Liquid City Mafia

On September 30 2012 13:14 BlackMamba24 wrote:
I can tell you this much. Let go of trust. Your doctor, your local police officer, even the nice old lady at the grocery store might be on the mafia payroll. The only thing you can trust is your own mind.

On September 30 2012 13:14 BlackMamba24 wrote:
The only thing you can trust is your own mind.

On September 30 2012 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
Also I'd like to know what you found worth reading in annul's post. First of all, setup speculation (as the mod has pointed out) is useless. Not to mention the fact that he's trying to sell certainties rather than speculating anyway - speculation has an air of questioning and uncertainty, but annul's post brashly made assumptions based on the daypost which I find terribly suspicious.

On September 30 2012 23:31 Mattchew wrote:
I am disappointed annul didn't follow up with any discussion about the on-going game afterwards

On September 30 2012 23:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
However, I'd like for you to explain why an FoS of you is "FoSable" please. This is probably gonna be good.

##vote: annul

On September 30 2012 23:59 VisceraEyes wrote:
Anyway, that's all you got right now so I'd certainly not lynch you for that.

On October 01 2012 00:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
I voted for you because you said you were gonna FoS me without FoSing me like a little bitch.

On October 01 2012 00:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
I know you as scum tend to give town more information than they need.

On October 01 2012 00:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
So when I see you making assumptions about the game based on the daypost (clues or no, what you did wasn't speculating).

On October 01 2012 00:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yes, I voted for you.

On October 01 2012 13:18 kushm4sta wrote:


He's a lynch I can feel good about even if he flips green.

On October 02 2012 08:29 Sharrant wrote:
@Risk



Yes. I told you, I got up early to make a post. I spent an hour going through filters and writing that post.

Anyways, I'm not talking any more about anything even related to my previous activity level, it's pointless.

So, onto the important stuff.

On Austin: Austin seems quite scummy to me, with almost all of his posts having been focused on KJ using "spy" instead of scum. I agree that it threw me at first, and I was pretty suspicious because of it (see my earlier post). That was his only bit of scum hunting though, was going after him for saying spy. Yes, he unvoted him after that, but never tried to pick up on anyone else after. He asks for opinions about Shady and Kush's play, but doesn't feel the need to write a word about them in return.

I'm giving him leeway for now because Marv said that his play thus far has been according to his meta, and that's something I'll trust him about. If his posting doesn't improve by day 2 though, I think he'd be looking like a nice target to lynch.


@everyone
Can someone please tell me if Risk is usually this agressive? I've never played with him before, but he seems kind of off the rails at this point. I'm suspicious of him, but especially since his last post I'm thinking that he just gets really emotional when he plays.

On Risk:
You just kind of suggest a lynch on Kush without explaining or even mentioning suspicions of him. Then you make a post about KJ and vote Shady, again without explaining or even mentioning suspicions of him. Then your case on me is entirely "I assume he's been following the thread". THat's it. THe end. You took no exception with anything I said, didn't see anything wrong or misinterepreted, taken out of context or distorted to call me out on. You just said "Hey, he made a long post as his first post. Scum for sure". Apparently so scummy that you would prefer to drop Shady, KJ and Kush all just to lynch me if more people were around.

At this point, I think you're scum. I'd love to be wrong, if you can link me to some of your past games, that'd be great. Maybe this just is standard to how you play, and someone will let me know, but I think you're scummy.

##vote Risk.Nuke

I'll have another post up either at or a little after the night post, with reads on a few more people.

On October 02 2012 08:42 kingjames01 wrote:


This is a good point. With annul it's kind of hard to tell usually. Sometimes mafia annul gets through the early days by flying under the radar and showing up every now and then to vote.

If it continues, then I would be very wary of trusting anything he says because he is really good at amplifying flaws in logical arguments.

On October 02 2012 09:26 kingjames01 wrote:
It fits how you're playing so far this game but it doesn't mean you're scum. It could also mean you're Town.