|
On September 25 2011 06:28 ToxNub wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2011 05:56 clusen wrote:
He doesn't have to rethink his logic, if there are 168 guys with more bans like you than you are at rank #169. The guys with 6 bans would not be #168, the number they get depends on how many guys have more bans, they take the next free number, so if there are 50 guys with 7 or more bans for example all dudes with 6 bans would be number 51. There is no empty space. Right, so 6 bans are 51st place, and then nobody is in 52nd ,53rd... Or 168th. Makes lots of sense. No. There are 50 people tied for 9th.
Not that it matters what place you are, but it works the way Appendix says in every sport everywhere pretty much. If there are five guys tied for first you don't give the sixth a silver medal. If there are 168 guys who are higher than you, you aren't ranked #10.
|
Canada8029 Posts
On September 25 2011 06:21 Grend wrote:I like IdrAs 8 bans, suspect that count may have risen though  And CharlieMurphy did have some worthwhile posts. For example he had this thread about this map or something in Brood War that had this interesting community tied to it and it was a rather in depth guide of how to play it. Dont remember whether it was Bloodbath, Fastest or something else. Remember that it was a good read though.
You should try reading the rest of the thread. ~_~
|
On September 25 2011 06:46 Spazer wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2011 06:21 Grend wrote:I like IdrAs 8 bans, suspect that count may have risen though And CharlieMurphy did have some worthwhile posts. For example he had this thread about this map or something in Brood War that had this interesting community tied to it and it was a rather in depth guide of how to play it. Dont remember whether it was Bloodbath, Fastest or something else. Remember that it was a good read though. You should try reading the rest of the thread. ~_~
Or the mods could give you responsibility for updating the OP so people dont have to wade through 20 ish pages 
22 is quite alot more than 8!
|
Is there a way to get anti-bans to show up on the automated ban list so that I can reduce my overall bancount by having a deeply negative bancount on this particular account? It seems like each time I make a post that is so incredibly and indubitably not banworthy that post should be noted in the automated ban list for the world (and bots keeping track) to see.
|
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_=
|
On September 25 2011 08:18 Deekin[ wrote:
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_=
I got banned for posting "lol" because it was posting a single word, but for some reason it's okay for "Quality Posters" to do the same, and even blank post.
|
top 20, im such a badass.
rofl didnt think id be so high on the list, o.O.
|
On September 25 2011 08:21 Pisko. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2011 08:18 Deekin[ wrote:
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_= I got banned for posting "lol" because it was posting a single word, but for some reason it's okay for "Quality Posters" to do the same, and even blank post.
That's because they get a lot more leniency here.
For example, if I do what idra has done on this site, I probably would get IP banned
|
On September 25 2011 08:21 Pisko. wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2011 08:18 Deekin[ wrote:
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_= I got banned for posting "lol" because it was posting a single word, but for some reason it's okay for "Quality Posters" to do the same, and even blank post.
They get away with it because they don't ONLY post shit, they post alot of stuff worth reading too, so they get away with "less good" if they flame or post real bullshit they still get warned/banned like everyone else.
|
Hm yes let's contemplate why haji or rekrul who have been posting on the website for years and years should be treated differently than someone who registered last month.
On second thought, just reread this. It's not elitism or any of that crap. It's one of the small differences that says the posts you make on TL actually matter.
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
On September 25 2011 08:18 Deekin[ wrote:
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_=
You have 8 bans and 4 warnings. How the hell do you figure you post decently?!?
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
Spazer - How easy would it be for you to add an aka filter?
ie, so you could associate alt accounts with a single user. For example, OakHill and Pokehill are the same person, Amnesia and clazziquai are the same person, Spor and Charliemurphy, etc.
|
On September 25 2011 14:56 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Spazer - How easy would it be for you to add an aka filter?
ie, so you could associate alt accounts with a single user. For example, OakHill and Pokehill are the same person, Amnesia and clazziquai are the same person, Spor and Charliemurphy, etc.
AMNESIA AND CLAZZIQUAI ARE THE SAME PERSON??? O_O
|
16973 Posts
On September 25 2011 08:18 Deekin[ wrote:
I dont even understand why I was banned, I think I post decently atleast =_=
Wrong on this one.
|
This thread is absolutely wonderful
|
SpoR is Charlie Murphy?
I didn't know that. :p (Shows how nooby I am)
|
Canada8029 Posts
On September 25 2011 14:56 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Spazer - How easy would it be for you to add an aka filter?
ie, so you could associate alt accounts with a single user. For example, OakHill and Pokehill are the same person, Amnesia and clazziquai are the same person, Spor and Charliemurphy, etc.
Workin' on it as we speak.
|
Baltimore, USA22251 Posts
On September 25 2011 15:01 synapse wrote:
AMNESIA AND CLAZZIQUAI ARE THE SAME PERSON??? O_O
On September 25 2011 15:27 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
SpoR is Charlie Murphy?
Yes and yes.
On September 25 2011 15:40 Spazer wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2011 14:56 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Spazer - How easy would it be for you to add an aka filter?
ie, so you could associate alt accounts with a single user. For example, OakHill and Pokehill are the same person, Amnesia and clazziquai are the same person, Spor and Charliemurphy, etc. Workin' on it as we speak.
Awesome. If you're not sure on any alts, let me know.
|
I would put my money on Idra over ANYONE for most bans within the next 5 years lol
|
On September 25 2011 07:25 Gummy wrote:
Is there a way to get anti-bans to show up on the automated ban list so that I can reduce my overall bancount by having a deeply negative bancount on this particular account? It seems like each time I make a post that is so incredibly and indubitably not banworthy that post should be noted in the automated ban list for the world (and bots keeping track) to see.
"negative bancount"
Haha that's a new one. Guess you're really ashamed of those bans huh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
