The Automated Ban List - Page 1567

On December 15 2012 05:57 Myles wrote:

Wax seems more annoyed than anything. Probably saying to himself 'Goddamnit, if that starts another 20 page feedback thread..."

On December 15 2012 05:57 jdseemoreglass wrote:
Caihead down :O

On December 15 2012 05:51 Slaughter wrote:


They won't work the same way in the US because we have had them for so long. But anyways stop replying to older posts as gun control stuff should be kept out of this thread and go to the gun control thread, which is now active again.
[snip...]
User was temp banned for this post.

On December 15 2012 05:59 EmperorKira wrote:
So tragic RIP

User was temp banned for this post.

On December 15 2012 06:00 KwarK wrote:

He edited out his post during the ban process which is why it looks so odd.

On December 15 2012 06:02 jdseemoreglass wrote:


I am truly amazed by the number of people who think this can actually work, saying your opinion and then immediately saying to take it to another thread like that makes it ok. I've seen about 5 posts like that already.

"Here is what I think, now stop talking about it because we aren't supposed to!" -_-


lol, they must be pretty quick on those edits Kwark. They making you look like a maniac hahaha

On December 15 2012 06:05 Bibbit wrote:
Welcome back Caihead, I knew you knew better

On December 15 2012 06:09 KwarK wrote:
'twas I

On December 15 2012 06:09 KwarK wrote:
'twas I

On December 15 2012 06:12 Melliflue wrote:

So you cannot modify a ban length but you can un-ban someone? What stops you from unbanning somebody and re-banning them with a different ban length?

On December 15 2012 06:12 Melliflue wrote:

So you cannot modify a ban length but you can un-ban someone? What stops you from unbanning somebody and re-banning them with a different ban length?

On December 15 2012 04:23 KwarK wrote:
Regarding the TB ban, whatever happened with it (didn't see the post that caused it or the context) his first route should have been to discuss the issue with the moderation staff. He was subsequently unbanned so he must have done that and the system worked. Bitching about tl from his platform before using the systems we have in place to fix mistakes is kinda unnecessary in my opinion. We were wrong to ban him apparently but we fixed it. By the same token he was wrong to turn it into a bigger issue than it needed to be and mischaracterise our process, he should clarify that it was fixed without any real drama or hassle.

On December 15 2012 07:51 TotalBiscuit wrote:


I didn't speak to the moderation staff, they spoke to me. No bitching was actually done, the tweet was very matter of fact, plus it was clarified in a follow-up tweet.

So whats the problem?

On December 15 2012 08:14 KwarK wrote:
Clearly I need to inform myself better. Apologies sir.

Edit: Read your twitter, you were bitching and "and if you have the nerve to speak up against it? BAN" is very unfair considering we have an entire subforum devoted to feedback.