• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:24
CEST 17:24
KST 00:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202541RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 685 users

Election Mafia

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 06 2011 05:06 GMT
#23
/in

This is my first mafia game on a forum (I've played a lot IRL), so I may be a little bit of a newbie at first.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 07 2011 17:12 GMT
#46
There's over 1000 views of this page. All those people just viewing it should sign up too. That means you, random viewer!
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 09 2011 06:17 GMT
#60
Ugh. Day 1 during finals week. I'm going to try to keep my post count up, but I may end up being a little bit busy studying to play as actively as I could.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 04:22 GMT
#204
Alright! Game's finally started! XD

I am a newbie, so I won't be running for anything yet until I see how the whole election thing ends up working. I really do think, though, that everyone should at least get out there and post a big wall o' text so that we can all get reads on each other and begin the scumhunt. If you're going to run, say so and give the reasons why. If you're not going to, then at least post something so that we can see where you stand. Having a scum in office, especially the pardoner office, would be devastating to the town. Now to read the other posts. I'll have another, more detailed post up shortly.

Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 04:55 GMT
#213
@Eiii Transparency is definitely a big issue to consider when voting for a candidate. I completely agree that a surprise pardon is reason enough for a lynch: the elected officials need to explain their reasoning BEFORE they act on it, or I see no reason to keep them in office.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 04:59 GMT
#214
@nyczbrandon Don't just follow the majority, read the posts and decide for yourself what you want to vote for. It's my first time playing too, but I'm going to make sure that the votes I make are for reasons that I have thought out. Get into the game as much as possible, because it's more fun that way! :D
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 07:07 GMT
#255
Also going to bed. Just a few things:

1. There's still lots of time before the election deadline. We should definitely wait to start the bandwagons rolling until after we've heard everyone's opinions on the matter.

2. Goes along with the last one, people are still sleeping or are just lurking. We need everyone to weigh in before we commit to anything.

Guess that's it from me for tonight. I'll try to have some sort of response to the inevitable flood of posts that will come as I sleep. See you all in the morning.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 18:00 GMT
#324
K, couple points I have from reading last night's posts:

1. The role of pardoner seems really prone to WIFOM. I agree on the no pardoning rule and that any pardon is reason for a lynch. The exception pointed out by risk.nuke does need some consideration. If there is a mass vote switch for some reason, and the pardoner feels like a pardon is necessary, they should have to justify it very well to everyone else. If they can't justify the pardon well enough to make us believe they are acting in the best interest of the town, their neck will definitely be in a noose before nightfall.
risk.nuke's exception: + Show Spoiler +
Exception 1. mass last minute vote switch.
Questionable Exception 2. Everyone agrees on lynching someone, then occurs a last hour voteswitch when some keyplayers are unavailable.


2. Even though there is a battle of the titans for the mayoral slot currently going on, there are a few people who are using the election mayhem to slip under the radar (or so it seems). These people are just as likely to be scum as the rest of us, but without them posting, we have no idea. I'll try to pressure some of the lurkers, but even the big candidates need to pay attention to them as well. It'll be better for the twon if we can get everyone involved in the discussion as much as possible.

3. Kind of an idea from me. Because the voting is done in a separate thread, votes could easily be made without gaining the attention of the debaters in the main thread. If we had everyone post in the main thread why they are casting their vote and for whom before casting their vote it might help make the connection between the debate and the actual votes a little clearer. To start off I'll cast my vote: I'm voting for Radfield in the election right now because he is one of the more active players in the thread. I really don't have much else to base my vote on, but know that it will probably change several times before the day ends. I encourage everyone else to announce their vote on the main thread too.

4. I'd really like some of the less active candidates to post their views too. Right now the debate is centered on Radfield/Arctocod/ProfBA because they're actually posting and expressing their views. if you guys want to win some votes, you're going to have to be more active than them, because they've already got some momentum.

More from me later today after some more discussion topics have arisen.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 18:08 GMT
#327
For the lurkers in the thread, maybe a couple questions would get some activity:

1. What do you think of the No Pardon, No Exception rule?

2. Give your specific impressions of the campaigns so far, especially the major ones.

Remember, the more you get into the game you're playing, the more fun it is! :D
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 18:35 GMT
#336
If the mayor was the first to be killed in the day one post, and then the mayor spot is up for grabs, does that mean that the other spots emptied in the day one post will be the roles in the future elections?
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 12 2011 18:59 GMT
#349
Some interesting discussions going on. I'm off to take a final, so I won't be posting anything for a few hours. I'm hoping for some really exciting stuff when I come back XD!
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 04:39 GMT
#425
Lynching a lurker should be our ABSOLUTE last option. Rather than taking them out of the game, we should instead make as much of an effort to bring them into the discussions as we can.

I'll start by saying that DropBear is looking a bit scummy to me. He makes a post telling us to vote for him, not lynch a hydra, endorses Radfield, and discourages discussion on the mayor and pardoner roles. He then promptly disappears off the face of the planet, reappearing only to dodge a bit of poking from arctocod.

DropBear's filter + Show Spoiler +
LOL Kavdragon the village idiot.

I am running for mayor too

I've played over 10 games with a reasonable win rate. I also have been sniped really early the last few times I've played due to nailing mafia early and want to last longer this time. I suck horribly at lying and am really obvious as a Mafia so you know what you are getting.

I don't think voting for any of the hydras is a good idea, they are hydras because they don't have the time/effort to be involved individually. Vote for a single player people.

I would endorse Radfield other than myself as he is easily the best player here and I feel is also not that hard to tell his alignment.


These posts about what the mayor and pardoner do and why they are important are basically spam. We can read we know what the roles do. Focus on who we are electing and why rather than clutter the thread.


Cos this tactic worked so well last time Palmar -_-


DropBear's scumminess makes some sense here: Throw in your bid for mayor, just so that scum can have a bid, then, when you see that it isn't going well, vanish in the confusion of the arguments of the other candidates. DropBear, please give us some more information: prove to us that you are not scum, because right now, you look pretty scummy. I'm casing my lynch vote right now for DropBear

To clarify: I'm not changing my mind in the same post: I still think that lynching all lurkers is a bad thing. I'm using my vote in this case to put some pressure on a very scummy looking lurker to try and draw him back into the discussion. If DropBear can prove to me that he's not scum, my vote will go somewhere else.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 07:12 GMT
#441
@Comprissient Thanks for giving your analysis. While I do agree that my scumread on DropBear is pretty theoretical at this point, my goal here is to try and pressure DropBear out into the open so that we can all better get a read on him. I chose to put the pressure on him because he looked the scummiest to me at the moment. If DropBear can prove his innocence to me, I will move my vote.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 07:55 GMT
#444
That's it from me for tonight. I'm looking forward to some great posts tonight. DropBear, I expect a reply from you soon before I wake up tomorrow.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 13:20 GMT
#477
@DropBear Thanks for responding. I was mostly using my vote to try and bring a less active player out of inactivity and try to get a better read on them. You've proven enough to me to make me believe that you are not as scummy as you looked. I'll move my vote.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 20:18 GMT
#547
I'm going to read through the filters of all the players currently being suspected or accused and give my thoughts on all of them in a bit. Prepare for a massive infodump from me in about 15 minutes or so.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 13 2011 20:49 GMT
#558
Alright, here's my reads on all the people currently under suspicion. If you feel that I left anyone out, tell me and I'll do a write-up of them too.

(In no particular order)
Nisani201:

+ Show Spoiler +
On December 13 2011 10:53 Nisani201 wrote:
Alright, I just caught up on the thread.
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2011 03:08 Spaackle wrote:
For the lurkers in the thread, maybe a couple questions would get some activity:

1. What do you think of the No Pardon, No Exception rule?

2. Give your specific impressions of the campaigns so far, especially the major ones.

Remember, the more you get into the game you're playing, the more fun it is! :D

1. No Pardon should not be carried out until the very late game, where there's probably some weird scenario in which pardoning would be important. However I don't think we need to discuss that now because there are too many possibilities.

2. Radfield seems to be playing pro-town. Palmar is not taking his usual controversial stance that he normally seems to assume. This is not scummy (I even think he said somewhere that he was going to try out a new style) but at this point I trust Radfield a lot more.

##Vote: Radfield (for election)

Nisani posts after lurking for quite some time and answers the questions I gave the lurkers. He gives some short answers and then doens't post anything for two hours.

On December 13 2011 12:37 Nisani201 wrote:
Zeks is a null-read for me. Yeah the scumslips are pretty stupid but in my experiences I've found that these easy D1 lynches don't go too well.

If there are no other candidates besides him then I will definitely vote him. Otherwise I will wait for more.


Nisani says that he doesn't have a read on zeks yet, but decides to wait until more info comes up.


On December 13 2011 12:39 Nisani201 wrote:
We could also lynch a lurker (such as TotallyNotTwoPeople). Again, I want more information.


Suggests lynching a lurker, and gives TNTP as an example. Nothing really suspicious stands out here.


On December 13 2011 14:11 Nisani201 wrote:
I just read Greymist's analysis on Jistu and I think he is much more viable lynch then Zeks.

Eiii, why are you voting MyZentor? You provided no reason other than a quote.

Somewhat off topic: after playing in XLVII, this is much more relaxing... so much better not having 100 players or whatever it was that game.


Decides that Jitsu is better than Zeks based on GreYMisT' analysis, then questions Eiii about his vote.


Read: Lurking Town
Nisani hasn't been posting much since the beginning, but what he has been posting has been fairly non-contradictory and he's done a bit of motive questioning. He just seems like a regular townie withour much to say.

Jitsu:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 12 2011 13:41 Jitsu wrote:
I'll just state my policy views now, since I want to get alot of opinions on this. Not only to see generate discussion, but also to get some feedback on how the potential mayor's stand on hot-topic issues.

LALiars - I am stuck on this. As stated before, if a Blue has to lie to prevent their potential unveiling, this could be a beneficial thing to town, but, by that time, I think town would be able to use voting in their own way to keep the blue safe. For instance, if a needed blue is revealed, we can simply vote them to Mayor and keep them safe via Bodyguard. We can take advantage of the two protected, voted positions. Am I understanding this wrong?

LALurkers - Lurking is also anti-town. In the games I have played (limited experience) mafia who lurk, and are forced to the surface because of a Lurker Policy, can slip up very, very easily. Forcing discussion is never a bad thing. The more that is discussed, the more that can be analyzed by the townie populace, and the better decisions can be made.

As prplhz said before, I will not be looking into previous games to gain inflection on how useful someone is. I want to know how the mayor will work for us now, not how the Mayor worked in previous games and how they hope to work now. I still would like to see who the potential mayor candidates stand on policy ideas, as well as some analysis from already fleshed out posts/future posts.



On December 12 2011 15:40 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 14:51 GreYMisT wrote:



One thing that strikes me about radfield this game is how he immediately tied himself to arctocod in his election post. saying that you should vote for me, but his guy is also a good choice, so he will probally get pardoner anyway, but still vote for me. while an argument could be made that he is trying to show all the new players who to vote for, something sets me off about this. He should theorectically know he is town, and therefore should be pulling out all the stops to get people to vote for him, not endorsing other candidates he doesn't even know the aliengment of. Because of this, i am uncomfortable voting him for mayor at this time.


I agree with this. Radfield tied himself quickly to another player. I have no scumread on him right now (nothing he has done really screams "mafia" to me) but I think we should hold on voting and bandwagoning this early, regardless. How would it look if Arcotocod flipped mafia after Radfield tied himself too him?

Again, not claiming I have scum-vision. Just making a point that "itchy-trigger-finger" voting might be a bad thing.



On December 13 2011 00:52 Jitsu wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 12 2011 22:58 Radfield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 13:08 GiygaS wrote:
On Jitsu's lynch policy question, I believe in LaL heavily[.....]


I think LAL is pretty terrible. It does two things wrong: One, it gives mafia a legitamate topic to discuss early game, when in fact we want them discussing elections and lynches. Two, it gives mafia a reason to push townies who may lie, even when the circumstances are not particularly damning to the townie. Every lie needs to be treated on a case by case basis. Townies lie ALL THE TIME, whether LAL exists or not, so it does not make sense to implement the policy. Not to mention, voting based on policy after Day 1(or even day 1) is terrible for town. We vote on content, not policy.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 13:29 Eiii wrote:
Having a pro-town hydra behind a bodyguard should be town's goal for today, in my opinion.

Could we start discussing in advance how the pardoner should be used?


Hydras are only as good as the time they have to invest in the game. I agree that a Palmar/Syllo hydra is a potent force, but I don't think that a hydra by definition is better than a single player. If I was hydra'd onto an inexperienced player, I fail to see how that would be stronger than me by myself.

Note on the Pardoner: Every game the pardoner exists people talk about how scary the pardoner is if in mafia hands, but this is NOT TRUE. This is where policy is actually helpful. The pardoner MAY NOT use their pardon, ever, end of story. Even if you are a townie pardoner, and think whomever is getting pardoned is town, you STILL do not use a pardon.

The reason for this is that if town reaches a majority, pardoning that player throws town into chaos, regardless of the alignment of the player pardoned. Palmar has stated several times that he will not vote for a player just to get a lynch(in majority lynch scenarios) if he thinks they are town, and this is a good gameplan. But that does NOT transfer over to pardoning players who you think is town(not that palmar thinks this). It is never worth it to break town atmosphere and toss it into chaos in order to save one townie.

The Pardoner NEVER uses the pardons. Period. If a pardoner ever uses a pardon, we lynch him the next day(or vig him that night if we are able to). For this reason the pardoner is not dangerous until lylo(or close to it).

Only once we get to lylo does the pardoner become dangerous. This is why it is essential that if we have a pardoner of questionable alignment, we get rid of them before the endgame. However before that, on day 1/2 and probably 3, they are not worth worrying about.

Show nested quote +
LALurkers - Lurking is also anti-town. In the games I have played (limited experience) mafia who lurk, and are forced to the surface because of a Lurker Policy, can slip up very, very easily. Forcing discussion is never a bad thing. The more that is discussed, the more that can be analyzed by the townie populace, and the better decisions can be made.


Lynching lurkers is a somewhat viable strat for Day 1, particularly in a game with many players who are unknowns. However I am strongly against it in this situation. With a mafia KP of 5/2 rounded up, it is hugely beneficial for us to pick off a mafia day 1, and I have never seen a lurker flip mafia on day 1. So I think we should hone our lynch onto active players, even at risk of killing an active townie. The risk vs reward is really high in this setup.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 14:48 Comprissent wrote:
I do think it is better to put a more active person into office anyways, it is up to town to catch a slipup

This being said, it now makes more sense in my head to NOT vote for two extremely active players who are running for office, rather leaving one out of an office. If they are both scum, and experienced, town is in trouble. Leaving a lesser experienced person in office may be helpful, where if both offices turn out to be scum, we have a better chance of catching one.

It's just like what was just said,
these positions don't really control the game so what's the biggie with leaving one office for someone not as experienced?


This quote doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but maybe I am reading it wrong. The purpose of putting active experienced players into the elected roles is to keep them safe. That's it. There is no reason to keep someone safe who is either highly inexperienced, or only moderately active.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 15:40 Jitsu wrote:
I agree with this. Radfield tied himself quickly to another player. I have no scumread on him right now (nothing he has done really screams "mafia" to me) but I think we should hold on voting and bandwagoning this early, regardless. How would it look if Arcotocod flipped mafia after Radfield tied himself too him?


Arctocod flipping mafia would say nothing about my alignment in strict terms. One, I tied them to myself on policy, before even seeing them post. Two, the likelyhood of us both being scum is quite low. If anything Arctocod flipping scum makes it more likely for me to be town. Furthermore, if we are both mafia, there is very little incentive to tie ourselves together. Honestly though, at this point the only thing that ties us together is that we are both vets.

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 16:31 cascades wrote:
I must be missing something. A lot of people like Sheth are saying Radfield is protown, but he only has one post as of now, and I don't see it. His post just states information any non first time players should know. In fact, he straightforwardly suggests Arc without caring about his alignment.

Anyhow, my analysis of his post indicates that it is a post both townie Radfield AND mafia Radfield would make. I would like to warn people not to jump to conclusions like that. They may be strong players, but that indicates nothing about their alignment.


Correct. I could have easily made my first post as either town or mafia. Basing a read off of the first post in the game is most definitely jumping to conclusions.

Arcto, Drpobear I dont know, Gigas so far so good. A little too early for me to be making reads though.



Going to address the things Radfield responded to with my post(s):

Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 22:58 Radfield wrote:
I think LAL is pretty terrible. It does two things wrong: One, it gives mafia a legitamate topic to discuss early game, when in fact we want them discussing elections and lynches. Two, it gives mafia a reason to push townies who may lie, even when the circumstances are not particularly damning to the townie. Every lie needs to be treated on a case by case basis. Townies lie ALL THE TIME, whether LAL exists or not, so it does not make sense to implement the policy. Not to mention, voting based on policy after Day 1(or even day 1) is terrible for town. We vote on content, not policy.

I don't understand your reasoning on this. Seeing as how you are a veteran, I will bow to your decision however and drop the issue.

Show nested quote +
Arctocod flipping mafia would say nothing about my alignment in strict terms. One, I tied them to myself on policy, before even seeing them post. Two, the likelyhood of us both being scum is quite low. If anything Arctocod flipping scum makes it more likely for me to be town. Furthermore, if we are both mafia, there is very little incentive to tie ourselves together. Honestly though, at this point the only thing that ties us together is that we are both vets.


Please don't think i'm accusing you of anything. In my mind, if we were to discover that Player B was mafia, and Player A associated with Player B, than Player A would have a higher likelihood of being mafia. Again, maybe that is my inexperience, but that is how my head would process it.



On December 13 2011 01:09 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2011 00:57 Radfield wrote:
On December 13 2011 00:52 Jitsu wrote:

On December 12 2011 22:58 Radfield wrote:
I think LAL is pretty terrible. It does two things wrong: One, it gives mafia a legitamate topic to discuss early game, when in fact we want them discussing elections and lynches. Two, it gives mafia a reason to push townies who may lie, even when the circumstances are not particularly damning to the townie. Every lie needs to be treated on a case by case basis. Townies lie ALL THE TIME, whether LAL exists or not, so it does not make sense to implement the policy. Not to mention, voting based on policy after Day 1(or even day 1) is terrible for town. We vote on content, not policy.

I don't understand your reasoning on this. Seeing as how you are a veteran, I will bow to your decision however and drop the issue.



I'd much rather you understand what I'm saying. Which part doesn't make sense?

And just because I'm a veteran doesn't mean I'm right. I bet there are plenty of vets who disagree with my statement on LAL (and they might be right!).

I'll be gone for about the next 9 hours. Might be able to pop on around dinner time though.


Sure. Hopefully we can clear this up quickly.

In my opinion, lying does nothing to benefit the town, save rare circumstances in which a blue town role needs to keep their identity hidden. If we can bring issues to the fore-front with honesty and integrity, we would be able to root scum out quicker than if everyone was throwing off-hand lies. I can understand you're feeling on the case-by-case basis; I think it's pretty self-evident that most things in mafia need to be treated on a case-by-case basis; In this way, Policy is a bad word to use since it shows an unwavering thought process regardless of potential outcomes.

Seeing as how we are almost down a day already, and I agree with your statement about giving the mafia a way to tie up valuable time spent discussing this topic, I thought it better to drop the whole thing and defer to you're rational as a vet, and let sleeping dogs lie, as it were.

The whole point of bringing policy questions up in the first place was to try to get discussion to try to start some analysis. Maybe it's not a stereotypical move by players on the first night - we can chalk that up to my inexperience if you want, I think it was just my personal way of getting discussion started.

Does that clear things up a bit, Radfield?



On December 13 2011 04:16 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2011 03:08 Spaackle wrote:
For the lurkers in the thread, maybe a couple questions would get some activity:

1. What do you think of the No Pardon, No Exception rule?

2. Give your specific impressions of the campaigns so far, especially the major ones.

Remember, the more you get into the game you're playing, the more fun it is! :D


I don't beleive I would classify as a lurker, but I will chime in with these posts regardless.

1. I think the No Pardon train of thought is good. However, as I stated before, this blanket "No Exception" thing scares me. Case-By-Case basis, I believe, would be better. If there is a blanket statement that says "if X happens, Y must always be the result," and a situation blindsides us where we will need to use the Pardon power, than I think it could be useful to use. That being said, if you are elected to the role of Pardoner, and you use it freely even once without sufficient cause, expect a vote from me for a lynching.

2. I am going to tie this in with my vote. I feel that Radfield would be the best person to be saved from a mafia kill. I feel that he fleshed out his ideas and I get a town vibe from him, even after we had our banter back and forth, and I give him my support, at least for now. His willingness to defend his position, take the posts and respond to them, while also asking questions himself, has solidified my vote for him.

Extra Note: I read a page or two back about posting votes in your thread, especially when it gets down to voting for lynching. I thought this would be a good idea, as well as officially voting in the Vote Thread. I think it might add some weight behind the post if it's all together. I can't speak for everyone, [and I know this is simply filler post] but I just wanted to say that I will probably follow this trend.



On December 13 2011 06:19 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 13 2011 06:16 evantrees wrote:
1. What do you think of the No Pardon, No Exception rule?

I like it the case of a mayor swung lynch bugs me a little though.
have to go out so I'll stop there for now.


Something doesn't sit right with me here. Come post, like, 5 minutes after Sheth calls him out for being a lurker, than covers and says he's going out.

And I didn't even understand the meat of his post.



On December 13 2011 08:02 Jitsu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 12 2011 14:51 GreYMisT wrote:
While it isnt suspicious to agree with someone, notice the way in which he did it. He states that we should hold off voting right now, and then for some reason says "How would it look if Arcotocod flipped mafia after Radfield tied himself too him?" I cant think of a town reason someone would post this, but forcing people vote later in the day, so delay information and give themselves time to come up with votes is a mafia agenda. Also the sentence I quoted seems to be trying to do what radfield said scum would try, which is to make it so arctocod and radfield dont end up in office together. there is no town perspective for posting that.


I simply didn't think it wise to start throwing votes around right as the game started. If you think that's mafia agenda, I apologize. I was originally wary of Radfield, but after our talks later, I felt that he was acting generally in a pro-town manner. Also, if I didn't want Arctocod and Radfield to go into office together, why would I already have voted for Radfield as my election vote? Like I said, I was skeptical at the beginning of Radfield's motives, but I have since warmed up to him.



Show nested quote +
GreYMisT wrote:
The above post was the next to catch my eye. after reading this post, basically the only thing he is saying really is "i wanted to start discussion" but notice the way he defers to radfields judgment upon being questioned, and then when questioned about that backtracks on himself. In my experience town players know what they believe, and dont have to worry about pleasing others.

Overall his posts between and after those have seemed very artifical, cold, and thought out to me. he seems very worried about not offending anyone, and never outright accusing. a town player won't do this. But mafia would


Did you read the whole thing GreYMisT? It was a pretty precarious situation. I deferred to Radfield's judgement because we were spinning tires on something that wasn't extremely productive, IE: deciding what a good lynch policy was. Later on, when Radfield asks me to explain my thought process, I did. Not quite following your backtrack upon backtrack upon backtrack. I do know what I believe, which is my ideas on Lynching Liars (which we are again talking about, somehow) but since it was a moot point at that time, I decided to drop it since it was unimportant.

I felt that whole situation was wrapped up fairly by the end.

As for accusing people, I'd like to get some fleshed out thoughts before posting half-witted accusations against someone, and up until a few pages ago, we were still discussing the possibilities of who the election candidates were.



On December 13 2011 19:59 Jitsu wrote:
Ahhh, just woke up. After seeing the events of the night, I thought i'd give my feeling on who might be someone to pay attention to. I felt worried Comprissent a few of his posts ago, and he recently really got it sparked in my mind that he might be scum.



Show nested quote +
This being said, it now makes more sense in my head to NOT vote for two extremely active players who are running for office, rather leaving one out of an office. If they are both scum, and experienced, town is in trouble. Leaving a lesser experienced person in office may be helpful, where if both offices turn out to be scum, we have a better chance of catching one.


This was a valid point. You said we shouldn't have had two people in office at once. Cool. In the next post, you even defend your stance that we shouldn't have those two experienced players in office, by saying have someone questionable in office as Pardoner.

Show nested quote +
Ok, so assuming we stick to this play on No pardoning, no exceptions, the only advantage either of the offices gives is immunity on night 1 from getting hit. This just helps us keep the vets alive, am i right?

Radfield seems the most organized and willing to work with town, even if I don't like his infrequent posting. I would also like Arc, as having two players is very nice to keep safe (as having double the chance for a slipup if he is scum)


Than you 100% switch your stance to wanting both Arc and Radfield in office. Hmmmm, ok...I could see it, but you're calling *me* wishy-washy? Fine, fine..

Show nested quote +
If Zeks is scum he would have probably made up his mind right away who he wants in office. This makes him seem town as he is trying to feel out the candidates. Also, more have stepped up in this '12 hour' window you've talked about, so I can't blame anyone for changing their minds


You stated if Zeks was scum, he would have voted right away who he wanted to vote for in office. It makes him seem town because he wants to try to feel out the candidates. I think that was exactly the same play I made early, trying to get a feeling for the mayoral candidates. According to that line, I should be pro-town.


Show nested quote +
For the lynching scenario:
1. Lynch a lurker, guarantee losing a towny
2. Lynch someone active, either hit scum or lose an active towny.

So far i think only greymist has the only analysis that is actually backed by logic
Spackle, your analysis on Dropbear is 100% theory, and I would not like to lynch based off that
MrZentor's reasoning behind going for Zeks explains nothing either, what does 'having the hydra only helps town' mean?

This being said, I'd tentatively vote for Jistu. Worst case scenario, we lose a towny either way. But with the amount of active posters, i think it's worth the shot to try for hitting a red.


but than you go ahead and say that the Anti-Jitsu analysis was backed by logic - logic that is counter-acting your own logic. Also, by my count, the following people (up to Comprissent's) to tentatively vote for me are GreyMist, Radfield, Nisani, and Comprissent, in that order.

You also say that the lynching scenario is either Lynch a lurker, and guarantee losing a town (I don't see how you can guarantee to lose a town) or lynch an active player, with a chance of either way. How about we look at some post analysis instead of just picking out of a hat?

Comprissent is pretty wavy in my eye. Like to see some thoughts from others.


Read:Town
I really don't have much so say specifically about many of these posts. Jitsu discusses things with other players, generally stays pretty active and backs up his reasoning with logic and sources. he looks pretty town to me right now.

Turns out this took a lot longer than I thought. I have to go, but I'll finish this up later today.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 14 2011 00:01 GMT
#606
@ProfBA Two things:

1: For the large analysis that I'm working on, I went through the thread and picked out every person that had been suspected. I started on the analysis, doing the players in the order I had the tabs in my web browser open, but ran out of time to finish. While I agree that Nisani may have not been the best analysis pick, there has been a lot of people pointing to Jitsu as scum. I feel that going through all the candidates who have been under suspicion and then posting my analysis will benefit both me and the rest of the town by showing what my reasoning is on all these candidates. I will try to clean up the ones I still have to do, though.

2: Why am I a pick for lynching?
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 14 2011 00:06 GMT
#608
@MrZentor Within an hour. I'm working on it now.
Friendship is Magic!
Spaackle
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States153 Posts
December 14 2011 00:26 GMT
#618
@ProfBA I explained in my last post that I wasn't really doing my analysis in any sort of order, just what order my tabs ended up in. I posted what I had because I needed to leave and I wanted to get at least some information out before I went.

Also, to pick who I analyzed, I skimmed the thread and pulled up the filter of anyone who had been suspected of being scum. My method for doing it may not have been the best, but I'm trying to fix that for the rest of my analysis.
Friendship is Magic!
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena14706
ComeBackTV 2756
TaKeTV 686
Hui .634
3DClanTV 456
Rex270
EnkiAlexander 266
mcanning199
CranKy Ducklings183
Reynor175
UpATreeSC147
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena14407
Hui .617
Rex 265
mcanning 191
Reynor 165
UpATreeSC 129
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 5084
Flash 1791
Jaedong 1778
Barracks 1616
BeSt 1040
EffOrt 958
Mini 676
ggaemo 640
Stork 573
Snow 506
[ Show more ]
Soma 295
Soulkey 280
GuemChi 250
ZerO 225
Rush 154
Hyun 85
Dewaltoss 70
TY 58
soO 40
Sacsri 38
Sea.KH 36
scan(afreeca) 29
sas.Sziky 24
Yoon 17
Movie 15
Terrorterran 15
Bale 6
Dota 2
syndereN467
420jenkins350
XcaliburYe314
Counter-Strike
sgares728
fl0m382
flusha232
byalli77
edward46
Super Smash Bros
Westballz36
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor73
Other Games
singsing2024
hiko1131
crisheroes441
Fuzer 162
ArmadaUGS91
KnowMe76
QueenE53
ZerO(Twitch)19
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH237
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2589
• WagamamaTV611
• masondota2460
League of Legends
• Nemesis6000
• TFBlade833
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
18h 36m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 19h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.