On September 08 2011 04:27 bumatlarge wrote:
I'm not role fishing, im simply stating that I think everyone has an ability. No one needs to counter claim that, but I half my fun in mafia is speculation. Don't think anyone should be voting anyone yet, we need 9 for a lynch, so silly accusations aren't gonna cut it 5 minutes into the game.

What does needing 9 for a lynch have to do with your idea that we shouldn't be voting each other?

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 07 2011 22:01 GMT

#130

I'm still wondering why 9 votes to lynch means we shouldn't be voting anyone yet.

You have a lot of "people misrepresented and twisted words, they're scum" in your posts but you're doing the exact same thing. GGQ did not point any finger at you, he was asking JeeJee why he chose to vote GGQ instead of you.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 01:51 GMT

#147

Oh Nemesis where are you?

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 20:01 GMT

#180

I would rather kill TAA.

##Unvote
Vote TheAwesomeAll

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 20:01 GMT

#181

##Vote TheAwesomeAll

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 20:36 GMT

#182

Let's get this thread going. If not TAA I would be down for GGQ.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 21:07 GMT

#194

I don't agree with the case on iGrok. I don't think scum would put themselves so out there at the start of the game without trying to push something, and he's not really trying to push any objective. I find GGQ a bit suspicious for trying to throw suspicion on an obvious RV before the game even started.

TAA's posts have been a lot of nothing relevant. I feel best about him, especially with his response to Bayonnet's post. He says it's good analysis but then that it's all irrelevant because it's an OMGUS. If it's good analysis it obviously isn't an OMGUS.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 08 2011 22:49 GMT

#220

On September 09 2011 06:20 Mig wrote:
Palmar how is iGrok opening the game with a planned vote on BA impulsive?

The iGrok defense doesn't make sense. All he did was put a vote on the smurf basically stating it is nothing and just a pressure vote. So how exactly is that putting himself out there? Also I don't know why you guys are even defending him in the first place.

What does iGrok as scum stand to gain by doing what he was doing? BA wasn't going to get lynched from what he posted and if he just wanted somewhere easy to park his vote well there were a plethora of other people random voting for no reason, he could've just blended right in.

@Bayonnet
I really don't see posting stuff like "I'm on edge" being a Mafia tell. Mafia would be more careful not to post stupid shit like that.

You're taking iGrok's play on day 1 in the first few pages (this game) and saying he's scum because it's not the same as iGrok's play on like day 4 or 5 of another game (XLIV). Well duh it's going to be different, there's actual material to go off when you're on day 4/5 while no one has a solid read on anyone else on day 1.

The only actual scummy thing I've seen from iGrok so far is this:

On September 08 2011 11:20 iGrok wrote:
Look, if you want to tunnel someone, that's fine. Just pick someone else to fight with.

Where he doesn't try to discourage tunneling even when it's harmful to Town.

I would feel good with TAA today.

On September 09 2011 04:18 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
random vote, ergo scum, is a pretty bad base for an analysis. the rest of your analysis is pretty good but starting it of with that random vote makes me think you are mainly attacking him because he voted for you.

On September 09 2011 06:18 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
##unvote
##vote bumatlarge
of iGrok and GGQ, iGrok is the scummiest but the case against either is pretty bad.

From "case is good" to "case is OMGUS" to "case is bad, let's vote bumatlarge" (where did the case against bum come from?).

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 09 2011 01:13 GMT

#248

iGrok has some bad wording in his posts. Nothing else he has done makes him look particularly Town or scum really, but Mafia love to try to lynch people for badly worded posts. I would know, I basically used that method to secure multiple mislynches as scum in XLIV.

Palmar calling him sure Town is ridiculous as well, but that's Palmar. Posting in stupid hyperboles is what he does.

Let's lynch TAA.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 09 2011 01:24 GMT

#251

On September 09 2011 10:15 chaos13 wrote:
I'd switch to TAA or iGrok if I thought either of them were good lynches. The question raised now is which is worse - no lynch or town lynch? One of them at least gives us information from a flip. Cause it doesn't look like GGQ will be hanging tonight.

What makes you think GGQ is a better lynch? Your post about him was pretty neutral but now he's the best lynch?

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 09 2011 02:24 GMT

#262

rofl, so my vote randomly attracts people to sheep my vote without thinking he's scum? Clearly you think something is up with TAA too since you keep mentioning him as a major lynch candidate.

Curu

Canada2817 Posts

September 09 2011 02:29 GMT

#266

If someone I thought was scummy was pushing in a vote for someone I thought was Town, I wouldn't give a shit about how many votes he has, I'd be trying to dissuade it.

So did these 5 votes come out of thin air? Or are they the entire Mafia team all early voting the same lynch?

That WBG is trying to accuse me of being the only reason TAA is picking up heat is ridiculous.