|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
i offered to bear empyrean's babies. he respectfully declined (despite how cute they would look), but agreed to reopen. Trayvon Martin, always remember, always discuss, always accuse him of "lean" drug use for buying snacks during a basketball game.
|
On July 18 2012 10:02 dAPhREAk wrote:i offered to bear empyrean's babies. he respectfully declined (despite how cute they would look), but agreed to reopen. Trayvon Martin, always remember, always discuss, always accuse him of "lean" drug use for buying snacks during a basketball game.
Well im glad to see that the thread will be re opened, it needs to be discussed, but I'm hoping that some banling camps that thread to hell and back, because its just going to go down hill again with out a good old purge, like the days of old. General thread generates far too much discussion in this thread.
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
On July 18 2012 10:10 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 10:02 dAPhREAk wrote:i offered to bear empyrean's babies. he respectfully declined (despite how cute they would look), but agreed to reopen. Trayvon Martin, always remember, always discuss, always accuse him of "lean" drug use for buying snacks during a basketball game. Well im glad to see that the thread will be re opened, it needs to be discussed, but I'm hoping that some banling camps that thread to hell and back, because its just going to go down hill again with out a good old purge, like the days of old. General thread generates far too much discussion in this thread.
Just as an aside, that's a great OP in the thread.
|
baby elephant was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-04-13 08:15:54 and had 273 posts.
Reason: Not once in the past 200 posts (too lazy to go deeper, but I suspect it's just as bad) have you made a post that's longer than one line.
This, despite four warnings and a temp for doing exactly that.
from the how to present females in sc2 thread:
On July 18 2012 08:08 baby elephant wrote:
naked
User was banned for this post.
i have to admit, i lol'd at his post.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
On July 18 2012 10:31 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +baby elephant was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-04-13 08:15:54 and had 273 posts.
Reason: Not once in the past 200 posts (too lazy to go deeper, but I suspect it's just as bad) have you made a post that's longer than one line.
This, despite four warnings and a temp for doing exactly that. from the how to present females in sc2 thread: Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 08:08 baby elephant wrote:
naked
User was banned for this post. i have to admit, i lol'd at his post.
On July 18 2012 09:42 IdrA wrote:
How many warnings total will that be IdrA? (if he gets a warning that is)
|
Canada18410 Posts
On July 18 2012 07:09 Empyrean wrote:rofl, tree.hugger warned him at the exact same time I permed him.
I'm just surprised it took that long for him to get perm'd.
|
On July 18 2012 10:31 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +baby elephant was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-04-13 08:15:54 and had 273 posts.
Reason: Not once in the past 200 posts (too lazy to go deeper, but I suspect it's just as bad) have you made a post that's longer than one line.
This, despite four warnings and a temp for doing exactly that. from the how to present females in sc2 thread: Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 08:08 baby elephant wrote:
naked
User was banned for this post. i have to admit, i lol'd at his post.
Funny, but stupid to say on tl, or any other forum. I must admit i like his spirt though, not content to make mere on line posts, he pushed on into the realm of offensive one lines posts, and found his ultamite reward, disneyland. The gray (wrinkly) pilgrim has now found the greatest of his kind, joining greats such as charlie murphy and ggnore in the great gathering place of their kind.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37043 Posts
Z.SC2. was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 10:52:12 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
Z-SC2 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 11:05:52 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
Wasn't the next one supposed to be an IP ban?
|
On July 18 2012 11:18 SeeKeR wrote:Show nested quote +Z.SC2. was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 10:52:12 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Show nested quote +Z-SC2 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 11:05:52 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Wasn't the next one supposed to be an IP ban?
TL staff to nice. I think this means that we need rekrul back to whip this group of over kind, over caring, and over nice hammer wielders into shape.
|
On July 18 2012 11:21 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 11:18 SeeKeR wrote:Z.SC2. was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 10:52:12 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Z-SC2 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 11:05:52 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Wasn't the next one supposed to be an IP ban? TL staff to nice. I think this means that we need rekrul back to whip this group of over kind, over caring, and over nice hammer wielders into shape.
Worst Nazis ever.
To clarify, you guys are failing badly at being Nazis. I suddenly realized that could be taken wrong.
|
On July 18 2012 11:24 JingleHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 11:21 Jaaaaasper wrote:On July 18 2012 11:18 SeeKeR wrote:Z.SC2. was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 10:52:12 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Z-SC2 was just banned by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-07-18 11:05:52 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Wasn't the next one supposed to be an IP ban? TL staff to nice. I think this means that we need rekrul back to whip this group of over kind, over caring, and over nice hammer wielders into shape. Worst Nazis ever. To clarify, you guys are failing badly at being Nazis. I suddenly realized that could be taken wrong.
That could have been taken very badly. If this truly was the nerd reich we would both have been sent to the disney land death camp, you for posting that and i for giving you the idea.
|
I think for some people IP bans are impossible because they have dynamic IP (iirc). There are still lots of ways to find PBUs though.
|
On July 18 2012 12:33 Aerisky wrote:
I think for some people IP bans are impossible because they have dynamic IP (iirc). There are still lots of ways to find PBUs though.
A good way to find PBU's is to have them keep naming themselves the same thing.
|
On July 18 2012 12:42 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 12:33 Aerisky wrote:
I think for some people IP bans are impossible because they have dynamic IP (iirc). There are still lots of ways to find PBUs though. A good way to find PBU's is to have them keep naming themselves the same thing.
Yup ^^
tdot was a particularly obvious one. R1CH's captcha idea was an incredibly funny PBU solution though 
|
Blazinghand
United States25555 Posts
On July 18 2012 12:47 Aerisky wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 12:42 Dodgin wrote:On July 18 2012 12:33 Aerisky wrote:
I think for some people IP bans are impossible because they have dynamic IP (iirc). There are still lots of ways to find PBUs though. A good way to find PBU's is to have them keep naming themselves the same thing. Yup ^^ tdot was a particularly obvious one. R1CH's captcha idea was an incredibly funny PBU solution though
What was the captcha idea?
|
|
|
On July 18 2012 15:08 Probulous wrote:![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Hot_Bid/R1CH/R1CHcaptcha.png )
Perhaps any username with 'Z' and "SC2" contained should get the same treatment.
|
There's a guy named Sc2zero7 whom I'm moderately sure is actually not the one we're talking about. Mostly posts in KMD and KDD.
|
On July 18 2012 15:45 Aerisky wrote:There's a guy named Sc2zero7 whom I'm moderately sure is actually not the one we're talking about. Mostly posts in KMD and KDD.
Then possibly instead of just 'Z' AND "SC2", it should be names in the form of str+Z+str+SC2+str where str = any string inculding the empty string.
|
I laughed at "including the empty string." Someone has spent too much time doing set theory  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i53.tinypic.com/2zqy1bl.jpg)
