EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1816
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18835 Posts
StevenWang was just temp banned for 1 week by GMarshal. That account was created on 2012-12-30 04:38:54 and had 27 posts. Reason: I asked you in the thread to take it to website feedback. I warned you to take it to website feedback in PMs. You ignored me, so now you can't argue about it. Who knew GMarsh was such a poet  I asked you I warned you You ignored me So away with you! | ||
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
On March 27 2013 04:32 farvacola wrote: Who knew GMarsh was such a poet I asked you I warned you You ignored me So away with you! Nickleback-level poetry right there | ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
On March 27 2013 04:10 StevenWang wrote: Don't take this the wrong way... But TeamLiquid is a profitable business. These should in fact be PAID positions. This is no longer just a community website. It is a business. TeamLiquid has merchandise, outlet ability, advertisements that make money, a pro league roster (which are paid) and a merge with Team EG. The largest and most profitable team in USA. http://www.worthofweb.com/website-value/http://teamliquid.net (Highly accurate in reading impressions.) Estimated net worth of www.teamliquid.net is 25,000,000. Bringing in almost 4,000,000 a year. Not to mention if you wanted to know what the salaries of their players are, I can go into detail about that as well. As I said, don't take this personally, but I believe people should know that www.TL.net is a business that is utilizing volunteer work to keep up their profitable website. On March 27 2013 04:13 StevenWang wrote: And I am a firm believer that volunteer work is and only should be allowed for "non-for-profit businesses." On March 27 2013 04:14 StevenWang wrote: http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/docs/volunteers.asp Right from the department of labor. On March 27 2013 04:19 StevenWang wrote: For profit companies are NOT allowed to utilize volunteers. User was warned for this post On March 27 2013 04:21 StevenWang wrote: http://smallbusiness.foxbusiness.com/legal-hr/2012/09/21/using-volunteers-interns-to-save-it-could-cost/ Another link describing in full. A volunteer can not benefit a profit business. In this case they are... On March 27 2013 04:22 StevenWang wrote: That is aside from the point. I am a business owner. This is illegal, and wrong. You have to at least offer compensation... A business like tl can afford to pay 8 dollars an hour... User was temp banned for ignoring warnings, both in PMs and in the thread. Kind of scary once you realize that other people who couldn't be bothered posting might share this belief. | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
On March 27 2013 22:22 Gamegene wrote: Kind of scary once you realize that other people who couldn't be bothered posting might share this belief. I thought he had a point there for a second. Then I saw he was talking about TL and I was like, "Lol, nevermind. He's just a dumb whiner." X-D A business like tl can afford to pay 8 dollars an hour... Bahahahahaha.... I think the members of TL are "compensated" satisfactorily by seeing people like him banned.  | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
inb4 Gmarshall forms the band 3 bans down with KadaverBB and Nyovne, Kwark can be the bassist that no one ever sees lol. They write all their lyrics on bans. | ||
imallinson
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On March 27 2013 22:22 Gamegene wrote: Kind of scary once you realize that other people who couldn't be bothered posting might share this belief. It's kind of stupid arguing that people are being treated unfairly when the people you are talking about are doing it completely willingly and aren't being forced. Also weird that the two people who were complaining about it being a voluntary position both had <30 posts and thus haven't really contributed anything to tl themselves. | ||
|
[RIDER]DubTrub
United States153 Posts
alaeh was just banned by KadaverBB. That account was created on 2013-03-27 22:09:29 and had 1 posts. Reason: Registered just to ask for a dota 2 key. abbasbasili was just banned by KadaverBB. That account was created on 2013-03-27 15:31:24 and had 2 posts. Reason: Registered just to ask for a dota 2 key. Everyone + Show Spoiler + except for me Stop doing stupid shit like this. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On March 28 2013 02:07 [RIDER]DubTrub wrote: Everyone + Show Spoiler + except for me Stop doing stupid shit like this. I really don't understand this behavior, Valve gave me and just about everyone I know like 7 keys, I am the some odd percentage. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On March 28 2013 02:16 ThomasjServo wrote: I really don't understand this behavior, Valve gave me and just about everyone I know like 7 keys, I am the some odd percentage. Not really. I'm in the same boat and so are my close friends and considering how you can't sell a DotA 2 key anymore this must surely mean that pretty much everyone has one. Oh and lol at that guy who was trying to portray TL as some ruthless company that makes massive profit off the back of exploiting volunteers or whatever. Seriously? lol | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On March 27 2013 22:22 Gamegene wrote: Kind of scary once you realize that other people who couldn't be bothered posting might share this belief. It is, since if you take what he's saying at face value, then he's correct. But of course if you clicked on a few of his links you'd see that he's heavily distorting his 'facts'. The very first link I clicked from the DoL website was a survey to find out if you're business is exempt from these rules and the very first question was: over 500k yearly revenue. So unless Nazgul is secretly raking it in, I highly doubt TL has to follow these volunteer rules. There are plenty of other exemptions that TL might match too (I couldn't be bothered checking them all) and you could probably even argue that the purpose of TLpedia is for people to add information and thus they aren't employees but users, ect. Actually, the funniest part was the worth of web link he provided. For fun I punched in the website for my company - which does no advertising mind you - and it had us doing millions of dollars a year in advertising revenue (it's in the fine print: it multiplies traffic X guestimated cpm). So ya, worthofweb like all the other web traffic sites is pulling numbers out of their ass. | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Either way the guy ended up out of line, although its reasonable for him to speak up and say he thinks TL should pay people. I disagree with him, but he can have his opinions. Just not expressed like that... | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On March 28 2013 07:03 Salazarz wrote: Seriously? Japan wouldn't surrender, and it would be a bloody war with millions of casualties? They had basically no standing army left by the time nukes were bombed. Majority of Japanese troops were stationed in Manchuria and around the Pacific, and they were crushed by that point. They had barely any fuel for what few operating warships and aircraft they had left, food supply was a major issue, and there were no reserves to be called upon. I'm sorry but I'm not going to give you any 'sources' on this because it's not something I just looked up on wikipedia or whatever stupid website just now to prove how valid my argument is. But hey, I'm sure they'd put up a glorious defence with like, ninjas and shurikens. User was temp banned for this post. edit: ban reason was not related to japan bombing. Salazarz was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK. That account was created on 2012-04-21 20:19:46 and had 404 posts. Reason: nope | ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=95875¤tpage=1815#36296 | ||
micronesia
United States24723 Posts
Also, discussing whether or not nuclear warheads were justified in Japan is not a big leap from whether from current events. I'll be impressed when you find a thread arguing about who is the best strategist in game of thrones turning into a japan-bomb argument. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On March 28 2013 07:19 micronesia wrote: Note that the ban was apparently for the crap about 'I won't give sources' rather than for bomb discussion. Also, discussing whether or not nuclear warheads were justified in Japan is not a big leap from whether from current events. I'll be impressed when you find a thread arguing about who is the best strategist in game of thrones turning into a japan-bomb argument. i do enjoy a challenge. the other thread that turned into nuclear bombing in japan was the bush/blair war crimes one. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On March 28 2013 07:13 dAPhREAk wrote: someone told me that all arguments lead to discussing the bomb in Japan. i thought he/she was kidding. maybe not. north korea thread: I think that was Godwin's law and it said that the longer an internet discussion goes on, the higher the probability of someone mentioning or drawing comparison to Hitler or the Nazi movement. | ||
|
Snorkels
United States1015 Posts
I got to the end of page one confused by StealthBlue's link and worried by the number of nukes floating around in there. Check which mod closed it and NINE year necro >:D I don't even... | ||
| ||
