Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia III

On June 05 2011 03:22 OriginalName wrote:


I think I can answer this instead of Palmer.

1. We get none, we have a free target for scum to avoid ASSUMING WE HAVE A VET.

2. Said "confirmed" townie could be scum trying to control us and avoid his lynch. We also could have no vet making counterclaiming irrelevant furthering his position.

3. It creates more Wifom (see 2)

4. Claiming in a closed setup unless about to be lynched is a pointless undertaking. We have no way of confirmed outside of death and a sane DT who could also be fakeclaiming.

On June 08 2011 15:40 OriginalName wrote:
My Defense:

Id like to first of all point out some similarities between today and yesterday:

-This bandwagon is being formed rediculously easily.
-Most people are sheeping of the reasons of one person.
-They will if I go through both be silly mislynches.

Im going to focus on the first point mainly.

In this case the most coherently explained and analysed non-sheeping opinion is from Kavdragon. He took what he thought to be scum and organised and presented it. He honestly succeded in scaring the metaphorical crap out of me. I dont deal with pressure well and came up with a shoddy defense.

Therefore I after I basically had the majority of town gunning for me I panicked but Ive come to realize that theres no reason it should have happenes that fast. Sure JeeJee tryed to defend me but lets face the fact that it justs looks like a scumbuddy trying to save me. However if I were scum why put that risk to try to save me? Im have the most heat on me atm if it were me Would have kept my trap shut and bussed.

I then chose to throw another lynch candidate out there. I chose to do this to try to give another option to us but I did not explain that at all as you can clearly see.

So now I really have no idea what to do, I'm having a hard enough time articulating what im trying to say at the moment, as such if there is anything specific youd like addressed please ask. I have absolutely nothing to hide from town.

On June 09 2011 07:41 OriginalName wrote:


... how does that REMOTELY make sense.

If I was getting bussed chances are nothing would have been said and I would not have even remotely tried. I would have died and given NO INFORMATION. The number rule of scum play IS TO NOT GIVE INFORMATION. Seriously dude stop tunneling me.

I'm willing however to move over to Unichan however in this case its mostly just to save my own hide.

##Unvote Palmer
[b]##Vote Unichan

On June 05 2011 01:26 Varpulis wrote:

yet your example made no sense whatsoever, and is almost entirely WifoM. That's not how scumhunting works. What hesmyrr is doing is how scumhunting works. Analyzing posting and content, not blindly looking at who died and who was talking about them. That can lead you to scum, but does not help identify them.

The argument "he died so she is suspicious" is terrible.

##vote mataza step it up.

On June 05 2011 05:27 Varpulis wrote:
Guys, my vote on mataza is pressure. His posting seemed a little off, and I wanted to see how he reacted to the votes. His reaction so far has been alright, though "go ahead an lynch me" isn't a good attitude. He still needs to step up his posting, but i don't have a read on him yet.

Back to the lurkers! This is stefftasiq's only post this game. He was sleeping when the day post came, I get that, but he hasn't posted again since.

He says that mataza playing differently is "interesting" and that sinani's "have not posted" list (which he was on) could be a way to divert attention from sinani. It's a bad post with very little content.

##unvote mataza
##vote stefftastiq

On June 05 2011 11:13 Varpulis wrote:

Not damning evidence by any means. At least he's sharing his opinion and his reasons why. Does seem a bit sheepy though. Not sure how you came to the conclusion "this is scum" with that analysis.

Frankly, there's not enough information on the table to properly identify scum, i think. You could say that half the players in this game are trying to be active without content. It seems to me that you really wanted to find somebody scummy, so you picked a person and figured out how is posts could be interpreted as scummy.

Lynching an inactive is good and all, but it's better to lynch the one in that group that's the least active, rather than one that's just posting fluff. We can leave them for later.

On June 05 2011 14:36 Varpulis wrote:
alright, stefftastiq's at least making an effort now. I'd be interested to see his posts when he's not drunk and tired. Get some rest steff! If you don't contribute tomorrow this vote's right back on you.

It seems that we're out of lurkers. Everybody has at least posted something. Once more time passes we'll see who isn't super active, but for now it's back to pressuring.

##unvote stefftastiq
##vote Palmar

step it up, Palmar.

On June 06 2011 00:14 Varpulis wrote:
Palmar's back and posting well. good. Most of his points make sense to me. Sinani needs to step it up as well. He has 13 posts since the game began, and only 1 with real content, and that was joining the bandwagon on stefftastiq and parroting what the rest of us gave as reasons. My vote ends up on him at the end of today if he doesn't start posting better.

Meanwhile, i found another lurker. Kavdragon has yet to post his opinion about anybody. He advocates lynching lurkers to the extent that we should "focus on lurkers" today instead of pressure and discuss. The only thing going for him is that he shot down the discussion starter vet claim plan.

He said that he won't be lurking, I'd like him to prove it.

##unvote Palmar
##vote Kavdragon

On June 06 2011 06:19 Varpulis wrote:
Alright, my vote on OriginalName is accomplishing nothing at this point. He needs to step up his posting or I'll be gunning for him later.

---

[red]sinani206[/red

My previous analysis of Sinani can be found here

Since then, he posted

In this post, he pretends that he doesn't know what he was expected to post. I call bullshit. He's avoiding posting an opinion and hiding behind his lurker vote. At this point, he's playing to a scum objective, by lurking actively and not giving us quality posts to analyze.

##unvote OriginalName
##vote sinani206

---

As an aside, i've got a major noobtown read on stefftastiq atm.