the bullshit after-the-fact explanation for his actions. It just reads as a lie trying to justify the dumb play in the first place. I've seen several instances of scum trying to justify shit after the fact... Kei, i think you were in that game with talis and his 'reads' plan where he was scum? On top of this is his absence from the thread afterwards. If you're seriously making a point about how trolling is bad (...) then at best it's completely hypocritcal to disappear without actually then providing any content. Your response to it, Kei, is validation of Shady playing like that. Boo! ##Vote: Shady Sands | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 20:43 Mementoss wrote: ##Vote: Kushm4sta Pretty self explanatory. Except I don't think he's scum at the moment. He's managing to be surprisingly unargumentative and I don't think he has the self-control to pull that off as a lie. His town games are littered with big scumslips, and I've watched/coached/hosted every single one of his newbie games. Coag and VE are playing like coag and VE is the sum of what's been said about them. Z-Bo, as I tried to explain (perhaps poorly), it was the explanation for Shady's trolling and his subsequent lurking that I particularly disliked, but you seem to be representing it otherwise. On October 01 2012 11:39 kingjames01 wrote: So what we're shifting towards is whether Shady's 'plan' to preempt trolling was legitimate or a cover-up? That should not be the focus of our first day. Instead, I'd like Shady to come back to the thread and give us something more concrete. Shady: what do you think about the assertion that I was being wishy-washy? Also, tell us if you have a spy read on anyone yet, who and why. Bla bla bla bla. What do you think, about, you know, anything? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 21:34 kushm4sta wrote: lynching someone you don't think is scum is common. it's called a policy lynch. also no one who I want to lynch is getting lynched, so I might as well join this bandwagon because I don't like shady 's play Who do you want to lynch most of all right now and why? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 13:17 Shady Sands wrote: In response to trolling: I think people are drastically overblowing the following post: How is that a lie, Marv? I explicitly said I was trolling even though on the very first page DrH told GRush to eff off for presumed trolliness. I knew this was going to get me a high chance of being modkilled. But given that there are people who are possibly smurfing for others here, there's still a risk that trolls are here, so I wanted to play that way to make sure no one dared to troll... or at least I could abuse tolerance for trolls to the same extent as others. Now reading through filters So in the game with the most specific anti-troll host/rules, you felt the need to make a point? Is it not true then that you were basically having a hissy fit? This way my interpretation of your pre-game post, and it's the fact that you tried to make your trolling into a legitimate point that reads as fake to me. To the bold, you said this and then made two further inconsequential posts. Did you find nothing to comment upon? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 01 2012 22:27 Z-BosoN wrote: I don't know coag, and I don't know VE. On coag, its a pity that's how he plays then, I hate ppl like that. Hope seeing his brilliant play in day 2. I still don't like how VE attacked annul though, but given this was the beggining of day one I don't necessarily think that part is scum motivated. I'd like him to be clearer on KJ, though. Risk, yea you should read my post, I specifically addressed that. Marv, I just don't feel that way. Shady usually comes off scummy as shit no matter his alignment, so I don't think that is enough to push a lynch. In my experience Shady's scummyness usually comes from massive bouts of "lol didn't read thread!". His play here is distinct from this normal ailment of his. Well, aside from the fact he said he was reading filters and then didn't give us anything, but that's not the same either ^^ | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On September 03 2012 18:47 kushm4sta wrote: So it seems like the consensus is to lynch either cubu or kville. Anyone not feel this way? Even if they aren't mafia they are solid policy lynches. Now the question is which one. Kville is the bigger lurker, but I think there is a higher possibility for cubu to actually be mafia. Honestly cubu probably isn't mafia either, just because I think mafia would put more effort into their posts. Lynching one of these guys is better than lynching someone who is active though. So my vote is still on cubu. Will vote for policy lynches just fine, check Calls Cubu probably not mafia but is happy to have his vote on him, check | ||
| ||
