• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:18
CEST 13:18
KST 20:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202568RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced3BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Simple editing of Brood War save files? (.mlx) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 692 users

SCVs versus Mule

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 22:01:51
September 07 2010 21:57 GMT
#1
Did anybody dd a comparison for how much of a mineral income difference there is between upgrading the command center and calling mules, and just not upgrading and keep making SCVs?

If i don't need scans or supply and just want the fastest growing economy possible, is it good to skip the mules and not upgrade at all?
SilverPotato
Profile Joined July 2010
United States560 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 22:01:13
September 07 2010 22:00 GMT
#2
You can't do this yourself? Mules gather 30 while SCVs gather 5.

Mules on average gather 270 minerals (9 trip

http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Mule
"The ability to learn faster than your competitors may be the only sustainable competitive advantage." ~Arie de Geus
Zoltan
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States656 Posts
September 07 2010 22:01 GMT
#3
its not hard to figure out yourself- a scv takes 17 seconds to build and harvests approx 1 mineral per second. 35 seconds to build the OC- so it "costs" you 50 minreals for the OC (isntead of spending 100 on scvs you spend 150 on the OC). A mule mines 6X faster than a SCV- so after 1 mule, you have almost broken even, after 2 mules, your way ahead.
'HOW LONG HAVE THOSE REAPERS BEEN KILLING MY PROBES?!?!
Bair
Profile Joined May 2010
United States698 Posts
September 07 2010 22:01 GMT
#4
The sooner you get an OC the better. You may lose build time for a few SCVs, but the MULEs make up for it. The sooner you build the mules, the sooner it catches up because when you have an OC you can build SCVs and call down MULEs.
In Roaches I Rust.
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
September 07 2010 22:18 GMT
#5
This article says a mule harvests 2 times faster than an SCV :

http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Mule

And this one says 3 times as fast :

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Mining_Minerals

2 times faster sound about right. Is it?

Also from the same article you can see that an SCV brings around 50 minerals per minute, and from my own experiments i could only see 40 minerals per minute. So 1 mineral per second for a total of 60 per minute seems a bit off...
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 22:44:26
September 07 2010 22:36 GMT
#6
Had 22 harvesters mining minerals(@SoW) with avg 800minerals/min, so 40 per min(0.66min/sec) is I'd say around right.
Mule mines 270/90 or 3 minerals/sec, like 4.5x faster than norm scv. I think the correct way to think of this is that you can make 2 SCVs instead of upgrading OC. 2 SCVs produce ~1.3min/sec vs 3min/sec from mule, so the longer you wait, the mule mining starts adding up vs the 2 SCV mining.(when you upgrade to OC it'd then be around (3-1,3)*[time between OC arriving in secs] less minerals you would have if you had built the OC first)

There are situations where stalling OC might be good, but for econ it's prob only if you're using those extra mins for another early CC.
bobartig
Profile Joined August 2010
40 Posts
September 07 2010 22:46 GMT
#7
No, you can never do as well with just scvs, and, without a single measurement, here's why: A mule can mine concurrently from a mineral patch with scvs. Once you hit saturation, additional scvs do very little to nothing, but adding a single mule to the mix is like adding a mineral patch. As it happens, it's like adding 1.66 mineral patches. The rate of harvest for mules is so high, if your concern is economy, you would be plain crazy to try and build away from it.
Bibdy
Profile Joined March 2010
United States3481 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 22:50:03
September 07 2010 22:48 GMT
#8
One OC can pretty much maintain one MULE at a time (slight overlap), so its essentially worth a permanent 6 SCVs that don't suffer diminishing returns on their gather speed until you start spending the energy on COMSATs and Calldowns. It costs as much as 3 SCVs up front, and takes as long as two SCVs to make, but it pays for itself pretty rapidly.
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 23:34:20
September 07 2010 23:19 GMT
#9
You guys are right.

I was under the impression that you would lose money on the first mule, but get a huge economic benefit as the game gets longer. But after running the numbers and a couple of simulations, I can see now that even the first mule is more profitable than the SCVs, and you cannot have it soon enough.

I'll save you the calculations, but the result was that even the first mule puts you ahead by 15 (EDIT 15 not 60, corrected) minerals compared to pumping SCVs nonstop. (To get to that number you have to account for everything, cost of the comsat but also the cost of the SCVs.)

One last question though, at what rate does the command center regenerate energy? I want to calculate exactly how many mules i can call over time and the associated income.
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
September 07 2010 23:23 GMT
#10
http://sc2armory.com/game/terran/buildings/orbital-command says 0.56 or mule every 89.something secs.
Jaeger
Profile Joined December 2009
United States1150 Posts
September 07 2010 23:24 GMT
#11
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Energy

Says 0.5625 energy per second
https://www.dotabuff.com/players/8137911
Pfeff
Profile Joined August 2010
United States270 Posts
September 07 2010 23:33 GMT
#12
Come on man, do some looking of your own. All this shit is on one site
When your loading screen shows my name, just F10 -> N
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-07 23:42:12
September 07 2010 23:40 GMT
#13
On September 08 2010 08:33 Pfeff wrote:
Come on man, do some looking of your own. All this shit is on one site

I did search for command center energy regeneration on Google but could not locate the information.

Also often you see mistakes on web articles (example of the previous wiki entries that says mule is 2x and 3x faster), so it never hurts to discuss everything. Ends up the real answer was 4.5x faster.

Besides... would forums like this one exist if everybody just searched for everything?
ZannX
Profile Joined August 2010
United States70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-08 01:41:08
September 08 2010 01:38 GMT
#14
You can always open the galaxy editor.

According to the editor, the mule's stats are:

Amount: 6x SCV
Time: 2.05x SCV

So the mule gathers at roughly 2.93 or 3 times as fast.

And of course the Orbital Command's energy regeneration rate is 0.5625 as stated earlier. Which means it takes 88.89 game time to get 50 energy and a mule lasts 90 game time which matches the typical in game experience that you can call down a second one just as the first one runs out.
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-08 01:46:46
September 08 2010 01:43 GMT
#15
On September 08 2010 10:38 ZannX wrote:
You can always open the galaxy editor.

According to the editor, the mule's stats are:

Amount: 6x SCV
Time: 2.05x SCV

So the mule gathers at roughly 2.93 or 3 times as fast.

And of course the Orbital Command's energy regeneration rate is 0.5625 as stated earlier. Which means it takes 88.89 game time to get 50 energy and a mule lasts 90 game time which matches the typical in game experience that you can call down a second one just as the first one runs out.

The editor gives you raw numbers that do not take into account things like travel distance and mining times, so it stays in the land of vague theorycraft.The math behind the 4.5x is as follow (from observed experimentation thus more reliable) :

mule brings 270 minerals over 90 seconds, that is : 3 minerals / second

SCV brings ~40 minerals per minute, that is : 0.66 minerals / second

3 m/s divided by 0.66 m/s = 4.54 times faster.
ZannX
Profile Joined August 2010
United States70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-08 01:50:28
September 08 2010 01:48 GMT
#16
On September 08 2010 10:43 Draken wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2010 10:38 ZannX wrote:
You can always open the galaxy editor.

According to the editor, the mule's stats are:

Amount: 6x SCV
Time: 2.05x SCV

So the mule gathers at roughly 2.93 or 3 times as fast.

And of course the Orbital Command's energy regeneration rate is 0.5625 as stated earlier. Which means it takes 88.89 game time to get 50 energy and a mule lasts 90 game time which matches the typical in game experience that you can call down a second one just as the first one runs out.

The math behind the 4.5x is as follow :

mule brings 270 minerals over 90 seconds, that is : 3 minerals / second

SCV brings ~40 minerals per minute, that is : 0.66 minerals / second

3 m/s divided by 0.66 m/s = 4.54 times faster.


You're assuming 40 minerals per minute is correct. The person who stated 40 minerals per minute had 22 scv's harvesting on presumably 8 patches. That's obviously going to be slower per SCV than 8 scv's on 8 patches.

You can't argue with hardcoded numbers - the SCV literally has a resource collection multiplier of 1 while the mule has 6 and the SCV has a collection time multiplier of 1 while the mule has 2.05.

The 22 scv example further favors the mule of course since the mule can mine at the same time as an scv so it's very good for saturated bases - which is probably why the math turned out to be 4.5x since the base was actually oversaturated (20 scv's is *optimal* for 8 patches).

I'm not sure what you mean by mining times and travel distance. They move at the same speed (2.8125) and mining time is... built into the editor (as I stated earlier the mule has 2.05x an scv's mining time). The only variable to consider here is saturation as I just demonstrated.
Nehm
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands22 Posts
September 08 2010 01:50 GMT
#17
Mules are less good compared to scvs in the early game because of your low saturation. But as far as I know you regain approximatelyevery mineral you lost or spent because of your oc on your first trip.
What if I say I will never surrender?
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
September 08 2010 05:08 GMT
#18
On September 08 2010 10:48 ZannX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2010 10:43 Draken wrote:
On September 08 2010 10:38 ZannX wrote:
You can always open the galaxy editor.

According to the editor, the mule's stats are:

Amount: 6x SCV
Time: 2.05x SCV

So the mule gathers at roughly 2.93 or 3 times as fast.

And of course the Orbital Command's energy regeneration rate is 0.5625 as stated earlier. Which means it takes 88.89 game time to get 50 energy and a mule lasts 90 game time which matches the typical in game experience that you can call down a second one just as the first one runs out.

The math behind the 4.5x is as follow :

mule brings 270 minerals over 90 seconds, that is : 3 minerals / second

SCV brings ~40 minerals per minute, that is : 0.66 minerals / second

3 m/s divided by 0.66 m/s = 4.54 times faster.


You're assuming 40 minerals per minute is correct. The person who stated 40 minerals per minute had 22 scv's harvesting on presumably 8 patches. That's obviously going to be slower per SCV than 8 scv's on 8 patches.

You can't argue with hardcoded numbers - the SCV literally has a resource collection multiplier of 1 while the mule has 6 and the SCV has a collection time multiplier of 1 while the mule has 2.05.

The 22 scv example further favors the mule of course since the mule can mine at the same time as an scv so it's very good for saturated bases - which is probably why the math turned out to be 4.5x since the base was actually oversaturated (20 scv's is *optimal* for 8 patches).

I'm not sure what you mean by mining times and travel distance. They move at the same speed (2.8125) and mining time is... built into the editor (as I stated earlier the mule has 2.05x an scv's mining time). The only variable to consider here is saturation as I just demonstrated.

Since I'd hate to have been not clear, at 8 scvs I was avg 340 or 42.5minerals/min, 11 @ 440 , 12 @ ~500, 10 @ ~420. I switched to LT and checked there and got similar results...That being said, I figured out as I was looking at the income tab, I'd take an estimated guess that the whole 60 minerals/minute comes from the fact income shows minerals/42,86sec(like APM).
This ofcourse doesn't matter in the slightest though, but explains the discrepancy better. The reason why I say it doesn't change anything is, sure the value of SCV mining might be then instead a lot closer to 1min/sec, but at the same time the mule's value pumps up to 270/(90/1,4) = ~4,2, which is again around 4.5x when you have more than 8 scvs on minerals.
Draken
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada61 Posts
September 08 2010 08:17 GMT
#19
I'd take an estimated guess that the whole 60 minerals/minute comes from the fact income shows minerals/42,86sec(like APM).

I don't understand this part, could you explain the 42 seconds / APM thing please?
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-09-08 09:39:49
September 08 2010 08:34 GMT
#20
On September 08 2010 17:17 Draken wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'd take an estimated guess that the whole 60 minerals/minute comes from the fact income shows minerals/42,86sec(like APM).

I don't understand this part, could you explain the 42 seconds / APM thing please?

Fastest is 40% faster than real life(aka 100 RL sec = 140 ingame fastest sec). This translates to APM in SC2 and it seems income. 60/1,4 = 42,659xxxxxsec so income per min is actually income per 42.659 sec and same with APM

Edit: Man I've posted way to much in this thread, sorry about that :/ Anyway to clarify it takes SCV roughly 5sec(gametime) to go a trip so ~1mineral/sec by timing it, which would make the income tab not add up if it was over 60 sec, but makes sense if it is over 42.x sec. This doesn't really matter at all though like I said earlier, except then the '60minerals per minute' thingie is true, if you are talking RL minute(aka 60sec instead of 42.x)
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #94
CranKy Ducklings93
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech54
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 15489
Barracks 3502
Bisu 1070
Flash 706
Jaedong 585
Shuttle 498
Larva 362
ToSsGirL 328
EffOrt 325
firebathero 321
[ Show more ]
BeSt 241
Soulkey 232
Last 157
Hyun 143
ZerO 75
ggaemo 70
Rush 59
Free 40
Shinee 25
sSak 23
Movie 16
zelot 15
IntoTheRainbow 5
Dota 2
XcaliburYe844
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor225
Other Games
singsing2178
B2W.Neo868
Beastyqt720
Fuzer 321
crisheroes282
ZerO(Twitch)19
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 15
lovetv 12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH274
• StrangeGG 56
• Adnapsc2 15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2284
League of Legends
• Jankos1449
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2h 42m
CSO Cup
4h 42m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 42m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
21h 42m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 2h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.