EPTOn December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:
someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell
someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell
Do not open the Pandora's box. You know not what you ask of.
The Automated Ban List - Page 2854
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37124 Posts
Do not open the Pandora's box. You know not what you ask of. | ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell just a guy who constantly shit on Zest about being overrated and he and Olli used to just argue about it all the time. that's about it. I think the guy made an alt account or two to come back and try and do the same | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
You learn something new every day. | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States14003 Posts
On December 17 2016 14:02 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote: someone want to explain this to me? not ringing a bell Sack was this huge Zest supporter who had to defend him against Olli | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37124 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
After all, the whole point of having the ABL is entertainment, right? | ||
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On December 18 2016 06:42 opisska wrote: What is the point of having the spambots even show in the ABL. We know well that not every bans show them, so it's kinda absurd that the most boring ones do. After all, the whole point of having the ABL is entertainment, right? Imo when the ban itself is boring - a spambot for instance - it should be the moderator's responsibility to come up with funny ban reasons we can talk about. | ||
Jer99
Canada8160 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On December 18 2016 08:15 Jer99 wrote: deal We'll rate the ban reason between 1 and 5 (so it fits in a poll). We then take the average over all voters. Best two ban comments for each mod then count towards the monthly competition. If you win, you get to hand out a 1 week temp to anyone completely without reason. | ||
|
Jer99
Canada8160 Posts
On December 18 2016 09:14 Cascade wrote: We'll rate the ban reason between 1 and 5 (so it fits in a poll). We then take the average over all voters. Best two ban comments for each mod then count towards the monthly competition. If you win, you get to hand out a 1 week temp to anyone completely without reason. totally reasonable | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19268 Posts
| ||
|
Cricketer12
United States14003 Posts
On December 18 2016 10:17 tofucake wrote: we can already do that, though yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19268 Posts
| ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On December 18 2016 11:45 tofucake wrote: that's not going to happen Even a linear decrease in the number of nazi comments would be pretty good. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37124 Posts
On December 18 2016 10:52 Cricketer12 wrote: yes but this way you reduce the nazi comments exponetially But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments  | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On December 18 2016 12:38 Seeker wrote: But... But... We like the Nazi mod comments I don't... | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
Don't you need to do actual mod work to get Nazi mod comments directed at you? | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States14003 Posts
On December 18 2016 13:20 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Don't you need to do actual mod work to get Nazi mod comments directed at you? Is this why Temp lost pashun? | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
Good way to keep things interesting. Also opens up for meta plays where posters second guess who will get banned and can vote unreasonably high or low for that mod if the poster thinks it's his enemy or himself that'll get banned. Of course, this is outside the rules, and will give a ban if caught manipulating the polls. The mods can of course play according to this and let people think that they'll ban someone unpopular to get unfair extra votes. Of course, thru can then turn around and ban whoever, but the voters Matt not fall for it the second month. The mod can also ban someone they think will vote against them, and try to use the week of temp ban to make some particularly funny ban comments that then have higher chance of scoring high. | ||
| ||
