I apologize for being busy.

So we're having a day 1 lynch without any starting information huh. An open setup with unknown roleblockers gives a disadvantage to the town, but as the saying goes, "a challenge means god's afraid of your progress"

All right, lets see.
...

Looking at the past two pages, there's nothing to analyze. There's only been two votes, and the only discussion has been whether to lynch inactives.

no. Bad idea. In a game such as this, planning to lynch an inactive just allows the reds to guide the discussion to whichever inactive green they know isn't a part of them and leads to the town's disadvantage.

I'm not going to post any votes until there's something more concrete to go on.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 05 2011 14:02 GMT

#237

I apologize - my schedule is really off right now.

I promise I'll be here more often.

Gmarshal (.5)
Deconduo
Aidnai
Subversion

Huh - wait a minute - town had nothing to go on. Why did you guys vote?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 05 2011 14:02 GMT

#238

I mean, what made you vote for Beneather?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 05 2011 16:10 GMT

#242

>>>> Vote for inactives strategy is... not beneficial at all for the town, to say the least. The reds can subtly direct to whoever they would know is not a red and yet inactive. :/ We as town have no information, and reds can use that to lynch a green. If we don't have any information, pressuring is fine.. but just hitting someone because they're inactive is not a good strategy at all. This is why I also like the mayor idea for the first day, as it gives a way for town to get useful info on day 1...

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 06 2011 12:20 GMT

#288

kingjames' post sounds like a kneejerk reaction due to the potentially losing the bandwagon. -_-

And I'm surprised people hasn't picked up on the scumminess of aidnai's suggestion that the town shouldn't discuss anything during the night. First he says it's sad that there's such lack of activity, then he encourages town to stay inactive? Discussion is the only weapon for townies with no information. Whether it is done during the night or during the day doesn't make any difference - this just looks like a subtle effort by a red to sabotage the town's efforts.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 06 2011 22:16 GMT

#297

On January 07 2011 06:49 chaoser wrote:
I want to know why orgolove didn't vote the first day. I understand if this was a 30 person game and one person abstaining isn't THAT important but it's a 9 "person" game and one whole team not voting is HUGE.

Right.

Did you not read my post immediately afterwards? It was still in the middle of the season, and I was unable to log on before the deadline to place my vote. Since then I've tried as well as anyone to contribute and make sense of this discussion, from which there really wasn't any.

Focusing on inactivity won't help the town, and I'm surprised you, of all people, are choosing to do that, especially without any response to deconduo's suggestion.

@deconduo: what exactly do you mean by hypocop?

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 07 2011 05:32 GMT

#301

Anyway. Lets get this going.
##Vote: Kingjames/aidinai

My reasons have already been posted.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 07 2011 23:15 GMT

#318

On January 08 2011 08:06 aidnai wrote:
However, I will not be deterred from the task at hand. Orgolove has posted again in the other game, so I know for a fact he's read my analysis and knows the votes are mounting over here. I'm having a hard time imagining a pro-town reason for not contributing to discussion in this thread, and not defending yourself from a lynch...

Oh really? Do I need to respond to every single post against me? What is this now - I can't even log on TL without being harassed about responding in a forum game? Nice.

I've already made my point, and in clear enough language for the town to understand. I'm hoping that flamewheel will come by and consider it as well. It'll be the town's loss if they can't see such clear inconsistencies throughout your post and yet still not vote.

orgolove

Vatican City State1650 Posts

January 08 2011 09:24 GMT

#339

gg.

On January 08 2011 13:26 aidnai wrote:
Orgo let us down. I guess he didn't care about town winning this game, as I see it, he did have a responsibility to show up and DO SOMETHING to show he was town.

Don't blame your ineptitude on my actions. I've posted enough to show what I thought, and my interpretations of the events. It is on you for not heeding my words.

And it's poor form to shittalk on someone who technically won't be able to respond to anything, as per the rules.