|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 05 2012 19:37 blubbdavid wrote: Are you seriously comparing Mani with Combat-Ex?
I hope that is not what he meant. On that note, in the "Notable Classy Gamers" thread did anyone see this post a few down:
On May 04 2012 22:49 Johnnyboy13 wrote: I'd have to say combatEX, Free coaching, Youtube vods, and a great mannered guy. Now that's class.
|
On May 05 2012 19:31 TheAmazombie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2012 19:18 -_-Quails wrote:On May 05 2012 18:57 marttorn wrote:On May 05 2012 18:45 -_-Quails wrote:On May 05 2012 18:16 TheAmazombie wrote:On May 05 2012 18:14 marttorn wrote:On May 05 2012 18:10 TheAmazombie wrote:On May 05 2012 18:08 marttorn wrote:On May 05 2012 18:02 solidbebe wrote: enough of this procrastination, I need to write that goddamn paper, SMITE ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You have no idea how tempting it is to start an argument about Anime with you right now. Well...too late. Sorry, I don't watch or know enough about anime to perform the assist in that department. What, you're saying Death Note, HSD: K and Bleach all fit in the "ecchi" category? Liar. Damnit...I swear you are trying to talk to me...Hello?! Hello?! This could be an amusing if completely off-topic conversation to watch. I dunno, I think having a conversation about anime in the ABL might be the last drop for He Who Must Not Be Named. I know you're watching us. Lurking in the shadows, ready to pounce. >,> <,< v,v ^,^ Hmm... To be fair, only one of you would be talking about anime. The other would just be increasingly bewildered as you ascribe them viewpoints then argue against them yourself. Point taken about not waking He Who Must Not Be Named though. theblueassasin was just temp banned for 1 week by Pholon.
That account was created on 2011-01-07 15:51:28 and had 29 posts.
Reason: Don't ever violate the wiki again. Another liquipedia ban. Is there any way to find the page that was messed with other than searching through all of the histories of pages?
Yes, but it's not perfect.
First you can use the Special:BlockList page to see if there's any information, but generally you'll need to use the Special:Log/delete. It's not perfect but you can get an idea.
|
On May 05 2012 19:37 blubbdavid wrote: Are you seriously comparing Mani with Combat-Ex? No. I was comparing Mani to the Dark Lord Voldemort. The person you mentioned is unworthy of comment, let alone capitalisation.
|
WECKL was just temp banned for 2 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2004-08-25 04:26:36 and had 32 posts.
Reason: On May 05 2012 02:43 WECKL wrote: This destiny guy continues to own all of you again and again.
Im gonna insult you the only way I know i wont get banned: quote: You are stupid and you know nothing about sc2
Please, try contributing something to the conversation first then we can talk about that insult not netting you a ban.
HAHAHA! I love this. "I know I won't get banned..."
I was expected a little more of a burn from the mods, I must say. But whatever, still laughed ><
|
It is dead. Almost 4 hours since the last post. The ABLD thread is dead!
|
Sounds like good news to me! There's hope yet.
|
On May 05 2012 20:35 -_-Quails wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2012 19:37 blubbdavid wrote: Are you seriously comparing Mani with Combat-Ex? No. I was comparing Mani to the Dark Lord Voldemort. The person you mentioned is unworthy of comment, let alone capitalisation. Shhhh dont say his name!
|
Mifflin you are terrible. Must eat food and chill until I regain my strength. Sadly The Toast is the only one who will probably understand this. Maybe heyoka will.
|
Canada11372 Posts
On May 05 2012 22:24 CyDe wrote:Show nested quote +WECKL was just temp banned for 2 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2004-08-25 04:26:36 and had 32 posts.
Reason: On May 05 2012 02:43 WECKL wrote: This destiny guy continues to own all of you again and again.
Im gonna insult you the only way I know i wont get banned: quote: You are stupid and you know nothing about sc2
Please, try contributing something to the conversation first then we can talk about that insult not netting you a ban. HAHAHA! I love this. "I know I won't get banned..." I was expected a little more of a burn from the mods, I must say. But whatever, still laughed >< I was creating one, but I vacillated too long on the wording and p4nDemik got him.
|
On May 06 2012 03:24 Falling wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2012 22:24 CyDe wrote:WECKL was just temp banned for 2 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2004-08-25 04:26:36 and had 32 posts.
Reason: On May 05 2012 02:43 WECKL wrote: This destiny guy continues to own all of you again and again.
Im gonna insult you the only way I know i wont get banned: quote: You are stupid and you know nothing about sc2
Please, try contributing something to the conversation first then we can talk about that insult not netting you a ban. HAHAHA! I love this. "I know I won't get banned..." I was expected a little more of a burn from the mods, I must say. But whatever, still laughed >< I was creating one, but I vacillated too long on the wording and p4nDemik got him. so you have to right out the reason for a ban and then ban. You cant just ban an edit in your witty remark?
|
Canada11372 Posts
On May 06 2012 03:57 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2012 03:24 Falling wrote:On May 05 2012 22:24 CyDe wrote:WECKL was just temp banned for 2 days by p4NDemik.
That account was created on 2004-08-25 04:26:36 and had 32 posts.
Reason: On May 05 2012 02:43 WECKL wrote: This destiny guy continues to own all of you again and again.
Im gonna insult you the only way I know i wont get banned: quote: You are stupid and you know nothing about sc2
Please, try contributing something to the conversation first then we can talk about that insult not netting you a ban. HAHAHA! I love this. "I know I won't get banned..." I was expected a little more of a burn from the mods, I must say. But whatever, still laughed >< I was creating one, but I vacillated too long on the wording and p4nDemik got him. so you have the right out the reason for a ban and then ban. You cant just ban an edit in your witty remark? Once it goes through, it's uneditable- much to my dismay if there's a spelling mistake or missing word. I suppose I could 'claim it' by closing the report and then writing the ban reason. But there's a few times when a couple mods were working on the same ban, but one beats the other
|
[V] was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2011-11-26 19:14:09 and had 905 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. So who was this guy? Gongryong?
|
On May 06 2012 05:05 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +[V] was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2011-11-26 19:14:09 and had 905 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. So who was this guy? Gongryong? The name looks kind of like an M. M for mysterious!
|
On May 06 2012 05:05 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +[V] was just banned by Antoine.
That account was created on 2011-11-26 19:14:09 and had 905 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. So who was this guy? Gongryong? he got to 905 posts without getting PBU banned. seems he cleaned up his act.
|
sieksdekciw was just temp banned for 2 weeks by Harem.
That account was created on 2012-04-09 02:44:45 and had 86 posts.
Reason: "quality" poster who keeps making "quality" posts and never whines or complains about balance either
On May 06 2012 04:14 sieksdekciw wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2012 03:55 imanoobcs wrote: The turret has no reason to last 4 minutes. And the raven is not that pricey. Compare it to any other caster. It cost 50 more gas than an infestor for example. Same amount of minerals. It has detection, can fly, has 3 abilities instead of just 2, turrets cost 50 energy instead of 75 for fungal. The seeker missle does aoe 100 damage and follows its target so it hard to miss. Fungal does 36 damage and you can miss with it. Im just saying, its not my fault its not used more often. I see them quite a bit actually. I think they should lower the time they are out to maybe 1 minute and raise the cost to 75, like storm and fungal are. Are you comparing turret to storm and fungal? Only explanation, I see is that you are zerg, zergs are not famous for being terribly bright. User was warned for this post to be fair, zergs arent terribly bright. thats why they require a hivemind. they cant think for themselves.
|
It´s special, no?
TL.net. May 06 2012 06:25. Posts 3 PM Profile Quote # hanlonbro was just banned by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2012-05-03 02:41:11 and had 108 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/NTKaE.png)
Sad that it´s wasted for a PBU.
Edit: Well, ok when I think about it, that´s not just bans in the thread. So it´s not really special...I thought it was the 25k ban
|
On May 06 2012 06:31 Hondelul wrote:It´s special, no? Show nested quote +TL.net. May 06 2012 06:25. Posts 3 PM Profile Quote # hanlonbro was just banned by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2012-05-03 02:41:11 and had 108 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/NTKaE.png) Sad that it´s wasted for a PBU. Edit: Well, ok when I think about it, that´s not just bans in the thread. So it´s not really special...I thought it was the 25k ban 
Painful last post, too. I mean really? For an overheating mid-range GPU?
On May 06 2012 06:03 hanlonbro wrote: I have an easy solution. Get a new graphics card and use mineral oil cooling.
User was banned for this post.
|
|
|
United States7639 Posts
I think we all came to the agreement that [V] was GG.NoRe lol
|
Okay - I have an idea for a new system to try and not punish people who are 1 line bad posters but want to actually contribute to TL. Basically there could be a new tab on the side of every thread where people who are labeled bad posters get placed int o a category where they can only make x number of posts per day and they don't get automatically posted but get placed into the new tab where other TLers with over 1k posts or something can +1 or -1 the post and if it reaches a certain threshold of either positive or negative it could make the user receive a warning or something negative or actually get posted in the thread.
Not posted in website feedback because I don't expect this to actually happen - but just to ponder this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|