Responsibility Mafia!

On December 21 2011 09:07 wherebugsgo wrote:


what do you think of LSB, Foolishness?

Same question to everyone else, but particularly Palmar.

On December 21 2011 10:06 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
I wanted to wait for LSB to respond, but I agree that the OP including something else does seem to imply the possibility of third parties or other, similar roles. We know the traitor is one of these, but there's the possibility of a role like SK or Survivor, as well. I've never seen Survivors in any games here, though, but SKs are (were?) fairly common.

Also, Foolishness, do you have any other thoughts you'd like to share? From my experience playing with you, you avoid posting a lot as scum, and also try to avoid having to contribute. This makes you look like an apathetic or busy townie, but in my games with you, you turned out to be scum. So, I'd rather you remain more active than that, so I can get a better read on you.

Gonna re-read LSB's posts and WBG's case on him.

On December 22 2011 03:35 L wrote:
So, from the get go I'd eliminate most of the players who have been voting for others, those who are aggressively asking questions of others as potential targets for the day 1 lynch. Additionally, I'd put more suspicion on players who are overly apologetic at this stage in the game. That said, i wouldn't link suspicion to post count or length directly because there's an impetus from everyone to minimize their exposure to triggers. That said, voting is less of a town-tell than aggravating people; voting is important insofar as it establishes a rivalry.

...

I'm somewhat more conflicted with respect to Palmar because he fit this profile to a T prior to me going to sleep last night, then he started contributing. I'm not sure if that's because people started singling him out as a bullshit one-line poster and actually voting for him on that basis, but if the above is correct he'd probably not have been willing to engage VE for that long as mafia, and consequently VE is probably town because he pushed through an overt warning of Palmar's regarding him becoming annoying and kept on him to the point of voting for him.

VE is essentially the green/bluest person in the town in my eyes at the moment because of this.

On December 22 2011 05:00 Palmar wrote:
Are you trolling me Foolishness?

In your text L even concludes I'm probably not mafia.

Again, what has his read on VE to do with anything?

What the fuck?

On December 22 2011 05:03 Palmar wrote:


No, now you explain why you don't want to vote for L based on this.

On December 22 2011 05:04 Jackal58 wrote:

What do you think of Palmar Foolishness? You seem to be quite willing to comment on others reasoning to this point while providing none of your own. If you had to vote this very moment who would you vote for and why? Actually you've said damn little this game so far.

On December 21 2011 18:53 Palmar wrote:
Are you around for a bit syllo? I really need someone to talk to.

Yes I do agree that GM would be a pretty good lynch today. I tried to get him to explain why all he had to offer was policy lynches but he hasn't posted since. I don't think we should be lynching prplhz though, he's marginally more useful than most people in this thread.

Did you notice that BloodyC0bbler came into the thread and the one thing he focused on was the RNG idea, something that had been out of the discussion for a long while by then. I still believe it's a good idea if a town would roll with it from the start, but at the point his post is completely irrelevant to the discussion, to the point that this post is basically a huge pile of nothing. We know absolutely nothing about BC from that one post.

In addition I've had a problem with L's posting since the very beginning, I don't know if this was how you posted back when he was playing but in today's environment that's almost enough to just lynch him by default.

And finally, what do you think about WBG's case on LSB? Do you agree with me that it felt a bit forced, especially the part where he basically flat out accused LSB of being a SK?

On December 22 2011 05:30 Jackal58 wrote:


So are you defending L or Palmar? You say Palmar can't be mafia yet you can justify L's vote on him. I'm confused.

I've never played with L before that I can recall but I did play as L in personality mafia. He apparently has issues with Bill Murray.

On December 22 2011 13:36 prplhz wrote:
I'm going to venture asking Foolishness a question.

Is LSB town?

On December 22 2011 13:41 prplhz wrote:

1. You don't buy into the idea that GMarshal would never claim to be busy when he's actually just lurking because he doesn't want to say anything because he's scum?
   
2. By "being responsible" I hope you're not talking about "responsibility points", but about how LSB is actually around to defend himself while GMarshal is not?
   

I numbered my question so it would be very easy for you to answer!

On December 22 2011 14:19 bumatlarge wrote:
Well gee. LSB was telling the truth, so there is definitely some tricky host business with where GM got the iea to make that counter-claim. I don't think that alone shows his colors one way or another.

On December 22 2011 15:01 wherebugsgo wrote:
well GM will shoot if he's town. Scum will die, or GM will die. It's that simple.

we should choose who GM should shoot.

Sandro what do you think? Who should be shot?