EPTTL Mafia L
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Ok, I have been looking for clues in the first 6 pages,I'll post stuff as I go, day 1 it's hard to get a good case going against anyone,but this is to note: I'm not the best townie here so you might be asking yourself why am I running for mayor, I came here to win and I think the best thing to do as a townie is to try and win the election By Risk.nuke Things that strike me: This guy wants to win, but recognizes he is far from the best townie.What do we do, as townies? Think logically, not run for mayor cause we have a BIG ego.And this is basically what he is doing. The amount of GREEN in his post made me lean towards mafia instead of a blue role, cause he wants to slip under the radar. Conclusion:I think he wants DT immunity, and shows some scumminess. A decent choice for a day 1 lynch. Else he is a bad townie with a big ego, but ,,always townie, never not townie,, doesnt fully convince me and I think he's feeling a bit guilty. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
This guy is not town, he runs for mayor, gives advice Sandroba has so far made 1 post, not giving out a ton, i encourage him to be posting more. Protactinium tries to have a fight on day 1 on the basis that mr wiggles' campaign is not stone-solid. My policy as town would'nt be Lynch all Liars, because non-newb mafia don't lie usually and that you may easily lynch a blue role, which has to make more use of lies than a townie.I would lynch all those unproductive enough to start a fight so easily as Protactinium has. So, day 1 candidates for a lynch, in order: Risk.nuke Protactinium Bumat | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I was hastily posting from school's computer.Bumat is 3rd on my list which means,, wait and see,, He's not town, that's all the reads i have on him. Ill be waiting for Bill Murray to show up to the thread before I even consider him or his candidacy. So far I'm leaning towards voting for Cheese, as he is one of the few people in this game I have experience with. I am more likely to recognize his scum play if he is scum and, lets face it, he has a flaming pony as his campaign picture. So Cheese, since you opened the game with a vote on Wiggles, and he is now also running for mayor, will you be hanging him upon your election? This post and the analysis bumat made on it DO AGREE with. What bugs me with bumat is that his post on blues seems suspicious, as either he's claiming a blue or he is red leading the blues in error by telling them to moderate their actions and not give info as quickly to town. I EDITED THE POST 3 MINUTES AFTER I POSTED REASON: BAD SPELLING. It's not like i went,, On second thought'' then edited 3 mins after because i wanted to say something else. Now i have time, i'll deal with gcq and the others. Right now, my goal is to have the best chance of lynching scum on day 1.PERIOD. Day 1 is a jumble usually,you can not say who is scum and who isnt for sure.Need more info. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Else he is just a bad townie with a big ego Biggest reason is that I think you're red.Lynching scum is good.Lynching bad townies is middle-to-bad. Lynching townies who really think well is bad. Lynching blues is terribad. Really,I have a big mouth and am not afraid to admit it. So i start pointing fingers. So far i see that you have returned my accusation against me.I could counter-argue that you make me a wordbender when I quoted your post word for word. I can't make anything out of a mayoral campaign that says''Vote me.I am bad at playing scum, I am very good at getting scum lynched''.That is generic. We want a mayor that comes up with sensible,spot-on accusations, not Vagueness. Like others also said, there is bound to be scum trying for mayor.That combined with your post which showsreturned accusations, like you would need to defend by attacking another.Do you feel guilty? | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 13 2012 14:56 Protactinium wrote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Show nested quote + On January 13 2012 14:26 Ciryandor wrote: /confirm LOL I won't vote for Kitaman after XLVIII's disaster. He was an absolute derp in that. Waiting for people to put in a serious campaign with a decent policy. This is why I'm waiting for Mr. Wiggles and Cyber_Cheese to provide us with good reasons; and right now, Wiggles has the best campaign of the lot. I of course wonder if Sandroba or Palmar will try to get to the elections again. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm running for mayor on the platform of lynching Ciryandor. There's no way you seriously think Mr. Wiggles has the best campaign. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey I agree with this guy, so I'm voting him. I am very much a fan of killing Ciryandor. You give no reason, cite a troll post, yet you are active.I have delved into town-Palmar and yes, town-Palmar usually runs for mayor or takes interest in mayoral elections.More than one-liner posts would be helpful.FoS Palmar. D3, why lynch BM? He first got involved in elections by Foolishness and then posted to say why CC is hypocritical, which is semi-relevant.Maybe he is trying to defend bumat. On the other hand sandro has been like,, I will be running for mayor''. BUT and I can tell you that keeping me alive will improve town's chances by a lot Blueclaim. Rgtheschworz signing out | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Anyway, I was just fishing for info. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I will format better in the future. So far BC and BM have the most solid cases for mayor. BC-He has been active as he promised so far, is beggining to scumhunt, and ,,I am accountable for my actions'' has convinced me more than the generic things VE, risk, sandroba have been posting. BM-Now I don't know who this guy is, but one thing i'll give him: He had initiative at the start of day 1, built up a believable case against CC trying to force a mislynch, has some support from the town. Still, I will be waiting about 8 more h to decide on my vote.Hoping to see more from those 2 | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I'm gonna vote BM, as Sandroba has the highest chance of being scum out of potential candidates.His posts have been weird enough, he runs for mayor then isnt particularly active or scum-hunting,some of his posts like the one with the eagle landing on his arm disturbed me. I'll keep an eye on the following: Risk.nuke, Palmar. I feel palmar still has a role to play. Don't lynch him day1, maybe day 2 if he continues like that. The whole mason thing started by BC was useless in my opinion.50/50 chance of being mafia/town. Bollocks, they're maybe more town masons than mafia, maybe less. You can't know that, unless maybe.. you have external information. Also, as sandro is suspicious and BC had made a sort of a deal with him, my feelings about this persona shall remain mixed at best. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
If he continues to post 1-liners and fluff, then you confirm what you said, right now. It is suspicious that he wants VE, because VE has f-ed up with his partnership with CC, he turned back on him almost instantly, remember?AND he keeps calling VE bad. But Macpo has raised FoS on himself because of his apologetic behavior, etc. Contrast this to Adam, who is himself relatively newbie, but seems more confident AND DOESNT MAKE LISTS. I will support any investigations on Palmar's actions ON DAY 2 | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
| ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Also we should focus on 1 or 2 lynch candidates, and pressure them hard, else we let them get away with diverting attention and starting third-party wagons. Right now, those would be Risk.nuke and Macpo. I encourage them to post in the next 6 hours, else they're scum in my eyes.They're from EU too, so they have no excuse. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
I noticed you actually only contribute when you are threatened.Your post confirms that.Suspicious but not nearly enough to make a case. Then You proceed by attacking your attackers, namely JayJay and me. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 15 2012 02:29 Jayjay54 wrote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Show nested quote + On January 15 2012 02:17 risk.nuke wrote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- He made some bad posts and then disappears, agree. It's odd, but some people have to do stuff on the weekend. He's def a candidate though - Jay -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I just realised this. Look at my posthistory and tell me if you would describe it as "I made some bad posts". SCUM for softdefending me without seeing my filter. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't know, if I should respond to that. L had a point and called me out for a reason. I like to clarify things then. And it is important to do so. But your accusation is clearly OMGUS. I didn't even really accuse you and said you might be busy during the weekend. Who are you to tell me that I didn't look into your filter and that I don't keep a spreadsheet? That's just not right. Also, notice how I said bad, not scummy. So a) you're campaign "always a townie" was just. well, bad. I didn't like it, it felt generic, it was badly formated and it lacked a solid gameplan. b) calling out rgSchworz because he didn't like your campaign either in a very agressive and condescending way. again, not even really scummy. just bad. All in all yeah, I think you are one candidate to look out for. After this post even more. Although, and I repeat myself here, I don't even think you're scummy, but you seem scummy, because your posts lack quality. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What omgus are you speaking of? Try to get into my head as I am getting into his head. He is doing a typical scum-move, softdefend the townie, In itself it's not a scummy move. Scum loves to do this but townies do this to and that is not what I am reacting on. Here is the thing. Jay refered to my posts as bad. Which to anyone who looks at them could see they are clearly not bad. They are few but there isn't a single irrelevant/bad post in there. So why would anyone call them bad? Well they wouldn't. So why would Jay defend me without reading my filter. Well because he is scum and therefor know I am town and unluckily assumed that the reason I was looked at was a bad post. He was beeing uncarefull and made a scumslip. And Jay haven't accused me so how can It be omgus. Look at the mass contradictions in his followup post. "I wasn't accusing you, but this is omgus" and "I don't think you're scum but you're scummy" <--- WHAT? He is also bringing up rgSchwors which makes no sense unless perhaps feels it's more pro-town to ignore attacks on you. I was just arguing/discussion with rhSchwors when he attacked my candidacy which is the natural thing to do. He's just trying hard to make me look bad. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On January 15 2012 02:32 Mattchew wrote: yay for risk.nuke and jayjay tunneling one another because they disagree -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- mattchew, he might be tunneling the me, but I am clearly not tunneling him with one post. Why on earth did you make a post like that for because it's purpose seemed to be to minimize, lessen and prevent discussion of this. Which seems incredibly biased. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If I'm elected I'll lynch Jay, I support BC for the election stronger then before because of jay's efforts against him. You're working based on the assumption that your posts are awesome, which they are not. You have started a campaign then continued by NOT PUTTING ANY EFFORT.You accuse JayJay on no basis, instead making the assumption that he's scum to explain your POV. Also scumpoints for using the awesome scumterm "we should" rather then "I will". Utter bullshit.You want to basically isolate me by telling me to use,, I will''. And you know that without town's support, you're free to live another day. SCUM | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Try to get into my head as I am getting into his head. He is doing a typical scum-move, softdefend the townie, In itself it's not a scummy move SO he's doing a scum-move thats not a scummy move? Omg, i sense contradiction | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
You are not defending your case. I am NOT convinced JayJay is town, only thing I know about him is that he's active, and seems not to contradict himself.And that he's probably german. Distinguishing bad townie play from scum play is very hard Oh really? Bad townies usually don't have a spider sense that tells them to accuse whoever accused them. That is what you are doing right now, may I remind you. And I don't work based on townreads. I know that we have limited opportunities to lynch scum, and i'm trying to get this done. At the moment, you're not defending yourself, you aren't saying anything of importance other than the fact that I may be stupid, you are trying to avoid this issue I raised multiple times.One more nail in the coffin and you're certainly red in my eyes. | ||
|
rgTheSchworz
Romania425 Posts
Considering he has few posts it shouldn't take long to analyze. | ||
| ||
