EPTMr. Wiggles Mini Mafia I
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
Eventhough i'm not going to vote at this point for him, i'm kinda suspicious about sephirotharg. He seems to change from opinions a bit too much. But then again, i've seen weirder play in mafia. ps. I'm now out for the night, just stepped in as replacement so no high post count for me day1.. will be here tommorow | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On December 24 2011 13:27 sephirotharg wrote: Aren't my actions in line with an unskilled player? Trying (and not succeeding as much as I had hoped) to lure out scum with an (admittedly) poorly executed plan. Seems less like scum and more like noob, to me. I never announced my intentions to lurk - that was a misinterpretation on your part. And don't make the mistake of thinking that you can run my life or determine what I do - virtually (in both senses) yelling at me to come back is rude and counter-productive. As I've explained earlier, voting for myself as a placeholder was merely because I didn't want to expose any of my feelings on other players at that time - I prefer to reserve my judgments for later on. The contradictory statement was merely me saying that I didn't want votes on myself, then later in the same post saying that I was watching anyone who voted for me. After reading it over, I realized it sounded dumb and contradictory, so I changed it. Re-read both posts for yourself if you don't believe me. On December 24 2011 19:33 Shraft wrote: However, he did point out one thing, namely that his play might be more in line with that of a newer/unskilled player. He has indeed. But, as you can see in the spoiler, he is defending himself very well aware of his fault. And a he has said himself, he is not really a noob. He might be a bad player, but that basic mistake he should not be making here. + Show Spoiler + On December 23 2011 13:35 sephirotharg wrote: For myself, I've never played mafia here on TL, but I've played a small amount on some other forums. I'm not skilled, but it's still fun  As for policy lynches, I'm against Lynch All Liars, only because it tends to lead to players narrowing their focuses too much - lynching someone, even if they are a liar, may not be the best idea for the town. And Lynch All Lurkers is also a bad idea, not the least because at times I am one . Same reason as before, with the added rationale that life gets in the way sometimes - papers, work, family and such all happen, and sometimes you can't devote the time necessary.With that said, doing some estimation, worst case scenario (assuming bad lynches and vig kills, with one vig, as well as all mafia kills), we have until day 3 to flip a red. Keeping that in mind, what say the people about a day 1 lynch? I'm not going to let anyone come in here, screw around with us a bit and then state "I am not a mafia" and get away with it. ##Vote: sephirotharg | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On December 25 2011 07:35 jaybrundage wrote: Oh and we need minus to get in here and post he has contributed very little. Hyshes as well. We need more posts from these guys or we will not be able to get a read on them. Please post what you think about the current cases me and Sep pretty easy. Sep is making no sense whatsoever. I'm not gonna allow him to screw around here a bit and then get away with it. All he did up to now is anti-town. His case on you was no case, it was a dull replica. He didn't do anything. And about the case on you. Its based on things i don't see in your posts. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On December 25 2011 14:42 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Alright, that didn't go so well. That mislynch was caused by both his actions, and a majority of us being relatively content with having found someone that looked scummy. For as long as there are more scum out there than we can lynch per day, we should be scum hunting after we find a most likely candidate. Of particular concern to me was sheep voting. A few people sheep voted, if I had to name names, they would be Dirkzor Shraft Jaybrundage Hyshes The former two make the list because their initial votes were merely pressure. Their decision to be on the wagon at the end of the day is what matters most, and they borrowed logic from others. At some point you're going to have to make reads on candidates other than the one you want to hang most, to make sure there is a majority if you think someone is scum. It's ok to not have new content in an analysis on a bandwagon you want to join. Scum only say so many scummy things each, it's not like every word is overflowing with scummyness, so at some point the amount of new things to contribute is going to run dry. As a townie, you have to recognise that your argument brings nothing new, and show in your post both who helped you and what logic of theirs convinced you. The problems with reading people arise when townies get content with sheeping, and not doing any analysis. Again, if you're sheep voting, realise that you are, and show the logic that convinced you a person is scummy. Dirkzor, Shraft, Jaybrundage and Hyshes: Tell us what convinced you to be on the lynch at the end of the day. More importantly, if you could kill somebody right now, who would it be and why?. I did not sheepvote. I'm just not gonna let anyone come in here screw with us and get away with it. Especially when they say they are a noob but clearly aren't. There is no need as town to play so anti-town in a mini setup. Trickery can maybe used in abigger game, but here we have no room for it. And thus, in a mini game i see that as scumplay. There is no point in making lists atm of who is scum or not. I'm going to wait until we know who the scum shot this night. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On December 26 2011 06:12 Cyber_Cheese wrote: I called it sheeping because your pressure was made off a relatively weak statement. What about his play after you put the vote on inspired you to have it there at the end of the day? Did you believe both Seph and Jay were scum at the times you voted them? You claim to use getting a lynch as the reason to swap back to Jay, but your vote-swap changed it from 8v3 to 9v2. Even before your swap, and given that Seph wasn't going to vote for himself, that left the game at 7v4, a majority on Seph already. What parts of the pages between these convinced you that your vote was necessary to ensure a majority was reached, and did anything else factor in outside of wanting to ensure a lynch? Alright, what made you feel that he clearly wasn't a noob at the time? The automatic default from 'bad trap' to 'scumplay' seems like multiple leaps of logic based off the fact he wasn't the noob he claimed to be. Noobs don't point out there mistakes. Someone else does this for them. He knows way too much about the game. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
Anyway, I read the new posts kinda fast. Atm i think Shraft should be lynched. ##Vote Shraft | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
Just to do my obligation as town: ##Vote GiygaS I don't have the time nor the energy for this atm. I'm really sorry for this. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
| ||
