EPTDreamHack Winter 2011 Day 3 - Page 203
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Weson
Iceland1032 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:07 1Eris1 wrote: I hate this whole "oh puma is such a bad player because he relies on 1-1-1) HE PLAYS TO WIN The guy can play amazing macro games we've all seen it, he's not fucking bitbyebye or something, he just plays smart. Why the fuck would you play only macro games if thats where your oppenent is strongest? If 1-1-1 is imbalanced or whatever fine, hate the build, not the player. Players should always play to win. What a silly post. I decide who I support, and I enjoy certain types of games. I support players who play in ways I enjoy, and I don't support players who don't. I support Hero because he plays in such an exciting and aggressive way. If I thought the 1-1-1 is imbalanced (and I played Terran) I would use it. But I wouldn't have any right to argue with people who wouldn't become my fan. | ||
|
oogieogie
United States3657 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:08 mvtaylor wrote: These experts seem to have found some reasons for you lol i still say immortals..harden shield/50 damage to take out the tanks, bunch of stalkers with obs for banshees, and sentry/zealot for FF/tanking shots? idk | ||
|
Beardedclam
United States839 Posts
| ||
|
Boundz(DarKo)
5311 Posts
| ||
|
Poisonblack
452 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:10 Talin wrote: NP MLG ezpz Code S again.And like in MC's case, it's called "hoping to win as much as possible until people actually get good enough and I drop to Code B". ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | ||
|
_Repo
United Kingdom71 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:09 Petrina wrote: Yup, playing like this is not making him a lot of fans. He is definitely a player I downvote whenever I get the chance. Stop QQing please. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
| ||
|
Tantaburs
Canada1825 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:10 Skyline026 wrote: Ok bronze. Ill make sure everybody gets the memo. Multiple pros have said that one base collosus does not counter 1-1-1 | ||
|
Kluey
Canada1197 Posts
| ||
KadaverBB
Germany25657 Posts
| ||
|
DoubleDouble
United States106 Posts
marines arent even the unit that makes 1-1-1 strong. | ||
|
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:09 GreenAndOrangeTurtle wrote: Exactly. Its a tournament not a popularity contest. Who cares how you win as long a you do it Here on the forums, it is a popularity contest. I care how people win, it determines who I cheer for. | ||
|
Romitelli
Brunei Darussalam566 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:10 hysterial wrote: Yeah artosis is quite wrong. People should just start one gate expand/nexus first imo. How can you go nexus first against T if you have no idea on what's coming? And it's also pretty map dependent. | ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
lol and let's see how long that will last.  | ||
|
GreenAndOrangeTurtle
Australia193 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:09 Lysanias wrote: It's rather boring to watch though, even if it's all part of the game. I'd rather see beautiful games with alot of action. And this is pure as spectator. And that remark is so 2005 or so, get something more original ty. Of course we want to see 30 min macro games as spectators. But its a tournament, we want to see the players doing what they think is the best thing to win not the most entertaining thing | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
On November 27 2011 03:09 Badfatpanda wrote: once in a tournament= too much people love MC and Naama when they allin, double standards are kool double standard seems to apply for you as well because you only seem to consider this tournament, but let me tell you that puma used 1/1/1 against genius as well and remember IEM vs mc? 3 games 1/1/1 in a row. and thats only in ONE set cannot blame him though because the " playing to win" would most likely apply for me as well if I compted for 25k | ||
|
DOUDOU
Wales2940 Posts
| ||
| ||
