| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On February 12 2013 00:52 Shellshock1122 wrote: Yeah so many warnings already. Only a matter of time until the bans start flying Personally I would've banned McBengt too, he's made a few shitposts in there and has no idea how to argue. Also lol that guy saying "good move he sucked". XD | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
In a manner of speak the ABL is a sort of canonization for truly worthy banned users. XD | ||
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
| ||
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
On February 12 2013 00:56 DarkLordOlli wrote: Geez that thread really got me. Sometimes I get really angry at things I read, especially when religion is involved. Got worried for you there for a second.. - I feel the same way, but only with bicycle racing and doping, really weird, I know | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:08 ELA wrote: Got worried for you there for a second.. - I feel the same way, but only with bicycle racing and doping, really weird, I know I got a few warnings by now for little silly things. Gotta be more careful. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On February 12 2013 00:56 DarkLordOlli wrote: Geez that thread really got me. Sometimes I get really angry at things I read, especially when religion is involved. See, I wonder why we don't take a page out of other forums' books, and separate General forum into "random stuff" and "intellectual discussions", the latter being a subforum with stricter rules and regulations as regards the content of posts, manner in which positions are presented and arguing in general. Sure, I guess the threads would get somewhat less exposure and might be a bit intimidating for newer members to engage in discussion in, but that's not necessarily a bad thing, if it can rid us of quality posts along the lines of... + Show Spoiler [Warning: exaggerations within] + "lol religion sux ur all dumb" "omg ur gonna burn in hell for that!!" "homosexuals are an abomination" "dude fuck the system 420 blaze it erryday" "omg marijuana kills literally like 900 thousand million bajillion people EVERY DAY" "lol the pope sucks :O" Y'know, would be nice to have a sub-forum where people who make outlandish claims and either refuse to or are unable to produce any relevant evidence do not belong, same for people who conveniently ignore refutations of their case while continuing to ramble about meaningless or false things. Plus I assume it would give interesting threads more longevity, since there would be less posts like the ones spoilered above cluttering them up. Just a thought... | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:08 ELA wrote: Got worried for you there for a second.. - I feel the same way, but only with bicycle racing and doping, really weird, I know Bicycle racing and doping? Are you racing yourself? Also: Rolf er ren =) | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:12 MasterOfPuppets wrote: See, I wonder why we don't take a page out of other forums' books, and separate General forum into "random stuff" and "intellectual discussions", the latter being a subforum with stricter rules and regulations as regards the content of posts, manner in which positions are presented and arguing in general. Sure, I guess the threads would get somewhat less exposure and might be a bit intimidating for newer members to engage in discussion in, but that's not necessarily a bad thing, if it can rid us of quality posts along the lines of... + Show Spoiler [Warning: exaggerations within] + "lol religion sux ur all dumb" "omg ur gonna burn in hell for that!!" "homosexuals are an abomination" "dude fuck the system 420 blaze it erryday" "omg marijuana kills literally like 900 thousand million bajillion people EVERY DAY" "lol the pope sucks :O" Y'know, would be nice to have a sub-forum where people who make outlandish claims and either refuse to or are unable to produce any relevant evidence do not belong, same for people who conveniently ignore refutations of their case while continuing to ramble about meaningless or false things. Plus I assume it would give interesting threads more longevity, since there would be less posts like the ones spoilered above cluttering them up. Just a thought... There was this one thread on a discussion forum I used to hang out on. I think it was called "Proof of God" or something. It started out with the simple question "Is the fact that you cannot disprove God proof that belief is legitimate?" or something. Long story short, it turned into the biggest shitfest you'll ever see with extremely intelligent people on either side going completely nuts, insulting each other, somebody declaring themselves the new Messiah (and actually trying to prove it). It lasted for three months or smth and then everybody who participated in it got banned, lol. | ||
|
ELA
Denmark4608 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:12 Dirkzor wrote: Bicycle racing and doping? Are you racing yourself? Also: Rolf er ren =) Hahaha, fo' sure he is It's not really the doping discussion itself because I think that's a super important discussion, but when the Major Tours are on and you are discussing the races themselves and the douches just start going "LOL, why are you even watching this? EPO EPO EPO" I snap.. Cost me a few warnings in the past T.T EDIT: No, I don't race myself - Stick to swimming, however this sport has quite a few doping problems itself. Luckily, it doesn't dominate every aspect of discussion, though | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
Poor edit but basically sums up the pope thread + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ASRRMkL.gif) | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25657 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:12 MasterOfPuppets wrote: See, I wonder why we don't take a page out of other forums' books, and separate General forum into "random stuff" and "intellectual discussions", the latter being a subforum with stricter rules and regulations as regards the content of posts, manner in which positions are presented and arguing in general. Sure, I guess the threads would get somewhat less exposure and might be a bit intimidating for newer members to engage in discussion in, but that's not necessarily a bad thing, if it can rid us of quality posts along the lines of... + Show Spoiler [Warning: exaggerations within] + "lol religion sux ur all dumb" "omg ur gonna burn in hell for that!!" "homosexuals are an abomination" "dude fuck the system 420 blaze it erryday" "omg marijuana kills literally like 900 thousand million bajillion people EVERY DAY" "lol the pope sucks :O" Y'know, would be nice to have a sub-forum where people who make outlandish claims and either refuse to or are unable to produce any relevant evidence do not belong, same for people who conveniently ignore refutations of their case while continuing to ramble about meaningless or false things. Plus I assume it would give interesting threads more longevity, since there would be less posts like the ones spoilered above cluttering them up. Just a thought... You should really start putting your ideas some place else, you are good at starting up discussions in the ABL  | ||
|
Olli
Austria24422 Posts
On February 12 2013 01:17 ThomasjServo wrote: You were on quite a tear from what I read DarkLordOlli, I was a bit nervous for you. It is a frustrating topic, extremely difficult to discuss in any unemotional context. As far as the papacy goes, my interest only extends as far as the selection process as I think it is an interesting tradition. I didn't have the time or wherewithal to sink my teeth in to a debate, especially when it was that heavy already. Poor edit but basically sums it up. + Show Spoiler + Yeah I was definitely running towards a ban there. I personally will never ever ever ever ever be able to understand how any belief, be it religious or not, can put anything before people's lives. And I was more and more getting the vibe that that's what they were defending. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
Acertos was just temp banned for 1 week by micronesia. That account was created on 2012-02-22 08:45:20 and had 217 posts. Reason: You've been warned multiple times for unnecessary bashing... and now you do it here, despite the moderator note at the top of the thread telling you not to. You aren't following the rules. Yeah that was a bad post, glad to see he got banned. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
Hit on pretty much everything the mod note stated not to, fantastic. | ||
|
StrawDog5
29 Posts
On February 12 2013 03:43 corumjhaelen wrote: Nice name StrawDog, Peckinpah fan ? :p Hell no. On February 12 2013 03:45 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Joined TL.net Friday, 8th of February 2013 Posts in ABL and is condescending. Seems legit lol. Who was your main that got banned bro? I've only been condescending to you actually  | ||
|
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
| ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
Posts in ABL and is condescending. Seems legit lol. Who was your main that got banned bro? | ||
|
farvacola
United States18838 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On February 12 2013 03:50 farvacola wrote: All I can say is that this forum dodged a bullet having that thread open up while I was asleep i hesitated to be super serious and proving that he wasn't a bad pope but that'd be such a ban trap :D | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
The PondCast
RSL Revival
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Classic vs Cure
Reynor vs TBD
WardiTV Korean Royale
PiGosaur Monday
RSL Revival
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
herO vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
