EPTI've written the guidelines for the tech support forum and I've been getting PM's to answer people's tech problems and have done so.
I have been banned for 4-5 times if I remember correctly, but don't take my word for it I can't remember 100%.
Every time I've been banned has been because of nothing. I have been banned on the excuse of "conspiracy theory" or ignorance like that, when in fact I have been banned by people who are less knowledgeable about the stuff I'm talking about and disagree with me on the topic.
Before the last ban, I was banned for three month because I said that Barack's Obama the most public person on earth birth certificate was fake. I mean he is a public person, he is open to attacks and criticism. especially when there is base for it like hiding his real full form birth certificate for 3 years and spending millions of dollars on lawyers to hide the issue. I mean I would call that suspicious, a man who has nothing to hide doesn't just spend millions of dollars hiding his birth certificate and avoid any mention of it.
But in the least case is free speech, its personal opinion that is posted in a thread asking if you think his birth certificate is false or not. I mean what I'm I supposed to do, say no its real just so I don't get banned ? Its a thread asking for personal opinion, I post mine personal opinion based on facts and research and I get banned.
The latest case being with me being banned for writing the obvious fact that the mujahedins were created by the USA government in the 79 and if they are created, funded and managed by the USA isn't it stupid to look at them as the terrorists? Especially since you've been lied to by Bush that Iraq:
1. Was harboring terrorists
2. Then it was that he was helping terrorists
3. Then it was he had chemical weapons
4. Then it was he had nuclear weapons
5. Then it was he just has every weapon of mass destruction
6. Finally 6 years after it came out that Iraq had nothing do to with terrorists, had absolutely no weapons of mass destruction and that they barely had ammunition for their AK47's !!!
But lets talk about the other thing I posted which was that Brezinski admited in a French magazine to creating the mujahedins in 79 and that Pentagon officials invited anwar al-awlaki to dine with the at the pentagon just months after the 9/11 attacks.
Now here is the post I send to Nyovne beofre being banned, explaining that I had sources, links and facts on which I post this info.
Thanks for your warning buddy, but no thanks. Hey so Fox news lied about the al-qaeda terrorist being invited to dine with pentagon officials months after 9/11(prolly to congratulate him on job well done) and Brezinski was imagining they set up the mujahedins in the 79?
Again I don't see any rules on TL that say anything about "facts" being presented and that pentagon dining was admitted later on. The official excuse was they wanted to talk to al-qaeda and be friends. Yeah right, sorry I'm not a child to believe that crap.
But hey guess Bin Laden wasn't treated at the US hospital in Dubai http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/nov/01/afghanistan.terrorism
"Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere. "
This article was written in 2001, 2 years before the Iraq war, so I guess I need to be stupid once again and just accept that imaginary terorists want to kill everybody. And even though Iraq had nothing to do with al-qaeda and had no weapons of massive destruction as Bush lied. But yes lets trust Bush against overwhelming evidence who already lied about weapons of massive destruction in Iraq and go against all common sense and logic.
BTW buddy, where is the rule that says don't post "FACTS" on TL? I'm sick and tired of you abusing your power on me for actually posting some real facts into a childish conversation.
Again I don't see any rules on TL that say anything about "facts" being presented and that pentagon dining was admitted later on. The official excuse was they wanted to talk to al-qaeda and be friends. Yeah right, sorry I'm not a child to believe that crap.
But hey guess Bin Laden wasn't treated at the US hospital in Dubai http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/nov/01/afghanistan.terrorism
"Two months before September 11 Osama bin Laden flew to Dubai for 10 days for treatment at the American hospital, where he was visited by the local CIA agent, according to the French newspaper Le Figaro.
The disclosures are known to come from French intelligence which is keen to reveal the ambiguous role of the CIA, and to restrain Washington from extending the war to Iraq and elsewhere. "
This article was written in 2001, 2 years before the Iraq war, so I guess I need to be stupid once again and just accept that imaginary terorists want to kill everybody. And even though Iraq had nothing to do with al-qaeda and had no weapons of massive destruction as Bush lied. But yes lets trust Bush against overwhelming evidence who already lied about weapons of massive destruction in Iraq and go against all common sense and logic.
BTW buddy, where is the rule that says don't post "FACTS" on TL? I'm sick and tired of you abusing your power on me for actually posting some real facts into a childish conversation.
Again this ignorant banning on the basis of "conspiracy theory" which is actually FACT with sources and links posted is really getting out of control. Its like if I was a mod and
I didn't agree with someone's political or religious or whatever beliefs I can ban them like its a joke. But its even worse than that, because it banning for posting FACTS. If you think the USA didn't create the mujahedins go talk to Brezinski. If you think Iraq had nuclear weapons go talk to Bush, if you think Osama is the evil terrorist then go talk to the french intelligence agent that TOLD that US was going to attack Iraq (1 year) ups sorry, it was actually 2 years before it happened. (READ UP the article date)
I mean I'm being banned here for writing the actual facts, which they are if you know they are going to attack Iraq 1 year and more before it happens.
I would appreciate if there is a new rule on TL.net that has mods removed if they ban someone based on ignorance. I would also like Nyovne and Pa4demic to get banned from TL.net as they are clearly in violation of the power and I would like my ban history to be erased.
