On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:
someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell
someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell
Do not open the Pandora's box. You know not what you ask of.
Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?37023 Posts
December 17 2016 05:07 GMT
#57061
On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell Show nested quote + On December 14 2016 21:13 Olli wrote: You know that I vowed not to moderate anymore after the SackOfWetMice incident. Do not open the Pandora's box. You know not what you ask of. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
December 17 2016 05:07 GMT
#57062
On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell Show nested quote + On December 14 2016 21:13 Olli wrote: You know that I vowed not to moderate anymore after the SackOfWetMice incident. just a guy who constantly shit on Zest about being overrated and he and Olli used to just argue about it all the time. that's about it. I think the guy made an alt account or two to come back and try and do the same | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 17 2016 14:56 GMT
#57063
You learn something new every day. | ||
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
December 17 2016 16:20 GMT
#57064
On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell Show nested quote + On December 14 2016 21:13 Olli wrote: You know that I vowed not to moderate anymore after the SackOfWetMice incident. Sack was this huge Zest supporter who had to defend him against Olli | ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?37023 Posts
December 17 2016 21:31 GMT
#57065
| ||
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
December 17 2016 21:42 GMT
#57066
After all, the whole point of having the ABL is entertainment, right? | ||
Elentos
55511 Posts
December 17 2016 23:10 GMT
#57067
On December 18 2016 06:42 opisska wrote: What is the point of having the spambots even show in the ABL. We know well that not every bans show them, so it's kinda absurd that the most boring ones do. After all, the whole point of having the ABL is entertainment, right? Imo when the ban itself is boring - a spambot for instance - it should be the moderator's responsibility to come up with funny ban reasons we can talk about. | ||
![]()
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
December 17 2016 23:15 GMT
#57068
| ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
December 18 2016 00:14 GMT
#57069
On December 18 2016 08:15 Jer99 wrote: deal We'll rate the ban reason between 1 and 5 (so it fits in a poll). We then take the average over all voters. Best two ban comments for each mod then count towards the monthly competition. If you win, you get to hand out a 1 week temp to anyone completely without reason. | ||
![]()
Jer99
Canada8157 Posts
December 18 2016 01:01 GMT
#57070
On December 18 2016 09:14 Cascade wrote: We'll rate the ban reason between 1 and 5 (so it fits in a poll). We then take the average over all voters. Best two ban comments for each mod then count towards the monthly competition. If you win, you get to hand out a 1 week temp to anyone completely without reason. totally reasonable | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule19047 Posts
December 18 2016 01:17 GMT
#57071
| ||
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
December 18 2016 01:52 GMT
#57072
On December 18 2016 10:17 tofucake wrote: we can already do that, though yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule19047 Posts
December 18 2016 02:45 GMT
#57073
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
December 18 2016 02:55 GMT
#57074
On December 18 2016 11:45 tofucake wrote: that's not going to happen Even a linear decrease in the number of nazi comments would be pretty good. | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
December 18 2016 03:18 GMT
#57075
| ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?37023 Posts
December 18 2016 03:38 GMT
#57076
On December 18 2016 10:52 Cricketer12 wrote: yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments ![]() | ||
![]()
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
December 18 2016 04:19 GMT
#57077
On December 18 2016 12:38 Seeker wrote: Show nested quote + On December 18 2016 10:52 Cricketer12 wrote: On December 18 2016 10:17 tofucake wrote: we can already do that, though yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments ![]() I don't... | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
December 18 2016 04:20 GMT
#57078
On December 18 2016 13:19 The_Templar wrote: Show nested quote + On December 18 2016 12:38 Seeker wrote: On December 18 2016 10:52 Cricketer12 wrote: On December 18 2016 10:17 tofucake wrote: we can already do that, though yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments ![]() I don't... Don't you need to do actual mod work to get Nazi mod comments directed at you? | ||
Cricketer12
United States13974 Posts
December 18 2016 04:25 GMT
#57079
On December 18 2016 13:20 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Show nested quote + On December 18 2016 13:19 The_Templar wrote: On December 18 2016 12:38 Seeker wrote: On December 18 2016 10:52 Cricketer12 wrote: On December 18 2016 10:17 tofucake wrote: we can already do that, though yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments ![]() I don't... Don't you need to do actual mod work to get Nazi mod comments directed at you? Is this why Temp lost pashun? | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
December 18 2016 08:37 GMT
#57080
On December 18 2016 10:01 Jer99 wrote: Show nested quote + On December 18 2016 09:14 Cascade wrote: On December 18 2016 08:15 Jer99 wrote: deal We'll rate the ban reason between 1 and 5 (so it fits in a poll). We then take the average over all voters. Best two ban comments for each mod then count towards the monthly competition. If you win, you get to hand out a 1 week temp to anyone completely without reason. totally reasonable Good way to keep things interesting. Also opens up for meta plays where posters second guess who will get banned and can vote unreasonably high or low for that mod if the poster thinks it's his enemy or himself that'll get banned. Of course, this is outside the rules, and will give a ban if caught manipulating the polls. The mods can of course play according to this and let people think that they'll ban someone unpopular to get unfair extra votes. Of course, thru can then turn around and ban whoever, but the voters Matt not fall for it the second month. The mod can also ban someone they think will vote against them, and try to use the week of temp ban to make some particularly funny ban comments that then have higher chance of scoring high. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH309 StarCraft: Brood War• davetesta7 • Kozan • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel ![]() • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Esports World Cup
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
Esports World Cup
Esports World Cup
CranKy Ducklings
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
|
|