EPTWould like to hear about the story tho.
Drunk bet ?
The Automated Ban List - Page 2751
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
SkrollK
France580 Posts
Would like to hear about the story tho. Drunk bet ? | ||
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On May 30 2016 06:13 SackOfWetMoose wrote: + Show Spoiler + On May 29 2016 11:17 Alarak89 wrote: PvT win rates: 1. sos 65.32% (in games) bo3+ 75.00% (in matches) bo5+ 90.91% (in matches) 2. rain 64.73% (in games) bo3+ 70.49% (in matches) bo5+ 57.89% (in matches) 3. parting 64.58% (in games) bo3+ 72.73% (in matches) bo5+ 62.50% (in matches) 4. hero 63.47% (in games) bo3+ 67.80% (in matches) bo5+ 73.33% (in matches) 5. dear 61.69% (in games) bo3+ 71.11% (in matches) bo5+ 87.50% (in matches) 6. classic 61.29% (in games) bo3+ 61.29% (in matches) bo5+ 62.50% (in matches) 7. stats 57.38% (in games) bo3+ 55.17% (in matches) bo5+ 60.00% (in matches) 8. zest 57.06% (in games) bo3+ 57.45% (in matches) bo5+ 50.00% (in matches) PvZ win rates: 1. hero 65.13% (in games) bo3+ 78.43% (in matches) bo5+ 85.71% (in matches) 2. dear 64.90% (in games) bo3+ 77.50% (in matches) bo5+ 55.56% (in matches) 3. sos 64.06% (in games) bo3+ 66.10% (in matches) bo5+ 61.64% (in matches) 4. rain 63.13% (in games) bo3+ 69.81% (in matches) bo5+ 70.00% (in matches) 5. classic 62.18% (in games) bo3+ 66.67% (in matches) bo5+ 75.00% (in matches) 6. zest 57.40% (in games) bo3+ 54.76% (in matches) bo5+ 55.56% (in matches) 7. stats 56.20% (in games) bo3+ 51.53% (in matches) bo5+ 42.86% (in matches) 8. parting 55.52% (in games) bo3+ 57.47% (in matches) bo5+ 29.63% (in matches) PvP win rates: 1. zest 67.02% (in games) bo3+ 85.71% (in matches) bo5+ 80.00% (in matches) 2. stats 65.33% (in games) bo3+ 80.56% (in matches) bo5+ 85.71% (in matches) 3. sos 62.07% (in games) bo3+ 69.81% (in matches) bo5+ 64.29% (in matches) 4. classic 58.51% (in games) bo3+ 61.54% (in matches) bo5+ 69.23% (in matches) 5. parting 57.20% (in games) bo3+ 58.21% (in matches) bo5+ 66.67% (in matches) 6. rain 56.06% (in games) bo3+ 60.87% (in matches) bo5+ 38.46% (in matches) 7. dear 55.75% (in games) bo3+ 54.55% (in matches) bo5+ 53.85% (in matches) 8. hero 55.47% (in games) bo3+ 55.93% (in matches) bo5+ 50.00% (in matches) So again, who is more "stable" and "healthier"?  Awful PvT...laughable PvZ...patchtoss PVP What's that spell? Z-E-S-T User was banned for this post. Oh okay bye then. | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
| ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
But then I also doubt he has found anything better to do with his life.. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55594 Posts
On May 30 2016 16:53 Phredxor wrote: Doubt this was actually him. But then I also doubt he has found anything better to do with his life.. Well, at the very least, if it wasn't the original it was a good impression. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On May 30 2016 17:36 Cascade wrote: How can you be patchtoss in PvP? >_> If a patch favors your favored playstyle? ie if some patch suddenly makes macro zealot/immo/archon play the almost only viable playstyle and that's what you were good at, well you'll be better off than the guy who always played mass blink stalker | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 30 2016 18:04 OtherWorld wrote: If a patch favors your favored playstyle? ie if some patch suddenly makes macro zealot/immo/archon play the almost only viable playstyle and that's what you were good at, well you'll be better off than the guy who always played mass blink stalker Ok, yeah I guess. Why not. I can definitely see it in tvt with some insisting on mech no matter what. | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On May 30 2016 18:12 Cascade wrote: Ok, yeah I guess. Why not. I can definitely see it in tvt with some insisting on mech no matter what. I know we are all waiting for avilos time in the sun. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51702 Posts
| ||
|
AbouSV
Germany1278 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 30 2016 19:14 Phredxor wrote: I know we are all waiting for avilos time in the sun. A patch making tanks shoot nukes is however quite unlikely and anything short of that won't probably accomplish the goal | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 31 2016 18:15 Phredxor wrote: If the communities opinions on David Kim were true then that would be a very real possibility. If I were in charge of TL, I would just set-up and automoderating bot such as they have on reddit and make a list of words for which I would shadowban people into a shadow forum where only such people would see each other. First on the list would be "David" and "Kim", because everyone who feels the need to discuss a person he knows squat about instead of the game is a dickhead. You'd be an innocent causality, but at least you would see some interesting things on your trip through dickland. Next one would sure be "design" | ||
|
Phredxor
New Zealand15076 Posts
On May 31 2016 19:32 opisska wrote: If I were in charge of TL, I would just set-up and automoderating bot such as they have on reddit and make a list of words for which I would shadowban people into a shadow forum where only such people would see each other. First on the list would be "David" and "Kim", because everyone who feels the need to discuss a person he knows squat about instead of the game is a dickhead. You'd be an innocent causality, but at least you would see some interesting things on your trip through dickland. Next one would sure be "design" I'd be willing to make that sacrifice :D | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On May 31 2016 19:32 opisska wrote: If I were in charge of TL, I would just set-up and automoderating bot such as they have on reddit and make a list of words for which I would shadowban people into a shadow forum where only such people would see each other. First on the list would be "David" and "Kim", because everyone who feels the need to discuss a person he knows squat about instead of the game is a dickhead. You'd be an innocent causality, but at least you would see some interesting things on your trip through dickland. Next one would sure be "design" So we can't discuss about the players either? All we can do is say "woah beautiful move by X" or "that game was bad"? | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 31 2016 19:32 opisska wrote: If I were in charge of TL, I would just set-up and automoderating bot such as they have on reddit and make a list of words for which I would shadowban people into a shadow forum where only such people would see each other. First on the list would be "David" and "Kim", because everyone who feels the need to discuss a person he knows squat about instead of the game is a dickhead. You'd be an innocent causality, but at least you would see some interesting things on your trip through dickland. Next one would sure be "design" Oh, that's a great idea! More words to shadowban: - retarded - broken - OP - dickhead To avoid suspicion, would you shadowban "shadowban" in the shadow forum to a sub-shadow forum? | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On May 31 2016 19:32 opisska wrote: If I were in charge of TL, I would just set-up and automoderating bot such as they have on reddit and make a list of words for which I would shadowban people into a shadow forum where only such people would see each other. First on the list would be "David" and "Kim", because everyone who feels the need to discuss a person he knows squat about instead of the game is a dickhead. You'd be an innocent causality, but at least you would see some interesting things on your trip through dickland. Next one would sure be "design" Wouldn't it just be easier to ban yourself, that way you wouldn't have to deal with all the stupid stuff? | ||
| ||
