World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:02 slOosh wrote: Scum marv would call scumbuddy HF scum? Scum-marv would deflect like a baws | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 02 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote: Hmm. Ok so another reason why I think HF is town. If marv is scum with him, then Marv wont call him town. If marv is town, marv is probably right. So both ways, HF is town I think. I think that marv is null, he hasnt shown much of anything either way. To be expected this early on, no? I think you're either under or overestimating marv's scumgame if you think he can't call his scumpartner town. Same goes for town marv being right/wrong about HF On October 03 2013 00:02 slOosh wrote: Scum marv would call scumbuddy HF scum? Whatsup sloosh, any thoughts on stuffs? | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Let's not be exaggerating now | ||
slOosh
3291 Posts
As for Dirkzor ... I'm leaning town on him. The thing reads like he came into thread while still developing thoughts, got called out and is all frazzled out for it. I disagree that voting HF is the easy way to go, because at the time three people (me then BH then clarity) had given town reads on him. Scum willingly voting HF after seeing three people give town reads means that they are ready to engage attention. So I don't think it was an easy "park my vote move along". | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:14 marvellosity wrote: I said he "felt quite town" Let's not be exaggerating now its cool man, it rustles BH's jimmies. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:16 slOosh wrote: I still think Risen is lame, but he hasn't posted yet. As for Dirkzor ... I'm leaning town on him. The thing reads like he came into thread while still developing thoughts, got called out and is all frazzled out for it. I disagree that voting HF is the easy way to go, because at the time three people (me then BH then clarity) had given town reads on him. Scum willingly voting HF after seeing three people give town reads means that they are ready to engage attention. So I don't think it was an easy "park my vote move along". You will admit, though, he's all but admitted his vote is worthless. There's quite the difference between "developing thoughts" and "voting someone based on bs" | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:16 slOosh wrote: I still think Risen is lame, but he hasn't posted yet. As for Dirkzor ... I'm leaning town on him. The thing reads like he came into thread while still developing thoughts, got called out and is all frazzled out for it. I disagree that voting HF is the easy way to go, because at the time three people (me then BH then clarity) had given town reads on him. Scum willingly voting HF after seeing three people give town reads means that they are ready to engage attention. So I don't think it was an easy "park my vote move along". Being frazzled is exclusively a townie characteristic? Yes his vote draws attention to him but he clearly did not read the thread in enough detail to provide good reasons for his vote, which means he possibly did not read closely enough to understand thread sentiment about HF either. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Though honestly if you were wrong I'd sheep you as scum so, meh. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Anyway, want to hear more from sloosh and this townread of his. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:16 slOosh wrote: I still think Risen is lame, but he hasn't posted yet. As for Dirkzor ... I'm leaning town on him. The thing reads like he came into thread while still developing thoughts, got called out and is all frazzled out for it. I disagree that voting HF is the easy way to go, because at the time three people (me then BH then clarity) had given town reads on him. Scum willingly voting HF after seeing three people give town reads means that they are ready to engage attention. So I don't think it was an easy "park my vote move along". It's twice you've mentioned this now without any furthe explanation. Makes marv a sad little whore. | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On October 03 2013 00:16 slOosh wrote: I still think Risen is lame, but he hasn't posted yet. As for Dirkzor ... I'm leaning town on him. The thing reads like he came into thread while still developing thoughts, got called out and is all frazzled out for it. I disagree that voting HF is the easy way to go, because at the time three people (me then BH then clarity) had given town reads on him. Scum willingly voting HF after seeing three people give town reads means that they are ready to engage attention. So I don't think it was an easy "park my vote move along". Firstly this doesn't even make sense. Dirkzor just coming into the thread with a straight up single paragraph on me and then voting me over the guy he wrote the rest of the post on was outwright confusing to say the least. Why specifically would he even mention that much on oats compared to say, risen and ray (who nobody has so far even mentioned despite his ridiculous 2 posts)? What you imply is that he actually had read the thread in its entirety to know that 3 people had given town reads on me. When you see his next post: On October 02 2013 19:15 Dirkzor wrote: Not different reasoning. He hasn't done anything. I said the in the first post and I stand by that. Add that to supporting rng "because BH said so" and him walking around BH's shadow is a great reason for me to vote him. I still dont get how it can be opportunistic? Had it been oppurtinistic if I had voted someone else or is it onle because it was HF? Followed by: + Show Spoiler + On October 02 2013 20:11 Dirkzor wrote: Thank you. Ok. So I went back to find evidence that HF have been sheeping BH. Not much was found... Only little thing was this (and it's not really worth noting in the sheeping department): Other then that HF have been more original then I said he had been. Hmm.. That clashes with my previous belief. After re reading I'm also leaning more scum on oats. But I'm not sure it is entirely because of re-reading or just because I now think HF looks less scum. The problem with oats is that he have done some wierd shit as I pointed out earlier. But the feel I get when reading his filter is of someone who cares... It clearly shows that he in fact did not read the thread and only the beginning/my filter. He doesn't value his vote, he doesn't read the thread before posting a conclusion and then backtracks when people call him out on it claiming to have 'reread'? Lastly, On October 02 2013 22:38 Dirkzor wrote: Maybe I didn't value that vote so highly. Maybe I did just want to stir up things to see what fell out. That's a complete 180 from what he was expressing before. It seems like a fishy way, as people have mentioned, to try and appear like he was doing it all on purpose all along. ------------------------------------------------------- Also, sloosh, you have still not answered our posts about: On October 02 2013 18:37 Holyflare wrote: slOosh at least started asking questions when he initially joined into the discussion although has not really contributed since then at least he read up to date or so it seems. He's not too into meta but is alright saying that oats' play is just like his meta view of him though which was a little odd. Need to hear more on that side of things. Why is oats not portraying scum traits to you, especially after his unvote just today? Why have you not even mentioned it, and why are you basing off meta you aren't into? ---------------------------- As for oats, On October 02 2013 23:59 Oatsmaster wrote: Hmm. Ok so another reason why I think HF is town. If marv is scum with him, then Marv wont call him town. If marv is town, marv is probably right. So both ways, HF is town I think. I think that marv is null, he hasnt shown much of anything either way. That's ridiculous wifom and adds nothing to the entire topic. I don't like it one bit. Especially coupled with, On October 02 2013 22:56 Oatsmaster wrote: I read/detunneled. ##vote Dirkzor also sheeping marv is cool. + Show Spoiler + On October 02 2013 13:35 Oatsmaster wrote: I dont understand how you equate having a extreme stance on someone from their first post = scummy. Both me and Risen explained reasons to think that Holyflare is scum and you seem to think that Holyflare is scummy too. WHAT THE FUCK IS THERE TO CONVINCE YOU ABOUT ?? ? ? ?? ? I dont know if you are bad or if you are scum BH. Dirkzor had "an extreme stance on a first post" but it's ok to vote him now for it? Especially as you now say: On October 03 2013 00:23 Oatsmaster wrote: Man both Marv and Clarity are saying the exact same things. If you agree with Marv on his vote, why is it such a factor to you that someone else agrees with it so openly? At least he has put forth reasoning into his voting, even if it is similar to marvs. Yours just straight up changed until you were pressured to post why you switched and even then you haven't told us why you are voting dirk? | ||
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Come on townies, shine bright. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
If you agree with Marv on his vote, why is it such a factor to you that someone else agrees with it so openly? At least he has put forth reasoning into his voting, even if it is similar to marvs. Yours just straight up changed until you were pressured to post why you switched and even then you haven't told us why you are voting dirk? What? I just pointed out something humorous. why so srs. Also I agree with whatever Marv and clarity said about Dirkzor. Dirkzor had "an extreme stance on a first post" but it's ok to vote him now for it? Especially as you now say: Its null. Holyflare, can you verbalise why you think im scum in like 3-4 points please so I can address/destroy them. | ||
| ||