EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 75
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22260 Posts
| ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On June 07 2010 02:03 EvilTeletubby wrote: I don't think there were official threads to the public about either one. So it will just remain mostly a mystery then? | ||
|
Licmyobelisk
Philippines3682 Posts
On June 07 2010 02:22 meeple wrote: So it will just remain mostly a mystery then? IIRC, Plexa demoted Rek with a very very long message as well before banning him lol | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11567 Posts
| ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On June 07 2010 03:07 Licmyobelisk wrote: IIRC, Plexa demoted Rek with a very very long message as well before banning him lol http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=76628 That was a reaction to Plexa's ban on Rek... but I don't think Plexa demoted him or even that it was the thoughts of a single mod. It's probably Naz's final say and a collection of feelings amongst the mods at that time. | ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On June 07 2010 03:23 FragKrag wrote: Didn't rekrul say he was gonna make a much better site or something after he lost his mod powers? haha Yeah lol... http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=70275 I don't think it ever went anywhere though.... | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
 | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21550 Posts
On June 06 2010 16:45 Badjas wrote: TL is not a democracy. In the end I think nazgul's and meat's will is law, but it all goes easily when all admins are swell dudes. Also, I guess hot_bid, like perhaps all admins, have database access where the names are changed directly, rather than through a fancy html form interface. Plus, saying that only someone else than R1CH can do something, is false by definition. I can't think of a single case where Naz or Meat has even tried to pull rank. Unfortunately all the admins are pretty reasonable, so it's pretty boring up top. :p And HB inherited his naming powers from Saro. | ||
|
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
On June 07 2010 04:06 {88}iNcontroL wrote: common guys, he just lost 15k and we are discussing his history of bad He gambled and lost, that doesn't deserve any sympathy. | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22260 Posts
On June 07 2010 03:07 Licmyobelisk wrote: IIRC, Plexa demoted Rek with a very very long message as well before banning him lol Not even close. ^_^ In fact, you just merged two seperate events together.  We generally don't discuss things like this externally, but just keep in mind... these decisions are NEVER made lightly, and always involved a lot of input from a lot of people over a period of time. | ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
wanderer was just temp banned for 30 days by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2007-05-19 00:48:48 and had 573 posts. Reason: "Stop being a bunch of goth fags and just join the rest of the world already, ffs. Black is for bad guys and Bat Man." Nice post after a 2 day ban. Go elsewhere. Thank you. It's about damn time. | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
| ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
Brainsurgeon was just temp banned for 2 days by Liquid`Nazgul. That account was created on 2010-04-09 19:22:48 and had 36 posts. Reason: This + only one liners = go take a break. Have you read the 10 commandments? Does anyone else find this an odd ban? I didn't find anything really that offensive about the post... simply that he didn't like the song or the remix. He didn't personally insult the OP, nor try to start a flamewar. I've seen countless posts like this where the person disagrees/dislikes with the OP and no bans handed out. Perhaps his post history is crap one-liners or rubbed Naz the wrong way... and regardless its just a 2 day but just saying... | ||
|
Half
United States2554 Posts
On June 07 2010 09:49 meeple wrote: Does anyone else find this an odd ban? I didn't find anything really that offensive about the post... simply that he didn't like the song or the remix. He didn't personally insult the OP, nor try to start a flamewar. I've seen countless posts like this where the person disagrees/dislikes with the OP and no bans handed out. Perhaps his post history is crap one-liners or rubbed Naz the wrong way... and regardless its just a 2 day but just saying... It's probably has to do with history as much as content. Pretty sure they'll ban you if you only post stuff like that. | ||
|
seRapH
United States9808 Posts
| ||
|
seppolevne
Canada1681 Posts
On June 07 2010 09:49 meeple wrote: Does anyone else find this an odd ban? I didn't find anything really that offensive about the post... simply that he didn't like the song or the remix. He didn't personally insult the OP, nor try to start a flamewar. I've seen countless posts like this where the person disagrees/dislikes with the OP and no bans handed out. Perhaps his post history is crap one-liners or rubbed Naz the wrong way... and regardless its just a 2 day but just saying... While I did make fun of the words per post statistic thread, he's at about 5. Sometimes you just need a kick in the pants. | ||
|
EmeraldSparks
United States1451 Posts
Other long-time contributor denigrates said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and flames back. Other long-time contributor takes a metaphorical shit on said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and decides to discontinue entirely voluntary project. Long-time contributor gets one-week ban. Something about that seems off. | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
On June 07 2010 12:54 EmeraldSparks wrote: Long-time contributor begins community project. Other long-time contributor denigrates said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and flames back. Other long-time contributor takes a metaphorical shit on said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and decides to discontinue entirely voluntary project. Long-time contributor gets one-week ban. Something about that seems off. Rek very clearly made two jokes. Do I think GG deserved the ban? Maybe not, but there was no doubt it was a very large overreaction to cancel a project that had a lot of support and excitement just because of 2 comments. | ||
|
meeple
Canada10211 Posts
On June 07 2010 12:54 EmeraldSparks wrote: Long-time contributor begins community project. Other long-time contributor denigrates said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and flames back. Other long-time contributor takes a metaphorical shit on said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and decides to discontinue entirely voluntary project. Long-time contributor gets one-week ban. Something about that seems off. That's kinda an oversimplification of what actually happened... Rekrul was joking around, his posts weren't that offensive. NeverGG cancelled a project that many people had put effort into, regardless of it being voluntary on her part or not. I imagine it would have the same outcome if someone made a huge Beta key contest and got everyone all hyped then cancelled the thing after someone made a snide remark. | ||
intrigue
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
On June 07 2010 12:54 EmeraldSparks wrote: Long-time contributor begins community project. Other long-time contributor denigrates said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and flames back. Other long-time contributor takes a metaphorical shit on said project. Long-time contributor gets angry and decides to discontinue entirely voluntary project. Long-time contributor gets one-week ban. Something about that seems off. don't do this. there have been posts discussing the nevergg ban at length in the past few pages. even if you disagree, you don't have to be snarky about it. | ||
| ||
