EPTIdra Banned for 90 Days - Page 39
| Forum Index > TL Community |
Hello, all! It's become quite apparent that many of you are not reading the first post carefully. Failure to do so in the future will be met with swift punishment. And as always, remember to be civil. Thanks, Empyrean. Time stamp: 03:59 KST. | ||
|
Rinnegan5
Netherlands319 Posts
| ||
|
meep
United States1699 Posts
On May 08 2011 09:16 Senx wrote: It doesnt say it, but implies it. And it happend. And thats what idra wanted. ... you're only assuming that he implied it. ... | ||
|
Pajaropoop
United States1 Post
| ||
|
elmizzt
United States3309 Posts
On May 08 2011 09:17 Rinnegan5 wrote: Idra will stay my favorite player. I ppl who are not acting like sheep. You must love the TL mods then, judging from all their unpopular decisions!  | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On May 08 2011 06:44 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Feel free to discuss this here as long as things stay civilized. We're going to ban for flames and insults from either side. Read the bolded part | ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
and you're assuming he didn't imply it. ...lets keep going | ||
|
Sqq
Norway2023 Posts
On May 08 2011 08:46 BurningSera wrote: ok...so idra said: 'everyone pm Chill if this upsets you' automatically equals to 'idra encouraged his fans, through twitter, to harass and spam him on TL.'? no, idra didnt encouraged his fans to harass and spam Chill on TL, idra suggested that if our fans are not happy that he is not streaming(which caused by the ban), we can complain/talk to Chill if we wish. whereas, if some immature fans who harassed/spamed Chill, their actions are not within idra's responsibility. i take this as TL made this 30days ban because TL wanna punish us fans (especially those who harassed/spammed Chill). i fully understand that this is TL's sc2 forum, and you guys have the absolute power, but cant you guys settle things with a warmer method?? at least use some less provoking methods so that you dont cause more rages/angst from people/fans?? if you look at the whole thing, nobody is a winner. You would make a terrible lawyer | ||
|
Dysz
Sweden26 Posts
Besides Cruncher was cheating and BM so it was seen comming. I think waste of life isnt even something rly that bm to say. Its funny how some TL staff dont see its okey to state what Idra said, when i think they would do it thmselves if someone was chating against them. Supporting cheating in a rts game is like what? | ||
|
TyPsi5
United States204 Posts
| ||
|
NoScary
United States151 Posts
| ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
Uhm no, it does imply it. You can assume whether he meant it or not but the implication is there in any case. | ||
|
Spekulatius
Germany2413 Posts
The ban-related posts by IdrA: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=173866¤tpage=83#1657 http://twitter.com/#!/idrajit (scroll down, not hard to find). Related posts by Cruncher: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=205926¤tpage=16#301 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=205926¤tpage=23#446 Idra's ban history: http://i.imgur.com/cULBN.jpg The rest should be found in the OP by Nazgul. | ||
|
BurningSera
Ireland19621 Posts
On May 08 2011 09:19 Senx wrote: and you're assuming he didn't imply it. ...lets keep going exactly. nobody knows if he implied anything. i'm guessing that idra didnt admit that he 'intended' to cause the harm. TL banned him for 3months. if he did admit but didnt apologize, he deserves it tho. | ||
|
PraetorianX
Sweden780 Posts
For the 2 day ban Idra punished the community by stopping his beloved stream w/ commentary, and encouraged his fans to spam Chill in retaliation. What will he do now? Kill a family of cute kittens? Invade Belgium? I can't even comprehend the epic rage he must be exhibiting right now. I'm sure he is plotting his revenge as we speak. But really, what could he possible do? Start his own forum? | ||
|
[Atomic]Peace
United States451 Posts
Not true actually. If he actually didn't mean it, Idra would have said so to Nazgul when they talked. Idra didn't say so and because he meant it he got banned. | ||
|
h41fgod
Sweden377 Posts
Oh, and while the offending action didnt happen on the site, it was directed at the site because of something that happened on the site. Yeah. Ban well deserved. While going at this topic, yeah, I think Cruncher cheated and wish him the worst of luck in anything related to sc2. | ||
|
BurningSera
Ireland19621 Posts
i just love how logic plays out sometimes  | ||
|
eMazing
59 Posts
On May 08 2011 09:20 Dysz wrote: The only thing Idra did was to call Cruncher a waste of life. So what? If he feels like that, why not let him? Since when can you not have opinions about another person? Besides Cruncher was cheating and BM so it was seen comming. I think waste of life isnt even something rly that bm to say. Its funny how some TL staff dont see its okey to state what Idra said, when i think they would do it thmselves if someone was chating against them. Supporting cheating in a rts game is like what? If you don't want to read the thread and do not bother to look at the whole story, stop posting. IdrA didn't just "call Cruncher a waste of life" he told people on his twitter to go to TL and spam Chill (by him not regretting his actions it does imply that he meant what he meant), which Chill and the TL staff saw as unacceptable and banned IdrA for that. | ||
|
TheRhox
Canada868 Posts
On May 08 2011 09:20 Dysz wrote: The only thing Idra did was to call Cruncher a waste of life. So what? If he feels like that, why not let him? Since when can you not have opinions about another person? Besides Cruncher was cheating and BM so it was seen comming. I think waste of life isnt even something rly that bm to say. Its funny how some TL staff dont see its okey to state what Idra said, when i think they would do it thmselves if someone was chating against them. Supporting cheating in a rts game is like what? First of all you can't prove Cruncher was cheating so get off it already. Second of all There are rules that people should agree with before posting | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19258 Posts
I'd much rather see rational, level headed discussion, in which we all try to understand the other side's point of view. | ||
| ||
