|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Northern Ireland25387 Posts
On April 26 2014 01:58 NeuroticPsychosis wrote: Please learn to respect women. They like when you appreciate their mind for instance, not only their body.
Found this especially amusing haha
|
another one bites the dust in Ukraine (thread)... Even though I find the amount of mod action surprisingly low there, steadily the thread increases it's ban count
|
Northern Ireland25387 Posts
Historically which threads have the most bans associated with them and which have the highest bans:posts ratios? Outside of closed 1 post threads of course.
|
Netherlands6182 Posts
On May 22 2014 02:32 Wombat_NI wrote: Historically which threads have the most bans associated with them and which have the highest bans:posts ratios? Outside of closed 1 post threads of course. I'm going to guess US Politics Megathread is high on the list (because politics make people crazy) and KMD is also all the way up there.
|
Northern Ireland25387 Posts
For the total bans it's got to be up there, it is a super long thread though.
|
Gay rights threads tended to rack them up really quickly, a year or two ago when it was in the news all the time and before the US Politics Megathread which really did help to clean up general a fair bit.
On May 22 2014 00:56 Jormundr wrote:This thread is about as readable as some twisted hybrid of the balance whine and letting off steam threads. Is anyone happy with the thread as it has been for the past few days? Poll: Much Ado About NunezGive nunez his own thread so he doesn't have to derail this one (16) 57% Get Kwark in here with a modnote and a banhammer. (6) 21% I enjoy scrolling through 3 pages of bullshit to find news. (5) 18% Ban everyone but Cheerio (Pro), Judicator (neutral) and ??? (Con) so we can have a TL quality thread (1) 4% 28 total votes Your vote: Much Ado About Nunez (Vote): I enjoy scrolling through 3 pages of bullshit to find news. (Vote): Get Kwark in here with a modnote and a banhammer. (Vote): Give nunez his own thread so he doesn't have to derail this one (Vote): Ban everyone but Cheerio (Pro), Judicator (neutral) and ??? (Con) so we can have a TL quality thread
User was temp banned for this post.
Jormundr was just temp banned for 2 days by zatic.
That account was created on 2011-07-07 04:15:33 and had 974 posts.
Reason: Derailing and backseat moderation
This ban made me giggle.
|
Netherlands6182 Posts
What about that PUA thread that got shut down a few years ago? And the Scarlett fanclub thread?
|
The beta keys threads, and of course the ABL since so many people come here to request bans.
|
|
Those are like advertising bans, they should only count for a fraction of a ban. I would say 3/5s of a ban but that is a loaded fraction were there ever one.
|
On May 22 2014 03:35 ThomasjServo wrote: Those are like advertising bans, they should only count for a fraction of a ban. I would say 3/5s of a ban but that is a loaded fraction were there ever one. Announce that, wait for people to make crude black jokes, ban them all from the site!
|
|
On May 21 2014 20:48 lichter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 17:02 Deleuze wrote: Undercover moderating. Are there any other plainclothes mods out there?! if we told you then that would defeat the purpose of being undercover can you ban ppl too?
|
Germany25657 Posts
There are no undercover mods, not giving opterown a hammer was basically an oversight^^
|
Northern Ireland25387 Posts
I am so undercover and inactive that not even the mods know I have these powers.
|
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:41 Aveng3r wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2014 20:48 lichter wrote:On May 21 2014 17:02 Deleuze wrote: Undercover moderating. Are there any other plainclothes mods out there?! if we told you then that would defeat the purpose of being undercover can you ban ppl too?
Giving me the ability to ban would be the worst decision ever. Basically I'd just ban whoever annoyed me.
|
I wouldn't be active enough to use a banhammer given to me. -.-'
|
I'd be the friendliest mod ever. I'd forget the fact that I have a hammer, and leave funny jokes in people's mod notes.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On May 22 2014 09:51 KadaverBB wrote: There are no undercover mods, not giving opterown a hammer was basically an oversight^^ iirc i wasn't going to do much moderation on TL since i've been a bit busy with the launch of LD so i asked not to have the hammer, but the open reports that needed reporting were so tempting ;p so the hammer was forced on me!
|
Bearded Elder29903 Posts
It fits you opterown
|
|
|
|