On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote:
You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?!
You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?!
What if I had said Sylveon?
Two holes in your world now
Forum Index > TL Community |
Please, if you are not staff, don't answer questions in this thread, even if you think you know the answer. Also, please take complains about bans, question about TL as a site, etc to the Website Feedback Forum. | ||
![]()
monk
United States8476 Posts
June 24 2013 19:25 GMT
#8541
On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 01:27 SirJolt wrote: On June 24 2013 05:35 dravernor wrote: I mean, I assume Sir Jolt likes Jolteon because yeah. Am I right? Leafeon ![]() You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?! What if I had said Sylveon? Two holes in your world now | ||
Qbek
Poland12923 Posts
June 24 2013 19:28 GMT
#8542
On June 25 2013 04:25 monk wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote: On June 25 2013 01:27 SirJolt wrote: On June 24 2013 05:35 dravernor wrote: I mean, I assume Sir Jolt likes Jolteon because yeah. Am I right? Leafeon ![]() You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?! What if I had said Sylveon? Two holes in your world now Type - Fairy. World = shattered | ||
![]()
dravernor
Netherlands6175 Posts
June 24 2013 19:35 GMT
#8543
On June 25 2013 04:25 monk wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote: On June 25 2013 01:27 SirJolt wrote: On June 24 2013 05:35 dravernor wrote: I mean, I assume Sir Jolt likes Jolteon because yeah. Am I right? Leafeon ![]() You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?! What if I had said Sylveon? Two holes in your world now 404 pokemon not found ![]() | ||
farvacola
United States18818 Posts
June 24 2013 19:36 GMT
#8544
On June 25 2013 04:25 monk wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote: On June 25 2013 01:27 SirJolt wrote: On June 24 2013 05:35 dravernor wrote: I mean, I assume Sir Jolt likes Jolteon because yeah. Am I right? Leafeon ![]() You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?! What if I had said Sylveon? Two holes in your world now WTF is that? | ||
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
June 24 2013 19:39 GMT
#8545
| ||
Aerisky
United States12128 Posts
June 24 2013 19:41 GMT
#8546
On June 25 2013 04:25 monk wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:20 dravernor wrote: On June 25 2013 01:27 SirJolt wrote: On June 24 2013 05:35 dravernor wrote: I mean, I assume Sir Jolt likes Jolteon because yeah. Am I right? Leafeon ![]() You have shattered my safe little world.Blown it wide open. Leafeon? WHY?! What if I had said Sylveon? Two holes in your world now What in the sweet baby jesus? FAIRY TYPE? Are you kidding me??? T__T | ||
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
June 24 2013 19:43 GMT
#8547
However fairy type might be interesting, I guess it's a new counter to the worse designed type in the game dragon? | ||
![]()
SirJolt
the Dagon Knight4002 Posts
June 24 2013 19:49 GMT
#8548
On June 25 2013 04:39 Dirkzor wrote: How do you personally feel about TL+? I can only speak for myself, obviously, but I really like the idea. I'm not wild about subscription models for web as a whole (because they tend to lock off content), but I'm very much in favour of websites moving away from advertising or providing alternatives to advertising for those who feel that they dislike advertising enough to pay to get away from it. Given the near-ubiquity of adblock, I think that people have shown that they're dissatisfied enough with web-based advertising that they're actively looking for ways to cut it out. There are a few ways around this, one is to ask people to unblock ads, another is to give them the option of paying a little bit to directly sponsor sites they enjoy. I'd probably be pretty happy to just throw in a yearly subscription not to see ads without feeling guilty about it. Anything beyond that is sort of a happy garnish. | ||
![]()
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
June 24 2013 21:58 GMT
#8549
On June 25 2013 04:49 SirJolt wrote: I can only speak for myself, obviously, but I really like the idea. I'm not wild about subscription models for web as a whole (because they tend to lock off content), but I'm very much in favour of websites moving away from advertising or providing alternatives to advertising for those who feel that they dislike advertising enough to pay to get away from it. Given the near-ubiquity of adblock, I think that people have shown that they're dissatisfied enough with web-based advertising that they're actively looking for ways to cut it out. There are a few ways around this, one is to ask people to unblock ads, another is to give them the option of paying a little bit to directly sponsor sites they enjoy. I'd probably be pretty happy to just throw in a yearly subscription not to see ads without feeling guilty about it. Anything beyond that is sort of a happy garnish. How am I supposed to follow that? ... "+1" "What he said!"? | ||
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
June 24 2013 22:00 GMT
#8550
On June 25 2013 06:58 salle wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 04:49 SirJolt wrote: On June 25 2013 04:39 Dirkzor wrote: How do you personally feel about TL+? I can only speak for myself, obviously, but I really like the idea. I'm not wild about subscription models for web as a whole (because they tend to lock off content), but I'm very much in favour of websites moving away from advertising or providing alternatives to advertising for those who feel that they dislike advertising enough to pay to get away from it. Given the near-ubiquity of adblock, I think that people have shown that they're dissatisfied enough with web-based advertising that they're actively looking for ways to cut it out. There are a few ways around this, one is to ask people to unblock ads, another is to give them the option of paying a little bit to directly sponsor sites they enjoy. I'd probably be pretty happy to just throw in a yearly subscription not to see ads without feeling guilty about it. Anything beyond that is sort of a happy garnish. How am I supposed to follow that? ... "+1" "What he said!"? "Sirjolt, why are you so beautiful ?" | ||
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
June 24 2013 22:22 GMT
#8551
On June 25 2013 07:00 corumjhaelen wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 06:58 salle wrote: On June 25 2013 04:49 SirJolt wrote: On June 25 2013 04:39 Dirkzor wrote: How do you personally feel about TL+? I can only speak for myself, obviously, but I really like the idea. I'm not wild about subscription models for web as a whole (because they tend to lock off content), but I'm very much in favour of websites moving away from advertising or providing alternatives to advertising for those who feel that they dislike advertising enough to pay to get away from it. Given the near-ubiquity of adblock, I think that people have shown that they're dissatisfied enough with web-based advertising that they're actively looking for ways to cut it out. There are a few ways around this, one is to ask people to unblock ads, another is to give them the option of paying a little bit to directly sponsor sites they enjoy. I'd probably be pretty happy to just throw in a yearly subscription not to see ads without feeling guilty about it. Anything beyond that is sort of a happy garnish. How am I supposed to follow that? ... "+1" "What he said!"? "Sirjolt, why are you so beautiful ?" SirJolt may I have your adopted babies? | ||
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
June 24 2013 22:49 GMT
#8552
On June 25 2013 07:22 Jaaaaasper wrote: Show nested quote + On June 25 2013 07:00 corumjhaelen wrote: On June 25 2013 06:58 salle wrote: On June 25 2013 04:49 SirJolt wrote: On June 25 2013 04:39 Dirkzor wrote: How do you personally feel about TL+? I can only speak for myself, obviously, but I really like the idea. I'm not wild about subscription models for web as a whole (because they tend to lock off content), but I'm very much in favour of websites moving away from advertising or providing alternatives to advertising for those who feel that they dislike advertising enough to pay to get away from it. Given the near-ubiquity of adblock, I think that people have shown that they're dissatisfied enough with web-based advertising that they're actively looking for ways to cut it out. There are a few ways around this, one is to ask people to unblock ads, another is to give them the option of paying a little bit to directly sponsor sites they enjoy. I'd probably be pretty happy to just throw in a yearly subscription not to see ads without feeling guilty about it. Anything beyond that is sort of a happy garnish. How am I supposed to follow that? ... "+1" "What he said!"? "Sirjolt, why are you so beautiful ?" SirJolt may I have your adopted babies? SirJolt why did you name yourself SirJolt and not just Jolt? | ||
![]()
SirJolt
the Dagon Knight4002 Posts
June 24 2013 23:12 GMT
#8553
On June 25 2013 07:49 3FFA wrote: SirJolt why did you name yourself SirJolt and not just Jolt? Years ago, I was working as a freelance writer and writing an article on the gradually increasing complexity/depth of free-to-play browser-based games. One of the ten games we were discussing told me when I tried to register that I needed to have a thematically appropriate name so that I could facilitate any people who were hardcore into their roleplay. After having it complain at me about names I had tried to register, I got sick of it returning everything as inappropriate (nothing unreasonable). In the end, I just looked around at objects on my desk, and one of the things cluttering it was a stack of rechargeable batteries from a dictaphone I used to use for interviews. "Jolt" didn't seem thematically appropriate alone, so I threw on a prefix just to see what it would do. Name was approved, started the game a bit anxious to get through a bit of it and see what it was like. It immediately said something along the lines of, "Welcome, brave knight. You are in control of the keep, but we are under attack from the foes at X and Y. Your allies at Z are offering help. Can you fend them off, SirSirJolt?" I never quite got into that one, but the nick was so dumb that I kept it. | ||
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
June 24 2013 23:16 GMT
#8554
| ||
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
June 24 2013 23:29 GMT
#8555
Also, what game were you playing? o.O | ||
packrat386
United States5077 Posts
June 25 2013 08:39 GMT
#8556
| ||
Oukka
Finland1683 Posts
June 25 2013 13:06 GMT
#8557
| ||
![]()
SirJolt
the Dagon Knight4002 Posts
June 25 2013 14:35 GMT
#8558
On June 25 2013 08:29 3FFA wrote: Also, what game were you playing? o.O Too many years ago and not memorable enough, I fear. On June 25 2013 17:39 packrat386 wrote: SirJolt, where in Ireland do you live? Dublin ![]() On June 25 2013 22:06 Oukka wrote: SirJolt, if I were a fair maiden would you save me from a tower guarded by evil dragon? Nay, sir. I fear I lack the constitution, build, and bravery for the dragon-slaying business. | ||
![]()
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
June 25 2013 14:36 GMT
#8559
| ||
![]()
Firebolt145
Lalalaland34484 Posts
June 25 2013 15:12 GMT
#8560
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2![]() ![]() Sea ![]() GuemChi ![]() Leta ![]() Larva ![]() Jaedong ![]() BeSt ![]() Harstem ![]() Mind ![]() Hyun ![]() [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g10688 singsing1879 ceh91156 Happy755 JimRising ![]() hungrybox360 SortOf173 Dewaltoss28 JuggernautJason14 Fuzer ![]() Organizations
StarCraft 2 • LUISG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
Code For Giants Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
SC Evo Complete
Classic vs uThermal
SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] [BSL 2025] Weekly
SOOP StarCraft League
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
|
|