• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:30
CEST 16:30
KST 23:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.160Rollback Netcode in Brood War845.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202622Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.16 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
ASL22 General Discussion Sagi.gg Launcher Released BSL23 Confirmations Starts on New BSL Portal Visiting korea this week BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues ASL 22 Finals [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 13117 users

[Map Concept] Closer Mineral Placement

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
paper
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
13197 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 13:02:54
August 10 2005 12:39 GMT
#1
Sorry if it has been posted before T_T

I think the 'send miners to minerals and wait for economy to pick up' in the initial stages of the game gets pretty dull and repetitive.

Therefore, wouldn't it be a slight improvement for faster paced early-games by adding a few mineral patches closer to the CC/Nex/Hatch with a resource amount of <200 so that by the time Terran needs comsat the closer mineral patches are depleted and scan can be constructed? Not FMP style or 0Clut but a more natural look? Seriously, when do mineral patches form in a linear pattern, as seen all the time in maps? :s

Will this create any imba? :s

Just a small train of thought~

Someone should make a map or modify any present map and test it out :s
Try cheese, standard, etc~

Hates Fun🤔
wasted
Profile Joined October 2002
Germany1789 Posts
August 10 2005 12:54 GMT
#2
i guess that's not so easy. you would only speed up the mining proess, while the build times for units and buildings stay the same. i'd be surprised if that wouldnt hurt the balance, but i cant really think of a concrete senario. maybe zerg would have a disadvantage, since the larvae spawn so slowly while the other races build their stuff in seperate buildings. but that's just pure speculation...

another speed-up setting could be putting the same amount of minerals you have in 8 blocks into 10/12/14/etc blocks. that should speed up the eco, but after possible rushes.

someone should really test it, maybe we'd get some intresting results
---gone---
Sorrow_eyes
Profile Joined February 2005
United States1007 Posts
August 10 2005 13:18 GMT
#3
well, I think that would null the power of 9 pool perhapes. I am not all that certain though. Maybe put game speed on fastestx2 for the first 2 mins of game? x]
Myacctmessup: People tried to create a Perfect language that the whole world can communicate with out difficulty, that it is universal and easy to learn. Do you hapen to know what language is it? Fireblast: You mean love?
Locked
Profile Joined September 2004
United States4182 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 13:22:27
August 10 2005 13:20 GMT
#4
on 4-player maps it could fuck up trying to expand to another main..... that'd be annoying

not that its still not an interesting idea though, it would probably change some BOs around and maybe even balance but thats not always a bad idea if you're interested in combining different concepts
UMS map pack http://teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=50442
Sorrow_eyes
Profile Joined February 2005
United States1007 Posts
August 10 2005 13:26 GMT
#5
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.
Myacctmessup: People tried to create a Perfect language that the whole world can communicate with out difficulty, that it is universal and easy to learn. Do you hapen to know what language is it? Fireblast: You mean love?
Locked
Profile Joined September 2004
United States4182 Posts
August 10 2005 13:34 GMT
#6
On August 10 2005 22:26 Sorrow_eyes wrote:
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.


that would change the balance much much more

i think toss and terran would gain a much bigger advantage but i'm not sure which one more...
think about how many zergs only have like 12-15 drones on the minerals while the toss/terrans might have 20-30
UMS map pack http://teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=50442
paper
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
13197 Posts
August 10 2005 15:51 GMT
#7
Well, it would only be geared toward the mains :s

I would like a top gamer's opinion kekekekek <^____^>
maybe after a test run.. :D
Hates Fun🤔
Camila_br
Profile Joined April 2004
Brazil529 Posts
August 10 2005 17:06 GMT
#8
On August 10 2005 22:26 Sorrow_eyes wrote:
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.


lol 1 irradiate = bye bye drones
"Do you really want chat rooms?"
panschk[FP]
Profile Joined May 2005
Germany148 Posts
August 10 2005 17:27 GMT
#9
Camila he said one block on top of every _normal_ mineral block. That'd be like 8-9 normal mineral blocks like on every map+8-9 low value mineral blocks for an early extra-boost on top of them. And locked is right, t and p would have more advantage from that than zerg.

btw I like the initial idea, I had it a couple of times myself, but never did a map like that yet.
In general, it's P>T>Z with such a mineral system, so it would be good to have the rest of the map favoring zerg and terran more, to balance it out. One idea would be to place the "normal" minerals so that to mine them correctly, you should build a mainbuilding where the "fast" minerals were standing before. zerg could build another hatch, terran could lift of and land there, only toss would need to build a new nexus. Might be too much though
wasted
Profile Joined October 2002
Germany1789 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 17:28:39
August 10 2005 17:27 GMT
#10
[ ] you understood what he said

this obviously is directed at camilla
---gone---
NubainMuscle
Profile Joined June 2005
South Africa423 Posts
August 10 2005 17:28 GMT
#11
On August 10 2005 21:39 ryuGie wrote:
I think the 'send miners to minerals and wait for economy to pick up' in the initial stages of the game gets pretty dull and repetitive.


You think Broodwar's initial opening is mundane? Try playing Age of Empires...
Seriously you can go 15 minutes in the game without building a single unit, especially on large maps and/or island topography.
http://sc.gosugamers.net/bilder/members/9801.jpg
YouWontRockMe
Profile Joined July 2005
71 Posts
August 10 2005 18:53 GMT
#12
how about workers take 1 second to build in the whole game -_-
(hope u guys noticed the sarcasm)
Resonate
Profile Joined October 2002
United Kingdom8402 Posts
August 10 2005 21:01 GMT
#13
stacking is dumb cos u can't select the mineral patches below the top one to see how depleted it is.
Memory lane in nice
TreY
Profile Joined March 2004
United States997 Posts
August 10 2005 22:04 GMT
#14
It'd make 9-10 gate that much more powerful...
Team [LighT]
Chris307
Profile Joined June 2004
3095 Posts
August 10 2005 23:25 GMT
#15
I hate this idea, and I think everybody else would too.

This is like changing the dimensions of the chess board. Fuck that and fuck you.
PUSH DICE CUP BACK AND I SHOOT CRAP
Aquemini1337
Profile Joined August 2005
United States24 Posts
August 11 2005 03:15 GMT
#16
beginning of game is fine imo, yes slow and boring but it gives you time to do things like scout and prepare a strat to your opponents race, pos and his strat. It would hurt the game more then help. But thats just my thought, but innovative idea anyhow. Ill take the slow repetitive balanced game. Especially me being a z player ^^
When SC2 comes out OLs better be able to Poop on opponents, or else im not playing
SwedishHero
Profile Joined April 2005
Sweden869 Posts
August 11 2005 03:18 GMT
#17
On August 11 2005 12:15 Aquemini1337 wrote:
beginning of game is fine imo, yes slow and boring but it gives you time to do things like scout and prepare a strat to your opponents race, pos and his strat. It would hurt the game more then help. But thats just my thought, but innovative idea anyhow. Ill take the slow repetitive balanced game. Especially me being a z player ^^


feel the same, i like that time aswell to relax abit, and prepare
Italiano??...no...no italiano?
SaRangHaE
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States182 Posts
August 11 2005 03:24 GMT
#18
you should be hang for thinking of such a stupid idea. closer mineral patches fucks up the game in alot of ways. If this actually is possible, you would want this stupid idea to vanish very quickly, trust me ^^. Think of it like Warcraft 3, so fucking stupid because right-click autos mining/gathering where in Starcraft you are damn lucky to be able to manual your resource which is what Starcraft is all about.
don't taze me bro
rel
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Guam3521 Posts
August 11 2005 03:32 GMT
#19
I like the begining of game, so calm and peaceful, then BAM, ACTION! :D
I'll tank push my way into her heart. ☮♥&$!
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
20:00
WardiTV Mondays #108
IntoTheiNu 869
WardiTV841
OGKoka 308
Rex120
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 308
LamboSC2 151
Rex 120
ProTech4
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 44495
Bisu 2601
Jaedong 1142
actioN 1112
Horang2 839
Mini 798
EffOrt 659
Hyuk 500
Stork 400
firebathero 251
[ Show more ]
Snow 250
Rush 225
Zeus 163
Light 159
Yoon 119
hero 117
Dewaltoss 108
Sea.KH 87
PianO 75
sSak 70
Mong 53
Pusan 48
Shinee 45
Shine 20
Sexy 20
Sharp 20
Terrorterran 20
Rock 19
HiyA 16
Trap 15
sorry 14
scan(afreeca) 12
Icarus 10
zelot 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Sacsri 9
Noble 6
Dota 2
Gorgc8291
qojqva2389
Dendi1149
syndereN297
Counter-Strike
edward48
Other Games
B2W.Neo734
crisheroes414
DeMusliM234
Pyrionflax205
Liquid`VortiX153
KnowMe140
Khaldor125
Mew2King76
Trikslyr56
QueenE48
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV255
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 759
• WagamamaTV518
League of Legends
• Nemesis2241
Other Games
• Shiphtur591
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
9h 30m
Kung Fu Cup
20h 30m
The PondCast
1d 19h
Online Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
IPSL
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-12
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.