EPTAnd I like the ABL Diaries, maybe I wil contribute.
The Automated Ban List - Page 1036
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
And I like the ABL Diaries, maybe I wil contribute. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
A cold wind blows upon the shore. Yahoo banned in ten seconds. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
| ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:18 motbob wrote: I shouldn't have permed him -_- Nah. He got what would have been coming to him. His statement might have been intended well, but the fact is he insulted mods, called people nazis, and a few other things. Perm material. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
Fighting the good fight for all of TL. On May 04 2012 18:19 Praetorial wrote: Nah. He got what would have been coming to him. His statement might have been intended well, but the fact is he insulted mods, called people nazis, and a few other things. Perm material. I don't think he was insulting mods though, he was saying the community members who got him fired are " nazi's " unless im misunderstanding now too the second part of the post was bad but not perm worthy I don't think if there's no prior offenses. | ||
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
| ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:23 Dodgin wrote: I do not envy you or the other mods patrolling that thread, Motbob. Fighting the good fight for all of TL. I don't think he was insulting mods though, he was saying the community members who got him fired are " nazi's " unless im misunderstanding now too Perhaps he could've been given another chance, but if that is his opinion of the TL community then I wouldn't see much good coming from him in the future. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:23 Dodgin wrote: I do not envy you or the other mods patrolling that thread, Motbob. Fighting the good fight for all of TL. I don't think he was insulting mods though, he was saying the community members who got him fired are " nazi's " unless im misunderstanding now too the second part of the post was bad but not perm worthy I don't think if there's no prior offenses. The TL community is a cancer Also, calling anyone a nazi who's not a far right racist activist is ignorant. | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:27 Praetorial wrote: Also, calling anyone a nazi who's not a far right racist activist is ignorant. And all far right activists are nazis? --_____-- | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:30 solidbebe wrote: And all far right activists are nazis? --_____-- *racist**violent* But it would be the proper application of such a term, though neo-nazis would obviously be preferable. | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:25 motbob wrote: I think it's rare that a single bad post makes someone perm material. The rest of his post history isn't bad. Then maybe un perm him? You have that kind of power! | ||
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:34 MCDayC wrote: Then maybe un perm him? You have that kind of power! Only admins can unban or change ban duration. | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
Why don't they give it to banlings? They trust you with the power to ban but not to unban? I don't get it. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:37 solidbebe wrote: Why don't they give it to banlings? They trust you with the power to ban but not to unban? I don't get it. Admins are directly accountable. If a mod goes rogue, then there are certain restraints that are put on them. | ||
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:37 solidbebe wrote: Why don't they give it to banlings? They trust you with the power to ban but not to unban? I don't get it. It's less convenient but it has some advantages. If only a select few have the power to reverse ban decisions, that increases the autonomy of each mod. I can't be like "Kwark that ban was terrible" and reverse it 30 seconds after it was made. I don't mind not having the power. It just creates a lot more work for the admins, so if they think it's a worthwhile system, then I'm willing to let them carry on with it.  | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:40 Praetorial wrote: Admins are directly accountable. If a mod goes rogue, then there are certain restraints that are put on them. Has a mod ever gone rogue? | ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:34 Praetorial wrote: *racist**violent* But it would be the proper application of such a term, though neo-nazis would obviously be preferable. Here is a thought: How about calling people that aren't nazis nazis is incredibly offensive. I'm sure you can bring politics and your personal perspective into the definition all you like but lets just let offensive words be what they are. Calling someone a Nazi, that isn't a Nazi, is shitty. <----period. PS this ban reason plus this name made me giggle TL.net Bot TL.net. May 04 2012 18:37. Posts 3 PM Profile Quote # JohnnyBlaze420 was just temp banned for 2 days by motbob. That account was created on 2011-03-28 01:25:19 and had 685 posts. Reason: Look at the post above yours. The poster had the same opinion as you. He wrote a wonderful post explaining his reasons for holding that opinion in detail. You did the opposite, and now you are banned. | ||
|
Falling
Canada11578 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:41 motbob wrote: It's less convenient but it has some advantages. If only a select few have the power to reverse ban decisions, that increases the autonomy of each mod. I can't be like "Kwark that ban was terrible" and reverse it 30 seconds after it was made. I don't mind not having the power. It just creates a lot more work for the admins, so if they think it's a worthwhile system, then I'm willing to let them carry on with it. It is a little inconvenient, but I think it also give us greater pause before we pull the trigger. It's a bit of a hassle to adjust a ban and so you really don't want to be make a bunch of bad calls in a row. | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:42 Synwave wrote: Here is a thought: How about calling people that aren't nazis nazis is incredibly offensive. I'm sure you can bring politics and your personal perspective into the definition all you like but lets just let offensive words be what they are. Calling someone a Nazi, that isn't a Nazi, is shitty. <----period. Synwave-that's exactly what I was trying to say. | ||
|
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On May 04 2012 18:42 Synwave wrote: Here is a thought: How about calling people that aren't nazis nazis is incredibly offensive. I'm sure you can bring politics and your personal perspective into the definition all you like but lets just let offensive words be what they are. Calling someone a Nazi, that isn't a Nazi is shitty. <----period. If one is calling another a Nazi it's usually an indication of either an unwillingness or inability to engage in what they claim their actual political views are. There are very few self-proclaimed Nazi's out there, but I'm sure a lot of ignorant people ready to express racist or generally intolerant views - perhaps fascist would be more politically correct? EDIT: can't spell fascist EDIT 2: Hell, 16 ban combo for motbob! | ||
| ||
