|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On February 09 2013 04:07 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 03:53 andrewlt wrote:
My temper was really rising when reading that thread. Some people are just sick. The worst thing about this kind of threads is that most posters either don't read all of the material or conveniently choose to misread clear speculation/allegation as precise, hard fact. And from that point on come the debates and potential flame wars, even though it doesn't fucking matter because they're basing all of it on assumptions while failing to recognize that they're only that, assumptions, suppositions, speculation. General forum, why so bad?
For me, the worst thing is that these threads usually attract people with the most extreme opinions. The extremists usually derail the thread into a tangent about their conspiracy theories, their wild analogies and their generally insane beliefs. For example, people like zaqwe, sunprince and vividred, among others, already took the thread in wild tangents. And I haven't read much past page 20.
|
On February 09 2013 05:53 andrewlt wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 04:07 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On February 09 2013 03:53 andrewlt wrote:
My temper was really rising when reading that thread. Some people are just sick. The worst thing about this kind of threads is that most posters either don't read all of the material or conveniently choose to misread clear speculation/allegation as precise, hard fact. And from that point on come the debates and potential flame wars, even though it doesn't fucking matter because they're basing all of it on assumptions while failing to recognize that they're only that, assumptions, suppositions, speculation. General forum, why so bad? For me, the worst thing is that these threads usually attract people with the most extreme opinions. The extremists usually derail the thread into a tangent about their conspiracy theories, their wild analogies and their generally insane beliefs. For example, people like zaqwe, sunprince and vividred, among others, already took the thread in wild tangents. And I haven't read much past page 20.
The issues are not that unrelated actually. The conclusion that I've come to is that when it comes to controversial topics, generally the more extreme an opinion is, the more ignorant the person is. It's by no means a matter of fact, merely an empirical observation, but cliche as it may sound, the truth generally lies somewhere in the middle when it comes to matters involving humans. It's not all black and white and generally both extremes have some fair points as well as some ludicrous, outlandish claims. It wouldn't be that bad if people were actually willing to sit down, shut up and actually listen to one another and not misinterpret articles/studies/statistics but hey that's people for you... -_-
|
Damn StarStruck banned? He's smart, awesome and competent.
|
On February 09 2013 11:10 Torte de Lini wrote:
Damn StarStruck banned? He's smart, awesome and competent.
His posts are laced with a sort of cynicism that probably surpasses my own.
|
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it.
|
On February 09 2013 12:47 StrawDog5 wrote:
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it.
it says it right there in the commandments: our house, we do whatever the fuck we want.
|
On February 09 2013 13:07 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 12:47 StrawDog5 wrote:
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it. it says it right there in the commandments: our house, we do whatever the fuck we want.
Ehh this isn't how they usually use "This is our house." It does seem a bit funky to issue warnings when there's no way to know its not allowed, there's no mod note on that thread. But this isnt the place for that discussion.
StrawDog5, if you care enough you can go to Website Feedback and make a thread about it.
|
On February 09 2013 13:12 Bibbit wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 13:07 dAPhREAk wrote:On February 09 2013 12:47 StrawDog5 wrote:
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it. it says it right there in the commandments: our house, we do whatever the fuck we want. Ehh this isn't how they usually use "This is our house." It does seem a bit funky to issue warnings when there's no way to know its not allowed, there's no mod note on that thread. But this isnt the place for that discussion. StrawDog5, if you care enough you can go to Website Feedback and make a thread about it.
thats exactly how they use it because thats exactly what it says:
This means we run the site the way we see fit.
and there is no problem with issuing warnings to people who post in the wrong thread. thats what warnings are for. its not the end of the world to get a warning. it affects nothing about your use of the website.
|
Just think of it as the elastic cause of the Constitution.
|
On February 09 2013 13:16 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 13:12 Bibbit wrote:On February 09 2013 13:07 dAPhREAk wrote:On February 09 2013 12:47 StrawDog5 wrote:
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it. it says it right there in the commandments: our house, we do whatever the fuck we want. Ehh this isn't how they usually use "This is our house." It does seem a bit funky to issue warnings when there's no way to know its not allowed, there's no mod note on that thread. But this isnt the place for that discussion. StrawDog5, if you care enough you can go to Website Feedback and make a thread about it. thats exactly how they use it because thats exactly what it says: and there is no problem with issuing warnings to people who post in the wrong thread. thats what warnings are for. its not the end of the world to get a warning. it affects nothing about your use of the website.
Every time someone gets permed or even banned it's based on a "you have X moderation actions" justification. So I would hardly say it affects nothing.
And you can't really call it the "wrong thread." The thread is about a manifesto and a guy who is shooting people. He talks about gun control in said manifesto, and is using said guns to kill people.
|
On February 09 2013 13:53 StrawDog5 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 13:16 dAPhREAk wrote:On February 09 2013 13:12 Bibbit wrote:On February 09 2013 13:07 dAPhREAk wrote:On February 09 2013 12:47 StrawDog5 wrote:
Maybe you guys should add to the ten commandments that posts about gun control can only be made in a single thread devoted to it. Without that it seems a little baseless to warn out of the blue for it. it says it right there in the commandments: our house, we do whatever the fuck we want. Ehh this isn't how they usually use "This is our house." It does seem a bit funky to issue warnings when there's no way to know its not allowed, there's no mod note on that thread. But this isnt the place for that discussion. StrawDog5, if you care enough you can go to Website Feedback and make a thread about it. thats exactly how they use it because thats exactly what it says: This means we run the site the way we see fit. and there is no problem with issuing warnings to people who post in the wrong thread. thats what warnings are for. its not the end of the world to get a warning. it affects nothing about your use of the website. Every time someone gets permed or even banned it's based on a "you have X moderation actions" justification. So I would hardly say it affects nothing.
getting warned is making a misstake, if you start repeatedly getting banned your doing it wrong. Also mods can see what the warning was for. posting in the wrong thread isn't seen as a huge deal I would belive
|
why are there always so many awful posts yet whenever i browse forums i can never find any to report? its not fair TT
i do think a general note about not talking about gun control would be good though, instead of having to post it on every single thread every time anything related pops up.
|
United States97276 Posts
On February 09 2013 14:32 karis wrote:
why are there always so many awful posts yet whenever i browse forums i can never find any to report? its not fair TT
i do think a general note about not talking about gun control would be good though, instead of having to post it on every single thread every time anything related pops up.
Go to the Code S thread next week. If MC and/or Gumiho lose to Curious and Losira there will be plenty of posts to report
|
![[image loading]](http://puu.sh/1ZHAP)
So it's StarStruck's fault that some people are stupid? This is a sad day, he was easily one of the more informed and intelligent posters on this site.
On February 09 2013 14:33 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 14:32 karis wrote:
why are there always so many awful posts yet whenever i browse forums i can never find any to report? its not fair TT
i do think a general note about not talking about gun control would be good though, instead of having to post it on every single thread every time anything related pops up. Go to the Code S thread next week. If MC and/or Gumiho lose to Curious and Losira there will be plenty of posts to report
Or if MC wins with some sick timings/all-ins, that will probably beget a lot of whine as well. ^^
|
On February 09 2013 16:38 MasterOfPuppets wrote:So it's StarStruck's fault that some people are stupid? This is a sad day, he was easily one of the more informed and intelligent posters on this site. Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 14:33 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 09 2013 14:32 karis wrote:
why are there always so many awful posts yet whenever i browse forums i can never find any to report? its not fair TT
i do think a general note about not talking about gun control would be good though, instead of having to post it on every single thread every time anything related pops up. Go to the Code S thread next week. If MC and/or Gumiho lose to Curious and Losira there will be plenty of posts to report Or if MC wins with some sick timings/all-ins, that will probably beget a lot of whine as well. ^^
I recommend posting in website feedback that Kwark needs to go. He is demonstrating irascible demeanor, which compounds on the existing auxiliary evidence from other cases of malfeasance.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
The ban is obviously fine. The post was super condescending.
On February 09 2013 06:12 StarStruck wrote:
This thread is hilarious.
User was temp banned for this post.
This ban is his 20th mod note, which explains the length.
|
On February 09 2013 14:33 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 09 2013 14:32 karis wrote:
why are there always so many awful posts yet whenever i browse forums i can never find any to report? its not fair TT
i do think a general note about not talking about gun control would be good though, instead of having to post it on every single thread every time anything related pops up. Go to the Code S thread next week. If MC and/or Gumiho lose to Curious and Losira there will be plenty of posts to report
i would but im on west coast and im not staying up till 2 am just to increase my reporting percentage. maybe when i go to korea in a year or two ill be able to do it at a resonable time.
|
NITRIXdaisuki was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2010-12-09 01:48:38 and had 57 posts.
Reason: Hacker. Zero tolerance for scum.
I was wondering when it was going to happen. There goes Daisuki.
|
On February 10 2013 10:16 TheAmazombie wrote:Show nested quote +NITRIXdaisuki was just banned by Plexa.
That account was created on 2010-12-09 01:48:38 and had 57 posts.
Reason: Hacker. Zero tolerance for scum. I was wondering when it was going to happen. There goes Daisuki.
was quite alot of research in the gm hacker thread. Having a sponsorship and hacking... that didnt work out very well for the sponsor
|
I hope they sponsor another player, most people don't maphack :S
It's sad to see an e-sports sponsor leave because of one bad person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
