EPTSurprisingly Normal Mini Mafia II
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
 | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 16 2011 12:16 Mataza wrote: Small math problem. + Show Spoiler + 12 day1 ly nk 10 day2 ly nk 8 day 3 ly nk 6 day4 Since *not* lynching is also *not* an option, we have to get a result by day3. That is plenty of time. This should be doable. So scum is forced to lay really low, if they ever want to stand a chance. I don't understand the abbreviations in that math problem. What do you mean? | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 16 2011 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote: After rereading this post, I have a question for Mataza. At the beginning of a game, one starts to think about their goals. Your first act in this game was to count the minimum number of days before mafia wins under optimal circumstances. Why is that? Mhm, and you've also mentioned the Mafia's purported strategy, which is to stay under the radar. Something you haven't done. If you wanted someone to go off the path of finding the mafia, you would say that the strategy they would perform would be completely opposite to what you were doing. Also, you were the first one to make basic rules to know HE IS THE MAFIA. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 16 2011 23:52 VisceraEyes wrote: @nard Here's the thing...there might be special roles in the game; we don't know that there aren't. We're merely operating under the assumption that there are no PRs because until there's a special circumstance, there's no way to know otherwise. At present, I'm not really badmouthing anyone. I'm asking questions. People asking questions aren't scummy, as asking questions is all we can really do (unless you count randomly pointing fingers). If you'll direct your attention to the post in question, it's clear that I'm just trying to clarify Mataza's intentions. I actually think my post is to blame for people saying trigger-happy, as mine says HE IS THE MAFIA in all caps. Now I meant this jokingly, but it could have been taken as trigger happy. But, I do want Mayaza to answer our various questions. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 02:02 hiro protagonist wrote: good morning team. first timer here. I agree, this is off to a good start. there is no reason to suspect anyone right now, as there is very little to go on, so its a little wait and see  I agree with VisceraEyes, its important to ask alot of questions. I will want clarifications on posts I find suspicious, and please do the same for me!What do you think of the whole inactive debate? I think first day we should give them a break, but as they are more and more inactive we may want to infer scummyness. Also, its boring when people don't actually play :-P | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 02:49 Mataza wrote: I am curious what these various questions. So far I only gathered one: "Tell us why you´re/you´re not mafia!" I very well might be mafia, as everyone of you might be mafia too. But I can´t go ahead and tell you my plans before half the people posted, because then these plans wouldn´t work.(Since mafia would know what to do or what not to do.) About the inactives: Dependant on the number of inactives, it´s not a bad idea to lynch them. Low activity means they aren´t really helping the town and therefore it´s not a big loss. We wouldn´t lose any amount of discussion. But we can´t do that right now, because a) the day isn´t nearly over and b) there are too many. But people who do not post/do no vote are modkilled at the end of the cycle. I want you to respond to what I've said. I'll quote everything we've "asked you" right now: + Show Spoiler + On May 16 2011 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote: At the beginning of a game, one starts to think about their goals. Your first act in this game was to count the minimum number of days before mafia wins under optimal circumstances. Why is that? On May 16 2011 15:52 GiygaS wrote: you've also mentioned the Mafia's purported strategy, which is to stay under the radar. Something you haven't done. If you wanted someone to go off the path of finding the mafia, you would say that the strategy they would perform would be completely opposite to what you were doing. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
I am now Gigays, okay. Also, Mataza, when did I defend VisceraEyes. I only have asked you to answer our questions, that's it. If there was ever an accusation, I would never go, but Viscera didn't do that, etc. To clarify something: Why say something if you think it would just WISOM? Is it to confuse all of us? Anyway, I kind of FoS you, as you've really been the only one anyone can :/ Seriously people, TALK! P.S. To anyone who actually knows what GiygaS is: NESSNESSNESSNESSNESS | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
Inactives: 2 Guys we haven't seen, may get modkilled. Can't make an opinion on them yet. Karshe: + Show Spoiler + Hasen't really posted anything good at all. Might get modkilled, I don't know about him. stefftastiq: + Show Spoiler + Hasen't posted much but a brief "hello". Mentionned something about people being trigger-happy. I'm a tad suspicious as he should have posted again by now. Deepblu2 + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 05:41 DeepBlu2 wrote: I am here. This is off to a good start. I am active..Not sure who I think atm. On May 17 2011 11:57 DeepBlu2 wrote: I'm leaning towards Mataza at the moment. I'm not positive yet but just the fact he's defending himself so aggressively and has been caught with a couple of contradictions while blaming others as well. I'm going to be keep looking at his posts but he's my only suspect currently. I'm not saying it's definitely Mataza just the way he's handling himself is very defensive. Deepblu just posted so I haven't really had a chance to analyse his most recent post, but I'll give it a shot. His first post detailed how he's indeed "active" and he's formulating an opinion. Initially a bit scummy, if he hadn't posted anything, but he has now, so that lowers a bit of his suspicion. Based on his recent entry, he's leaning towards Mataza, based on his defensive stance. Overall, hasen't really produced much content, so I can't really say much about him. More active people: Mataza + Show Spoiler + Now, this guy seems a bit scummy to me, PROBABLY the most so far. The reasons have been brought up already: - He's implying he wants to become A leader of the town (maybe so he can control people? I don't know) - He is very defensive about his spot, very resilient to abandon anything. I don't know if this means he's mafia, but a person who goes out his way to say he's innocent seems a bit guilty :/ - Mentioned how many days Mafia has to stay alive. Good just be some helpful math. - HOWEVER after all this, he said he puts himself officially on trial. And he will only answer questions specifically asked at him. This implies he knows he has done wrong and wants to get a bit out of the spotlight. This is most likely because he's tired of constantly defending himself, but it could also be that he's Mafia and wants to sink back in to the shadows. I'm a bit suspicious of him. Also, he's got my name wrong twice now (it's not gigays, or gigas, it's giygas )VisceraEyes: + Show Spoiler + Got into Mataza as soon as the game begun, might just because he wants activity. The fact he HAS been avoiding questions to attack Mataza some more, which may imply he's trying to avoid them so that he doesn't have any answers. Don't know what I think of him, a bit suspicious. prplhz (anyone got tricks for this guy's name? )+ Show Spoiler + Seems very rational to me. Got some more discussion other then the back and forth between me, Mataza and VisceraEyes. Seems very pro-town to me, but once again, your best friends can sometimes be your worst enemies. I'm not very suspicious of him. nard + Show Spoiler + Kind of interesting. This guy has posted three times. Once to remind us all that it's too early to start making conclusions about Mataza, one that reminds us all that we have 48 hours before we have to make a decision and to take some time, and finally one that answers some suspicions on his first post, and saying he's not too suspicious of Mataza, and suspicous of me and Viscera (more Viscera). I don't know what this means, but IF we find out that Mataza is indeed a Mafia, I believe this guy is probably a cohort based on his behind-the-scenes support for the guy. I'm a bit suspicious of him. Palmar: + Show Spoiler + Has mostly mentioned inactives and getting some debate going on that topic. He may just be curious. That said, he was the first one to mention and notice Nard's post on being saying it was difficult to post the first time. Hasen't really added a lot of real content, but I believe he's pro-town. Only the minutest amount of suspicion. hiro protagonist + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 02:58 hiro protagonist wrote: Its true that lurking round is a good place for scum to hide, as there is little evidence to indict them. how ever all but 3 of us have posted and I doubt that ALL of the inactives will be scum... best bet is a scum has already posted, so we should try to sniff em out! If we don't have a good lead by tomorrow, then we should ask the lurkers to step up and explain themselves... That's his only post. Unfortunately, we don't get any background info on what country he lives in, so we can't analyse when he'll post. Unfortunate :/ The fact that he did add SOMETHING (scum have probably posted) shows he MIGHT be pro-town in his behavior. Don't know what to think on him due to inactivity. EDIT: Okay, he just posted another one that added a bit more content, so I moved him down here. Basically listing his suspicions. Seem's a bit more mafia now to be honest based on his bandwagonning to everyone else, but he may just agree with some people. EDIT: Yes, this is my first time EVER playing mafia, so this is a new experience for me. i'm gonna be interested to see if anything else develops. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 12:33 Varpulis wrote: NO EDITING Even if I note EDIT? And the post mentionned editing when it was posting. Sorry, it's already been done D: | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 12:44 Varpulis wrote: EBWOP: the reason for this is that editing allows players to alter the information that the rest of the town can use to analyze you. For example, Imagine that I'm one of the mafia, and I post a scumlist, then check through the thread again and see that nobody else thinks that Node is scum, If i were allowed to edit, I could delete Node from my scumlist and fit in better with the town, and nobody will be able to point out later that I was suspicious of Node. Do you understand why we don't allow editing? Yeah, sorry. What can I do now though? Won't do it again BTW. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 14:58 Mataza wrote: Lol Karshe. Giygass having done a great job of all people? I do state the obvious since this is a newbie game. And since the very beginning I had the feeling that some people do not know how this really works. I also "defend" myself as people are requesting answers for questions that they don´t write. I especially like "various questions". Giygass requests answers for nonsensical questions. Viscera took what I said and distorted it. His point on me provoking wifom is wrong. I urge you to reread that. I will make my cases later in the day. It´s 8 in the morning over here, gotta get busy. Are you writing my name wrong on purpose. Seriously. On my demanding answers to nonsensical questions, how is asking you: + Show Spoiler + - On May 16 2011 15:19 VisceraEyes wrote: Your first act in this game was to count the minimum number of days before mafia wins under optimal circumstances. Why is that? To which you respond "Oh, I wanted to know how many times we can fail." + Show Spoiler + - What is your thoughts on this sentence: On May 16 2011 15:52 GiygaS wrote: Mhm, and you've also mentioned the Mafia's purported strategy, which is to stay under the radar. Something you haven't done. To which you responded with a link to this thing call WIFOM. And all I could think about at this point in time is then; "Why did you say that in the first place" On the point of you bashing Karshe, he never said I was doing a great job, of say generating content. He said I was doing a great job of generating discussion. My intent throughout that afternoon.I even said: + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 02:31 GiygaS wrote: Also, its boring when people don't actually play :-P Finally, I re-read Viscera's point on me, where he says: + Show Spoiler + On May 17 2011 10:40 VisceraEyes wrote: Feels green except for how quickly he jumped on Mata after I even hinted at a reddish hue. This immediately AFTER a very friendly post encouraging people to post. Left me thinking 'Why, so you could immediately CAPSLOCKMAFIA them like Mata? Watch carefully. Actually, I didn't call him the mafia in all caps. this is actually what I said: + Show Spoiler + On May 16 2011 15:52 GiygaS wrote: Mhm, and you've also mentioned the Mafia's purported strategy, which is to stay under the radar. Something you haven't done. If you wanted someone to go off the path of finding the mafia, you would say that the strategy they would perform would be completely opposite to what you were doing. Also, you were the first one to make basic rules to know HE IS THE MAFIA. Now notice here that I said "Also, you were the first one to make basic rules to know HE IS THE MAFIA". By this, I meant that I was imagining people screaming at each other: "HE LIED LOW HE IS THE MAFIAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" etc etc. When I realized that these words, especially the capital letters, were indeed misunderstood, i made a brief apology. So when if ever, did I CAPSLOCKMAFIA Mata? | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
JOKE: I wouldn't suspect Mataza as my biggest threat if I was Mafia, because he can't even spell my name right. At least you can't spell his. On May 17 2011 19:53 DeepBlu2 wrote: Upon further review, I believe that Mataza is not mafia. He posted earlier that in order for the Mafia to thrive and be successful, they must lay low. However, he has done quite the opposite and I am starting to think that his "defense" isn't an overreaction to being Mafia but instead just trying to have justice served by having us vote the actual mafia members. I do believe, however, that the correct mafia member is none other than Glygas. Being sly in his ways, he has tricked people to vote against Matiza who he must believe is his biggest threat. Glygas has turned against the two most active players looking to seek justice for the Town in my eyes. He has been accusing people constantly and the time he has defended himself, he just used quotes or responses that were not though out which makes it very hard to find hard evidence. | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On May 17 2011 22:56 Mataza wrote: Back @ prp Who would I lynch? Good question. So far I behaved very provocative without telling much in hope a scum would slip clearly. There might be slips, but they are not obvious. Also it is harder to stay objective when being focussed thern I thought. I can´t say for sure just yet. But I will begin working on my cases now  Now I mean this as only I tiny bit of suspicion, but wouldn't that also imply: " I need to talk to my scum mates, so I'll get back to you on that one?" | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
On the subject of me having 3 votes, I'm more worried about who could slip by. Namely Skrammen. Skrammen hasn't posted at all until suddenly, he burst on the scene: Announcing his business the last few days very vaguely, Then jumps on the current trend of voting for me, without any reasoning behind doing so. This seems very dangerous to me, so I'm going to vote for him for the same reason that prplhz has reasoned: an evil unknown is far greater then a known one. ##Vote Skrammen | ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
|
GiygaS
Canada1043 Posts
| ||
| ||
