[T][M]Experimental Haunted Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
As to my intentions, I'm a perfect gentleman, I assure you | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
YDDE Q ______ (note 6 missing letters) -> "Inno a" -> "Inno a Satana" | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Heh, that would be somewhat appropriate | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
Might be too far fetched if the answer is "logical" because there's no one clear answer based on that | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 04:21 DoctorHelvetica wrote: there is a severe misunderstanding of the puzzle so i will intervene this once. there is more than one number input in the combination. Well that was the initial assumption, but the problem to me is that there are so many possibilities, it's hard to rule anything out and you only get one chance. Of course, we just could be missing something incredibly obvious. | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 05:55 Varpulis wrote: and out of curiosity what was the thought process that led to the solution, for those of us who didn't dismiss it as too simple an answer. L E V I A T H A N 12-5-22-9-1-20-8-1-14 | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
I don't know DrH at all, but this line of thinking rules out at least Varpulis/Trotske/Curu/Me and probably a few others. These players also aren't likely night 0 cult recruiting targets. I'll further narrow it down to meapak/kita/bumat/coag/amber/palmar/mig. I'm eliminating mig/palmar from consideration rather arbitrarily for now. Coag seems to be playing his recent style of "not actually playing the game", so voting him would be tempting. Amber hasn't been doing anything either. Bumat has been only marginally more active while meapak and kita have been putting more effort into this. I think a cult recruit would be putting more effort into this, so I'll be deciding between those two, or possibly amber, tomorrow. These are quite weak reasons for lynching someone, but I've to work with what I have. | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On August 06 2011 08:09 kitaman27 wrote: Why is everyone so certain that someone has been recruited into a cult? I don't know about you guys, but I was unable to perform any night actions on night zero, so I assume it is the same for others. Accusing people of being cult recruits at this point is only placing unnecessary doubt on pro-town players. syllogism, your thought process behind your vote is rather odd. Not only is it unlikely that anyone is a cult recruit, you are also punishing activity and promoting a poor thread environment. Yes, it's unfortunate but if I go on the path of lynching useless lurkers, I will still be stuck lynching lurkers by day 4. I will of course reconsider based on thread activity. I'm also not completely against lynching someone based on being worthless, but I'm inclined to believe that in the likely setup the scum will not be found there. There are flavor and more substantial reasons for believing the game did not begin as a standard 9/3 setup. Whether there is a recruiter or if DrH is making the decisions is another story. Nothing about the setup is obviously guaranteed, but you would have to provide me reasons for me to believe that it's a normal setup. | ||
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
| ||