|
On December 13 2009 09:50 iSCd wrote: Well kolll lost quite some points losing to two B+ players today - as long as SD_DS is playing a proper game it should be ok. But I dont like the games' flavour...
I'm not blaming Koll or Morrow because why wouldn't you want to play somebody the 3 times if you can get the points? Say they're looking for a game and the guy says he'll play. He knows he probably has no shot at winning, but wants to see both players do better in the ladder. While it's not cheating on their part it is certainly not in the spirit either. I expect there to be some of this, but I just hope it doesn't run rampant.
|
|
Hmm, now that I look at it the way I see it is that Morrow needs first place pretty badly. Imo he has improved alot but I think saying that hes in the top 12 of all foreignors right now isnt true. I think his rank is a little inflated and I think he could beat Nony in a Bo5 but I dont think he could make it past the qualifier because even if his TvZ and TvP is on par with the competition his TvT simply isn't.
|
On December 13 2009 09:50 zimp wrote:Show nested quote +On December 13 2009 07:59 538 wrote:On December 13 2009 07:57 iSCd wrote:Sziky has balls to play Sen for no reason - he droped from the top12 due to em... He was savely in them - the top12 are hardly threatend. Was he trying to get past Idra or what? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55b85/55b8543a784257d975cd9fcbb1cc0427735b6e14" alt="" He's just a baller. He wants to practice a bit because he feels he's not in his former shape. - thats what he said LOL
could have used another account and played some non tsl'ers?
|
|
Dreiven still fighting , if he can manage to get 2-3 wins maybe he will qualify just in time
|
No smurfing rule definitely hurt the more famous players
I know if you're good enough you can make it no matter what but it still kind of sucks that the degree of difficulty is higher. Ladder "strategy" shouldn't matter as much as it has turned out to matter in my opinion.
If there was somehow a TSL3 I kind of hope they let top players smurf (and transfer around to avoid getting detected). It would be a huge pain to check for abuse but if they forced a process (like you have to privately announce to the admins what account you're transferring from and to, and have every replay available for every game) on it I think it's doable.
|
Crazy how a full A ranking does not even guarantee a top 12 finish.
|
I'm agree, TSL rules should be changed T.T
|
LZ!!!!!!! MAKE IT BEFORE THE END T_T
|
morrow taken down by shauni haha
|
On December 13 2009 10:01 jtan wrote: morrow taken down by shauni haha
Too bad for Morrow but this way we might see another sweden in the playoffs.
|
damn morrow.. well at least I can go sleep now
|
Reason's trying to make it to qualifiers 3 now I guess. Damn he seems ubeatable as far as foreigners go, so damn strong
|
On December 13 2009 10:02 grobo wrote:Too bad for Morrow data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" but this way we might see another sweden in the playoffs.
Yeah, I noticed there have been 6-7 swedes from the cutoff point to rank 70 today. Wondered how many of them would make it.
|
So the bar might even rise to 9700..
|
On December 13 2009 09:42 city42 wrote:I wonder how the admins will enforce the rule as it pertains to kolll vs sziky. The rule is as follows: Show nested quote + Rule 2 - Example: If you are playing the same player, 3-0, 4-1, 5-2 would be acceptable scores, but 4-0 or 5-1 would not be. Any violations will result in point penalties.
Now, kolll beat sziky 3-0, then lost 1-2 to him just recently. However, he won the first game of the second three game series, meaning at that moment in time he was 4-0 vs. sziky. The rule can be interpreted two ways: 1) If at any point in time you have a 4+ win differential against the same opponent within a 24 hour period, you have broken the rule. 2) If, after the 24 period starting with the first game has elapsed, you have a 4+ win differential against the same opponent, you have broken the rule. Kolll would be guilty of #1, but not #2 (although if he keeps playing sziky he could potentially violate #2 as well).
In my understanding they should have stopped playing as soon as it was 3-0 in favour of one of them. Way #2 would be an absurd rule, how could you be sure that you will bring back the differential to only 3 at the end of the day?
|
Lz and G5 need to get or I'll be dampened with sadness
|
Man... I want Mamon to make it more than anyone... If he doesnt I will feel so bad for him.
|
On December 13 2009 09:57 darktreb wrote:If there was somehow a TSL3 I kind of hope they let top players smurf (and transfer around to avoid getting detected). It would be a huge pain to check for abuse but if they forced a process (like you have to privately announce to the admins what account you're transferring from and to, and have every replay available for every game) on it I think it's doable.
and wouldn't that be exciting. i somehow doubt we would have 156 pages of p26hn1 is only 1 win out of the top 48 guys! wow, p28jd5 just 3-0'd p98kd8! siick!
certain sacrifices must be made to turn games of starcraft into a $23k tournament. bending to spectators is one.
|
|
|
|