|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 18 2010 06:43 Kleinmuuhg wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On November 17 2010 20:00 JohnColtrane wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2010 19:59 HopLight wrote:On November 17 2010 19:56 JohnColtrane wrote:On November 17 2010 19:56 HopLight wrote:
This map is so ridiculously ZvP favoured.... so's your face Actually I'd be unfavoured in any matchup on any map, but thats a completely different story now isn't it? i think your face is quite suited to a long macro game on the Forbidden Zone I'm unable to make it right with all them spoilers, someone help me please 
Seriously? Sometimes I just don't understand what people are thinking when they post.
Edit: To avoid confusion: I'm clearly commenting on the post that got JohnColtrane banned. Not the comments that I quoted.
|
United States10328 Posts
On November 18 2010 02:50 TL.net Bot wrote:JohnColtrane was just temp banned for 2 days by Plexa. That account was created on 2008-07-15 22:27:23 and had 4804 posts. Reason:
Show nested quote +On November 17 2010 20:00 JohnColtrane wrote:On November 17 2010 19:59 HopLight wrote:On November 17 2010 19:56 JohnColtrane wrote:On November 17 2010 19:56 HopLight wrote:
This map is so ridiculously ZvP favoured.... so's your face Actually I'd be unfavoured in any matchup on any map, but thats a completely different story now isn't it? i think your face is quite suited to a long macro game on the Forbidden Zone .... cmon
I found this quite amusing, personally (though a bit combative  )
|
United States4053 Posts
i found it funny too (though in a very idiotic way)
but plexa should have put "i think a ban is quite suited to your face" as the ban reason imo
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
God reading LR threads with those comments piss me off to no end.
And by piss me off to no end I mean I like that little button I have...
|
"Your face is so ridiculously ban favored"
On November 18 2010 17:05 flamewheel wrote:
God reading LR threads with those comments piss me off to no end.
And by piss me off to no end I mean I like that little button I have...
what button?? i want a button.
|
On November 18 2010 17:06 Coagulation wrote: "Your face is so ridiculously ban favored" Show nested quote +On November 18 2010 17:05 flamewheel wrote:
God reading LR threads with those comments piss me off to no end.
And by piss me off to no end I mean I like that little button I have... what button?? i want a button.
oh god, is this gonna spawn another hilarious TL hostage thread? If so, I'm all for it xD
|
Are allowed to discuss closed threads here also?
I feel bad for FuDDx having his thread closed. I understand that recruiting TL for a voting army is not allowed, but I thought he'd get a star (pun intended) treatment. He might have had a better chance if he put slightly more effort into the thread. I think he planned to do that, but then it got closed.
|
On November 19 2010 03:52 garbanzo wrote:Are allowed to discuss closed threads here also? I feel bad for FuDDx having his thread closed. I understand that recruiting TL for a voting army is not allowed, but I thought he'd get a star (pun intended) treatment. He might have had a better chance if he put slightly more effort into the thread. I think he planned to do that, but then it got closed.
TL policy, from what I know, doesn't let anyone break the rules. If the offender is a quality contributor/poster/important SC icon (think IdrA, Day[9], NeverGG, FuDDx), rules can be bent and punishments can be more lenient or nonexistent, but we're all expected to follow the guidelines of the site, regardless of your status. That's part of why I like TL's moderation policy; some websites let their senior members get away with crazy shit without repercussions. We don't do that here. No double standards for posting are permitted without damn good reasons. No matter your importance to the site, you still gotta follow the rules.
FuDDx's topic was closed precisely because of that. You'll notice the mod closing the topic posted in a very friendly, almost apologetic tone. As a starred member, FuDDx has a lot of respect, but respect doesn't permit rulebreaking; otherwise, we might accidentally set a standard that breaking the rules is permissible. As a starred member, FuDDx has a sort of responsibility to represent what a good poster should be on TL. I wish him luck with his balloons, but we have the Sponsored Threads category for a reason.
|
Hyrule18967 Posts
|
Osaka27118 Posts
no, there is just a conflict with the post and the code.
|
Hyrule18967 Posts
My OCD does not permit this!
|
Osaka27118 Posts
I was gonna fix it but I can envision you squirming on your seat manically trying to guess a moderator's password in order to do it yourself, so I will leave it.
|
On November 19 2010 07:42 Manifesto7 wrote:
I was gonna fix it but I can envision you squirming on your seat manically trying to guess a moderator's password in order to do it yourself, so I will leave it.
How cruel...
|
Hyrule18967 Posts
On November 19 2010 07:42 Manifesto7 wrote:
I was gonna fix it but I can envision you squirming on your seat manically trying to guess a moderator's password in order to do it yourself, so I will leave it.
NYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Well played, sir. Well played. Excuse me while I go freak out. Again.
|
Osaka27118 Posts
I'll give you a hint. Fakesteve's password has a lot to do with male anatomy... although that probably wasn't hard to guess anyway.
|
Hyrule18967 Posts
You just want me to type many variations of "penis". It won't work.
And neither did any of the variations I tried.
|
Mani why are you so diabolical.
|
Osaka27118 Posts
On November 19 2010 07:55 Coagulation wrote:
Mani why are you so diabolical.
Your mind takes a turn for the worse when you're in the belly of a shark.
|
On November 19 2010 08:02 Manifesto7 wrote:Your mind takes a turn for the worse when you're in the belly of a shark.
Come on, you were in there for, like, two seconds. I'm pretty sure you were this sinister before that happened.
If you were nefarious enough to engage a slew of grandmothers in mortal combat three years ago, I'd think the shark wouldn't have been all that instrumental toward baiting Tofucake.
|
On November 19 2010 03:59 Aeres wrote:Show nested quote +On November 19 2010 03:52 garbanzo wrote:Are allowed to discuss closed threads here also? I feel bad for FuDDx having his thread closed. I understand that recruiting TL for a voting army is not allowed, but I thought he'd get a star (pun intended) treatment. He might have had a better chance if he put slightly more effort into the thread. I think he planned to do that, but then it got closed. TL policy, from what I know, doesn't let anyone break the rules. If the offender is a quality contributor/poster/important SC icon (think IdrA, Day[9], NeverGG, FuDDx), rules can be bent and punishments can be more lenient or nonexistent, but we're all expected to follow the guidelines of the site, regardless of your status. That's part of why I like TL's moderation policy; some websites let their senior members get away with crazy shit without repercussions. We don't do that here. No double standards for posting are permitted without damn good reasons. No matter your importance to the site, you still gotta follow the rules. FuDDx's topic was closed precisely because of that. You'll notice the mod closing the topic posted in a very friendly, almost apologetic tone. As a starred member, FuDDx has a lot of respect, but respect doesn't permit rulebreaking; otherwise, we might accidentally set a standard that breaking the rules is permissible. As a starred member, FuDDx has a sort of responsibility to represent what a good poster should be on TL. I wish him luck with his balloons, but we have the Sponsored Threads category for a reason.
I guess the inherent difference is that it's breaking a rule rather than just gently bending it. Oh well, I still feel bad for FuDDx.
In other news,
TehForce was just temp banned for 1 week by heyoka.
That account was created on 2010-07-25 22:08:30 and had 165 posts.
Reason: You have all kinds of warnings about not 'contributing' by adding how much you think a thread sucks.
Not only that, you clearly didn't read the OP of Excal's thread before waltzing in to say 'LOL THIS IS WORTHLESS'. Stop being a moron.
It really bothers me when someone (Excalibur_Z) goes into a lot of research and analysis, makes a great post about it and then someone else (TehForce) just shits all over it by not reading the post.
On top of that, he's wrong!
--------------------
Edit:
I didn't want to have consecutive posts so I'll just tack this on to this one.
MrProphylactic was just temp banned for 1 week by FakeSteve[TPR].
That account was created on 2010-09-09 11:59:36 and had 126 posts.
Reason: yo you're kind of an asshole
no reason to be so aggressive in a thread about space
Nooooo! He called me out in a PM. Now he'll never see my reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
