• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:34
CEST 10:34
KST 17:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week5[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings We need to be discussing a new patch right now! Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
https://www.facebook.com/SAINTSKINVitaminCSerumCan
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Script to open stream directly using middle click A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 517 users

a1's Sandy Bridge SC2 Builds

Forum Index > Tech Support
Post a Reply
Normal
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-22 18:40:39
April 01 2011 03:32 GMT
#1
a1's Sandy Bridge SC2 Builds




PREFACE

Sandy Bridge CPUs, introduced at the beginning of this year, represents the best of Intel's design prowress to date. The CPUs significantly outperform both past Intel and AMD chips alike. Because of their raw performance across all price tiers, they are exceptional choices for Starcraft II, a game that relies heavily on the CPU for performance. So why is there a guide dedicated directly to these CPUs? As stated above, these chips are the cream of the crop. But don't take my word for it, check out these reviews and benchmarks for the Core i7-2600, i5-2500, i5-2400, and i3-2100:

+ Show Spoiler +


Tech Report
[image loading]

Legit Reviews
[image loading]

Anand Tech
[image loading]

Tom's Hardware
[image loading]

Techspot
[image loading]




THE CPUS

There are a myriad of Sandy Bridge CPUs available, but we'll be focusing on three for this guide. These selections represent the best bang for buck in the Sandy Bridge family:


Core i3-2100

The 2100 is Intel's entry level Sandy Bridge part. It is technically a dual core CPU, and since SC2 primarily takes advantages of two CPU cores, this processor is more than adequate for gameplay. It shines because it runs a very fast speed - 3.1ghz. Also, it does come with Hyperthreading, a way to utilize all the power of the processor by creating 'virtual cores' to spread out the workload across the whole chip, allowing you to gain some performance in multithreaded applications like movie creation and streaming. It's the cheapest of the family, and also runs the coolest.

Do note this processor cannot be overclocked by the user.



Core i5-2400

The 2400 runs in the middle of the pack. It is also a 3.1ghz cpu at stock speeds, but it has Turbo functionality, which increases that speed to 3.4ghz, a free 300mhz overclock. The 2400 is a true quad core processor, so it is very fast in content creation, and a good choice if you might want to stream one day. The 2400 usually sells for around $190. The bigger brother of the i5-2400 is the i5-2500, which represents a 200mhz increase in stock speeds, and a much higher Turbo speed of 3.7ghz; however, the real-world performance difference between the 2400 and 2500 is negligble and the end user will never notice the difference. The money saved can be spent on other components.

Do note this processor cannot be overclocked by the user.



Core i5-2500k

The bigger brother of the 2400. I just told you I'm not going to recommend this cpu, so why is it here? Technically, this isn't the same CPU. The -k suffix indicates the processor can be overclocked by the user (with the proper motherboard). The particular importance of this is that many users are easily achieving 4+ghz speeds with these chips. That is a massive improvement over stock speeds and the first processor of its kind to reach those speeds in the hands of the average joe. Because of those overclocks, the 2500k represenst one of the fastest desktop CPUs you can purchase. The 2500k can be found for a bit under $230.


Recommendation
  • If you are on a budget, the Core i3-2100
  • If you want better streaming performance and have some more room in your budget, the Core i5-2400
  • If you want the best and are comfortable with overclocking, the Core i5-2500k



MOTHERBOARDS

Intel provides several chipsets for motherboards. It can become confusing for the average user to understand the motherboard landscape due to the limitations Intel puts on the chips. I'll go over the general features of the chipsets and motherboards:
  • H61
    • Entry level, valued priced
    • These boards are usually 'barebone', meaning they don't have additional features found on higher priced boards, and usually lack additional heatsinks to help cooling of other components
    • Only 2 RAM slots; limits your upgrading capability down the road as you'd have to replace your ram sticks rather than just adding more.
    • No SATA6 support, meaning you can't take advantage of high-speed Solid State Hard Drives (some manufacturers may add SATA6 support though a third-party solution, and may drive the price up, and hard drive performance may vary)
    • No USB3 support (as above, manufacturers may add support through third party solutions, but may drive the price of the board up)
    • Cannot overclock the CPU
  • H67
    • Value to mid pricing levels
    • May come with additional features not found on H61 boards, and some boards may have additional cooling capability
    • 4 RAM slots (2 on some models)
    • SATA6 support
    • Most motherboards do come with USB3; some lower priced H67 boards may not have USB3
    • No overclocking of the CPU
  • P67
    • Mid to high range pricing
    • 4 RAM slots, SATA6, USB3 found on virtually all boards
    • Less expensive boards will not have additional heatsinks
    • Overclocking enabled
  • Z68
    • Mid to high range pricing
    • Same features found on P67
    • "Hydra" software*


The primary difference between them lies in the ability for the user to overclock their CPUs. If you want to overclock, you require a CPU with a -k suffix, and a P67/Z68 motherboard. Any other combination of chipsets and cpus will not allow you to overclock.

Lastly, all Sandy Bridge CPUs come with a built-in video card (GPU) on the CPU itself. These GPUs are not very powerful and are not recommend for even SC2. You will notice H61/H67 motherboards come with video output ports (VGA, DVI, HDMI), these boards can use the built-in GPU found on these processors. P67 boards cannot use the built-in GPU and so do not have these ports.

* Z68 boards can use the built in GPU and using the "Hydra" software, allows the Sandy Bridge GPU to accelerate movie encoding software while you game at the same time.

Currently, there is no streaming software optimized for Hydra.

Recommendation
  • H61 boards are for meant for strict, low budgets. Be wary that these boards may have quality issues. Based on their lack of features, and fluctuating prices of H67 boards, these are often a last resort option.
  • H67 boards are generally recommended, but may be a bit more costly than H61 boards. Always look for combo savings to equalize the cost between H61 boards. Be wary that some boards may lack features. If you are not planning on overclocking, get an H67 board.
  • P67 boards are recommend for users not on a tight budget, and will be overclocking their CPUs.
  • Z68 - The only way I'm going to recommend this is if you believe one day, there will be streaming software optimized for Hydra. I don't see that happening in the foreseeable future, so stay away, unless a particular board happens to be on sale/cheaper than an equivalent P67 version.


Manufacturers
  • ASUS
    • Generally high quality boards with many features
    • Wide selection of boards across price tiers
    • Graphical, easy to use UEFI BIOS
    • Carry a slight price premium, but I feel they are the premier option for motherboards.
  • Gigabyte
    • Build quality comparable to ASUS
    • Slightly better pricing, but be wary of features on some models
    • No graphical BIOS
  • MSI
    • Wide motherboard range and pricing
    • Graphical BIOS
    • Not as popular as Gigabyte, Asus options
  • ASRock
    • Originally a budget-orientated offshoot of Asus
    • Not many models
    • Cheaper than other manufacturers, beware of quality issues


Always make use of website tools to find best sellers, user reviews to find what boards may have quality issues, and combo pricing to find good deals!


AUXILLARY INFO


For information on other components, their general performance, and reputable brands, see The Computer Build Resource Thread. The thread has hundreds of replies and great current information on what people are buying. Check it out if you're stuck!



VIDEO CARDS
+ Show Spoiler +

Starcraft 2 isn't the most graphically demanding game. It does look pretty at max details, and you don't need to spend hundreds of dollars on a top tier card to achieve that. Many inexpensive cards can run the game very well at 1920x1080. Do note however, turning on anti-aliasing on these less powerful cards will reduce your performance significantly.

  • Budget - $100 to $120
    • Radeon 5770
    • Radeon 5830
    • Geforce GTS 450 (Overclocked editions)
  • Mid Range - $160 - $200
    • Radeon 6850
    • Geforce GTX 560
  • Upper Ranges - $200+
    • Radeon 6950
    • Geforce GTX 560 Ti (Overclocked editions)
  • $300+
    • Radeon 6970
    • Geforce GTX 570


Recommendations
Budget
  • The Sapphire Radeon 5830 is the best bang for buck at $110 (May 22)
  • The EVGA GTS 450 Superclocked, followed by the Gigabyte GTS 450 at $115 (May 22)
  • The Sapphire Radeon 5770 rounds it out at $120

Mid
  • XFX 6850 at $167 (May 22), followed by other numerous 6850 cards at $170
  • EVGA GTX 560 at $190 (May 22)

Upper
  • EVGA GTX 560 Ti at $230 (May 22)
  • Gigabyte 6950 1GB at $237 (May 22)
    $300+
    • Whatever's on sale!



HARD DRIVES
+ Show Spoiler +

Starcraft 2 benefits significantly from SSDs (Solid State Drives). Their super fast access times and read rates mean Starcraft 2 loads radically faster over traditional hard drives.

If you are thinking about an SSD, consult this guide at Anandtech for a ranking of drives. The workload in that review does include the loading of SC2 (among a myriad of other tasks). Please note - SSDs are not for budget builds, as even lower capacity drives cost upto 4x as much as traditional drives.

If you are looking for a budget build, the Samsung F3/F4 are among the best drives you can purchase. They provide the best storage-performance-price ratio of any traditional drive on the market. Do note the Samsung drives may not be available at every retailer, thus the Western Digital Black models are my next suggestion; they offer better performance in some cases but are usually a bit more expensive. Again, watch for pricing on these components and buy whichever is cheaper.




POWER SUPPLIES
+ Show Spoiler +

You don't need super powerful PSUs; please look at this page. This review has a listing of the most powerful video cards available on a system with the most power hungry CPU available. The power draw is for the entire system. The GTX 580, a very power hungry card, tops out at around 400 watts. Find a power supply that's on sale, has good reviews, and has enough connections for your system.




OTHER COMPONENTS
+ Show Spoiler +

There are a myriad of manufacturers and models you'll find for other components - cases, memory, dvd drives, etc. Its hard to directly recommend one product due to wild pricing fluctations you find with these components, so a great tip I tell everyone - use customer reviews to your advantage. Find products with a lot of reviews, that usually means a lot of people are buying them! And read the reviews too, for example - there might be a defect showing up in new shipments of the product that recent reviews will expose. As recommended above, check out The Computer Build Resource Thread to ask questions if you're stuck.




ON THE BUILDS, PRICING
+ Show Spoiler +

The builds below do not include a monitor or operating system, or peripherals such as mouse, keyboard, speakers, etc. Budget accordingly.

The prices found below are general prices found at the time of writing. They are meant to give you an idea on the types of components and power you'll be getting for your money, rather than recommending specific products.

There may be sales or combos that may significantly lower the pricing. If you're thinking about local retailers, some components below may not be specifically available; just get what's comparable. Buying at multiple retailers will incur a higher overall shipping cost, though - its often cheaper to buy at one retailer as they'll ship everything in one box for savings. Lastly, big and heavy items like cases and monitors will incur significant shipping costs due to their bulk (if no Free Shipping offers are available); buy these locally if it'll save you money on shipping. Do the maths to find what's best for you.

The US store Microcenter usually has Intel CPUs at a significantly lower cost than online stores; if you have one in the area, I'd definitely recommend checking them out.

The builds are primarily based on Newegg. Newegg offers a wide selection of components and competitive pricing, but important for here, they have a 'Wish List' system that allows you to create builds to send to others for review. I'm not endorsing that you 100% buy from Newegg (they are a good choice); as I explained above, explore all your options to see what's best for you.




On to my builds!

(USD Prices, Newegg)

Again, these builds are just a guideline on pricing of components and what you'll get for your money. Always consider the alternatives if budget allows, or if you're not happy with something, like the cases for example.

*** UPDATED: May 17th

Read: + Show Spoiler +
I've updated the builds with new motherboard options. The original ASRock was seeing some bad reviews and after a sad story with a member here at TL, I'm not going to recommend it anymore.

i3-2100 build replaced with ASUS P8H67-M LX
Combo'd: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.638749

You lose out on USB3 with this selection but the price remains low.


i5-2400 build replaced with ASUS P8H67-M LE
Combo'd: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.642630

This board is the same family as in the cheaper build above, but comes with USB3.

If you think might want this board with the i3-2100, here's the combo page: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.642585


i3-2100 Build - $500

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=12584234

Notes: + Show Spoiler +
The entry level build now features a quality ASUS board based on the H67 chipset; it comes with native SATA6 ports incase you might want a speedy SSD in the future. See the above updated spoiler regarding USB3.

If you need more storage space, add or replace the hard drive with this Samsung 1TB or WD Caviar Black 1TB. The case is very cheap at $30, but as always, get what looks best for you.


i5-2400 Build - $700

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=15843492

Notes: + Show Spoiler +
This build is very similar to the 2100 build, because the 2400 cannot be overclocked.

The price of the case is raised to $50 to allow for a higher quality case; the case is well featured, but as always, get what best interests you.

RAM is upped to 8GB, a more powerful video card has been added, and the power supply upped a bit as well in the case you'd want to purchase a better video card down the road.

This CPU will run a bit more hotter than the one above and the cooler will be a bit more noisier; if you think you'd want a third party heatsink, consider the Hyper 212.

If you need more storage space, add or replace the hard drive with this Samsung 1TB or WD Caviar Black 1TB.

If you want to add a more powerful graphics card, consider the GTX 560 Ti, or Radeon 6950.


Build i5-2500k - $ ??

http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/PublicWishDetail.aspx?WishListNumber=15843532

Notes:+ Show Spoiler +
So you want to build a computer with the 2500k so you can overclock the hell out of it. Great! The build provided at the link is the lowest I would consider; but for such a high end build, I'm sure some of you are planning larger budgets for a more fully featured computer. Let's examine the components:

CPU: 2500k (No Notes)
RAM: 8GB (No Notes)
DVD: (No Notes)
---------------------
Motherboard: The P8P67-M Pro is a comparibly inexpensive board that carries the P67 chipset, which allows you to overclock. It's main features are the extra heatsinks, as compared to other cheaper boards. This board also enables SLI/Crossfire. Alternatives are MSI P67A-G45 (Larger ATX-sized, $10 cheaper), ASRock P67 Extreme4 (ATX-Sized, beefier heatsinks, more peripheral options, $10 more). From there, you get more expensive boards, which are larger ATX-sized versions of the mATX boards. Get them if you think you'd need more expansion slots for things like sound cards or multiple video cards ... if you want the best of the best for truly high overclocks.

Video Card: The video card is the most variable option of the build. You can purchase a cheaper card like the 6850 to cut the price of the build by upto $75, or get even more powerful cards like the 6970 or GTX 570 by adding another $100. The 6950 runs in the middle of the pack and is a fairly fast card for SC2, and this XFX comes with a lifetime warranty. Alternatives include XFX 6850 ($75 cheaper, much less performance), XFX 6970 and GTX 570 (~$100 more).

Hard Drive: I would highly consider an SSD for this build. My recommendations as follows: The best bang for buck, Crucial C300 64GB (350MB/s read, 70MB/s write) $135. Note thie drive is about 55GB after formatting.

High reliability, Intel 510 120GB (450MB/s read, 200MB/s write), $285.

Cream of the crop, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB (550MB/s read, 500MB/s write), $300. I highly recommend a large storage drive to keep backups of your SSD drive in the case of drive failure.

Power Supply: Alternatives: XFX 650w, in the case you want additional PCI-e connectors for SLI/Crossfire. Please refer to The Computer Build Resource Thread for a listing of reputable brands, and to ask questions regarding specific models. For PSUs, you're looking for high efficiency ("80+ Plus Bronze" and up), enough connectors for your components (such as 2 PCIe connectors for powerful video cards), and things like silent fans as well. PSUs vary wildly in pricing so watch out for sales!

Heatsink: The Coolermaster Hyper 212 is an excellent heatsink. It is very inexpensive at $35. If you find the fan is a tad loud for your tastes, consider a quiter fan. The Noctua NH-U12P is a beefier and quiet alternative. The Prolimatech Megahalems is the largest and most expensive heatsink I will recommend, and you'll need to purchase a fan seperately.

Case: The Coolermaster 371 is an inexpensive case that supports long video cards, plain and simple. There is a plethora of cases across all price ranges that offer different looks and features. Buy what you like ... its what you'll be staring at for the rest of your life!




OVERCLOCKING

Google is your friend.
starleague forever
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
April 01 2011 03:54 GMT
#2
The IGP in Sandy Bridge processors is actually quite powerful compared to other IGPs; they can run Low comfortably, so a person using their computer for some heavy processor use while still wanting to maintain a playable quality and a low price can just stick with an H61/H67 motherboard with no graphics card (budget streaming? Coooooool). HD Graphics 3000 is much more powerful than 2000, although they both handle SC2 at above 60FPS.

Other than that, pretty awesome builds!
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-01 04:19:41
April 01 2011 04:15 GMT
#3
On April 01 2011 12:54 Zeke50100 wrote:
HD Graphics 3000 is much more powerful than 2000, although they both handle SC2 at above 60FPS.


Source? The only review I've seen of them is from xbit, and it doens't paint a good picture: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/intel-hd-graphics-2000-3000_8.html#sect4

and anandtech http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4083/34877.png
and techreport http://techreport.com/articles.x/20188/17

starleague forever
skyR
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada13817 Posts
April 01 2011 04:29 GMT
#4
You don't need a K processor to overclock, you can overclock +400mhz with any processor on P67.
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-01 04:44:50
April 01 2011 04:36 GMT
#5
Anandtech's method of testing was to use six massive armies and clashing them together. That's not very common to see The GPU test they ran had above 100FPS (150, even), and having a standard 200/200 army stresses it much less.

Notebookcheck also tested the mobile versions of the processors here, with the main page here. Granted, it is for notebooks, but the desktop versions are probably equal. They also did the 2000 version (the more common one in desktop processors) here.

EDIT: And here is part of a test from techspot.
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
April 01 2011 04:53 GMT
#6
And both anandtech and notebook check ran at measly 1024x768 :p

On April 01 2011 13:29 skyR wrote:
You don't need a K processor to overclock, you can overclock +400mhz with any processor on P67.


Achieving 400mhz on bclk with the 2100/2400 would mean setting it at 400 / 31 = 113mhz. Don't think i've seen that high bclk's yet ... sources would be appreciated.

Unless you mean the turbo ratios for the 2400?
starleague forever
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
April 01 2011 05:00 GMT
#7
Resolution really doesn't matter when you're talking about playability and saving money in the same sentence ^_^
skyR
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada13817 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-01 05:03:56
April 01 2011 05:03 GMT
#8
[image loading]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i5-2500-2400-2300_11.html

Probably shoulda worded my previous post better =\
Saltticus
Profile Joined May 2009
United States1 Post
April 01 2011 05:05 GMT
#9
For your final build with the 2500k, I am a little skeptical a 500 watt PSU will be enough under load especially with that power-hungry HD 6950. You do have other GPU/PSUs as alternatives though. Anyone wanting to build a new computer should verify how much wattage their system is going to hog under load.
MassHysteria
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3678 Posts
April 01 2011 05:07 GMT
#10
Good information, thanks for posting this...thinking about building a new comp with tax money once I get it and this was a good start for looking into it
"Just ban all the J's...even jinklejoes" --unnamed source
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
April 01 2011 05:20 GMT
#11
On April 01 2011 14:05 Saltticus wrote:
For your final build with the 2500k, I am a little skeptical a 500 watt PSU will be enough under load especially with that power-hungry HD 6950. You do have other GPU/PSUs as alternatives though. Anyone wanting to build a new computer should verify how much wattage their system is going to hog under load.


i5-2500k uses about 65W at full load at stock frequency and voltage when not using the IGP. It's safe to say even with some heavy overclocking, the CPU + mobo + RAM + a few HDDs + fans + etc. won't amount to more than 200W power draw. HD 6950 limits itself to 200W while drawing much less than that in games. Even if you bump up the PowerTune, overclock the GPU, and allow greater power draw, you're not going to draw something obscene like 300W to actually test the capabilities of a decent 500W ATX 2.x PSU rated for continuous power.

Verifying wattage is definitely not a bad idea though. Verifying you're getting a good model is probably more important though, as the whole world is set up to make people overestimate how much power they need anyway (so that condition should already be met).
Legatus Lanius
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
2135 Posts
April 01 2011 05:21 GMT
#12
On April 01 2011 14:05 Saltticus wrote:
For your final build with the 2500k, I am a little skeptical a 500 watt PSU will be enough under load especially with that power-hungry HD 6950. You do have other GPU/PSUs as alternatives though. Anyone wanting to build a new computer should verify how much wattage their system is going to hog under load.


500watts will be fine, the 6950 doesnt use that much power

also that site says 400watts for the total system including the gtx 580, not 400watts for the graphics card alone
"He's the Triple H of Brood War." - Ribbon on Flash | "He's more like the John Cena of Brood War." - Aus)MaCrO on Flash
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
April 01 2011 05:23 GMT
#13
To add to the above replies, both the Antec and Seasonic have well over 400watts available through 12V, 500D specsheet, jonnyguru review.
starleague forever
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
April 01 2011 05:28 GMT
#14
On April 01 2011 14:03 skyR wrote:
[image loading]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i5-2500-2400-2300_11.html

Probably shoulda worded my previous post better =\


I remember this pic ... the whole time I thought it was just trying to explain turbo, but I see what you're trying to say now. I'll add the info in, thanks.
starleague forever
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
April 01 2011 14:42 GMT
#15
Great article. Really productive, not suggesting super low end parts, and still comes in at nice moderate pricing.

Also, no badly used jargon and plagiarism. Best SC2 PC guide I've seen.
Grease
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States138 Posts
April 01 2011 15:36 GMT
#16
There is afterall... cheap Intel builds.. Just got to know more than what i know lol!! but great job will use this in future for referencing and possibly copying :-)
SHIT HAPPENS
ZeaL.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5955 Posts
April 01 2011 15:39 GMT
#17
I like seeing more and more people knowing that you don't need a super powerful PSU to get by. The PSU manufacturers try to make it sound like your computer will explode if you don't have a 750 W PSU so you'll go out and spend the money when in reality probably 95% of builds use less than 450 W.

Something to note is that the Samsung F3 and F4 are very different depending on what size drive you get. The F4 2 TB drive is actually a 5400 rpm drive which is not good. The 320 gb F4 on the other hand is more of a performance drive at 7200 rpm, but you'll get similar performance and more space with a F3 1 TB for less $$$. If you live in the US, its an even better deal because the F3 1 TB is on newegg for $55 which is a steal.
Sero
Profile Joined October 2010
United States692 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-05 08:12:35
April 05 2011 08:04 GMT
#18
Great, easy guide. I just build my second computer using this. Good work =)
<3 FlaSh HiyA Stats HoeJJa
chrisolo
Profile Joined May 2009
Germany2606 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-05 08:47:31
April 05 2011 08:46 GMT
#19
I just bought a laptop with the second generation of sandy bridge i7 processor, especially for Starcraft 2. Thank you, you made my day So lucky right now :D
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ - aka cReAtiVee
ensign_lee
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1178 Posts
April 05 2011 15:05 GMT
#20
Just a question, why are you recommending a MICRO atx board with teh i5 2500k system?
mav451
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1596 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-04-05 15:30:16
April 05 2011 15:23 GMT
#21
On April 06 2011 00:05 ensign_lee wrote:
Just a question, why are you recommending a MICRO atx board with teh i5 2500k system?


It's the cheapest x8/x8 board (which let's you use SLI or XFire). I'm having trouble finding information on the phases though, but I would hope it's at least 8+2, not the 4+1 of the full-size LE model (which is pretty bad lol).

This is very similar to people who bought the P55M-UD4. What's funny is that the P55M-UD4 has 12+2 vs. the 8+2 of the full-size UD4P model. It does make me optimistic that the Asus board is at least 8+2 though.

Amazon, of all places, listed the non-Pro with 8+2. Hmm.
With no power comes no responsibility?
Myrmidon
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States9452 Posts
April 05 2011 15:40 GMT
#22
On April 06 2011 00:23 mav451 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2011 00:05 ensign_lee wrote:
Just a question, why are you recommending a MICRO atx board with teh i5 2500k system?


It's the cheapest x8/x8 board (which let's you use SLI or XFire). I'm having trouble finding information on the phases though, but I would hope it's at least 8+2, not the 4+1 of the full-size LE model (which is pretty bad lol).

This is very similar to people who bought the P55M-UD4. What's funny is that the P55M-UD4 has 12+2 vs. the 8+2 of the full-size UD4P model. It does make me optimistic that the Asus board is at least 8+2 though.

Amazon, of all places, listed the non-Pro with 8+2. Hmm.


Looking at pictures on newegg, the P8P67-m and P8P67-m Pro seem to have 4+1. They don't advertise the DIGI+ VRM for those models either.

A proper 4+1 design with quality components and good enough cooling should be enough for overclocking an i5-2500k or i7-2600k, but those things are kind of difficult to tell by pictures.

The LE has trouble overclocking with its 4+1 implementation, but I wouldn't extrapolate that to the P8P67-m Pro.
sinani206
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1959 Posts
April 05 2011 16:44 GMT
#23
On 100% load, you should be using 70% of your PSU's wattage.
For more info, click here.
Generally you want your idle power draw to fall into ~30%-40% of the PSU's rated wattage, and your peak power draw to fall into ~70%-80% of the PSU's rated wattage.
literally everything is wifom just shut the fuck up
Aggnog
Profile Joined August 2010
Bulgaria77 Posts
April 05 2011 17:08 GMT
#24
From what I can tell it seems there is marginal difference between the i3 and the higher end CPUs, even with overclocking and atleast in SC2, which is something I wanted to confirm before upgrading. Thanks for the great guide!
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
April 05 2011 17:17 GMT
#25
On April 06 2011 00:23 mav451 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 06 2011 00:05 ensign_lee wrote:
Just a question, why are you recommending a MICRO atx board with teh i5 2500k system?


It's the cheapest x8/x8 board (which let's you use SLI or XFire). I'm having trouble finding information on the phases though, but I would hope it's at least 8+2, not the 4+1 of the full-size LE model (which is pretty bad lol).

This is very similar to people who bought the P55M-UD4. What's funny is that the P55M-UD4 has 12+2 vs. the 8+2 of the full-size UD4P model. It does make me optimistic that the Asus board is at least 8+2 though.

Amazon, of all places, listed the non-Pro with 8+2. Hmm.


its true this matx board has absolutely no where near the amount of power phases as its bigger brothers. however, you can achieve overclocks with sandy bridge with little to no changing of the vcore.

i question the ability for someone to get up around 5ghz using a board like this but as i mentioned in the post, if you're going that far, you're prob gonna invest in a better and beefier board anyways.

kudos
starleague forever
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
May 17 2011 16:56 GMT
#26
I've updated the builds with new motherboard options. The original ASRock was seeing some bad reviews and after a sad story with a member here at TL, I'm not going to recommend it anymore.

i3-2100 build replaced with ASUS P8H67-M LX
Combo'd: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.638749

You lose out on USB3 with this selection but the price remains low.


i5-2400 build replaced with ASUS P8H67-M LE
Combo'd: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.642630

This board is the same family as in the cheaper build above, but comes with USB3.

If you think might want this board with the i3-2100, here's the combo page: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.642585
starleague forever
ZeaL.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5955 Posts
May 17 2011 19:32 GMT
#27
I'm not sure about not recommending the 2500k over the 2400. The price differential is relatively small and if you get in on a deal that differential can shrink to 20-30 USD. I managed to get the microcenter deal for i5-2500k + Asus P8P67 for 330 which makes it only 40 more than an H67+i5-2400 build though I know that deal is pretty ridiculous (and currently unavailable I think).

The performance difference at stock is pretty minimal but it actually makes a pretty damn huge difference when overclocked which is stupidly easy. I'm talking easiest and largest overclock I've done in the last 10 years of pc building which does in fact net a pretty huge performance increase without even needing a voltage bump. I think the performance advantage is enough that the 50-100 you spend extra on the P67/i5-2500k is justified over getting a better gpu as its unlikely you will need to upgrade an i5-2500k within the next 3 years whereas any gpu will begin to feel dated within 2 years.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
May 17 2011 19:42 GMT
#28
I think he was more aiming at specific price points, it's actually easier for most people to reconfigure upwards than downwards off of a base build.
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
May 18 2011 21:19 GMT
#29
On May 18 2011 04:32 ZeaL. wrote:
I'm not sure about not recommending the 2500k over the 2400. The price differential is relatively small and if you get in on a deal that differential can shrink to 20-30 USD. I managed to get the microcenter deal for i5-2500k + Asus P8P67 for 330 which makes it only 40 more than an H67+i5-2400 build though I know that deal is pretty ridiculous (and currently unavailable I think).

The performance difference at stock is pretty minimal but it actually makes a pretty damn huge difference when overclocked which is stupidly easy. I'm talking easiest and largest overclock I've done in the last 10 years of pc building which does in fact net a pretty huge performance increase without even needing a voltage bump. I think the performance advantage is enough that the 50-100 you spend extra on the P67/i5-2500k is justified over getting a better gpu as its unlikely you will need to upgrade an i5-2500k within the next 3 years whereas any gpu will begin to feel dated within 2 years.


the 2400 build exists because there are many people that do not what to tread in overclocking for whatever personal reason. while you can always mention to how easy it is to overclock with some motherboards, some simply don't feel comfortable with it.

further the performance difference between the 2400 and 2500 (non k) is negligible, so its logical to just recommend the one that saves you monies
starleague forever
FalconPunch
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States134 Posts
May 19 2011 05:28 GMT
#30
Starcraft 2 benefits significantly from SSDs (Solid State Drives)


Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I am building a computer for sc2 around the i3-2100. I already bought a 750gb WD Caviar for this computer since it was on sale for $30.

The main problem with my current computer is that it lags during big fights during team games. Also, if I ever accidently "alt-tabbed" or hit the "windows" key, out of SC2 during a game, I would lag out because it takes literally a minute to switch to my desktop. (I have since then disabled the windows key). But anyway, I'm building a new computer that would hopefully get rid of these problems, so I guess the main thing is I need it to run smoothly during large fights during 3v3 or 4v4 matches. Would the SSD help in this case?
You only live twice.
skyR
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada13817 Posts
May 19 2011 05:36 GMT
#31
SSD does not improve performance, it just decreases load times which quite frankly doesn't matter in SC2 since you're waiting on the other person to finish loading anyways.
Zeke50100
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States2220 Posts
May 19 2011 05:49 GMT
#32
On May 19 2011 14:28 FalconPunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
Starcraft 2 benefits significantly from SSDs (Solid State Drives)


Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I am building a computer for sc2 around the i3-2100. I already bought a 750gb WD Caviar for this computer since it was on sale for $30.

The main problem with my current computer is that it lags during big fights during team games. Also, if I ever accidently "alt-tabbed" or hit the "windows" key, out of SC2 during a game, I would lag out because it takes literally a minute to switch to my desktop. (I have since then disabled the windows key). But anyway, I'm building a new computer that would hopefully get rid of these problems, so I guess the main thing is I need it to run smoothly during large fights during 3v3 or 4v4 matches. Would the SSD help in this case?


SSDs only affect loading times to any significant extent. Alt+Tab is mainly based on your RAM, and, more specifically, how much you have of it.
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
May 19 2011 07:18 GMT
#33
On May 19 2011 14:28 FalconPunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
Starcraft 2 benefits significantly from SSDs (Solid State Drives)


Can you elaborate on this a bit more? I am building a computer for sc2 around the i3-2100. I already bought a 750gb WD Caviar for this computer since it was on sale for $30.

The main problem with my current computer is that it lags during big fights during team games. Also, if I ever accidently "alt-tabbed" or hit the "windows" key, out of SC2 during a game, I would lag out because it takes literally a minute to switch to my desktop. (I have since then disabled the windows key). But anyway, I'm building a new computer that would hopefully get rid of these problems, so I guess the main thing is I need it to run smoothly during large fights during 3v3 or 4v4 matches. Would the SSD help in this case?


try running in windowed-fullscreen mode, but yes, this is more of a ram situation.
starleague forever
PandaBlunt
Profile Joined September 2010
United States292 Posts
May 19 2011 07:42 GMT
#34
Many thanks for the post! Will be using your list for the i5-2400 as my backbone ^_^.
(╮°-°)╮┳━┳
Dusty
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3359 Posts
May 19 2011 08:19 GMT
#35
I have an i5-2500k and get much higher FPS counts than what they have on there (game starts around 205 fps and slowly goes down to ~100 fps in the late game.
FalconPunch
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States134 Posts
May 19 2011 08:24 GMT
#36
To follow up on my original question, do you guys think 4gb of ram is enough so that alt-tabbing won't lag? Or should I go with 8gb?
You only live twice.
mav451
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1596 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-19 15:30:23
May 19 2011 15:29 GMT
#37
There's rumors of an unlocked dual-core SKU, i3 2120K, $150. It would put it about $25 above the current i3 2100.
+ Show Spoiler +
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http://www.xfastest.com/cms/tid-61002/


The price is a bit too high IMO, as the i5 2400 is just $40 more. *Shrug*
It does shake up the mobo decision-making for budget builds though regardless.
With no power comes no responsibility?
a176
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada6688 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-19 15:43:30
May 19 2011 15:42 GMT
#38
On May 19 2011 17:24 FalconPunch wrote:
To follow up on my original question, do you guys think 4gb of ram is enough so that alt-tabbing won't lag? Or should I go with 8gb?


4gb of ram is listed in the builds and that is well enough for SC2.

Though, many of us would suggest 8gb if you can afford it, because the price of ram is so cheap nowadays.

Also consider that some motherboards only have 2 ram slots, which makes upgrading difficult in the long run, so starting with a larger amount from the getgo may be a wise decision.

But, like what was said with the SSD, it doesn't actually increase the FPS of the game. It just helps you to run more programs at the same time and expedite your task switching.

As always, its a balancing act to get the most from your budget. More ram ... better video card ... better CPU? Make a post in the computer build help thread with the components you're looking at currently, and your budget, and you can get the opinion from a lot of the other tech gurus here at TL.
starleague forever
ataryens
Profile Joined June 2010
Iran213 Posts
May 19 2011 15:45 GMT
#39
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has reviews like the one in the first page but for more demanding games and for (various OCed 2500ks), the SC2 one is nice but I feel like there is a GPU bootleneck for those legit reviews.
skyR
Profile Joined July 2009
Canada13817 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-19 16:11:56
May 19 2011 16:10 GMT
#40
On May 20 2011 00:45 ataryens wrote:
Hey guys,
I was wondering if anyone has reviews like the one in the first page but for more demanding games and for (various OCed 2500ks), the SC2 one is nice but I feel like there is a GPU bootleneck for those legit reviews.


core i5 2500k @ 3.3, 4.3, and 4.7 along with 2600k, 990x, and a Phenom II X6 at various clock speeds: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i7-2600k-990x_9.html#sect2
ataryens
Profile Joined June 2010
Iran213 Posts
May 19 2011 16:17 GMT
#41
Thanks buddy, I am having second thoughts about overclocking now :S maybe i should go with 2500 or 2400 and H board and not spend money on a cooler.
EliteReplay
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Dominican Republic913 Posts
May 19 2011 18:19 GMT
#42
thanks for the info im AMD builder but i want to have a resume about shipset in Sandybridge mobos
if play random i can't call any race imba?
Quarry
Profile Joined March 2011
14 Posts
May 20 2011 09:06 GMT
#43
Being completely incompetent regarding hardware, i just bought components based on some computer-build guide. I wish I red this thread beforehand. Should I return the AMD CPU? If so, the motherbord and the RAM (the power supply?) have to be replaced as well, right?

Here is what I bought:

1. CPU: AMD AM3 Athlon II X3 450 Box (3x 3,2 GHz)

2. Motherboard: ASRock 880G PRO3

3. Memory: Kingston PC1333 4GB (1333 MHz, 240-polig) DDR3-RAM Kit

4. Video Card: Sapphire HD5830 Xtreme (PCI-e, 1GB, GDDR5)

5. Hard Drive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 HD502HJ 500GB

6. Power Supply: be quiet BN105 Pure Power 430W

7. Case: Lancool PC-K58ATX Midi Lancool PC-K58 ATX Midi

I hope to post in the right thread. Thank you in advance.
android_245
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Australia103 Posts
May 20 2011 09:24 GMT
#44
I'd just like to suggest adding the new Z68 chipset based motherboards which allows overclocking and enables the usage of the integrated Intel HD Graphics (also allows GPU switching between discrete and integrated GPU). Its basically a H67+P67 mobo with additional features such as SDD caching but no benefits to gaming Although the Z68 mobos poses no improvement in gaming over the P67 mobos, I just think it'll be good to put it in to reduce any confusion.
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 12:02:56
May 20 2011 11:48 GMT
#45
On May 20 2011 18:06 Quarry wrote:
Being completely incompetent regarding hardware, i just bought components based on some computer-build guide. I wish I red this thread beforehand. Should I return the AMD CPU? If so, the motherbord and the RAM (the power supply?) have to be replaced as well, right?

Here is what I bought:

1. CPU: AMD AM3 Athlon II X3 450 Box (3x 3,2 GHz)

2. Motherboard: ASRock 880G PRO3

3. Memory: Kingston PC1333 4GB (1333 MHz, 240-polig) DDR3-RAM Kit

4. Video Card: Sapphire HD5830 Xtreme (PCI-e, 1GB, GDDR5)

5. Hard Drive: Samsung SpinPoint F3 HD502HJ 500GB

6. Power Supply: be quiet BN105 Pure Power 430W

7. Case: Lancool PC-K58ATX Midi Lancool PC-K58 ATX Midi

I hope to post in the right thread. Thank you in advance.


You actually aren't completely incompetent regarding hardware. You would be if you thought you weren't, at the same level of knowledge. You're somewhere 5-10% higher than you actually thought.

That won't technically be a useless computer, at least for low end gaming, but you'd do much better on bang for the buck with one of a1's builds, yes.

But as for your question, only the CPU and Motherboard would have to be swapped. The DDR3 RAM would still work on an 1155 socket motherboard. The PSU, I don't know if it's all that great or not.

Quarry
Profile Joined March 2011
14 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-20 15:53:50
May 20 2011 15:48 GMT
#46
Thanks a lot for your advice. I guess I'll swap with the Core i3-2100 and ASUS P8H67-M LX from a1's $500 build then.
Gara
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada435 Posts
June 01 2011 20:31 GMT
#47
Thank you so much for the motherboard part of this guide! I was so confused when trying to research motherboards for my first build!
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 26m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 60
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4844
Zeus 648
Nal_rA 547
Leta 262
PianO 256
ToSsGirL 154
JulyZerg 151
soO 79
GoRush 59
NaDa 43
[ Show more ]
Mind 37
Light 14
NotJumperer 14
Dota 2
ODPixel400
XcaliburYe365
League of Legends
JimRising 633
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1804
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor187
Other Games
SortOf108
Trikslyr30
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick32941
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2202
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
1h 26m
SHIN vs Clem
Cure vs TBD
FEL
3h 26m
FEL
7h 26m
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
7h 26m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
9h 26m
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
DaveTesta Events
9h 26m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Classic vs TBD
FEL
1d 6h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.