Newbie Mini Mafia XXI - Page 22

On July 18 2012 03:31 tube wrote:
Why would someone blame you for a possible mislynch should Obvious get lynched. If it's not obvious, nobody was taking you seriously when you were randomly voting Obvious except Obvious himself. I only voted him once I actually started getting a read, as did Jingle and perfection.
Three people found it scummy because it's scummy, how's that fascinating?

I don't need anyone to distract the town away from me because nobody had any good reason to lynch me to begin with. If you think otherwise explain, not with some roundabout theory that bases itself on false assumptions.

On July 18 2012 03:36 drwiggl3s wrote:
Deadline is soon approaching and we still aren't at a consensus.

Currently I think both tube and Obvious can be seen as scum. But the meta switch by tube (where he all of a sudden changed his tone, style, writing) seemed way too coached to have been his own doing.

A vote against Obviousis a decent one, but I gotta go with my gut here and think tube is the more "obvious" scum player.. Unless I can pull more reasoning out of why Obvious is mafia, I'll leave my vote where it is now.

##tube

On July 18 2012 03:10 JingleHell wrote:
And because three people agreed in the public thread that somehow makes them the three scum? You're well into the "bizarre WIFOM" territory. I can't even see the slightest train of thought where we'd want to be in that position if we were scum.

On July 18 2012 03:38 tube wrote:
you're using the same argument that obvious backtracked on
theres literally no difference between the way i was talking before and the way i am now except i use punctuation and capitalization
how do you even get coached in mafia why does everyone keep suggesting this

On July 18 2012 03:42 YourHarry wrote:


Of course agreeing with something that is agreeable is not scummy. It is possible that towns can agree on something.

Agreeing with something that I do not find agreeable - that Obvious.660's post is a "meanginless" scummy post - in a very short period of time, with the common motivation to lynch the same person, is scummy.

On July 18 2012 03:31 tube wrote:
Why would someone blame you for a possible mislynch should Obvious get lynched. If it's not obvious, nobody was taking you seriously when you were randomly voting Obvious except Obvious himself. I only voted him once I actually started getting a read, as did Jingle and perfection.
Three people found it scummy because it's scummy, how's that fascinating?

I don't need anyone to distract the town away from me because nobody had any good reason to lynch me to begin with. If you think otherwise explain, not with some roundabout theory that bases itself on false assumptions.

On July 18 2012 03:48 YourHarry wrote:


Your reasoning that I may not be the person to be blamed if Obvious.660 lead to mislynch is logical. I agree that if I was away, and Obvious flipped town, I should not be the one to seem most scummy.. But even despite not providing any reason to vote Obvious.660, I did strongly push his bandwagon - mostly to see his reactions - which could seem scummy in many people's eyes. As you recently read, Hapha's accusation against me included this as my scuminess.

Also, I still fail to see how Obvious.660 personal reads of everyone in the game is scummy. At least when I play mafia, we frequently take turns to reveal reads on every player in the game.

On July 18 2012 03:48 Hapahauli wrote:
But Tube didn't make a scumslip! He was asked to change his tone for the town and did so!

On July 18 2012 03:47 JingleHell wrote:


You're literally not making any sense. Scum all making the same point is beyond silly behavior. Like I said, you're taking us into useless WIFOM arguments here, but unless a situation is clutch, scum should be trying to avoid linking their fates like that.

Especially in a D1 situation, where there's people making miniature cases every direction, the last thing scum should do is all be pointing the same direction. You're grasping at ridiculous straws, and not doing much to convince me of your innocence. Frankly, if obvious flips red, you and Hapa will be the first people I'll be looking at. Clearly a lot of people find him at least worthy of watching, if not a current vote, as evidenced by the many posts stating such.

On July 18 2012 03:51 JingleHell wrote:


And if the two of us are agreeing on it, you'd think it would be obvious as all hell to anyone else, right?