• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:28
CEST 05:28
KST 12:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy2Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)3BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL19] Grand Finals
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Who’s Getting the Effortless-Chic Look Just Right?
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18030 users

TL Mafia 'Area' LIII

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 14 2012 18:46 GMT
#21
/in
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 19 2012 15:38 GMT
#78
We full? We starting. Maybe Mods should do a mass pm ready check cause signups have been up for awhile
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 20 2012 02:01 GMT
#88
lets do this tomorrow? its a date
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 20 2012 13:22 GMT
#111
##vote VE, too soon?
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 20 2012 13:57 GMT
#113
[image loading]
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:02 GMT
#131
so my teammates are + Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
Mafia LI
?
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:11 GMT
#141
On April 21 2012 09:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Vote: Mattchew

Scum were going to win sir. WE WERE GOING TO WIN!!!

yeah, you were. sorry im MKP and you Parting.
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:12 GMT
#142
actually, im more of the IPL internet (or computer) and your parting (scum team prime)
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:15 GMT
#144
So anyway should we policy lynch Bill Murray because
a. he is scum in like 99% of his recent games
b. he gets away with everything "because he's Bill Murray"
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:21 GMT
#148
On April 21 2012 09:17 johnnywup wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 09:15 Mattchew wrote:
So anyway should we policy lynch Bill Murray because
a. he is scum in like 99% of his recent games
b. he gets away with everything "because he's Bill Murray"

No, because he's Bill Murray.
Seriously though, Policy Lynches should be a last resort. This is stated at the beginning of every game by one player or another, I don't get how people still want policy lynches.

why so serious, why not let the idea breathe? maybe even have it force BM to post, maybe let some scummy mofo's bandwagon it? Are you going to shoot down anyone pressure voting too cause thats gonna make you cover up for a lot of peoples reactions
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 00:24 GMT
#150
what about roleblockers laya?
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 04:03 GMT
#230
Yo anyone else reading paqman's posts... cause you guys should... scummy as fuck
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 04:10 GMT
#232
To elaborate
On April 21 2012 10:49 PaqMan wrote:
I like Gonzaw's idea of the vig's claiming. Only problem with that is that Scum will have a list of vig's and won't have to do any sniping..
So now that I think about it, I don't really like that idea at all lol.

Town can't keep assuming things this game. It'll make an ass out of u and me. We don't know how many of what roles there are and continuous speculation isn't going to help at all.

This reads to me as "i don't want to take a side, i want to look like i like both sides to the argument" also, lets change subject (but wait, read on)


On April 21 2012 11:43 PaqMan wrote:
Woops, I'm sorry! Scarface is on tv and I'm trying to multitask. It isn't working out obviously, so I'll be back in about three hours.

apology post and leave to get away from being wrong.

On April 21 2012 11:49 PaqMan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Paq he's talking about if there are more than 3 CLAIMS. If there are more than three CLAIMS then there's guaranteed to be a liar in the bunch, which is what he's saying.

Now go be a good lad and vote for gonzaw.


I'm not convinced that he made a scum slip. When he said "our" he could have been referring to whoever agreed with his points. I want to see what Gonzaw has to say about your accusation.

Interestingly filmsy opinion again, to me this just feels like he has more information than I do


On April 21 2012 12:01 PaqMan wrote:
But I do agree with you VE. Giving scum any more info puts them in an even greater advantage over us. A mass vig claim would be the same as handing them a hit list.
some of gonzaw's points however are pretty valid (no late-game chaos with vig claiming before lynch, etc etc).

Either way, I can't see a vig following either one of y'alls policies.
He claims, town lynches him and nothing is gained.
He claims, chance of mafia taking him out or keeps him alive, either way there's chaos.

I suggest that our vigilante (if we have one) doesn't claim at all. If he's about to be lynched then he needs to defend himself as a normal townie because claiming vig is going to create a shitstorm for us, which gives scum the upper hand.
If he's going to use his kp one someone, he doesn't need to claim before or after the kill. It's going to create too much confusion and WIFOM and finger-pointing and shit.

So I think that vigilantes should not make any claims this game.


I know how much we love the 3rd and 4th person to jump on an opinion and now that he knows people will agree with him, he can be firm in his assertion

There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 04:15 GMT
#234
hey johnny whatchu think of the post above yours
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 04:21 GMT
#237
you can make it for him

and johnny care to elaborate on what you agree or disagree with about paq, and maybe shed some new light to me.

bedtime... i'll be up in like 9 hours back at it again so you euros can play with me too
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 17:31 GMT
#299
I find it funny that paqman decides to attack me for lurking when I posted that I was going to sleep. Then votes me because I made a case against him? That makes sense, vote the guy thats actively looking for scum then accuse him of shit he isn't doing!

also gonzaw this is noted
We were discussing Paqman's behaviour, and Matt's suspicious behaviour too (for instance).

Why is paqman's only behaviour and mine suspicious? Do you find me to actually be more suspicious than paqman?


layabout what exactly about the marvel case do you like? also;
On April 21 2012 23:32 layabout wrote:
The Paqman case is forced as all hells.

+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 12:01 PaqMan wrote:
But I do agree with you VE. Giving scum any more info puts them in an even greater advantage over us. A mass vig claim would be the same as handing them a hit list.
some of gonzaw's points however are pretty valid (no late-game chaos with vig claiming before lynch, etc etc).

Either way, I can't see a vig following either one of y'alls policies.
He claims, town lynches him and nothing is gained.
He claims, chance of mafia taking him out or keeps him alive, either way there's chaos.

I suggest that our vigilante (if we have one) doesn't claim at all. If he's about to be lynched then he needs to defend himself as a normal townie because claiming vig is going to create a shitstorm for us, which gives scum the upper hand.
If he's going to use his kp one someone, he doesn't need to claim before or after the kill. It's going to create too much confusion and WIFOM and finger-pointing and shit.

So I think that vigilantes should not make any claims this game.


I know how much we love the 3rd and 4th person to jump on an opinion and now that he knows people will agree with him, he can be firm in his assertion

Because people are giving opinions there will inevitably be people who give opinions that other already have. Paqman was the 2nd to say that vigilantes should not claim + Show Spoiler +
(after VE, johnny also seems to support the idea but didn't take this stance Sentinel doesn't count because he didn't read the OP and his opinion cannot have had much grounding).
But how is that scummy? You might argue that he was trying to sheep town sentiment but at that point the thread was still quite divided.

I was saying that he did this after he had tried to post a middle of the road opinion. Then 2 or 3 others came in shooting down gonzaw's plan and he all of a sudden becomes much firmer in his stance (its like a bandwagon opinion instead of a bandwagon vote)


+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 11:49 PaqMan wrote:
On April 21 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Paq he's talking about if there are more than 3 CLAIMS. If there are more than three CLAIMS then there's guaranteed to be a liar in the bunch, which is what he's saying.

Now go be a good lad and vote for gonzaw.


I'm not convinced that he made a scum slip. When he said "our" he could have been referring to whoever agreed with his points. I want to see what Gonzaw has to say about your accusation.

Interestingly filmsy opinion again, to me this just feels like he has more information than I do

Paqman's comment is reasonable.
VE's vote is dependent on a particular interpretation of the use of the word "our". Nobody should be convinced by it!Not being convinced is reasonable. Wanting to see how a player reacts to an accusation before judging them is reasonable
I am wondering how mattchew ended up "feeling" like this comment in any way indicated that Paqman had more information than him.


I got that feeling because its context can be read that he is basically telling VE that he is wrong, but doesn't want blantantly tell him that.



Also, I never commented on the vig plans cause I don't care about blues, as I have said a lot in coaching, they are a nice to have not a need to have. What a town needs to have is scum hunting and clear townies, this will support our blues more than any amount of direction.

I don't think Gonzaw's plan is scummy, however I don't agree with scum being forced into acting the way he thinks they will. His entire plan, I feel, revolves around vigs getting their shots right, which will be hard enough in this game.

I am null on VE, I am hoping that whatever he is doing will become more evident as the day goes on, cause right now he just looks like he is tunneling a little.

Layabout just mentioned all the lurkers, I have already said I'm down with a BM lynch (a little less now that Paqman said that too).
I would also be willing to lynch anyone else on that lynch that doesn't come out to play


There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 17:32 GMT
#300
I hate making a big post and being at the bottom of the page
On April 22 2012 02:31 Mattchew wrote:
I find it funny that paqman decides to attack me for lurking when I posted that I was going to sleep. Then votes me because I made a case against him? That makes sense, vote the guy thats actively looking for scum then accuse him of shit he isn't doing!

also gonzaw this is noted
Show nested quote +
We were discussing Paqman's behaviour, and Matt's suspicious behaviour too (for instance).

Why is paqman's only behaviour and mine suspicious? Do you find me to actually be more suspicious than paqman?


layabout what exactly about the marvel case do you like? also;
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 23:32 layabout wrote:
The Paqman case is forced as all hells.

+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 12:01 PaqMan wrote:
But I do agree with you VE. Giving scum any more info puts them in an even greater advantage over us. A mass vig claim would be the same as handing them a hit list.
some of gonzaw's points however are pretty valid (no late-game chaos with vig claiming before lynch, etc etc).

Either way, I can't see a vig following either one of y'alls policies.
He claims, town lynches him and nothing is gained.
He claims, chance of mafia taking him out or keeps him alive, either way there's chaos.

I suggest that our vigilante (if we have one) doesn't claim at all. If he's about to be lynched then he needs to defend himself as a normal townie because claiming vig is going to create a shitstorm for us, which gives scum the upper hand.
If he's going to use his kp one someone, he doesn't need to claim before or after the kill. It's going to create too much confusion and WIFOM and finger-pointing and shit.

So I think that vigilantes should not make any claims this game.


I know how much we love the 3rd and 4th person to jump on an opinion and now that he knows people will agree with him, he can be firm in his assertion

Because people are giving opinions there will inevitably be people who give opinions that other already have. Paqman was the 2nd to say that vigilantes should not claim + Show Spoiler +
(after VE, johnny also seems to support the idea but didn't take this stance Sentinel doesn't count because he didn't read the OP and his opinion cannot have had much grounding).
But how is that scummy? You might argue that he was trying to sheep town sentiment but at that point the thread was still quite divided.

I was saying that he did this after he had tried to post a middle of the road opinion. Then 2 or 3 others came in shooting down gonzaw's plan and he all of a sudden becomes much firmer in his stance (its like a bandwagon opinion instead of a bandwagon vote)


+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 11:49 PaqMan wrote:
On April 21 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Paq he's talking about if there are more than 3 CLAIMS. If there are more than three CLAIMS then there's guaranteed to be a liar in the bunch, which is what he's saying.

Now go be a good lad and vote for gonzaw.


I'm not convinced that he made a scum slip. When he said "our" he could have been referring to whoever agreed with his points. I want to see what Gonzaw has to say about your accusation.

Interestingly filmsy opinion again, to me this just feels like he has more information than I do

Paqman's comment is reasonable.
VE's vote is dependent on a particular interpretation of the use of the word "our". Nobody should be convinced by it!Not being convinced is reasonable. Wanting to see how a player reacts to an accusation before judging them is reasonable
I am wondering how mattchew ended up "feeling" like this comment in any way indicated that Paqman had more information than him.


I got that feeling because its context can be read that he is basically telling VE that he is wrong, but doesn't want blantantly tell him that.



Also, I never commented on the vig plans cause I don't care about blues, as I have said a lot in coaching, they are a nice to have not a need to have. What a town needs to have is scum hunting and clear townies, this will support our blues more than any amount of direction.

I don't think Gonzaw's plan is scummy, however I don't agree with scum being forced into acting the way he thinks they will. His entire plan, I feel, revolves around vigs getting their shots right, which will be hard enough in this game.

I am null on VE, I am hoping that whatever he is doing will become more evident as the day goes on, cause right now he just looks like he is tunneling a little.

Layabout just mentioned all the lurkers, I have already said I'm down with a BM lynch (a little less now that Paqman said that too).
I would also be willing to lynch anyone else on that lynch that doesn't come out to play



There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 17:33 GMT
#302
EBWOP (aka lol FAIL)
On April 22 2012 02:31 Mattchew wrote:
I find it funny that paqman decides to attack me for lurking when I posted that I was going to sleep. Then votes me because I made a case against him? That makes sense, vote the guy thats actively looking for scum then accuse him of shit he isn't doing!

also gonzaw this is noted
Show nested quote +
We were discussing Paqman's behaviour, and Matt's suspicious behaviour too (for instance).

Why is paqman's only behaviour and mine suspicious? Do you find me to actually be more suspicious than paqman?


layabout what exactly about the marvel case do you like? also;
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 23:32 layabout wrote:
The Paqman case is forced as all hells.

+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 12:01 PaqMan wrote:
But I do agree with you VE. Giving scum any more info puts them in an even greater advantage over us. A mass vig claim would be the same as handing them a hit list.
some of gonzaw's points however are pretty valid (no late-game chaos with vig claiming before lynch, etc etc).

Either way, I can't see a vig following either one of y'alls policies.
He claims, town lynches him and nothing is gained.
He claims, chance of mafia taking him out or keeps him alive, either way there's chaos.

I suggest that our vigilante (if we have one) doesn't claim at all. If he's about to be lynched then he needs to defend himself as a normal townie because claiming vig is going to create a shitstorm for us, which gives scum the upper hand.
If he's going to use his kp one someone, he doesn't need to claim before or after the kill. It's going to create too much confusion and WIFOM and finger-pointing and shit.

So I think that vigilantes should not make any claims this game.


I know how much we love the 3rd and 4th person to jump on an opinion and now that he knows people will agree with him, he can be firm in his assertion

Because people are giving opinions there will inevitably be people who give opinions that other already have. Paqman was the 2nd to say that vigilantes should not claim + Show Spoiler +
(after VE, johnny also seems to support the idea but didn't take this stance Sentinel doesn't count because he didn't read the OP and his opinion cannot have had much grounding).
But how is that scummy? You might argue that he was trying to sheep town sentiment but at that point the thread was still quite divided.

I was saying that he did this after he had tried to post a middle of the road opinion. Then 2 or 3 others came in shooting down gonzaw's plan and he all of a sudden becomes much firmer in his stance (its like a bandwagon opinion instead of a bandwagon vote)


+ Show Spoiler +
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2012 11:49 PaqMan wrote:
On April 21 2012 11:34 VisceraEyes wrote:
Paq he's talking about if there are more than 3 CLAIMS. If there are more than three CLAIMS then there's guaranteed to be a liar in the bunch, which is what he's saying.

Now go be a good lad and vote for gonzaw.


I'm not convinced that he made a scum slip. When he said "our" he could have been referring to whoever agreed with his points. I want to see what Gonzaw has to say about your accusation.

Interestingly filmsy opinion again, to me this just feels like he has more information than I do

Paqman's comment is reasonable.
VE's vote is dependent on a particular interpretation of the use of the word "our". Nobody should be convinced by it!Not being convinced is reasonable. Wanting to see how a player reacts to an accusation before judging them is reasonable
I am wondering how mattchew ended up "feeling" like this comment in any way indicated that Paqman had more information than him.


I got that feeling because its context can be read that he is basically telling VE that he is wrong, but doesn't want blantantly tell him that.



Also, I never commented on the vig plans cause I don't care about blues, as I have said a lot in coaching, they are a nice to have not a need to have. What a town needs to have is scum hunting and clear townies, this will support our blues more than any amount of direction.

I don't think Gonzaw's plan is scummy, however I don't agree with scum being forced into acting the way he thinks they will. His entire plan, I feel, revolves around vigs getting their shots right, which will be hard enough in this game.

I am null on VE, I am hoping that whatever he is doing will become more evident as the day goes on, cause right now he just looks like he is tunneling a little.

Layabout just mentioned all the lurkers, I have already said I'm down with a BM lynch (a little less now that Paqman said that too).
I would also be willing to lynch anyone else on that lynch that doesn't come out to play



There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 17:34 GMT
#303
going to basketball be back in like 2 hours
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
Mattchew
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States5684 Posts
April 21 2012 19:35 GMT
#330
On April 22 2012 04:02 St.Daniel wrote:
It's so fucking hard to keep up with everything when you are at a camp with a crappy internet connection XD
I've read everything and I can't conclude anything with a confident, but I do have some ideas based on my observation so far. I'll post again as soon as I put some of pieces together.

And there is no need to be hostile at each this early in game, because thst's EXACTLY what they (scum) want. As long as we keep expressing ideas without trying to bite each other's head off. Remember, keep it simple and clear. <3 TL.

what
the
fuck?
There is always tomorrow nshs.seal.
1 2 3 4 5 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
TBD vs ArTLIVE!
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
uThermal 2v2 Circuit: May
CranKy Ducklings121
Liquipedia
OSC
21:00
Mid Season Playoffs
ArT vs ReBellioN
HonMonO vs Ziomek
Shameless vs LunaSea
MilkiCow vs GgMaChine
Moja vs HiGhDrA
Jumy vs TBD
Demi vs NightPhoenix
Solar vs Cham
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft355
Nina 135
SteadfastSC119
Ketroc 33
NoRegreT_ 22
EnDerr 13
StarCraft: Brood War
JulyZerg 124
Icarus 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever510
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1128
taco 482
Other Games
summit1g11351
C9.Mang01679
shahzam1299
ViBE244
ToD149
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1740
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH277
• Hupsaiya 75
• practicex 32
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 23
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5794
• Stunt201
Other Games
• Scarra1523
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
7h 32m
HiGhDrA vs Nicoract
MaNa vs HiGhDrA
HiGhDrA vs Reynor
Nicoract vs Reynor
MaNa vs Nicoract
MaNa vs Reynor
MaxPax vs Spirit
Krystianer vs Spirit
OSC
9h 32m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
15h 32m
Korean StarCraft League
23h 32m
SOOP
1d 5h
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
1d 6h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 7h
Cheesadelphia
1d 11h
CSO Cup
1d 13h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 14h
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
[ Show More ]
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
5 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.