|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 06 2015 04:10 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2015 03:59 Karis Vas Ryaar wrote:possible sort of spoilers for KESPa cup I guess. + Show Spoiler +On May 05 2015 16:59 Muxtar wrote: BALANCE, forcefields are sooo BALANCEd. GJ DKim. WTB ravagers now.
User was temp banned for this post. Want to buy ravagers? It has been a good while since we had some good ol' fashion WoL style balance whine that I've seen. Don't you think Baracks before supply depot is unbalanced guys? How about that Warpgate research time? Who doesn't want to buy a pet Ravager for home?
|
On May 06 2015 03:22 andrewlt wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2015 21:50 opisska wrote: As the show catches up to the books (and possibly even overtakes them), there is less possibility to spoil anything, no matter how hard you read. Is there even anything to spoil at this point? I've read a few show articles in Grantland and they are different stories now.
I am pretty sure there is still a lot to be spoiled and thus would like to end this conversation right here as I have avoided it with very large effort
The KESPA Cup I am surprised didn't produce more bans. I am a very reasonable person and try to be positive about SC2 and generally show nothing but disdain for the "daed gaem" naysayers, but today's PvZs made me pretty angry anyway.
|
On May 06 2015 03:00 OtherWorld wrote: Nooooo boxerfred y u tilt like that
Guessing his exams didn't go as planned
|
Guessing you didn't read the previous page
|
On May 06 2015 05:03 Cokefreak wrote:Guessing you didn't read the previous page data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
I did but i don't see him tilt like that for a ladder placement since he was something like 80-2 in plat a few season back and was laughing about not getting promoted to diamond when i was with terrible %age. I guess that was just the nail in the coffin.
EDIT : oh ! there's a naniwa thread. i call 4pages before stupid ban.
|
On May 06 2015 03:16 fluidrone wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On May 05 2015 23:36 Yoav wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2015 20:44 fluidrone wrote:On May 05 2015 20:37 Cricketer12 wrote:On May 04 2015 19:58 fluidrone wrote:On May 04 2015 19:06 Ghostcom wrote:On May 03 2015 22:45 fluidrone wrote:F ck me sideways! That is a lot to talk about <3! Why is this relevant? I senselessly selfishly like when arguments over mapmaking/maps make the abl cut. Kind of sad it is taking so long for "maps" to be as cut throat a subject on tl as units. In Shaa Allah I question the need of InshaAllah in your comment.... It means "who will live will see what happens". edit ps: no "need" really, more like a feel. tldr: + Show Spoiler +I would wholeheartedly welcome a comfortable high number of opinionated poster being "into" maps and their influence on the game, while this would be accompanied by bans (which I dislike, but dislike it less if it means the people are there (that would mean more weight presenting the issues to blizz)). Sorry for your lost time. Insha'Allah means "God willing," in the sense of "if God is willing." It's used to say you wish for something to happen, not as a neutral comment of "who knows." + Show Spoiler +On May 06 2015 00:25 Cricketer12 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2015 23:36 Yoav wrote:On May 05 2015 20:44 fluidrone wrote:On May 05 2015 20:37 Cricketer12 wrote:On May 04 2015 19:58 fluidrone wrote:On May 04 2015 19:06 Ghostcom wrote:On May 03 2015 22:45 fluidrone wrote:F ck me sideways! That is a lot to talk about <3! Why is this relevant? I senselessly selfishly like when arguments over mapmaking/maps make the abl cut. Kind of sad it is taking so long for "maps" to be as cut throat a subject on tl as units. In Shaa Allah I question the need of InshaAllah in your comment.... It means "who will live will see what happens". edit ps: no "need" really, more like a feel. tldr: + Show Spoiler +I would wholeheartedly welcome a comfortable high number of opinionated poster being "into" maps and their influence on the game, while this would be accompanied by bans (which I dislike, but dislike it less if it means the people are there (that would mean more weight presenting the issues to blizz)). Sorry for your lost time. Insha'Allah means "God willing," in the sense of "if God is willing." It's used to say you wish for something to happen, not as a neutral comment of "who knows." Exactly, that is why I was confused by its inclusion in the original comment Being a practicing atheist, (when I try) I believe in man (well, more like believe in women). Interpreting "inshalla" from your catholic mindset you see only what you want to see. Please allow yourself to be open to other usages of this "catch phrase" that is both very often used worldwide and said to mean very different things from very different people. There is no "proper" definition for anything as "important" (as this phrase/saying is), ever. The closest interpretation is: "those who will live will be there to see it happen" (nothing more nothing less, kind of like "history is written by those who survive").
I mean, I'm not gonna argue with you on the subjectivity of language, but you should know that in most circles people will interpret insha'Allah the way that Criketer or I did. For what it's worth, I'm not Catholic (Presbyterian), and neither is the phrase (it's Muslim).
And the usual use of the term isn't necessarily sectarian, or even religious. It means, "I hope" or "if it is possible" at the bare minimum. Atheists "hope" for things all the time, in much the same way that Monotheists pray for them. Yes, a Monotheist can take more meaning from the term insha'Allah, with the comforting reminder that the God of Justice has the ultimate say, but this is hardly necessary for the core use of the term.
|
Lalalaland34483 Posts
This is most certainly not the thread to discuss that, please take it to pm's. Thanks.
|
|
speaking of spoilers. this guy.... sarcastic remark about people not spoiling into spoiling.....
On April 06 2015 03:24 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2015 03:08 B.I.G. wrote:On April 01 2015 03:03 Falling wrote:On March 31 2015 23:11 KadaverBB wrote:On March 31 2015 23:10 ComaDose wrote:On March 31 2015 19:37 KadaverBB wrote:No, probably not data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" but we have a SHOW thread and BOOK/SHOW thread but what about a BOOK thread!? We are not creating a third thread. It's fortunate enough that we have two. We could you know... We could also have separate book threads for each in the series and separate threads for each season that way people can never be spoiled as long as they choose the right thread. TeamGRRM and just drop the whole esports thing. Or maybe people should just not read game of thrones thread if they don't want to risk getting spoiled. Yeah. Fuck everyone who wants to discuss the show without getting spoiled..selfish pricks! + Show Spoiler +
Excludos was just temp banned for 1 week by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2010-04-26 22:40:55 and had 3764 posts.
Reason: GoT spoilers. Do it again and I'll make it permanent.
|
TLADT24920 Posts
Can we get a warning for this please? Too many spoilers! My fingers got tired clicking through each one!
|
On May 06 2015 07:19 dAPhREAk wrote:speaking of spoilers. this guy.... sarcastic remark about people not spoiling into spoiling..... Show nested quote +On April 06 2015 03:24 Excludos wrote:On April 06 2015 03:08 B.I.G. wrote:On April 01 2015 03:03 Falling wrote:On March 31 2015 23:11 KadaverBB wrote:On March 31 2015 23:10 ComaDose wrote:On March 31 2015 19:37 KadaverBB wrote:No, probably not data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" but we have a SHOW thread and BOOK/SHOW thread but what about a BOOK thread!? We are not creating a third thread. It's fortunate enough that we have two. We could you know... We could also have separate book threads for each in the series and separate threads for each season that way people can never be spoiled as long as they choose the right thread. TeamGRRM and just drop the whole esports thing. Or maybe people should just not read game of thrones thread if they don't want to risk getting spoiled. Yeah. Fuck everyone who wants to discuss the show without getting spoiled..selfish pricks! + Show Spoiler + Show nested quote +Excludos was just temp banned for 1 week by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2010-04-26 22:40:55 and had 3764 posts.
Reason: GoT spoilers. Do it again and I'll make it permanent. I like it when KBB starts issuing threats.
|
On May 06 2015 07:19 BigFan wrote:Can we get a warning for this please? Too many spoilers! My fingers got tired clicking through each one! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Only the most dedicated 2%ers can read my shit.
|
excludos just got sent on an exodus
Excludos was just temp banned for 1 week by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2010-04-26 22:40:55 and had 3764 posts.
Reason: GoT spoilers. Do it again and I'll make it permanent.
at least with the way the tv shows going this should become impossible soon right? or maybe then the tv show will get in trouble for spoilering the book
|
On May 06 2015 07:32 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2015 07:19 BigFan wrote:Can we get a warning for this please? Too many spoilers! My fingers got tired clicking through each one! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" Only the most dedicated 2%ers can read my shit. + Show Spoiler +want spoilers?
On topic, I am sorry if you got (partly?) tilted off of your e fame, I certainly regret my ever sticking it up to you.
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
It seems that spoilers are serious business around here.
|
If you imagine morality spectrum, spoilering is somewhere between instituting concentration camps and burping in public
|
On May 06 2015 03:16 fluidrone wrote: I believe in man (well, more like believe in women).
You're placing your belief in some very tenuous hands.
|
On May 06 2015 14:43 NotSackOfWetMice wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2015 00:18 DarkLordOlli wrote: If anything you should be complaining about Fantasy. Fucker made it way too far. What do you know, happened to check back in here; Zest is still being ludicrously overrated (#5?? Above Stats??? Maybe in one of Olli's wet dreams) ...And Zest is still terrible...nothing has changed. First rounded by Fantasy. Patchtoss PvP sniper he remains Apology accepted. Concession accepted
Looks who's back (but he didn't last long). Glad to see he hasn't changed.
|
He's weak. Coming back with such a short post, not even original, meh. Step up your game.
|
On May 06 2015 15:58 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2015 14:43 NotSackOfWetMice wrote:On May 05 2015 00:18 DarkLordOlli wrote: If anything you should be complaining about Fantasy. Fucker made it way too far. What do you know, happened to check back in here; Zest is still being ludicrously overrated (#5?? Above Stats??? Maybe in one of Olli's wet dreams) ...And Zest is still terrible...nothing has changed. First rounded by Fantasy. Patchtoss PvP sniper he remains Apology accepted. Concession accepted Looks who's back (but he didn't last long). Glad to see he hasn't changed.
Who's that ? I can't figure out with that clever new nickname
|
|
|
|