EPTDUN
DUN
DUUUUUUUUUUUUUN
TL Mafia LII: JubJub Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
DUN DUN DUUUUUUUUUUUUUN | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On March 09 2012 06:38 layabout wrote: something is telling me to /in .... Is it a ghost because boy are those annoying | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On March 09 2012 07:27 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm the very paragon of manner in-game my friend. Only the most cordial and respectful OMGUS's ;D | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Also i would like to lynch rgTheSchworz :D ##Vote rgTheSchworz | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Also i think that we should be on top of lurkers to post content. We cant let people slide by with low post counts. Imma encourage people to post Blazinghand style POST YOU I LYNCH YOU And comon no one wants to kill Rg with meh XD | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Also I am firmly with the policy lynch all liars however more in the thread then pms. In Arkham City we had Rg lying multiple times in the thread making it hard for the town to get information, and completely discrediting himself. End game the town ended up lynching him Because they could not trust him at all. If he had been gone sooner town would have been better off. Also if we put this policy/guideline in place it will discourage people from blatantly lying, fake roleclaiming, and so on. Regarding PMs i think that they would be better saved for late game usually. Announcing who you are PMing should be fine. I can see both arguments so it should be up to the individuals discretion although i am leaning on announcing. This players have not posted in the thread yet. And i suggest we lynch one of them. Katina VisceraEyes Node [Uon]Sentinel Pandain RgTheSchoworz Curu | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
There's nothing wrong with putting a vote out there just for the hell of it. I dont like Rg playstyle (lying like 6 times as town) He even expressed he lied alot as town so he could get away with lying alot as mafia. We are unlikely to get a mafia day one So lynching a bad townie isn't to bad IF we choose to lynch him. I was mostly fishing for reactions. Didn't get to many sadly I say i do agree with lynching liars and Lurkers. However i suggest we use them as guidelines. TL towns dont lynch liars often enough and pushing lurkers to talk and contribute forces mafia to contribute. And in the process mess up Sharing PMs or not Sharing PMs both have pros and cons. To act like one is simply pro mafia is dumb. I think they both are viable ways to proceed. Also I put the list of players out. To try to elicit responses from them. I dont want to lost because half our player base isn't contirbuted it doesn't matter if they town or mafia. A town that contributes is a good town. (not spam tho) I want the lurkers to come out T_T I dont know about the jackal lynch we could of found a scum. Ill have to go over him. I dont know his meta to well tbh tho. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Putting the threat of a lynch to lurkers forces them to contribute. Simple as that. I think the jackal case can hold some merit. However i will hold my vote for now. I would like to see how he responds | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Who do you want to lynch. Put a case foward plz. And have to agree with curu. Matt hasnt said anything scummy as far as i can see. You case is really weak Katina | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
And i as you dont feel confident in my reads to push anything atm. I still think the jackal lynch makes sense even if mostly based on meta. I also think that our lurkers need to speak up a bit more. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
This could be the very rare very unlikly scum lynch day one. Given that none of the other cases seem good. lol at the matt case Vote Jackal58 | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On March 12 2012 19:31 EchelonTee wrote: hey look its a jubjub Saying that multiple people coming to the same conclusion at the same time doesn't mean squat, and I don't like how you imply those 3 people are likely town. In surprinsingly normal VII I posted a fake ass case on Bluelightz, then Shraft posted a nigh-identical case on it. scum and town can come to the same conclusions. I also am getting tired of meta arguments. I believed all you vets in TL L (oh palmar is being a scummy fck lynch him, NOT), and I tried to apply it in Newbie Mini III (DYH just decided to play differently trolol), but meta and only meta cannot convince me anymore. Hate on me all you want. There is a perfectly reasonable chance that Jackal is mafia. Now instead of pushing his reads on other people he is just making flimsy arguments. A case based mosty on meta is still a case. On March 12 2012 23:20 Kurumi wrote: Pandain has zero posts in the thread. That's sad, he knows how to play and should be here to help us. Schworz is away too. Deconduo said he dislikes the way layabout plays and that's it, though he's EU so I think he'll come back in something like 4-5 hours. Bill Murray is playing a good game so far and I am really happy about that. jaybrundage, You voted Schworz really quick, then posted a list with people we should lynch and then voted Jackal, sup? You ask for cases, say other cases are bad and never make one Yourself, what's up man? I voted Schworz. Because as a is stated i want to get some reactions sadly i didn't get as many as I wanted. I also dont like Rg's play style. The list I posted was the people that were lurking at that point. Putting pressure on lurkers is never bad. Its important that we keep our options open and think about lynching a lurker if no other good scum lynches come up. I decided to vote for jackal because i think the cases on him are decent. While mostly based on meta sometimes cases on meta to come thru. I didn't really post a case. Because Curu's case and prplhz mostly changed my mind. If i did post a case it would be rehashing and not worth posting. That said. I like how the jackal case isn't getting much momentum. It makes me think we could have picked up on a scum. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Put your votes in please no need to wait to the last minute | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Glad Palmar is here funny thing i only seen Palmar's town play XD (And one pro town third party) Palmar are you going to claim your DT check or not :o. Tommorow I think we should shoot into one of the scummy lurkers. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
VE I really would like to call you scummy but I can't. It's the wierdest thing... I think.....I think...... ....You might be town | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On March 14 2012 09:36 DoctorHelvetica wrote: jaybrundage, how are you differentiating between scummy lurkers and not scummy lurkers? Simple, Its just like looking at someone that post's regularly. You look at there posts and see any hidden agenda's or inconsistencies. I'm post who i think we should lynch tommorow. Don't like posting cases at night D: But Doc how about you do you think we should go for Caller or Jitsu still? | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
I think hes been very lurky and doesnt show any conviction in his reads. He has been jumping all over the place. And doesnt seem to invested in the game. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Kurumi for what i think could be a scum slip. As prplhz has pointed out his Rattata reference can be seen as mafia attracting the tratior or the tratior trying to call out mafia. I'm not sure why this has been glossed over quite so easily. Tratior has to be joined with the mafia and the sooner the better a free kill point for them. On March 13 2012 05:51 Kurumi wrote: My Rattata and I need friends. I am voting for the person who put the least effort into voting Jackal and this is Node. It's D1 and I don't want to lose him. We can verify his claim at any time. Also Jackal's Town: He gets roleblocked. Mafia loses 0.5KP every Night. Jackal's Scum: Thanks to basic math we might work out that he is lying about roleblocks. He has been posting in polish and generally not really contributing. He puts a vote on node because he has put in much effort. But besides that makes little contributions the the thread. Then votes for Caller because he he say's he doesn't think we will see the flip. Is he planning to hide it as scum. Or does he think that Caller is bullshitting about the whole thing which seems unlikely and dumb. On March 12 2012 10:33 Katina wrote: Hi!!! Since we are all pointing fingers I am going to point one as well to blend in! Woo! Okay, Mattchew. You ask a lot of questions..... Wait... This is all you do. I'm going to ignore the following post.... Because it's just so damn bad <3 ## Vote Mattchew I hope I have succeded in blending in now! I feel so pro bro. Regarding Katina her first post she jumps on Mattchew. She makes a case and points fingers simply because she wants to "fit in." So she makes a bad case on Matt with little to no reasoning saying his posts was just bad? Doesn't put any effort in it. She calls out people for posting with no content, however she has no content of her own. This play style is very similar to how she played in BCAC. She constantly called out people with out posting any thing of her own. She then calls out Node calling him on lack of content and flip flopping. Well this post has some merit. and Node has potential as red. I can totally see Katina pushing a teammate that has no content. Very similar to how she pushed her scum buddy sheth last game Also in BCAC. On March 12 2012 10:33 Katina wrote: Hi!!! Since we are all pointing fingers I am going to point one as well to blend in! Woo! Okay, Mattchew. You ask a lot of questions..... Wait... This is all you do. I'm going to ignore the following post.... Because it's just so damn bad <3 ## Vote Mattchew I hope I have succeded in blending in now! I feel so pro bro. She also tried to discredit a now confirmed townie VE Overall I would like to lynch either one of them. Any thoughts questions Oh and Palmar I would like you to PM me and roleclaim to me please. | ||
| ||
