On January 20 2013 17:16 ECHOZs wrote: Time for a buddha quote, Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future concentrate the mind on the present moment.
This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
this is music:
this is art:
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
On January 20 2013 17:16 ECHOZs wrote: Time for a buddha quote, Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future concentrate the mind on the present moment.
This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
On January 20 2013 17:16 ECHOZs wrote: Time for a buddha quote, Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future concentrate the mind on the present moment.
This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
On January 20 2013 17:04 ECHOZs wrote: Thanks for asking. These laws impact every aspect of my reality and what I make of it. As for 1 and 2, I pose a question what is the difference between humans, animals, plants, and a keyboard?
Varying degrees of complexity and the systems and processes that give rise to them.
Could you elaborate on 1 and 2, how is matter equal? Do you mean in a thermodynamic sense? And what do you mean by two properties of matter, surely gravity and electromagetic forces play a role as well.
Thanks for the question sorry I missed it. All matter is equal because we are all from an original source. Everything is composed of atoms at its most basic form, is evolution merely a way for atoms to communicate with each other? You ask do I mean in a thermodynaminc sense, no, why? Because I don't know what that is, you should just apply the laws yourself and maybe you could help me understand what you think it means and what the laws mean to you as an individual.
On January 20 2013 17:16 ECHOZs wrote: Time for a buddha quote, Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future concentrate the mind on the present moment.
This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
On January 20 2013 17:20 Aerisky wrote: [quote] This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
i think government should be separated by type of matter. its obvious that matter and dark matter respond to different sets of rules, and therefore, they should be subject to rule by their own form of matter. i will refer to this as matter nationalism, and advocate the separation of different forms of matter into separate but equal forms of government.
On January 20 2013 17:21 ECHOZs wrote: [quote] Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
i think government should be separated by type of matter. its obvious that matter and dark matter respond to different sets of rules, and therefore, they should be subject to rule by their own form of matter. i will refer to this as matter nationalism, and advocate the separation of different forms of matter into separate but equal forms of government.
On January 20 2013 17:16 ECHOZs wrote: Time for a buddha quote, Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future concentrate the mind on the present moment.
This was the fake buddha quote of the day for December 19, 2009!
Or Jebrumaytember 17 1/2, 2389 Year of Our Great Lord. Depending which time scale you want to use at the moment (don't want to be limited by time, do we?)
Thanks! Never knew that, but I don't care, why? Because I find the source to be completely irrelevant, I like how it sounded.
If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
On January 20 2013 17:26 farvacola wrote: [quote] If you do not care for sources and find them irrelevant, than why did you say "time for a buddha quote"?
Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
i think government should be separated by type of matter. its obvious that matter and dark matter respond to different sets of rules, and therefore, they should be subject to rule by their own form of matter. i will refer to this as matter nationalism, and advocate the separation of different forms of matter into separate but equal forms of government.
Separating by type of matter? Why limit matter?
But if separating is limiting, then defining "types" of matter makes them limits in themselves, doesn't it? Why are you putting limits on matter by agreeing that there are types of matter? Black, white, green, brown, grey, yellow, orange? Aren't they all just the same?
On January 20 2013 17:28 ECHOZs wrote: [quote] Because I wanted you to know where I was influenced from, that was for your benefit not mine.
But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
i think government should be separated by type of matter. its obvious that matter and dark matter respond to different sets of rules, and therefore, they should be subject to rule by their own form of matter. i will refer to this as matter nationalism, and advocate the separation of different forms of matter into separate but equal forms of government.
Separating by type of matter? Why limit matter?
But if separating is limiting, then defining "types" of matter makes them limits in themselves, doesn't it? Why are you putting limits on matter by agreeing that there are types of matter? Black, white, green, brown, grey, yellow, orange? Aren't they all just the same?
They are all the same, but they are also all unique, why? Apply the laws.
On January 20 2013 17:34 farvacola wrote: [quote] But in incorrectly identifying the originator as Buddha, you've misled everyone, even yourself apparently. For you find sources irrelevant and yet still reference them, improperly to boot. This is not even deconstruction, it is misinformation. Perhaps a limit is in order?
Its a form of communication. What is music? What is art?
How is this art? These are only examples of art, I ask again, what is art?
its a fail safe against restraint on freedom.
Restraint on freedom, I like that. I personally think individual freedom is a defining law of the universe and of matter. Thanks for sharing. Lets compare this to types of societies or subcultures, what are similarities between anarchism, democracy, and socialism?
i think government should be separated by type of matter. its obvious that matter and dark matter respond to different sets of rules, and therefore, they should be subject to rule by their own form of matter. i will refer to this as matter nationalism, and advocate the separation of different forms of matter into separate but equal forms of government.
Separating by type of matter? Why limit matter?
But if separating is limiting, then defining "types" of matter makes them limits in themselves, doesn't it? Why are you putting limits on matter by agreeing that there are types of matter? Black, white, green, brown, grey, yellow, orange? Aren't they all just the same?
They are all the same, but they are also all unique, why? Apply the laws.
Isn't uniqueness something of an absolute? "Being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else" sounds like an absolute, doesn't it? Just applying a law :o (not to mention "all the same")
EPT![[image loading]](http://media1.break.com/breakstudios/2012/2/25/dumbo%20crows.jpg)
