|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this.
He was banned for implying that Asians are incredibly smarter than everyone else, and that black people are good at running.
|
On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this. I'm just wondering what would happen if someone made the argument that IQ correlates with intelligence outside of the context of a racial discussion.
Given that IQ tests do a demonstrably poor job of accurately measuring intelligence, they would probably get mocked, then ignored.
|
United States8476 Posts
On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this. I'm just wondering what would happen if someone made the argument that IQ correlates with intelligence outside of the context of a racial discussion.
I don't think that had anything to do with the ban. He basically said "black people are dumb".
|
On November 05 2012 10:25 monk. wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this. I'm just wondering what would happen if someone made the argument that IQ correlates with intelligence outside of the context of a racial discussion. I don't think that had anything to do with the ban. He basically said "black people are dumb".
Well he said that blacks on average score lower on IQ tests and then extrapolated from that that they are less intelligent. So suggesting this idea, that IQ scores correlate with intelligence, outside of the context of race could still be seen as a racist declaration. I don't want to start a big debate here I just think it's an interesting question.
|
Off topic but thanks for the birthday wishes, peeps 
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On November 05 2012 10:28 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 10:25 monk. wrote:On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this. I'm just wondering what would happen if someone made the argument that IQ correlates with intelligence outside of the context of a racial discussion. I don't think that had anything to do with the ban. He basically said "black people are dumb". Well he said that blacks on average score lower on IQ tests and then extrapolated from that that they are less intelligent. So suggesting this idea, that IQ scores correlate with intelligence, outside of the context of race could still be seen as a racist declaration. I don't want to start a big debate here I just think it's an interesting question.
He was banned for being racist. Cheers.
|
On November 05 2012 11:02 tree.hugger wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 10:28 jdseemoreglass wrote:On November 05 2012 10:25 monk. wrote:On November 05 2012 09:53 jdseemoreglass wrote:On November 05 2012 08:29 Portlandian wrote:
The problem with Affirmative Action in schooling is that all races have different levels of intelligence. It is unreasonable to expect equal educational performance from groups with vastly different average IQs.
Discriminating against Asians in education because of their high intelligence is like forcing Black sprinters to carry weights to slow them down to the average speed of Asian sprinters.
But even worse than Affirmative Action is Disparate Impact law. Disparate Impact effectively establishes racial quotas in hiring because if Blacks do not meet hiring standards the standards are said to have "disparate impact" and are illegal.
User was banned for this post. So, was he banned for extrapolating that IQ scores mean intelligence? Just want to clarify this. I'm just wondering what would happen if someone made the argument that IQ correlates with intelligence outside of the context of a racial discussion. I don't think that had anything to do with the ban. He basically said "black people are dumb". Well he said that blacks on average score lower on IQ tests and then extrapolated from that that they are less intelligent. So suggesting this idea, that IQ scores correlate with intelligence, outside of the context of race could still be seen as a racist declaration. I don't want to start a big debate here I just think it's an interesting question. He was banned for being racist. Cheers.
Ah! Now it all makes sense. Cheers.
|
Its nice to see that dota has its own undesirables, mlg lr threads make me lose hope for Starcraft fans.
|
MLG was pretty tame ban wise
|
On November 05 2012 12:04 Chriscras wrote:
But what happens if the US Supreme Court rules that Affirmative Action is "racist?"
That has no bearing on the content which got the poster banned.
Edit: I got you good
|
On November 05 2012 12:04 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 12:04 Chriscras wrote:
But what happens if the US Supreme Court rules that Affirmative Action is "racist?" That has no bearing on the content which got the poster banned. Edit: I got you good
Wasn't worth it
|
Edit: Nvm shouldn't post this here.
|
Im guessing if you have studies and statistics to back that statement, it wouldnt be.
|
On November 05 2012 09:54 Prime`Rib wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 08:35 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:44 Prime`Rib wrote:On November 05 2012 07:28 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:00 Mambo wrote:
Wow, so much hate from the elitists. Never the less it DID happen. At the time it happened I had maybe 35 games played in total and 1 leave due to ISP crash. I got disconnected and could not reconnect due to dota 2 server was down. So i got a leave and got placed into low priority queue. It might have been one week instead of two, it is some months ago, but i remember it like it was two weeks. no, you are a fucking liar. The low priority system is designed so that you stay in the leaver queue according to your abandon games. Unless you have 1000 game abandon, 2 weeks is impossible. I am currently have 15 abandon games and my low pool only last 12 hours. Low Priority last for 24 hours. 1. If you abandon alot, there will be a threshold that will put you in LP. 2. Or you got reported and they put you in LP. 3. Abandoning 1 or 2 games in a row doesn't matter. 4. If everyone abandon the game before 5 minutes mark, the game wont record and you dont get an abandon. I have NEVER had to stay in a low priority queue more than 12 hours. State your source or you go to that lying corner and sit there until u regret posting that. Of course, you are a lying piece of shit. Apologize and I will forgive you. Fucking cunts. http://dev.dota2.com/showthread.php?t=52101Apologize NOW. NOW The LP duration increased by 24 hours duration. Not 12. Come at me, bro. What you got? You lying faggot. User was temp banned for this post.
Man, what is wrong with some people?...
|
On November 05 2012 12:46 Grobyc wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 09:54 Prime`Rib wrote:On November 05 2012 08:35 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:44 Prime`Rib wrote:On November 05 2012 07:28 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:00 Mambo wrote:
Wow, so much hate from the elitists. Never the less it DID happen. At the time it happened I had maybe 35 games played in total and 1 leave due to ISP crash. I got disconnected and could not reconnect due to dota 2 server was down. So i got a leave and got placed into low priority queue. It might have been one week instead of two, it is some months ago, but i remember it like it was two weeks. no, you are a fucking liar. The low priority system is designed so that you stay in the leaver queue according to your abandon games. Unless you have 1000 game abandon, 2 weeks is impossible. I am currently have 15 abandon games and my low pool only last 12 hours. Low Priority last for 24 hours. 1. If you abandon alot, there will be a threshold that will put you in LP. 2. Or you got reported and they put you in LP. 3. Abandoning 1 or 2 games in a row doesn't matter. 4. If everyone abandon the game before 5 minutes mark, the game wont record and you dont get an abandon. I have NEVER had to stay in a low priority queue more than 12 hours. State your source or you go to that lying corner and sit there until u regret posting that. Of course, you are a lying piece of shit. Apologize and I will forgive you. Fucking cunts. http://dev.dota2.com/showthread.php?t=52101Apologize NOW. NOW The LP duration increased by 24 hours duration. Not 12. Come at me, bro. What you got? You lying faggot. User was temp banned for this post. Man, what is wrong with some people?...
Takes every kind of person to make a world, I guess. I find it pretty adorable when someone attempts to go alpha on someone else over a forum.
|
United States10026 Posts
o! i remember one of my bans was because i made a bet with kiett on a bisu vs KT game. forget when kt zerg it was. i think hoejja or CH?
anyways, i post in the LR for the tempban to be short and heyoka sees this and has no idea wtf im talking about but bans me anyways. xD ill dig it up later when im not as busy.
|
Portlandian was just banned by tree.hugger. That account was created on 2012-07-04 14:49:45 and had 153 posts. Reason: ![[image loading]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2a5k25fzu1rqfhi2o1_400.gif)
Was this the scat porn guy? cause is amazing by tree.hugger lol i love when mods use appropriate memes or gifs
On November 05 2012 15:29 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 15:28 Shock710 wrote:Portlandian was just banned by tree.hugger. That account was created on 2012-07-04 14:49:45 and had 153 posts. Reason: Was this the scat porn guy? No, that guy was banned for racism.
oh lol *facepalm* right and i was just reading about that ban...hahaha
|
On November 05 2012 15:28 Shock710 wrote:Show nested quote +Portlandian was just banned by tree.hugger. That account was created on 2012-07-04 14:49:45 and had 153 posts. Reason: Was this the scat porn guy?
No, that guy was banned for racism.
|
On November 05 2012 12:04 Chriscras wrote:MLG was pretty tame ban wise
Still, there was a good amount of balance whining left unpunished.
Reporting posts in a LR is annoying when you're watching the games >.<
|
On November 05 2012 12:46 Grobyc wrote:Show nested quote +On November 05 2012 09:54 Prime`Rib wrote:On November 05 2012 08:35 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:44 Prime`Rib wrote:On November 05 2012 07:28 NB wrote:On November 05 2012 07:00 Mambo wrote:
Wow, so much hate from the elitists. Never the less it DID happen. At the time it happened I had maybe 35 games played in total and 1 leave due to ISP crash. I got disconnected and could not reconnect due to dota 2 server was down. So i got a leave and got placed into low priority queue. It might have been one week instead of two, it is some months ago, but i remember it like it was two weeks. no, you are a fucking liar. The low priority system is designed so that you stay in the leaver queue according to your abandon games. Unless you have 1000 game abandon, 2 weeks is impossible. I am currently have 15 abandon games and my low pool only last 12 hours. Low Priority last for 24 hours. 1. If you abandon alot, there will be a threshold that will put you in LP. 2. Or you got reported and they put you in LP. 3. Abandoning 1 or 2 games in a row doesn't matter. 4. If everyone abandon the game before 5 minutes mark, the game wont record and you dont get an abandon. I have NEVER had to stay in a low priority queue more than 12 hours. State your source or you go to that lying corner and sit there until u regret posting that. Of course, you are a lying piece of shit. Apologize and I will forgive you. Fucking cunts. http://dev.dota2.com/showthread.php?t=52101Apologize NOW. NOW The LP duration increased by 24 hours duration. Not 12. Come at me, bro. What you got? You lying faggot. User was temp banned for this post. Man, what is wrong with some people?...
Okay, that is the funniest thing I've seen so far. I'm gonna call troll on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
494
EPT
