|
On February 13 2013 23:34 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hiding scumreads normally is scummy, and I dont see why its different in this case.
At least we can use the 24 hours productively.
I dont think we should discuss who scum is gonna put up though.
Also DEBEARS, you havent posted anything since your opening post.
Well, it influences who scum will nominate to WIFOM us. That's why I'm going to draft up a post and wait until the day start to post it. I do think, however, we should be discussing motivation / intention / reason right now -- not making cases.
Are you for hail mary lynching dibbers tomorrow, Oats? Provided he does nothing useful -- null read throughout.
|
If tomorrow means the lynch cycle after this, I AM ALL FOR IT.
|
prplhz is the safest / best lynch for next cycle: you can read his filter and look at his interactions with Snarfs and VE, as well as the total apathy he had concerning the D3 lynch.
phagga is still my top read - observe his vote switch behavior last night:
Currently the votes are split between Snarfs and VE. At this point I'm still strongly voting VE and the only potential hint of my change is this post where I say I'm rereading. So, it looks like slOosh is probably gonna stick with VE. Votes are at 4-4 with prplhz voting CC. phagga comes in and waffles so I question his hesitation:
On February 13 2013 07:39 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2013 07:34 slOosh wrote:
phagga and prplhz, what the heck, how is choosing Snarfs vs VE so difficult for you guys when it is so obvious in your filters that you find indefinitely prefer VE over Snarfs? Dude, I might do the deciding vote here, I just want to be sure it's the right pick.That said, snarfs is a lurker, for whatever reason. VE had stuff in his play that just did not make any sense from a town perspective. Let's lynch VE. Ok. The highlighted line shows that he wants to be sure about this choice. Put some consideration into it y'know? ##Vote: VisceraEyes
On February 13 2013 07:55 phagga wrote:
You know what, fuck it.
##unvote: VisceraEyes
##Vote: Snarfs
let's lynch the scummy lurker.
Well, so much for careful consideration. He calls Snarfs a lurker in the first quote. Somehow in a span of ~15 minutes Snarf's lurking has become scummy and more deserving of a lynch against someone who "had stuff in his play that just did not make any sense from a town perspective." Not only that, it isn't because he reviewed his notes as he explains later - the 2nd quote is straight up YOLO. There's a mismatch in attitude consistency. A "go with the flow" mentality.
And then there is my case from D2 and his subsequent defense.
Should still lynch prplhz first. Then when prplhz flips scum I'll come, point at prplhz's filter and say "aha!" then we can lynch phagga. Can't do that with Snarfs' filter cause he barely mentions him - Coinky dink? Maybe. But add enough of them and the more straightforward answer is that he is scum.
|
I'm not gonna flip scum though.
|
My apathy concerning D3 lynch was because my case was ignored and the two people up for lynch were almost just as scummy as each other in my opinion. If you're gonna lynch phagga because I'm scum then you should really lynch me first so that you can reconsider phagga in the light of my flip.
|
11589 Posts
Why do you read phagga as town, prpl?
|
I'm literally afraid to say anything. Though I will say that I want to see more from debears before unilaterally deciding to lynch him.
I've reread the thread and found some interesting things...I'll post it up tonight after work (being after the nominations are up).
|
As a side note, if we just traded one inactive for another I'm going to be fucking pissed. XD
|
VE: Wanna give me a preview on what you think the nominations may turn out like this round?
3 T; 2T 1S, 1T 2S; 3S
|
I don't want to lynch phagga solely because I think you are scum prplhz; that is just icing on the cake.
Did you really think the votes were split between 2 scum?
|
On February 14 2013 07:55 Mocsta wrote:
VE: Wanna give me a preview on what you think the nominations may turn out like this round?
3 T; 2T 1S, 1T 2S; 3S
No...and frankly I'm disturbed that you're asking me this question.
|
|
|
On February 14 2013 08:19 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 07:55 Mocsta wrote:
VE: Wanna give me a preview on what you think the nominations may turn out like this round?
3 T; 2T 1S, 1T 2S; 3S No...and frankly I'm disturbed that you're asking me this question.
y?
you said you would step up to the plate of being town leader? I thought u enjoyed having my trust?
|
I fully intend to. Once the nominations are in. I thought I've made my thoughts on WIFOMing the nominations clear? I don't want to give scum any help in picking the nominations, that includes what I think the composition is going to be.
.....doesn't it? IS there any way for scum to manipulate that info?
|
Whatever, I'll tell you. If they're in trouble they'll likely keep out of the nominations (again?) this phase. Probably T,T,T.
If they're feeling saucy, maybe put one in praying to lynch one of the townies...but that's risky. Especially considering we already have one of their panels (from D2).
|
KK,
no need to get so defensive next time aite 
Was just a banter qusetion cos Im bored and I know you're present.
|
It's not defensive, I just thought we (and by we I mean you and I, not town in general) had had this conversation already.
While you're here what do you think? Scum gonna risk it? Or do you think they'll do TTT?
|
Well not sure if I say; I dont want to give scum any help in picking the nominations, after all?
right?
|
No there's no way to really manipulate that now. Before dawn D2 was one thing, but you asking me about it made me consider it...after D2 scum already have an idea how we're going to view the panel so it doesn't matter what we say.
Before you asked I was just operating under the same philosophy as the beginning of the game. Shit's changed mang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
