EPTOn June 09 2010 16:51 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote:
no, but we certainly have that choice!
your back is far too hairy for women to find you attractive!!!! hahahahaha
the best moderator strikes again!!!!
Show nested quote +
On June 09 2010 06:23 TLOBrian wrote:
You're right, it does make sense. Sorry.
Edit: You didn't have to insult me, though.
On June 09 2010 06:17 Chill wrote:
The explanation is simple in this case: If a thread is going to provide information or generate discussion, it will stay open. If the purpose is "List _______", then the end result is that we have 20 pages of people posting their comment and no one giving a shit about what anyone else has written. That isn't good for this community.
Now knowing that, you can go back and notice consistency in what I've said. Threads like "What's your favourite unit?" or threads with a simple question and a poll have all been closed for this reason.
You can disagree with it but you certainly cannot say it doesn't make sense.
Edit: And your reaction is irrational and frankly dumb. You put effort into something that got locked so you're going to make it worse for everyone else? To what end? What's the point?
On June 09 2010 06:12 TLOBrian wrote:
If someone trolls, acts like an idiot, or whines about something that is obviously not the case, I will respond.
Chill, I love your commentating, but I really don't like some of the threads you lock. The recent "Strongest/Weakest race" poll is a good example, I don't see what was wrong with it. It was just fun, and it had a good number of posts.
I just get frustrated when you lock threads that I enjoy posting in, and post a one liner at the end of it like, "Why isn't this locked?" It isn't needed!
Not to mention my first few posts on team liquid that I was trying to have a fun discussion, or brainstorm a new unit idea or whatnot. It was locked, and then the Mods would sit there in the thread after it was locked and flame me.
Would you not be frustrated? Would you not care about what you posted anymore after that? Because honestly, If I put time into something for it to be GOOD, and it gets locked, that is just frustrating. Then I see people posting stupid things all the time that deserves IMO a ban/lock, and it doesn't happen. That is why I believe now I post more negative things than try to add to the discussion.
Sorry for the drive-by comment. I'm just pissy.
And this is why I'm so angry at people on here.
On June 09 2010 05:27 intrigue wrote:
says the guy who was tempbanned for insightful posts like these:
is this a case where a mod just "comes along" and "doesn't agree"? is it not interesting to note that almost every single person who thinks our ban policies "don't make sense" are previously banned users? of course we make mistakes, given how large the site is growing. if you intend to criticize us for these, at least don't immediately discredit yourself and then make huge blanket statements. i'm not trying to pick a fight, i'm just taking these from your post history which everyone else can also see.
okay here are a few more of your most recent posts:
+ Show Spoiler +
do you realize how leniently you've been treated, and how you still managed to get yourself banned?
On June 09 2010 05:02 TLOBrian wrote:
Most Bans on Teamliquid don't make sense, and I've learned to accept that, locked threads too. If a mod comes along and doesn't agree, they just lock it.
Most Bans on Teamliquid don't make sense, and I've learned to accept that, locked threads too. If a mod comes along and doesn't agree, they just lock it.
says the guy who was tempbanned for insightful posts like these:
On May 10 2010 12:03 TLOBrian wrote:
^
![[image loading]](http://www.worldiv.com/pixs/retard-owls.jpg)
On May 10 2010 12:01 HazMat wrote:
I think you should be banned for calling every smart human being a douche bag.
I think you should be banned for calling every smart human being a douche bag.
^
On May 23 2010 03:06 TLOBrian wrote:
![[image loading]](http://www.pollsb.com/photos/o/31345-find_offensive_people_use_word_retarded_discribre_something_lame_stupid.jpg)
Whining about whine just adds to the situation, no?
Go. A. Way. : P
On May 23 2010 02:58 m3rciless wrote:
LOL, no ones gonna boycott SC2. This is like those stupid kids who want dedicated servers or something for MW2 and they all claimed they were going to boycott and then bam on release day they all bought and played it.
Suck. It. Up. Its already clear that the community disapproves of aspects of SC2 right now, that was made clear in kennigits thread. Stop making stupid whine threads like this.
LOL, no ones gonna boycott SC2. This is like those stupid kids who want dedicated servers or something for MW2 and they all claimed they were going to boycott and then bam on release day they all bought and played it.
Suck. It. Up. Its already clear that the community disapproves of aspects of SC2 right now, that was made clear in kennigits thread. Stop making stupid whine threads like this.
Whining about whine just adds to the situation, no?
Go. A. Way. : P
is this a case where a mod just "comes along" and "doesn't agree"? is it not interesting to note that almost every single person who thinks our ban policies "don't make sense" are previously banned users? of course we make mistakes, given how large the site is growing. if you intend to criticize us for these, at least don't immediately discredit yourself and then make huge blanket statements. i'm not trying to pick a fight, i'm just taking these from your post history which everyone else can also see.
okay here are a few more of your most recent posts:
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 08 2010 13:05 TLOBrian wrote:
I'm willing to bet that you're a terran player. Q_Q
Seriously, the game is not perfectly balanced, and the polls are pretty much dead on.
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2010 13:02 clickrush wrote:
how can races be imbalanced at all? the Author of this poll really has no idea what hes talking about.
there might be matchups that favor one side on certain maps and certain spawning locations. everything else is too generalized.
ppl who are actually voting here have no idea about balance (wether theyre skilled or not)
how can races be imbalanced at all? the Author of this poll really has no idea what hes talking about.
there might be matchups that favor one side on certain maps and certain spawning locations. everything else is too generalized.
ppl who are actually voting here have no idea about balance (wether theyre skilled or not)
I'm willing to bet that you're a terran player. Q_Q
Seriously, the game is not perfectly balanced, and the polls are pretty much dead on.
On June 09 2010 04:11 TLOBrian wrote:
I'm random, actually!
No, they're right. You're just scared to get nerfed, you enjoy winning with imbalanced things : D
Show nested quote +
On June 08 2010 13:16 Saechiis wrote:
Ironic, because I'm willing to bet that you're a Zerg player. Q_Q
Seriously, there hasn't been any time to claim racial imbalances with all the patches flying around. There's just biased people and polls claiming their race is weakest and the stuff they lose to the most is OP.
On June 08 2010 13:05 TLOBrian wrote:
I'm willing to bet that you're a terran player. Q_Q
Seriously, the game is not perfectly balanced, and the polls are pretty much dead on.
On June 08 2010 13:02 clickrush wrote:
how can races be imbalanced at all? the Author of this poll really has no idea what hes talking about.
there might be matchups that favor one side on certain maps and certain spawning locations. everything else is too generalized.
ppl who are actually voting here have no idea about balance (wether theyre skilled or not)
how can races be imbalanced at all? the Author of this poll really has no idea what hes talking about.
there might be matchups that favor one side on certain maps and certain spawning locations. everything else is too generalized.
ppl who are actually voting here have no idea about balance (wether theyre skilled or not)
I'm willing to bet that you're a terran player. Q_Q
Seriously, the game is not perfectly balanced, and the polls are pretty much dead on.
Ironic, because I'm willing to bet that you're a Zerg player. Q_Q
Seriously, there hasn't been any time to claim racial imbalances with all the patches flying around. There's just biased people and polls claiming their race is weakest and the stuff they lose to the most is OP.
I'm random, actually!
No, they're right. You're just scared to get nerfed, you enjoy winning with imbalanced things : D
On June 07 2010 04:36 TLOBrian wrote:
I wish this OP was true...Right now Zerg is the bug, and Terran is the giant fucking boot that goes squish!
I wish this OP was true...Right now Zerg is the bug, and Terran is the giant fucking boot that goes squish!
On June 06 2010 10:48 TLOBrian wrote:
Banananananaannanaanannan!!!!!!!
A+ Troll, can't get better than that!
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2010 09:19 HalfAmazing wrote:
Previous patch, with tanks being awesome, every TvT was pretty much viking/tank and the best player would win most of the time. With tanks being considerably crappier vs marauders and thors again, I'm noticing a much wider variety of strats, and all are basically dice roll all-ins. I seriously feel like I should just suggest a coin flip at the beginning of the game.
Anyone else feel the same? Every terran I've talked to in game, says it's random and lame.
Previous patch, with tanks being awesome, every TvT was pretty much viking/tank and the best player would win most of the time. With tanks being considerably crappier vs marauders and thors again, I'm noticing a much wider variety of strats, and all are basically dice roll all-ins. I seriously feel like I should just suggest a coin flip at the beginning of the game.
Anyone else feel the same? Every terran I've talked to in game, says it's random and lame.
Banananananaannanaanannan!!!!!!!
A+ Troll, can't get better than that!
On June 06 2010 10:54 TLOBrian wrote:
Q_Q I can no longer siege my tanks up in the middle of the map and kill multiple 200/200 armies with a 120 Food army anymore! What can I ever do?
Seriously, Terran players just make me mad.
The siege tank nerf isn't enough though, it needed 5 less damage than what it has now to be balanced. Its still overpowered, sorry!
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2010 08:09 Mnijykmirl wrote:
My siege tanks feel many times weaker against roaches. It's very aggravating.
My siege tanks feel many times weaker against roaches. It's very aggravating.
Q_Q I can no longer siege my tanks up in the middle of the map and kill multiple 200/200 armies with a 120 Food army anymore! What can I ever do?
Seriously, Terran players just make me mad.
The siege tank nerf isn't enough though, it needed 5 less damage than what it has now to be balanced. Its still overpowered, sorry!
do you realize how leniently you've been treated, and how you still managed to get yourself banned?
If someone trolls, acts like an idiot, or whines about something that is obviously not the case, I will respond.
On June 09 2010 05:31 Chill wrote:
I'm a little put off by this drive-by comment. I mean I'd like to see you post any examples whatsoever please to give your argument some merit.
Let's do this: For every close / ban you find that I agree doesn't make sense, I will post 10 that you have to agree make sense.
Go.
On June 09 2010 05:02 TLOBrian wrote:
Most Bans on Teamliquid don't make sense, and I've learned to accept that, locked threads too. If a mod comes along and doesn't agree, they just lock it.
Most Bans on Teamliquid don't make sense, and I've learned to accept that, locked threads too. If a mod comes along and doesn't agree, they just lock it.
I'm a little put off by this drive-by comment. I mean I'd like to see you post any examples whatsoever please to give your argument some merit.
Let's do this: For every close / ban you find that I agree doesn't make sense, I will post 10 that you have to agree make sense.
Go.
Chill, I love your commentating, but I really don't like some of the threads you lock. The recent "Strongest/Weakest race" poll is a good example, I don't see what was wrong with it. It was just fun, and it had a good number of posts.
I just get frustrated when you lock threads that I enjoy posting in, and post a one liner at the end of it like, "Why isn't this locked?" It isn't needed!
Not to mention my first few posts on team liquid that I was trying to have a fun discussion, or brainstorm a new unit idea or whatnot. It was locked, and then the Mods would sit there in the thread after it was locked and flame me.
Would you not be frustrated? Would you not care about what you posted anymore after that? Because honestly, If I put time into something for it to be GOOD, and it gets locked, that is just frustrating. Then I see people posting stupid things all the time that deserves IMO a ban/lock, and it doesn't happen. That is why I believe now I post more negative things than try to add to the discussion.
Sorry for the drive-by comment. I'm just pissy.
On June 09 2010 05:43 polgas wrote:
lol! +1 for all 3 posts above. Burn, troll.
lol! +1 for all 3 posts above. Burn, troll.
And this is why I'm so angry at people on here.
The explanation is simple in this case: If a thread is going to provide information or generate discussion, it will stay open. If the purpose is "List _______", then the end result is that we have 20 pages of people posting their comment and no one giving a shit about what anyone else has written. That isn't good for this community.
Now knowing that, you can go back and notice consistency in what I've said. Threads like "What's your favourite unit?" or threads with a simple question and a poll have all been closed for this reason.
You can disagree with it but you certainly cannot say it doesn't make sense.
Edit: And your reaction is irrational and frankly dumb. You put effort into something that got locked so you're going to make it worse for everyone else? To what end? What's the point?
You're right, it does make sense. Sorry.
Edit: You didn't have to insult me, though.
no, but we certainly have that choice!
your back is far too hairy for women to find you attractive!!!! hahahahaha
the best moderator strikes again!!!!
holy shit i shouldn't have unnested that quote
