EPTSteamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
| ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I think this game is going to be pretty cool. The multilynch mechanic scares me, though. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
In regards to liars and lurkers: I've always liked to lynch both as typically it teaches people not to lie or to lurk (less so with the lurking). Lurking makes people hard to read, which has a tendency to piss me off and lying is a pain in the ass because how do we know that's the only thing said person has lied about? More later. Classtime now. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I didn't see your post before I posted. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I have a question. Why should we be lynching any more than two people today? Part of me thinks that is a terrible idea; however, the closer we get to lylo, the less we can do that, correct? Also, wherebugsgo hurts my brain a little bit. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I've read chaoser's iso and I terribly want to believe he is town but my gut begs to differ with me. So I think I'm going to have to vote him :/ ##Vote:Chaoser | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
##unvote: Chaoser ##vote sinani206 There is no way I am letting kenpachi/chaoser get lynched over sinani based on what I've seen so far in this game. And yes, chaoser, I know I was your king but you died on me! That was a little bit rude of you to do, though. Now, I think I have an idea but first it is bacon time. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I just fail to understand why you guys would rather lynch him over sinani. That is the only reason I did it. Also, in retrospect, I have no idea why the hell I did that d1. That should be changed soon. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Sorry I'm an idiot. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I've removed the antivote. It'll take a little while to show up. :/ Again, to everyone playing: I'm sorry I'm an idiot. However, that being said... idiot != scum I thought it was a good idea at the time. Anyhow, I'll be back after class. Hopefully you guys will chill out by then. Greymist: Yes, I do. From what I've seen of his town play in the past, I felt he was town. If I'm wrong, I'm sorry. I have to go right now, but as soon as I'm back from class (around 4 pm PST, it's nearly two now) I will try to explain more. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. On November 17 2011 06:56 Drazerk wrote: I got the null void that I always get from kenpachi what exactly led you to believing he was town? He just felt more town to me than some of the other people in game.I felt trying to save someone I'd thought was town was a good idea, at least at that point in time. On November 17 2011 06:58 Drazerk wrote: Lanaia one last question - Was you aware your anti vote would appear in the vote list? I knew it would appear in the votelist with my name attached, yes. On November 17 2011 07:06 Zephirdd wrote: Kenpachi is saying a lot and defending himself a lot, but isn't giving anything conclusive. I already voted him to "pressure" him to give a good reasoning/analysis on the game(similar to Palmar's), but it's no use. The vote stands, and won't go back. That said, I'd like to know Lanaia's reasoning for the anti-vote, and WHY to take it back right now. I believe you had a good reasoning for Kenpachi to be town this game, and I want to know it. I also believe you were not aware that the Anti-Vote would show your name. However, why take it back? Why not just explain yourself later on(when you have the time), and convince people that Kenpachi is actually town? Why just let him die like that, are you trying to remove any "connections" people made between you and him? Or did you actually change your mind and are trying to actually lynch him? (Or are you Mafia trying to save your ass by team-killing?) It just feels scummy imo. ##Vote: Lanaia I took it back because people got all pissy at me. And people getting pissy at me frustrates me. I've already said I'm terrible at convincing people. And if I were trying to lynch him, I'd have a vote on him, no? And no, I am not mafia trying to save my ass because that would not be the best way to go about it. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. I don't care if you don't believe me. Now I am going to finish reading the game. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
Oh, and I didn't consult with town because that would essentially mean a full role claim d1- not something I wanted to do. CLEARLY I SCREWED SOMETHING UP. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
YES, I SCREWED UP... But we already have one person dead because of something I did. We really should not be lynching three people on the first day, or at least WE SHOULD MAKE ONE OF THOSE PEOPLE ONE OF THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE SAID VERY LITTLE SO FAR. Wouldn't it be a pity if kenpachi, chaoser and I are all town? I know I'm town, kenpachi's actions since he've died feel town, and chaoser does not feel as scummy as some other people do. Do we really want to lose three town on a first day lynch? I just looked through the OPs and I'm having trouble finding something. Is this like other TL mafia games in which mafia has more than one KP or is this like games I'm used to on MS where mafia only has one KP? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:36 Palmar wrote: you're the one that needs to die, kenpachi wasn't a must, but getting rid of him is fine anyway. and chaoser is scum, so we need to kill him. I'm sorry, but can you 100% explain to me why I need to die still? I've explained everything. I knew the antivote was going to appear, and does it really matter, CONSIDERING I could remove it? Or is it something other than that? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:42 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Stop apologising. Give us your opinion on how we should proceed with the rest of the day. Staying in the 'Kenpachi actually got lynched' mindset when we could be scum hunting is detrimental. We should probably get the lurkers to post, really. I'm sure that would help us out a bit. I mean, it's fairly hard to read people who don't talk and compare behaviour when a fairly sizable chunk of the game is saying next to nothing (and has very few posts). Generating conversation is good; however, it tends to be better when the conversation isn't simply focusing on 2/3 people when there are a ton who aren't speaking. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:48 wherebugsgo wrote: Also Lanaia this is really bothering me, but for whatever reason I feel inclined to use female pronouns whenever I refer to you. It's completely irrelevant to the game but unless you have a preference I'm just going to keep calling you by your name lol. Lanaia is my real name and I am female, so refer to me as whatever you want in regards to that. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 17 2011 19:53 Tyrran wrote: @Lanaia : So you did not want to claim d1, yet you used your anti-vote fully aware that he would show up?? This contradiction is the reason i still think you migth be scum. Conclusion Likely scum : Drazerk, Hyshes, Palmar, Hiroruby, Sinani206 Likely Town : Lanaia, LemonWalrus, GreyMisT, Zephirrd Confirmed Town: risk.Nuke. This is based on this analysis alone, I ignored on purpose most of the post that did not relate to the Kenpachi/lanaia Case. The goal was to find potential scum, we still need to confirm them ! I think we should not lynch anyone for now. If Kenpachi does not flip red, Focus on the likely scum above. If not, we lynched a red :D, and back to the drawing board, to re use risk.nuke wording. What do you guys think ? I would love some feedback on this. It is because I am a goddamn idiot. Also, I agree with your reads. On November 18 2011 01:48 Sabin010 wrote: im a native speaker and still havent figured that one out bro. It is most definitely then. Okay, dammit, what was I going to say. I've forgotten... I think I am going to vote Drazerk as he does feel fairly scummy to me at this moment (after reading his ISO and people's cases on him). On November 18 2011 02:01 Drazerk wrote: Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try This in particular bothers me a lot. Especially the ending there, "will never be lynched even if they try." Certainly feels like someone is full of himself. ##Vote: Drazerk | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 18 2011 10:58 wherebugsgo wrote: In addition, Lanaia's anti-vote on him meant that we NEEDED to lynch one of them. There was no choice, we need the information. If one of them is scum the other is almost guaranteed to be scum, simply because an anti-vote on day 1 like that is incredibly scummy. Notice how Lanaia has had almost no thread presence since then. If kenpachi flips scum then this is probably why. She excused herself and said sorry and now has had no influence on town concerns at all. One: I had class all day today. Two: my teachers announced exams after this game started so I've been studying as well. Indeed it's a shame they were both town. I really did not expect sinani to be town. Kenpachi's role was kinda cool. And right now, I'm not sure what to say. It's been a while since I last played on TL and don't really know what to talk about at night. | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 18 2011 23:50 Palmar wrote: I was under the impression Lanaia has played quite a bit on globalgamers (IRC mafia) I recall something about that from PTP2. If I'm wrong, well then I'm sorry I guess. IRC mafia is not the same as forum mafia. I am a hell of a lot better at IRC mafia than at forum mafia. Also, I'm really sorry if I don't post much within the next... 12 hours (unless the highway is shut down, I'll be working tonight). I hate this feeling I have. I want everyone who is currently active to be town (though that is highly unlikely). Right now, I feel that only one of chaoser and Palmar can be scum (leaning Palmar); however they could technically be both town, but I get the feeling scum would not try to bus day one, am I correct in thinking this? | ||
|
Lanaia
Canada1142 Posts
On November 19 2011 06:43 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Palmar, WBG, and Chaoser: Please stop shitting all over the thread with your shouting matches. This is one quote I am fully behind. ALSO can we stop mentioning games that aren't this game? I kind of fail to see how it is relevant given the game will never be the same, even if the same people are in it (not the case here), same roles (not the case), and everyone is the same alignment as last time (unlikely as we don't have the same people). Also: On November 19 2011 08:24 Palmar wrote: Why are you reading the filter when you need to be reading the thread and applying context in order to legitimately find scum? The filter is fine, but whenever you find something you have to read the context the quote is said in. I do not disagree with Palmar's uh, what's the word... approach to scum hunting here. Also, I'm really starting to get pissed off with people just quoting and saying shit like "k" or "lol." Or even not quoting and just saying that stuff. It's NOT productive in the slightest AND contributes to the fact we are at page 66 already. Don't complain about the amount of pages if you are one of the people who contributed to it in such a way as I just mentioned. Also, just saw that LSB died. I was not expecting that, to be honest (however I have no idea who I would have expected in the first place). Now, I don't understand why Drazerk is voting me, and I'm not fully sure I want to understand why he's voting me. Again, as with yesterday, I still believe Drazerk to be scum. ##vote: Drazerk I think I'm going to have to reread the thread for anything else, though. | ||
| ||
