| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
micronesia
United States24805 Posts
On December 12 2012 02:03 DODswe4 wrote: wouldn't you still need to visit said thread, not what others actually look at ? R1CH would have to clarify; I'm not sure how ads are affected by independent properties of TL such as how it is classified or what content it appears to have. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
 ).. I clicked the KMD thread (I've clicked it maybe twice before) and I got a shoe ad and a danish borger.dk ad (Citizen.dk some public something). So there... I just proved nothing! =) | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=218946¤tpage=384#7674 Al Bundy was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB. That account was created on 2010-04-22 11:49:11 and had 6652 posts. Reason: Calling someone a whore is probably not a good idea. edit: post was warned. mods are fast. | ||
|
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/DsW2f.png) They are scary sometimes | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/wHEKU.jpg) Plus, back before the elections, I was in the Congressional Election thread and I constantly got peppered with anti-Akin/-GOP ads. Seems it's geographically specific as well. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On December 12 2012 04:26 Qbek wrote: I just stumbled in this thread and see you talking about ads. I have a nice pic related to them They are scary sometimes I have a similar pic ^_^ ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/EnUkk.png) | ||
|
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Fj11M.png) Sick burn. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
| ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On June 16 2012 04:08 Failsafe wrote: I have today decided to apply to Blizzard Entertain products to create the game to be recognized "Starcraft 3." Blizzard's great success in the creation of Starcraft II: WoL is that Blizzard successfully demonstrates itself to be capable of producing a game like Starcraft 2. The great victory won is evidence that 'a-move Zerg', Infestorz 3 talentz, and 255 or infinite unit selection is a serious design flaw. The insight provided from this social commentary on the greatest humanitarian crisis known to man (the 'Untouchables' in India) is abolished. Thus, Blizzard is the most valuable company on the planet despite its known human or animals' rights infringements. User was temp banned for this post. Every time I feel down, I just go through Failsafe's blogs. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=345209 | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5080 Posts
These ad algorithms are going to turn into Skynet and kill us all they're so good. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:18 Praetorial wrote: Every time I feel down, I just go through Failsafe's blogs. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=345209 Oh man, I had forgotten about that gem. Thanks for the late night laugh. Edit: Little Rage Box was just temp banned for 2 days by KwarK. That account was created on 2011-05-24 06:14:53 and had 80 posts. Reason: If I shut down a religion argument in a topic saying to take it to PMs rather than making further posts in the topic and then you quote my "don't keep talking about this" post in your post where you talk about it you get a ban. It's not complicated. After only a few hours the thread claims it's first ban victim. On December 12 2012 07:25 Little Rage Box wrote: Its extremely relevant to the subject, the religious view that being gay/gay marriage is wrong is central to everything in this debate. But the question is should equality trump religious freedom? or vice versa? The simple answer is that religions view being gay a sin, that is their view, which doesn't make it right or wrong, its what they believe. But people saying that they can't or shouldn't say that is suppressing their freedoms. While I don't think that gay marriage or gay relationships are morally right based upon my religious beliefs, I understand that the same freedoms that give me the right to think that also protect their rights to think and do what they want. People just need to get over themselves and realize that just because they think and believe something doesn't mean its right, and that they can impose what they want. That goes for both sides of the fight. And this is coming from the son of a pastor in the South. Roll Tide Roll User was temp banned for reading a mod post saying to stop arguing about a thing and deciding the thing to do is quote it to start arguing about it. The topic was otherwise doing so well too. | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:25 Little Rage Box wrote: Its extremely relevant to the subject, the religious view that being gay/gay marriage is wrong is central to everything in this debate. But the question is should equality trump religious freedom? or vice versa? The simple answer is that religions view being gay a sin, that is their view, which doesn't make it right or wrong, its what they believe. But people saying that they can't or shouldn't say that is suppressing their freedoms. While I don't think that gay marriage or gay relationships are morally right based upon my religious beliefs, I understand that the same freedoms that give me the right to think that also protect their rights to think and do what they want. People just need to get over themselves and realize that just because they think and believe something doesn't mean its right, and that they can impose what they want. That goes for both sides of the fight. And this is coming from the son of a pastor in the South. Roll Tide Roll Don't you just hate it when you're f5'ing a topic, see a post you want to reply to, formulate a thoughtful response, post it, then realize it's been hit with the infamous red text? That just happened to me. -.-' | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
I think it is possible. In such case, everyone should go there and get banned. Seeing the huge success, it may become a tradition! | ||
|
KwarK
United States44401 Posts
I'm hoping it actually achieves that rarest of things, a topic discussing religion as an aspect of human society, rather than devolving into an argument about God. But I'm going to sleep now and I expect one person to say something wrong and then another to feel they must quote it rather than report it and then when I wake up people will be counting angels on the head of a pin. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:43 opisska wrote: I have the feeling that KwarK created the thread for the very purpose of the amusement of this honorable society. Or is it just a honey pot? I think it is possible. In such case, everyone should go there and get banned. Seeing the huge success, it may become a tradition! Lead the way, I promise I will be right behind you  | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:44 KwarK wrote: I don't think it's especially bantrappy, people just have to read the OP and the mod note and work out that it's about the specifics of the bill and the implications of the bill regarding the role of the state and the rights of private and religious institutions in a secular society. Whether or not you support the gay marriage only has a passing relevance, gays in the UK have been able to get civil partnerships for years and are pretty much universally referred to as married, while the rightness of any specific religious belief isn't relevant to the place of religion as a whole within society. I'm hoping it actually achieves that rarest of things, a topic discussing religion as an aspect of human society, rather than devolving into an argument about God. But I'm going to sleep now and I expect one person to say something wrong and then another to feel they must quote it rather than report it and then when I wake up people will be counting angels on the head of a pin. Dude, you should know that people just don't read op or mod notes. They read the title and then post. So any thread with the title containing the words gay, Obama, Idra, American, Scarlett or similar stuff is automatically a bantrap | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:44 Cokefreak wrote: Lead the way, I promise I will be right behind you Haha, "I'll drop my gun,... only after you drop yours." @KwarK: G'night! Wish I could report them to you, but I've only been here ~5 months soooo no fancy-schmancy "Report" button for me  That's also probably why it's not as successful a bantrap as people are hoping for, lol. | ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
On December 12 2012 07:44 redserpent wrote: the world is really coming to an end if people really think to approve such abominations,i mean really,its not natural guys,its not how we (humans) were created in the first place. i am not supporting gay marriage User was banned for a catastrophic failure to read the topic, understand the purpose of it and read the mod note. Five posts. We hardly knew ye... Is it just me, or does it seem like Romanians have a much higher perm rate? | ||
|
KwarK
United States44401 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
GSL
Epic.LAN
Big Brain Bouts
OSC
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Invitational
Epic.LAN
IPSL
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
