EPTLord of the Rings Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Also, curu mentioned earlier that he could rebalance the setup with 25/26 rather than 30, so that probably means there is a 4:1 scum ratio. Finally: ##Vote raynpelikoneet | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 17 2011 09:29 heist wrote: No. No. Do not claim if you have the ring unless you want to die. I think you misread what I said. I said that the ring holder should only claim if he decided he needed to pass it off or had a role requiring him to pass it. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 17 2011 11:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: Would you provide some info why would you like to heve me lynched? And why would you ever want to claim you have/had The Ring (at least at this stage of a game - or with this stage of info). Do you really think it's wise? Mainly to get a response from a player I've never played with before. Feel free to prove to me why you shouldn't be lynched. Obviously whoever has the ring should not claim. What I said was for the player to claim if they ever passed on the ring, since they were very likely be town. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
If not, the trolling has to stop now wherebugsgo. Players who are stating that they are busy, but will contribute later need to be constantly hounded to post. The moment we forget about them, they get away with posting the minimum to stay alive and give up basically no information. sandroba, I'm hoping to hear from you on Sunday as early as possible. Wiggles, what are your thoughts so far? raynpelikoneet responded reasonably and didn't get overly defensive so I'll remove my vote from him. ##unvote Navillus, I feel as if you're pulling the noob card. This is your 6th game, you should know better than to claim day one. I looked through your older games and couldn't find any other instance where you opened the game with a claim, combined with the fact you decided to sound really angry with the random censored swears, makes me suspicious. Besides the random vote on Drazerk, who do you suspect right now? chaoser, what makes prplhz stand out compared to all the other ring/general advice posts in the thread? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 18 2011 02:11 Navillus wrote: 6th game != learned anything in 1-5, esp. cause I died really quickly in some and wasn't paying that much attention to most of them so I couldn't really learn. Also you're either lying about looking through my games, or just didn't really try, cause last game I played I opened with basically the same line, a complaint about getting VT yet again (I think it was cosmic horror, if not it was 2 games ago in werewolves but I'm pretty sure it was cosmic horror.). Fair enough, I used vt and town as my keywords, which apparently filters out townie, so I take that back. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
Palmar decides he isn't going to read the thread the first two days JeeJee goes and randomly votes for himself Erandorr has 9 pre-game posts and one real post Archon_Toilet has two posts about flavor Pyo has nothing of interest If we don't call people out for doing nothing, scum are going to take advantage and lurk the game away. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 18 2011 17:37 syllogism wrote: Unfortunately a bunch of veterans are getting away with posting nothing at all (Jeejee/Sandroba/Palmar), but at least the latter two have an excuse due to not being around and I'm willing to ignore jeejee on day 1 due to his recent game history. Hmm? Does Palmar have an excuse for not being around? I thought that was by choice. WBG, you currently lead the vote, but a lot of people are claiming they are willing to spare you because you are third party. If that was the case, I would consider it as well. Are you willing to come out and claim black? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 00:50 chaoser wrote: Kira an, what do you think about navillus and prphlz? prplhz hasn't really stood out to me one way or another. He used his first few posts to talk about flavor, but so has half the other players in the game. The only thing that gives me bad vibes is that when he posted his list of candidates, he included nav based on others arguments rather than sharing his own opinion. nav opened the game with that "rage" vt role claim, but then he followed up with his name claim, which I'm not sure scum would so willingly give up. I don't like the fact that he is trying to show that he is bad at the game, however. On September 19 2011 01:02 Navillus wrote: Oh my wow... Please filter Ciryandor's posts, it's a big collection of "well I think X but maybe not X and Y is also possible but maybe we shouldn't because bad stuff could happen" He's super indecisive about his thoughts, then instead of giving a real opinion he decides to vote for inactives over any of the people who actually have cases made against them, this is very scummy this late because he's voting for someone with almost no chance of getting lynched AND with very little reasoning to back it up because he's inactive, this allows scum to get away with meaningless votes that don't tell us anything about them, or if we do manage to lynch an inactive it won't be a scum one because they'll shift the vote to a town inactive since, you know, we can't tell the difference. They're inactives. Now as I mentioned, it's late in the day so I don't think I can get him lynched so I'll leave it at FOS Ciryandor but on a very related note ##Vote pphlz Ciryandor has done nice little soft defends of him at least twice now, the first time saying that pphlz is a "good guy" the second he tries to use his inactive lynch idea to divert attention specifically from pphlz, so I say we lynch pphlz, then if he flips red we've got another definite red in Ciryandor. To be honest, this post right above me might be his biggest fault. The fact that he spends an entire post about Ciryandor and then manages to squeeze a prplhz vote right in the middle without giving a reason other than "I can't get him lynched". TranceStorm is guilty for the same thing a few posts earlier. chaoser, what is your opinion on nav? Are you still sticking to prplhz? JeeJee and Radfield dropping off the face of the earth makes me uneasy and Erandorr, I'd like to hear more of your opinion rather than you asking others for theirs. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
##Vote Erandorr | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 06:31 Erandorr wrote: I thought this was in the voting thread cause of migs post there. And my defence is there. (just kill me now this really isnt my week -.- ) Do you plan to repost what you had edited out? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 07:18 supersoft wrote: sorry guys, i was on the road the whole day and only have my telephone to post today. i vote iGrok because of the reasons i gave in my last post. You're basically trying to get away with a no vote. The lynch is tied and you're voting for the guy with 2 votes on him? Why not comment on the current situation? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 08:10 jcarlsoniv wrote: I believe he gave you a pass for the vote, but you will still need to make your 5 post quota...I think? Preferably more than 5. :/ | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 08:45 iGrok wrote: Erandorr - somehow appeared on his own vote list? Wait, what? Is there a scum politician or something? He never posted to change his vote. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 19 2011 13:12 DoctorHelvetica wrote: antagonistic/rude trying to get under peoples skin almost purely defensive play focusing only on people who criticized or voted for you everyone discounting the possibility you're scum begging for ring day 1 and spamming spam im done go read my posts ive said enough about you im not gonna keep repeating myself The fact that he is antagonistic/rude actually makes me come to the other conclusion, considering his attitude as town in some of the past games. When he was just plain trolling to start the game, rather than getting under peoples skins is what initially caused the red flags. On September 19 2011 18:32 Jackal58 wrote: Alright, it's night time now. Give Bugs the ring and get him out of here. Do you have a post restriction or something? On September 19 2011 21:37 chaos13 wrote: I haven't had a chance to read the case(s) on Erandorr in much depth but whenever town flips as a lynch D1 there will be at least one scum on their wagon. Granted, this time around he was lynched with a very small percentage of votes so it's possible that they stayed away from it. Either way look at the vote lists of people who didn't get lynched and you'll find scum. Especially on WBG (assuming he is town or third party and not mafia himself) because that is an easy justification for mafia vote D1. He was being pretty much useless and this gives them a great excuse to vote for someone. Check out Dr.H, iGrok, and Jackal on that list. All three players should know better. Sorry I couldn't be around to do more than vote and leave again yesterday. I'll do my best to be more present in the future. Oh god. "There will be at least one scum on their wagon" "Well, maybe not" "Look at the vote lists of those who didn't get lynched" How non-committal can you get? You're essentially saying there are either scum on the wagon or off the wagon. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 20 2011 10:14 chaoser wrote: Also want to say a my bad to prplhz. I'll post my thoughts in a bit, but are you claiming the hit that caused his bodyguard to die or are you just saying sorry for pushing his lynch? | ||
| ||
