|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On March 26 2013 08:26 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 08:23 AgentW wrote:On March 26 2013 08:17 cLAN.Anax wrote:On March 26 2013 06:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On March 26 2013 06:16 Aerisky wrote:
I'm so confused. Who's the actual person in that picture? wtf? well, first, he was the root of all evil, but then things became more complex, but later he returned to being the root of all evil. and then he went to LoL and nobody cared. edit: and quantic something or other--forgot that. One might say it was his fate....  But why on Earth would he mention Bisu when the pic is most clearly not Bisu? Does what he wrote seem like something a person who posts applicable pictures would post? lol. his first post from the pope thread.
That's... that's who I think it is, isn't it? This screams PBU.
On March 26 2013 08:37 Otolia wrote:
Is it possible for someone to have a permanent ban reverted ?
I just saw a post from someone whom I believe was permed. I am adamant he was banned because he was the only people that got under my skin so badly I wanted him to get banned too ... Nonetheless I can't found any post on him on the Banlist nor can I found a post I think I made a long time ago in this very thread rejoicing over his demise.
I believe so. IIRC, Belial was banned but he came back several pages ago. Dunno how or why.
|
|
|
On March 26 2013 08:37 AgentW wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 08:26 dAPhREAk wrote:On March 26 2013 08:23 AgentW wrote:On March 26 2013 08:17 cLAN.Anax wrote:On March 26 2013 06:20 dAPhREAk wrote:On March 26 2013 06:16 Aerisky wrote:
I'm so confused. Who's the actual person in that picture? wtf? well, first, he was the root of all evil, but then things became more complex, but later he returned to being the root of all evil. and then he went to LoL and nobody cared. edit: and quantic something or other--forgot that. One might say it was his fate.... But why on Earth would he mention Bisu when the pic is most clearly not Bisu? Does what he wrote seem like something a person who posts applicable pictures would post? lol. his first post from the pope thread. On March 04 2013 22:03 ShinYoung wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/d5Z6bi5.jpg) User was warned for this post That's... that's who I think it is, isn't it? This screams PBU. Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 08:37 Otolia wrote:
Is it possible for someone to have a permanent ban reverted ?
I just saw a post from someone whom I believe was permed. I am adamant he was banned because he was the only people that got under my skin so badly I wanted him to get banned too ... Nonetheless I can't found any post on him on the Banlist nor can I found a post I think I made a long time ago in this very thread rejoicing over his demise. I believe so. IIRC, Belial was banned but he came back several pages ago. Dunno how or why.
From what I know, after ~90 days, if you apologize to a mod, not PM-spammed anyone, and ask very politely to come back, they'll give you a second chance.
|
|
|
not around anymore. from commandments thread:
On March 26 2013 08:36 StillAroundBeaches wrote:
"The 10 commandements are vague enough that almost anyone here could be banned. That's why they are always the answer. But that means that they don't really help people know what will get them banned and what won't--only that they could be banned at any time, that others aren't, but they still could be for the same things. There's no reassurance to the contrary."
-Hot_Bid
|
StillAroundBeaches was just banned by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2013-03-26 08:22:03 and had 5 posts.
Reason: PBU
Good night, sweet prince. I hardly knew ye.
Nor do I care. If you were permabanned before, it was probably for good reason. Re-registering to (presumably) whine about it will only inflame the situation.
|
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post.
Shady Sands was just temp banned for 2 weeks by pPingu.
That account was created on 2012-06-20 07:05:43 and had 3383 posts.
Reason: Requested
Ask and ye shall receive. In this case, rather swiftly it would seem. Almost makes me wanna try it myself. Almost. As in that I know better than to and will never ask for such a thing.
+ Show Spoiler +For future reference, asking mods to temp-/permaban you is always a bad idea, no matter how funny it may seem at the time.
|
On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post.
I'm never sure if it makes mods jobs easier or harder when I report these posts which are asking for a ban. Thoughts?
|
On March 26 2013 18:06 [RIDER]DubTrub wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +Shady Sands was just temp banned for 2 weeks by pPingu.
That account was created on 2012-06-20 07:05:43 and had 3383 posts.
Reason: Requested Ask and ye shall receive. In this case, rather swiftly it would seem. Almost makes me wanna try it myself. Almost. As in that I know better than to and will never ask for such a thing. + Show Spoiler +For future reference, asking mods to temp-/permaban you is always a bad idea, no matter how funny it may seem at the time.
He wanted to get banned for whatever reason. Requesting bans is pretty common.
On March 26 2013 18:28 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post. I'm never sure if it makes mods jobs easier or harder when I report these posts which are asking for a ban. Thoughts?
There was some stuff on it a few pages back from Kadavar. Something to do with whether it counts towards people's ban stats. I think it makes no difference really, I can't imagine it making their lives more difficult.
|
Germany25649 Posts
On March 26 2013 18:28 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post. I'm never sure if it makes mods jobs easier or harder when I report these posts which are asking for a ban. Thoughts?
Reporting ban requests is a good thing. Mods aren't reading every post of every thread, so ban requests can easily be missed. When you report them they will definately be seen, and it takes about 30 seconds to handle the report, so it's no problem at all.
|
On March 26 2013 20:02 KadaverBB wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 18:28 Promethelax wrote:On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post. I'm never sure if it makes mods jobs easier or harder when I report these posts which are asking for a ban. Thoughts? Reporting ban requests is a good thing. Mods aren't reading every post of every thread, so ban requests can easily be missed. When you report them they will definately be seen, and it takes about 30 seconds to handle the report, so it's no problem at all.
thats a different way of thinking about it. I'd always thought it was kind of a dick move, but I see the logic in that Kadaver :>.
|
On March 26 2013 23:32 docvoc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 20:02 KadaverBB wrote:On March 26 2013 18:28 Promethelax wrote:On March 26 2013 17:17 Shady Sands wrote:
I was going to make some awesome irrelevant post in here to get the ban, but having tasted the short end (or infinitely long, if that makes sense) of that stick before, I don't want to mess up my mod history. Requesting two weeks off, thanks =)
EDIT: my last post for two weeks is going to be about tasting a long stick =S
User was temp banned for this post. I'm never sure if it makes mods jobs easier or harder when I report these posts which are asking for a ban. Thoughts? Reporting ban requests is a good thing. Mods aren't reading every post of every thread, so ban requests can easily be missed. When you report them they will definately be seen, and it takes about 30 seconds to handle the report, so it's no problem at all. thats a different way of thinking about it. I'd always thought it was kind of a dick move, but I see the logic in that Kadaver :>.
How is it a dick move if they want to get banned?
|
crazyweasel was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-07 02:51:35 and had 320 posts.
Reason: Arguing in the general forum without a shred of awareness of the issues involved, instead just going for the generic USA = evil bandwagon. The incident that got you banned was when you tried to argue that the USA was an aggressive evil state while NK was not and then cited the Korean War (in which NK invaded SK and a UN force was created to defend SK self detirmination) as an example of this.
Not in my general forum. We have standards.
KwarK once again wets his blade with the blood of the General Forum.
|
crazyweasel was just temp banned for 2 days by ToKoreaWithLove.
That account was created on 2011-03-07 02:51:35 and had 309 posts.
Reason: Stop being a bad poster. Stupid flamebait.
crazyweasel was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-07 02:51:35 and had 320 posts.
Reason: Arguing in the general forum without a shred of awareness of the issues involved, instead just going for the generic USA = evil bandwagon. The incident that got you banned was when you tried to argue that the USA was an aggressive evil state while NK was not and then cited the Korean War (in which NK invaded SK and a UN force was created to defend SK self detirmination) as an example of this.
Not in my general forum. We have standards.
Took him about six days and eleven posts for the repeat, I'd say weasel's time may be rather limited here. Should he choose to keep it up.
|
On March 27 2013 01:36 Ladygaga wrote:
Usa sux they are just a big bad bully and everyone is just afraid of them but im not. im not afraid of usa nukes and i hope all americans get a really bad headache atleast 5 min every day for the rest of their lives.
ban = proven right amerikee
User was banned for this post.
Ladygaga was just banned by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-09-13 02:53:57 and had 15 posts.
Reason: By request I think?
I think so too.
|
On March 27 2013 01:43 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2013 01:36 Ladygaga wrote:
Usa sux they are just a big bad bully and everyone is just afraid of them but im not. im not afraid of usa nukes and i hope all americans get a really bad headache atleast 5 min every day for the rest of their lives.
ban = proven right amerikee
User was banned for this post. Show nested quote +Ladygaga was just banned by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-09-13 02:53:57 and had 15 posts.
Reason: By request I think? I think so too.
I liked the part about a "really bad headache at least 5 min every day". Like it's not so extreme and filled with hatred as some banned posts are, but they wish people to be inflicted with moderate annoyance.
|
On March 27 2013 00:52 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +crazyweasel was just temp banned for 2 days by ToKoreaWithLove.
That account was created on 2011-03-07 02:51:35 and had 309 posts.
Reason: Stop being a bad poster. Stupid flamebait. Show nested quote +crazyweasel was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.
That account was created on 2011-03-07 02:51:35 and had 320 posts.
Reason: Arguing in the general forum without a shred of awareness of the issues involved, instead just going for the generic USA = evil bandwagon. The incident that got you banned was when you tried to argue that the USA was an aggressive evil state while NK was not and then cited the Korean War (in which NK invaded SK and a UN force was created to defend SK self detirmination) as an example of this.
Not in my general forum. We have standards. Took him about six days and eleven posts for the repeat, I'd say weasel's time may be rather limited here. Should he choose to keep it up.
not often you see a ban notice that is a paragraph long:
On March 27 2013 00:30 crazyweasel wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2013 00:19 KwarK wrote:On March 27 2013 00:12 crazyweasel wrote:Nuke will never be used(physically) again, in my opinion. Should never have been used either (ww2 was already won with stalingrad's battle). Nowadays Nukes are only used to make internatonal pressure. It's based on fear and a destruction potential. NK would never nuke USA, they just use menaces to obtain more fundings/lever towards international community.
I'm tired of hearing people talk about how combatants should take into account their adversary's civilian population centers in a war scenario. I'm tired of hearing people that have no clue what war justifies and entails try and put trite limitations in the effort to be or appear to be humane.
War is the killing of others on a large scale for a dedicated purpose. If I've a choice between ANY city in the United States getting nuked and NK's capital getting nuked, I would always, 100% of the time, protect the US' and choose NK's capital. I just pray to Almighty God that the put-offs and workarounds that the international community is running through don't cost more American lives.
If the international community's sanctions don't work and any American or South Korean forces are hit with nuclear weaponry... well.
why NK would derserve a nuke more than USA? if we speak about deaths, USa has spilled blood all over the planet for its proper interest ? Why is it that USA got in so lately in ww2, why didn't the west intervene when poland was invaded? what justifies USA having Nukes and not other countries? What other option have NK or Iran than nuclear fear to obtain gains while they suffer huge embargo from the west? I think this question needs a wider look: USA demonizing NK is also proclaiming itself good, while making NK inherently bad. Even though they should be on equal standpoints(NK hasnt done anything worse than USA). This is nonsensical USA bashing. NK is objectively worse than the USA in innumerable ways and pretending otherwise is absurd. NK is a Stalinist police state that exists only through deliberate impoverishment of its people and unrelenting state brutality, the USA is, for all its faults, a free state. The USA doesn't just say it's good and that NK is bad, the USA is objectively better than NK as can be seen by anything but the most biased misinterpretations of the facts. how is NK worse than USA? vietnam, kosovo, korea war, iraq twice, iroshima etc. the list is long im not USA bashing at all im simply relativising, nobody deserve a nuke is what i am saying. nothing more. No morality justifies a genocide. thats pure irrational hatred. NK is totally wrong in its policies i 100% agree. but as a matter of fact USA did help military totalitarism in South america, argentina, chile that are as bad as NK's totalitarism, where people died, disapeard, were tortured exiled. im just trying here to point out how incredibly TOO far you go. and you just proved me that its only about NK being "stalinist" User was temp banned for obscene levels of ignorance of the subject, specifically using the Korean War, in which NK invaded SK and a UN task force defended SK, as an example of the US being an aggressive state in comparison to NK. He was not temp banned for any of his generic bashing on the US in the other posts, it was this post alone, where he demonstrated a lack of awareness that North Korea was actually in the Korean war, that earned him it.
|
If Kwark was a mod years and years ago, ghostwriter would have been permed when he thought the Holocaust was spurred by religious affiliation, not "race", and that the Jewish identity was a purely religious one, not an ethnic-cultural one.
|
It also should be noted that by prefacing your statement with, "I'm not USA bashing at all, I'm simply relativising," (I think he meant contextualizing, but I don't want to put words in his mouth) that what is about to follow could be construed as bashing with little to no effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
