The Automated Ban List - Page 2461

On March 16 2015 20:36 BLinD-RawR wrote:


nobody bats an eye when I say it.

On March 16 2015 21:51 OtherWorld wrote:

He's talking about the Revised Featured Stream Requirements for 2015 thread d: which has in fact turned into a pro-Winter vs anti-Winter thread

On March 17 2015 06:32 farvacola wrote:
Weird stalkers are cool!

On March 17 2015 06:40 sSooG wrote:
i apologize in advance and i may get banned for this but I have to say it:

WINTER YOU F*****G PIECE OF S**T, I got permbanned from your chat when I asked a random guy in chat if he is a viewbot... Thank god that someone finally delivered evidence of something that was so fucking obvious since the first days... RIP Winter aka. most autistic-lying-viewbot-kiddo in the fucking universe

User was temp banned for this post.

On March 17 2015 07:55 Taidanii wrote:


Frankly, I think you should permanently ban me. IP ban me, if you have that capability.

However, you need to understand the difference between "conspiracy theory" and "scientific evidence". I have no care in the world if some crusader wishes to ban me for refusing to take in knowledge.

It would have been more professional for you to say "lol" than to flex your "ban hammer". **** off

User was banned for this post.

On March 17 2015 07:57 ThomasjServo wrote:


The salt is real.

On March 17 2015 07:58 The_Templar wrote:

I think he was intending on having another word on it

On March 17 2015 07:56 Cheerio wrote:

Thats not what really happened. First of all NATO already has borders with Russia, so they could have plenty of rockets there if they wanted, somehow they don't. And somehow they weren't really welcomed there, something important that Ghanburighan took care to point out. Secondly the situation in Ukraine was far more complicated than that. Putin was pushing for Ukraine to become a part of his USSR recreation. That was not really what Yanukovich wanted mostly due to two factors: 1) fears of giving up influence in Ukraine to Putin, to the point when he would eventually be forced to step down, 2) political backlash. The main weapon Putin had was gas prices. Ukrainian economy was very dependent on low gas prices for its outdated and ineffecient metallurgy, which brought in most of the foreign currency. When oil prices rebounded after the 2008 fall the gas prices became unsustainable. So the idea for Putin was either you integrate or we squeeze blood out of your economy. Yanukovich replied by starting EU integration process. It was a bluff, because the integration itself could not bring the fast money. As the talks about the association agreement were drawing to the end, instead of giving up Putin started "trade wars", showing what kind of troubles are awaiting Yanukovich if he signs the treaty. With no cards on his hands Yanukovich tried a last minute attempt to monetize the agreement and get the loan from EU. A miracle didn't happen, but at least they could blame the braking down in talks at the EU for refusing to give the needed loan. Then Euromaidan started. It was a minor event until a few hundreds of students got violently kicked from the square. It was that spark that exploded all the problems Ukrainians had with Yanukovich: worsening economy, incredible level of corruption, deteriorating justice and abuse of power. But the disaffection with Yanukovich was dissolved over the years. The new events brought the situation to the point when Yanukovich had to make concessions, or he would not be tolerated for much longer. The funny thing is that Euromaidan helped Yanukovich to secure the deal from Putin, who got scared he is losing Ukraine right here right now. Had he then made concessions required from him it would all have went down. But that didn't happen. What happened was further violence, attempts to clear out Maidan, gangs of titushkys roaming Kyiv streets and abducting activists, sometimes killing them, refusal to bring police officers who were responsible for violence to justice. Being unable to stop the violence and see their demands met activists started discenting to violence themselves. Eventually the situation got so violent and intense that the allies of Yanukovich started to abandon him. The troops were ordered out of Kyiv and the high-ranked officers of the governmental power institutions fearing they might be sacrificed by Yanukovich pledged their support to Euromaidan, and Yanukovich regime just fell apart, despite western officials even helping Yanukovich secure the deal to keep him in power.

If you look at the big picture, it was Yanukovich who started it, who made it worse, and who eventually got to be the victim of it as well. Not some evil NATO conspiring against him.

User was banned for this post.

On March 17 2015 08:15 KadaverBB wrote:
I didn't even read his post.