• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 20:42
CET 02:42
KST 10:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13
StarCraft 2
General
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win SC2 Proleague Discontinued; SKT, KT, SGK, CJ disband
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ The top three worst maps of all time Foreign Brood War Data analysis on 70 million replays BW General Discussion
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
Physical Exertion During Gam…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1662 users

[Map Concept] Closer Mineral Placement

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
paper
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
13196 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 13:02:54
August 10 2005 12:39 GMT
#1
Sorry if it has been posted before T_T

I think the 'send miners to minerals and wait for economy to pick up' in the initial stages of the game gets pretty dull and repetitive.

Therefore, wouldn't it be a slight improvement for faster paced early-games by adding a few mineral patches closer to the CC/Nex/Hatch with a resource amount of <200 so that by the time Terran needs comsat the closer mineral patches are depleted and scan can be constructed? Not FMP style or 0Clut but a more natural look? Seriously, when do mineral patches form in a linear pattern, as seen all the time in maps? :s

Will this create any imba? :s

Just a small train of thought~

Someone should make a map or modify any present map and test it out :s
Try cheese, standard, etc~

Hates Fun🤔
wasted
Profile Joined October 2002
Germany1789 Posts
August 10 2005 12:54 GMT
#2
i guess that's not so easy. you would only speed up the mining proess, while the build times for units and buildings stay the same. i'd be surprised if that wouldnt hurt the balance, but i cant really think of a concrete senario. maybe zerg would have a disadvantage, since the larvae spawn so slowly while the other races build their stuff in seperate buildings. but that's just pure speculation...

another speed-up setting could be putting the same amount of minerals you have in 8 blocks into 10/12/14/etc blocks. that should speed up the eco, but after possible rushes.

someone should really test it, maybe we'd get some intresting results
---gone---
Sorrow_eyes
Profile Joined February 2005
United States1007 Posts
August 10 2005 13:18 GMT
#3
well, I think that would null the power of 9 pool perhapes. I am not all that certain though. Maybe put game speed on fastestx2 for the first 2 mins of game? x]
Myacctmessup: People tried to create a Perfect language that the whole world can communicate with out difficulty, that it is universal and easy to learn. Do you hapen to know what language is it? Fireblast: You mean love?
Locked
Profile Joined September 2004
United States4182 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 13:22:27
August 10 2005 13:20 GMT
#4
on 4-player maps it could fuck up trying to expand to another main..... that'd be annoying

not that its still not an interesting idea though, it would probably change some BOs around and maybe even balance but thats not always a bad idea if you're interested in combining different concepts
UMS map pack http://teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=50442
Sorrow_eyes
Profile Joined February 2005
United States1007 Posts
August 10 2005 13:26 GMT
#5
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.
Myacctmessup: People tried to create a Perfect language that the whole world can communicate with out difficulty, that it is universal and easy to learn. Do you hapen to know what language is it? Fireblast: You mean love?
Locked
Profile Joined September 2004
United States4182 Posts
August 10 2005 13:34 GMT
#6
On August 10 2005 22:26 Sorrow_eyes wrote:
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.


that would change the balance much much more

i think toss and terran would gain a much bigger advantage but i'm not sure which one more...
think about how many zergs only have like 12-15 drones on the minerals while the toss/terrans might have 20-30
UMS map pack http://teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=50442
paper
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
13196 Posts
August 10 2005 15:51 GMT
#7
Well, it would only be geared toward the mains :s

I would like a top gamer's opinion kekekekek <^____^>
maybe after a test run.. :D
Hates Fun🤔
Camila_br
Profile Joined April 2004
Brazil529 Posts
August 10 2005 17:06 GMT
#8
On August 10 2005 22:26 Sorrow_eyes wrote:
I got an idea... how about make stacked 100 worth of minerals on top of every normal minerals? that way peons dont have to run around trying to find new mineral patches, and eventually those 100 minerals drain out.


lol 1 irradiate = bye bye drones
"Do you really want chat rooms?"
panschk[FP]
Profile Joined May 2005
Germany148 Posts
August 10 2005 17:27 GMT
#9
Camila he said one block on top of every _normal_ mineral block. That'd be like 8-9 normal mineral blocks like on every map+8-9 low value mineral blocks for an early extra-boost on top of them. And locked is right, t and p would have more advantage from that than zerg.

btw I like the initial idea, I had it a couple of times myself, but never did a map like that yet.
In general, it's P>T>Z with such a mineral system, so it would be good to have the rest of the map favoring zerg and terran more, to balance it out. One idea would be to place the "normal" minerals so that to mine them correctly, you should build a mainbuilding where the "fast" minerals were standing before. zerg could build another hatch, terran could lift of and land there, only toss would need to build a new nexus. Might be too much though
wasted
Profile Joined October 2002
Germany1789 Posts
Last Edited: 2005-08-10 17:28:39
August 10 2005 17:27 GMT
#10
[ ] you understood what he said

this obviously is directed at camilla
---gone---
NubainMuscle
Profile Joined June 2005
South Africa423 Posts
August 10 2005 17:28 GMT
#11
On August 10 2005 21:39 ryuGie wrote:
I think the 'send miners to minerals and wait for economy to pick up' in the initial stages of the game gets pretty dull and repetitive.


You think Broodwar's initial opening is mundane? Try playing Age of Empires...
Seriously you can go 15 minutes in the game without building a single unit, especially on large maps and/or island topography.
http://sc.gosugamers.net/bilder/members/9801.jpg
YouWontRockMe
Profile Joined July 2005
71 Posts
August 10 2005 18:53 GMT
#12
how about workers take 1 second to build in the whole game -_-
(hope u guys noticed the sarcasm)
Resonate
Profile Joined October 2002
United Kingdom8402 Posts
August 10 2005 21:01 GMT
#13
stacking is dumb cos u can't select the mineral patches below the top one to see how depleted it is.
Memory lane in nice
TreY
Profile Joined March 2004
United States997 Posts
August 10 2005 22:04 GMT
#14
It'd make 9-10 gate that much more powerful...
Team [LighT]
Chris307
Profile Joined June 2004
3095 Posts
August 10 2005 23:25 GMT
#15
I hate this idea, and I think everybody else would too.

This is like changing the dimensions of the chess board. Fuck that and fuck you.
PUSH DICE CUP BACK AND I SHOOT CRAP
Aquemini1337
Profile Joined August 2005
United States24 Posts
August 11 2005 03:15 GMT
#16
beginning of game is fine imo, yes slow and boring but it gives you time to do things like scout and prepare a strat to your opponents race, pos and his strat. It would hurt the game more then help. But thats just my thought, but innovative idea anyhow. Ill take the slow repetitive balanced game. Especially me being a z player ^^
When SC2 comes out OLs better be able to Poop on opponents, or else im not playing
SwedishHero
Profile Joined April 2005
Sweden869 Posts
August 11 2005 03:18 GMT
#17
On August 11 2005 12:15 Aquemini1337 wrote:
beginning of game is fine imo, yes slow and boring but it gives you time to do things like scout and prepare a strat to your opponents race, pos and his strat. It would hurt the game more then help. But thats just my thought, but innovative idea anyhow. Ill take the slow repetitive balanced game. Especially me being a z player ^^


feel the same, i like that time aswell to relax abit, and prepare
Italiano??...no...no italiano?
SaRangHaE
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States182 Posts
August 11 2005 03:24 GMT
#18
you should be hang for thinking of such a stupid idea. closer mineral patches fucks up the game in alot of ways. If this actually is possible, you would want this stupid idea to vanish very quickly, trust me ^^. Think of it like Warcraft 3, so fucking stupid because right-click autos mining/gathering where in Starcraft you are damn lucky to be able to manual your resource which is what Starcraft is all about.
don't taze me bro
rel
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Guam3521 Posts
August 11 2005 03:32 GMT
#19
I like the begining of game, so calm and peaceful, then BAM, ACTION! :D
I'll tank push my way into her heart. ☮♥&$!
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Patches Events
23:00
5.4k Patch Clash #9
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft505
elazer 148
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 717
NaDa 40
Dota 2
monkeys_forever260
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor129
Other Games
summit1g12069
shahzam679
Maynarde121
Mew2King88
ViBE21
fpsfer 1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1265
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 106
• davetesta28
• Mapu4
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 16
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5265
Other Games
• imaqtpie2579
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 18m
Wardi Open
10h 18m
StarCraft2.fi
14h 18m
Monday Night Weeklies
15h 18m
Replay Cast
22h 18m
WardiTV 2025
1d 10h
StarCraft2.fi
1d 14h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 23h
StarCraft2.fi
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV 2025
3 days
StarCraft2.fi
3 days
WardiTV 2025
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
IPSL
5 days
Sziky vs JDConan
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs TBD
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Tarson vs DragOn
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Revival: Season 3
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
RSL Offline Finals
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.