EPTLooney Lynching Mini Mafia - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
I don't really want to lynch ON. I think that case is based solely on lurking, not scumminess. Hopeless over ON Sandroba over djo | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 12 2012 20:50 Djodref wrote: yeah, I'm assuming that I'm not going to be able to use my votes the next round... @djo why are you assuming you will be voted over sandroba? | ||
|
da0ud
Hong Kong252 Posts
On October 12 2012 21:30 kushm4sta wrote: @djo why are you assuming you will be voted over sandroba? Hence if Djo is scum then ON cannot be scum, if Djo's assumption of being in the final is correct. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On October 12 2012 21:33 da0ud wrote: Hence if Djo is scum then ON cannot be scum, if Djo's assumption of being in the final is correct. Why is that? I don't follow. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
It's not possible for me to know which one of us is going to advance. I might not be able to be here at deadline so I might not even be able to check and last minute vote. I also prefer to clearly state my intentions right now rather than creating confusion at deadline by dropping suddenly 6 votes. I want Hopeless to advance and to be lynched today, regardless if I'm advancing or not. I also want my votes to be useful. I thought it through and I think the best thing was to use all my votes right now. The side effect is that people who would prefer ON to advance (or Hopeless to be eliminated) have also to commit their votes to achieve it and I really like this as well. By the way, I'm going out for the night and I don't know if I would be able to wake up before 11am tomorrow, if you know what I mean  | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On October 12 2012 21:28 kushm4sta wrote: I'm curious if ET will still defend sandroba and what reasons he will give. I don't really want to lynch ON. I think that case is based solely on lurking, not scumminess. Hopeless over ON Sandroba over djo | ||
|
da0ud
Hong Kong252 Posts
Sorry,,,, again mistypo, I meant If Djo is scum then Hopeless cannot be scum. So either both are townies, or Djo is scum and Hopeless not, or Djo is town and Hopeless is scum. But not both scum. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
@EchelonTee So sandroba kept up his appearance for the first couple of hours and since then he's had a "hunch" post and one measly contribution. Do you really think this looks like townie sandroba? Last sandroba townie game I remember was Space Station where he ruled the town with an iron fist and nailed like 5 out of 6 scum in the first two days. Fucking ridiculous. I don't think that this looks like townie sandroba at all. QUOTE] No, he doesn't like look like townie sandroba at time of your post (reading from p15). Might need to eat my words on him. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:05 prplhz wrote: @EchelonTee So sandroba kept up his appearance for the first couple of hours and since then he's had a "hunch" post and one measly contribution. Do you really think this looks like townie sandroba? Last sandroba townie game I remember was Space Station where he ruled the town with an iron fist and nailed like 5 out of 6 scum in the first two days. Fucking ridiculous. I don't think that this looks like townie sandroba at all. No, he doesn't like look like townie sandroba at time of your post (reading from p15). Might need to eat my words on him. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 12 2012 04:37 Mementoss wrote: 4. ET: Everything about his filter makes me think hes mafia. But maybe Im just reading him completely wrong. He dismisses any comments towards him at all times, hard defends sandroba twice, without real reason or logic to, and is being very sarcastic in the says things to the fact to not get called out on them later. + Show Spoiler + On October 12 2012 02:45 EchelonTee wrote: Uh I just did right there? When there is suspicion on two parties and we assume that at least one is town, then it means that mafia are pushing a townie successfully? + Show Spoiler + On October 12 2012 02:53 EchelonTee wrote: Getting lunch and going to classes. Apparently I have to announce my absences or else I'm "lurking away". His posting is pushing a bad town atmosphere and that is scum agenda. As well as some lines in his posts just seem off, like prplhz pointed out. I think hes scummy but I'm not entirely sure this could just be his meta. Im going to put a vote on him. How exactly are those posts promoting bad town atmosphere? The first one was an explanation post to prplhz; I'm trying to make my words clear. The second one I admit is negative, but that's because I take offense at being called a lurker, by a lurker. You say that I am being dismissive towards comments on me because I address them and turn them away. What would you like me to do instead? I have been snippy I admit, but you calling me scummy for directly confronting accusations is a bit unreasonable. However, I can tone down my language as I've been promoting a bad atmosphere. Never my intention. The majority of your suspicion seems to be centered around my negativity and my association with sandroba. The former I can address, and the latter is uncertain. We have no idea of sandroba is town or scum. I had an early town tell on sandroba because his ideas lined up with mine; this is what I always do to try and figure out towniness. If I find myself coming to the same conclusion as someone independently, then I feel more comfortable with that player. I might be wrong on sandroba, but I am far more comfortable leaving him for a Day 2 read. However, it's simply not right for people to say "EchelonTee supports sandroba. Since I think sandroba is scum, EchelonTee is also scum". That's making an associative tell before full information is available. Will I get a ton of heat if sandroba flips scum? Yes, and I'd deserve it for making a wrong read. But since we don't have that information yet, I'd appreciate it if people laid off. Condemn me if you see deception in my words, but not for simply stating my opinion on things. I'm trying to make it as open as possible why I had a town tell on sandroba, and that I should be held accountable if he flips scum. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 12 2012 05:17 sandroba wrote: That's pretty ridiculous comment prpl. And I known for my manners or my detailed explanation of my actions? No. Have there been any flips so far? No. Look at the cases people posted, which is the strongest? Definetely the case on ON. How can you ever say that I'm not trying to get scum lynched or that my play has been uninspired? You can't. Do you still think prplhz is scum? | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On October 12 2012 23:33 EchelonTee wrote: How exactly are those posts promoting bad town atmosphere? The first one was an explanation post to prplhz; I'm trying to make my words clear. The second one I admit is negative, but that's because I take offense at being called a lurker, by a lurker. You say that I am being dismissive towards comments on me because I address them and turn them away. What would you like me to do instead? I have been snippy I admit, but you calling me scummy for directly confronting accusations is a bit unreasonable. However, I can tone down my language as I've been promoting a bad atmosphere. Never my intention. The majority of your suspicion seems to be centered around my negativity and my association with sandroba. The former I can address, and the latter is uncertain. We have no idea of sandroba is town or scum. I had an early town tell on sandroba because his ideas lined up with mine; this is what I always do to try and figure out towniness. If I find myself coming to the same conclusion as someone independently, then I feel more comfortable with that player. I might be wrong on sandroba, but I am far more comfortable leaving him for a Day 2 read. However, it's simply not right for people to say "EchelonTee supports sandroba. Since I think sandroba is scum, EchelonTee is also scum". That's making an associative tell before full information is available. Will I get a ton of heat if sandroba flips scum? Yes, and I'd deserve it for making a wrong read. But since we don't have that information yet, I'd appreciate it if people laid off. Condemn me if you see deception in my words, but not for simply stating my opinion on things. I'm trying to make it as open as possible why I had a town tell on sandroba, and that I should be held accountable if he flips scum. I was unclear in my intention of those quotes, I was trying to show your sarcastic manner. Yes part of my suspicions was the interactions between you and sandroba but also the way that everytime you show up you show the need to defend yourself in an over the top manner, and then take off. Its not a huge tell, or big scum read, and thats why I didn't use more votes to push you through the matchup. Obviously, it is not scummy to be wrong about something. But since you are not up for lynch anymore, I will stop pushing you, and hope we have 1 mafia in the final 4 that we can make champion. Prove to me through your actions, not through your defenses. through the rest of the day cycle why you are town. If you are town, lets kill scum, if you are mafia, nothing we can do about it for day 1 at least. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 12 2012 08:07 kushm4sta wrote: ET. He has been posting plenty but it's mostly defensive. There is a real lack of scumhunt to his play, especially for someone of his reputation. Me analyzing and scumhunting. I have been addressing nearly every matchup; I disagree that there is a lack of scumhunt. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
??? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 12 2012 18:06 da0ud wrote: + Show Spoiler + Trying to get some reads/assocation of people from previous votes. 1) Only ET has been twice voting for someone he would face in the next round. Djo in the first round when he had a BYE and kush in second. If he was a scum, I would them believe Djo and kush are not. Because at first glance it doesnt seem logic to vote for your mate so that one of you for sure would advance to the next round. He is the only one who has ever voted on the next potential opponent. 2) on Mementoss : he seems to be throwing away votes on as many people as possible and of oppisite logic. Already voted for 4 people which is the most of all of us. First round he votes for Djo and kush to make them move to the next round on their respective matches. But when they move on he decides to now vote on none of them but even worse voting for their opponents in the matchups hence actually totally changing his mind on them and now backing them up. Should have voted again for them to follow his initial logic. 3) Austin looks too unconcerned after being saved on the first round, He hasn't voted anyone in the second round. Looks to me more like a scum who now hides to get us to forget about him. To me a townie, even saved should continue to be implicated in the votes in order to gather as much information as possible on other players. Please let me know your thoughts.... 1.) I don't disagree with your logic, but an example like that shouldn't be a hard association. Remember those were early rounds; a scum putting votes on his buddies in those rounds allows him to distance himself from them (a good scum tactic) while not endangering them too much. 2.) I disagree; people can change their mind as the game develops, and Mementoss has been fairly open, and clearly posted why he changed his logic. 3.) I think the fact that Austin didn't vote in the 2nd round is a bit strange. Not a huge tell, but IMO townies should be involved in at least a few of the matchups per round, for the reason you stated. On October 12 2012 16:59 da0ud wrote: H1 vs ON : It bothers me as well that ON doesnt seem to care very much and has posted only a few messages. Most of them being useless (like his phone being dead for 24hrs, the panic votes). Since then nothing has been posted and I agree that it seems odd for someone from town not to participate in the lynching process as it is its only real way of finding scum. 1. I would expect even more a townie to participate if he is still on for lynching. It makes sense for mafia not to worry about advancing if his accomplices do manage to save him at any future round. H1 posts seems pretty coherent i am maybe too newbie to have a good read out of it. 2. I haven't played no game with any of you in the past, and i actually don't really want to because i want to make myself an opinion out of your posts and not ur behaviour in other games. This post is pretty strange from you. You spent a fairly long post (listed above) detailing your opinions on 3 players, in an organized listed manner. But when it comes to 1der vs ON, a matchup that actually is in play right now, you are much more unclear and hesitant. 1. This point doesn't really hold; you say that a townie who is still in the running for a lynch would probably be more active, which is true. But a scum who is up for lynch would also probably be more active, compared to if he wasn't up for lynch. While I have my own reasons for being suspicious of ON, your logic here is a lot less laid out then your previous points. 2. It's not ok to put down an opinion, then say "well I'm not so sure because I'm a newbie". It seems like you're trying to shy away from responsibility for your actions. Especially because you are more assertive in other posts. If you could make a more definitive stance on 1der/ON, that would be nice. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 12 2012 23:56 EchelonTee wrote: WTF, 1der ninja unvoted and we haven't been making a big hullabaloo about it? ??? Just woke up. I'm too scummy, so no one wants to touch me with a 10 foot pole. Going to explain why I'm voting sandroba shortly, then address djodref's case on me. I'll also start going through the rest of the playerbase and lay out my thoughts and suspicions more clearly (i.e. at all). Do you need me to re-visit my unvote explanation ET? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
On October 13 2012 00:21 Hopeless1der wrote: Just woke up. I'm too scummy, so no one wants to touch me with a 10 foot pole. Going to explain why I'm voting sandroba shortly, then address djodref's case on me. I'll also start going through the rest of the playerbase and lay out my thoughts and suspicions more clearly (i.e. at all). Do you need me to re-visit my unvote explanation ET? No. You unvoted to preserve votes, but the manner in which you did it is shady. If you don't enjoy policy lynches, you shouldn't pull stunts like that. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5239 Posts
| ||
| ||
