On January 25 2012 06:25 Hassybaby wrote:
Toast, you're really bored aren't youdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Toast, you're really bored aren't you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
You have no idea.
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
January 24 2012 21:31 GMT
#15741
On January 25 2012 06:25 Hassybaby wrote: Toast, you're really bored aren't you ![]() You have no idea. | ||
![]()
Chill
Calgary25963 Posts
January 24 2012 21:45 GMT
#15742
On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: Show nested quote + On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. Why does God force you to post here? WHYYYYY?!!!!!!!! WHY HAVE YOU CURSED ME LORD???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | ||
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
January 24 2012 21:51 GMT
#15743
On January 25 2012 06:31 TheToast wrote: You have no idea. Join the club, hence writing content ;D! | ||
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
January 24 2012 22:11 GMT
#15744
On January 25 2012 06:45 Chill wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. Why does God force you to post here? WHYYYYY?!!!!!!!! WHY HAVE YOU CURSED ME LORD???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! chill | ||
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
January 24 2012 22:13 GMT
#15745
On January 25 2012 06:51 Torte de Lini wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 06:31 TheToast wrote: On January 25 2012 06:25 Hassybaby wrote: Toast, you're really bored aren't you ![]() You have no idea. Join the club, hence writing content ;D! I might start having to blog about some of my freshman year drunken student government stories. Some of them are so bizzare I don't know if people would believe them though. | ||
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
January 25 2012 00:18 GMT
#15746
TheOther was just temp banned for 1 week by HawaiianPig. That account was created on 2011-05-24 09:11:13 and had 1 posts. Reason: Read the thread note. Your intolerance is absolutely unacceptable. Don't ever post like this again. TheOther was just banned by heyoka. That account was created on 2011-05-24 09:11:13 and had 1 posts. Reason: Upgrading to perm. ouch poor noob what was he banned for? | ||
![]()
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
January 25 2012 00:24 GMT
#15747
On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: Show nested quote + On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
January 25 2012 00:28 GMT
#15748
On January 25 2012 09:24 tree.hugger wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. + Show Spoiler + http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GS_1bzaj2fw first time i have typed lol and actually lol'd. well played sir. | ||
Craton
United States17233 Posts
January 25 2012 01:12 GMT
#15749
I received this PM from "gtrsrs" I'm quite sure it's in volation of PM policy: legit question cause i have never seen you post anything remotely positive, everything is always the most downer thing ever - do your parents beat you or something? do you want to talk about it? | ||
arb
Noobville17920 Posts
January 25 2012 01:14 GMT
#15750
On January 25 2012 10:12 Craton wrote: Hi, I received this PM from "gtrsrs" I'm quite sure it's in volation of PM policy: Show nested quote + legit question cause i have never seen you post anything remotely positive, everything is always the most downer thing ever - do your parents beat you or something? do you want to talk about it? PM a mod about it, they usually deal with that | ||
liberal
1116 Posts
January 25 2012 01:20 GMT
#15751
On January 25 2012 10:12 Craton wrote: Hi, I received this PM from "gtrsrs" I'm quite sure it's in volation of PM policy: Show nested quote + legit question cause i have never seen you post anything remotely positive, everything is always the most downer thing ever - do your parents beat you or something? do you want to talk about it? After 6000+ posts you haven't learned that this should be dealt with by PM'ing a mod? Also, the message isn't really that bad. It's kind of funny really, although I realize it's not funny to you. I suggest getting a little thicker skin and not take the message so seriously/personally. | ||
![]()
Kiett
United States7639 Posts
January 25 2012 01:25 GMT
#15752
| ||
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
January 25 2012 01:27 GMT
#15753
On January 25 2012 10:12 Craton wrote: Hi, I received this PM from "gtrsrs" I'm quite sure it's in volation of PM policy: Show nested quote + legit question cause i have never seen you post anything remotely positive, everything is always the most downer thing ever - do your parents beat you or something? do you want to talk about it? dude, what a downer post in this thread. ;-) | ||
CeriseCherries
6170 Posts
January 25 2012 01:34 GMT
#15754
On January 25 2012 06:45 Chill wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. Why does God force you to post here? WHYYYYY?!!!!!!!! WHY HAVE YOU CURSED ME LORD???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He enjoys the moderate temperature | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
January 25 2012 01:53 GMT
#15755
On January 25 2012 10:34 CeriseCherries wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 06:45 Chill wrote: On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. Why does God force you to post here? WHYYYYY?!!!!!!!! WHY HAVE YOU CURSED ME LORD???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He enjoys the moderate temperature I'm warming up to you. | ||
nooboon
2602 Posts
January 25 2012 02:01 GMT
#15756
TheOther was just banned by heyoka. That account was created on 2011-05-24 09:11:13 and had 1 posts. Reason: Upgrading to perm. This ban made me realize that it says "1 posts" And now i can't get it out of my head ![]() | ||
Keyboard Warrior
United States1178 Posts
January 25 2012 03:00 GMT
#15757
On January 25 2012 10:53 TehTemplar wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 10:34 CeriseCherries wrote: On January 25 2012 06:45 Chill wrote: On January 25 2012 02:16 jdseemoreglass wrote: On January 24 2012 16:37 Craton wrote: On January 24 2012 15:19 NicolBolas wrote: On January 24 2012 11:03 Craton wrote: How is this worth a week ban: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=255487¤tpage=349#6977 Well... But education is completely irrelevant. You dont learn to understand economics by being able to do math equations, and you dont proof anything by empirical results. If that isn't stupidity worthy of a ban, I don't know what is. The phrasing on the last part was bad, but his overall thought wasn't wrong, which was elaborated on later posts. His tone was also civil. A week is extremely harsh. Clearly the ban was too harsh. But if you haven't learned this yet, tree hugger has a propensity to ban people who express opinions he doesn't agree with, particularly those of a "limited government" variety. The moment Hider made a link to Mises, he had a death sentence over his account. Of course, TH has the sense to wait for the poster to make some small error, to mispeak or say something unpopular or something that can be taken out of context, before banning them. Usually no one has the balls to point these types of things out, but when they do, the go-to argument in these types of cases is to always assume that the posters history is shit and justifies anything a mod ever does, without actually looking up their history and judging for yourself. It's the classic "god works in mysterious ways" type of justification. The reality is that certain people get tired of hearing certain arguments in certain threads, and feel it would be better for everyone if the arguments just went away. This is where all the sheeple point me to the ten commandments and the fact that the mods never believed in free expression or the tolerance of diverse opinions in the first place. And people call this a "mature" community lawl. User was temp banned for this post. Why does God force you to post here? WHYYYYY?!!!!!!!! WHY HAVE YOU CURSED ME LORD???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He enjoys the moderate temperature I'm warming up to you. Just be cool about it, otherwise people will get ideas. | ||
Keyboard Warrior
United States1178 Posts
January 25 2012 03:43 GMT
#15758
dAPhREAk was just temp banned for 2 days by SoMuchBetter. That account was created on 2010-07-14 10:52:14 and had 2176 posts. Reason: Don't derail threads with bullshit. Read them before you post. Anyone seen where this occured? | ||
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
January 25 2012 03:49 GMT
#15759
On January 25 2012 11:10 dAPhREAk wrote: Show nested quote + On January 25 2012 11:09 ticklishmusic wrote: On January 25 2012 11:07 dAPhREAk wrote: way to go Angela Zhang! I really hope you're trolling, because this has nothing to do with her... omg. you are stalking me now!!! dude, get the chip off your shoulder and go back to the other thread.... User was temp banned for this post. i think he had an argument in another thread and it carried over | ||
ComeOnNow
1 Post
January 25 2012 04:30 GMT
#15760
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2![]() Rain ![]() Sea ![]() Horang2 ![]() actioN ![]() Larva ![]() Mini ![]() Nal_rA ![]() ZerO ![]() Mong ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games tarik_tv39806 B2W.Neo1000 crisheroes440 sgares419 Fuzer ![]() Pyrionflax278 SortOf248 ZerO(Twitch)17 ArmadaUGS4 Organizations StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • -Miszu- ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Other Games |
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Korean StarCraft League
[ Show More ] PiG Sty Festival
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|