EPTFor the purposes of moderation, altered ban durations = 1 ban, and pardons = 0.
Most bans from TL - Page 25
| Forum Index > TL Community |
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
For the purposes of moderation, altered ban durations = 1 ban, and pardons = 0. | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 25 2011 02:11 marttorn wrote: I just found out about the legend of CharlieMurphy :O... Saw all his ban reasons, and finally the perm. An epic story to behold, I'm sure. I'm surprised how he survived 22k posts :S I guess he's back with SpoR though, so the legend of Charlie lives on? Charlie is an interesting case. The difference between him and any other random shit poster is that he actually tries to be good. I get the feeling that he tries really, really hard to not be a bad poster, but every now and then, he just goes full retard. He doesn't mean to, and he can't help himself, but sometimes, a guy's just gotta go and piss on a wall.  No offense, Charlie, if you're reading this. This is just the perspective I've adopted. | ||
Harem
United States11393 Posts
On September 25 2011 02:20 Aeres wrote: Charlie is an interesting case. The difference between him and any other random shit poster is that he actually tries to be good. I get the feeling that he tries really, really hard to not be a bad poster, but every now and then, he just goes full retard. He doesn't mean to, and he can't help himself, but sometimes, a guy's just gotta go and piss on a wall. No offense, Charlie, if you're reading this. This is just the perspective I've adopted. Tries to be good? You must be confused and thinking of some other poster. | ||
Spazer
Canada8036 Posts
On September 25 2011 02:15 Aeres wrote: For the purposes of Spazer's lists, yes, and no. All of the ban data is parses through the Automated Ban List, so unless Spazer is manually adjusting extended or repealed bans, an extended sentence (or reduced sentence, for that matter) would count as +n bans, where n is the number of times the ban duration was changed. Repealed bans are only not counted if the message in the ABL itself is altered to reflect this. I'm talking about a complete editing of the ban message to remove the text that would otherwise be parses. Otherwise, the ban still shows on the list. Happened to me once; was banned by accident, but even after the ban was reverted, I still have two bans instead of one, according to the list. ._. For the purposes of moderation, altered ban durations = 1 ban, and pardons = 0. Repealed bans are never noted in a useful fashion in the ban list. Occasionally a mod will post in the thread saying that a ban was reversed, but coding something to detect that is difficult at best. And as far as I'm aware, TL.net bot's posts in the ban list have never been edited. There probably wouldn't be much point in doing so, since I suspect moderation history is kept separate from the thread. If anything, the automated ban list serves as a public record, and not much else. In any case, my method doesn't detect posts if they are edited after I collect my data, because re-parsing a thousand page thread is silly. | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 25 2011 02:50 Harem wrote: Tries to be good? You must be confused and thinking of some other poster. I'm not saying he does a good job. I'm just under the impression that CM is embroiled in an unending battle against his idiocy when posting here. He loses most of the time, but it's not for lack of trying! | ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
| ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22261 Posts
On September 20 2011 08:46 ReignFayth wrote: I got banned 14 times... wtf o_o Hahaha, don't act surprised Josué~  | ||
|
Mithriel
Netherlands2969 Posts
NonY 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 why he'd get permabanned?  | ||
|
Steelavocado
United States2123 Posts
On September 25 2011 03:19 Mithriel wrote: lol second last on the list: NonY 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 why he'd get permabanned? He switched accounts, TL had to ban the username NonY, but now he uses the name Liquid'Tyler | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On September 25 2011 03:08 Aeres wrote: k fine charlie is retarded Mhhmm | ||
|
Deekin[
Serbia1713 Posts
I never wanted to be such a trash poster. | ||
|
ToxNub
Canada805 Posts
On September 24 2011 06:57 Appendix wrote: You are tied with everyone who has 5 bans, but there are still 168 people with 6 bans or more, placing you and your 5 ban friends tied for 169th rethink your logic here. If i am tied for 169th with 5 bans, then the people with 6 bans are tied for what? 168th? no? why not? think about that. If you count my position with 5 bans as a tie, you must also count all players with 6 as a tie, making them a single position on the 1st, 2nd, .... ranking. Your system created all sort of retarded empty spaces. | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
Gummy
United States2180 Posts
| ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On September 25 2011 06:04 Gummy wrote: It's really upsetting that I'm on this list twice, considering how good a poster I am. Some of the greatest geniuses of history were misunderstood in their time. Likewise, some of the greatest posters must also have been banned. Holy shit, your ego. (˚ぺ) | ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
Obviously, so many genius contributors to TL have been misunderstood. Like, when some newbie calls somebody else a faggot and wishes death upon him... You have to read between the lines man. Also yes, that ego (*_*) starstruck | ||
|
Grend
1600 Posts
 And CharlieMurphy did have some worthwhile posts. For example he had this thread about this map or something in Brood War that had this interesting community tied to it and it was a rather in depth guide of how to play it. Dont remember whether it was Bloodbath, Fastest or something else. Remember that it was a good read though. | ||
|
ToxNub
Canada805 Posts
On September 25 2011 05:56 clusen wrote: He doesn't have to rethink his logic, if there are 168 guys with more bans like you than you are at rank #169. The guys with 6 bans would not be #168, the number they get depends on how many guys have more bans, they take the next free number, so if there are 50 guys with 7 or more bans for example all dudes with 6 bans would be number 51. There is no empty space. Right, so 6 bans are 51st place, and then nobody is in 52nd ,53rd... Or 168th. Makes lots of sense. No. There are 50 people tied for 9th. | ||
| ||
